<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Comments by Baldaur Regis</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title>The wheel keeps turning....</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/18345423136/doj-dept-education-to-colleges-start-restricting-free-speech-campus-kiss-your-federal-funding-goodbye.shtml#c526</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Baldaur Regis]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 08:43:48 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/18345423136/doj-dept-education-to-colleges-start-restricting-free-speech-campus-kiss-your-federal-funding-goodbye.shtml#c526</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[...and never stops. Recall the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_Speech_Movement" rel="nofollow">Free Speech Movement</a> of 1964-65 - what was political censorship is now sexual censorship. Someday, somewhere a young woman will stand up and say "We are not afraid of words."]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Let me get this straight.....</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/02413623115/bogus-lawsuit-plus-threats-to-those-who-write-about-it-leads-to-epic-response.shtml#c574</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Baldaur Regis]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 15:10:39 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/02413623115/bogus-lawsuit-plus-threats-to-those-who-write-about-it-leads-to-epic-response.shtml#c574</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[IANAL, but I'm pretty sure the old "TA-DA!" ploy would be countered by the "I hereby sentence you to five years in Federal pound-me-in-the-ass prison" maneuver. Of course, he could counter with the "But I'm crazier than a shithouse rat!" defense, to which the proper judicial response (if hazy memories of old Perry Mason TV shows serve me correctly) would be "We are not amused."]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Let me get this straight.....</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/02413623115/bogus-lawsuit-plus-threats-to-those-who-write-about-it-leads-to-epic-response.shtml#c521</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Baldaur Regis]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 14:02:06 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/02413623115/bogus-lawsuit-plus-threats-to-those-who-write-about-it-leads-to-epic-response.shtml#c521</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Agreed. What's telling, though, is his tacit admission he can't go the last mile toward positive identification without the court's intercession. From one of his <a href="http://web.mit.edu/boojum/Public/jonmon-letter.html" rel="nofollow">Settlement Demand Letters</a>:<blockquote><i>Your past and future posts on LiveJournal and other websites will be uncovered once discovery commences in this lawsuit. With your identity is revealed [sic], you will eventually be added to the case.</i></blockquote>For good or ill, anonymity has ever been a valuable component of free expression; it is and should remain the toughest of veils to pierce.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Let me get this straight.....</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/02413623115/bogus-lawsuit-plus-threats-to-those-who-write-about-it-leads-to-epic-response.shtml#c257</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Baldaur Regis]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 12:01:45 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/02413623115/bogus-lawsuit-plus-threats-to-those-who-write-about-it-leads-to-epic-response.shtml#c257</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[From his press release, Mr. Monsarrat claims:<blockquote><i>Earlier in 2013 he created a cyber-investigation service, which cracks the real identities of cyber bullies who post defamatory material online. The release of names and identities is part of this new service, for one of Monsarrat's client with an ongoing legal case against cyber bullies. His company is working in partnership with Defend My Name, perhaps the most technically advanced of the top anti-defamation services, and Ishman Law Firm, which has expertise in defending victims from cyber-attack.</i></blockquote>OK, groovy. He's got patented technology to identify anonymous posters online. And yet, in his actual Complaint it states:<blockquote><i>Defendants John and Jane Does 1 through 100 are individuals whose true names and addresses of residence are currently unknown and unascertainable by Plaintiff, who have defamed Plaintiff through various false and defamatory Internet postings, and Plaintiff therefore sues said Defendants by such fictitious names. Plaintiff intends to identify the Doe Defendants through means of discovery and will amend this lawsuit to identify the Doc Defendants by proper legal names upon obtaining such information.</i></blockquote>He owns a cyber-investigation service. Wouldn't he have already identified these Does? Is his means of discovery the same old 'harvest IP addresses then subpoena ISPs for the actual name' shuck and jive the copyright trolls have been trying? Or do you have to notify the court before using cyber-investigation kung fu?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130507/00585822974/intellectual-property-owners-association-against-helping-blind-because-it-would-set-dangerous-precedent.shtml#c398</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Baldaur Regis]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 8 May 2013 12:09:50 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130507/00585822974/intellectual-property-owners-association-against-helping-blind-because-it-would-set-dangerous-precedent.shtml#c398</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><i>Try reality sometime, you might like it.</i></blockquote>Reality is just a crutch for those who can't handle drugs.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130507/15363322981/eff-gives-prince-lifetime-aggrievement-award-dmca-takedown-abuse.shtml#c178</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Baldaur Regis]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 8 May 2013 12:03:13 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130507/15363322981/eff-gives-prince-lifetime-aggrievement-award-dmca-takedown-abuse.shtml#c178</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Reputations are forged in the crucible of collective society. You don't own them. Reputations can own you, however, if you define yourself only through past achievements and spend your days zealously guarding what once was, at the cost of what is.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: YOUR only interest in &quot;the blind&quot; is as wedge against copyright.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130507/00585822974/intellectual-property-owners-association-against-helping-blind-because-it-would-set-dangerous-precedent.shtml#c162</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Baldaur Regis]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 8 May 2013 09:12:42 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130507/00585822974/intellectual-property-owners-association-against-helping-blind-because-it-would-set-dangerous-precedent.shtml#c162</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I never read his comments, just the subject line and scan the rest. He's ranting about the pope in this one, yeah? Or is he going off against the monarchy again?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130507/07065022977/dutch-law-would-authorize-police-to-hack-into-foreign-computers-phones-what-could-possibly-go-wrong.shtml#c161</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Baldaur Regis]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 7 May 2013 12:40:44 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130507/07065022977/dutch-law-would-authorize-police-to-hack-into-foreign-computers-phones-what-could-possibly-go-wrong.shtml#c161</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Also, I'm assuming Dutch law enforcement are just as technologically inept as American LE, so this work would be outsourced...to China.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130507/01074822975/gaijin-entertainment-demands-gaijincom-which-predates-them-doesnt-infringe-their-trademark.shtml#c115</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Baldaur Regis]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 7 May 2013 10:20:40 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130507/01074822975/gaijin-entertainment-demands-gaijincom-which-predates-them-doesnt-infringe-their-trademark.shtml#c115</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Three boxes of SABAM laundry soap, delivered to your door by gaijin ninjas.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130506/11472022963/royalty-collection-agency-sabam-sues-belgian-isps-pursuit-its-34-piracy-license.shtml#c373</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Baldaur Regis]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 7 May 2013 09:37:15 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130506/11472022963/royalty-collection-agency-sabam-sues-belgian-isps-pursuit-its-34-piracy-license.shtml#c373</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The ultimate goal of any for-profit org is to literally turn you upside-down and shake every penny out of your pockets. Taking just 3.4% must seem a teeth-grinding compromise for SABAM (and does anyone else think that name sounds like laundry detergent?). Companies may propose any damn thing they please; it's up to those affected by these proposals to tell them to go pound sand.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: That's FINE! But an entire recent movie isn't fair use.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130426/04283522846/celebrate-right-to-share-world-intellectual-property-day.shtml#c114</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Baldaur Regis]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 11:18:32 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130426/04283522846/celebrate-right-to-share-world-intellectual-property-day.shtml#c114</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["Whatcha doin this weekend?"<br />
"Well, I thought I'd do some infringement, then later mebbe do a little advocating."<br />
"Sweet."<br />
<br />
<br />
*rolls eyes*<br />
<br />
(this is what I'd say if replying to the REAL ass_in_the_hat)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>It's as if...</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130426/04283522846/celebrate-right-to-share-world-intellectual-property-day.shtml#c66</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Baldaur Regis]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 10:49:43 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130426/04283522846/celebrate-right-to-share-world-intellectual-property-day.shtml#c66</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[...I'm actually sitting in a bar in Hollywood and hearing those tie-wearers muttering 'fucking hippies and their fucking manifestos'...]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130410/12051322665/copyright-lobotomy-how-intellectual-property-makes-us-pretend-to-be-stupid.shtml#c761</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Baldaur Regis]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 12:30:29 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130410/12051322665/copyright-lobotomy-how-intellectual-property-makes-us-pretend-to-be-stupid.shtml#c761</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Your discussion with Akiri re 'attribution' brings to mind a concept perhaps closer to what you may be thinking about - <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Provenance" rel="nofollow">provenance</a> - wherein <blockquote><i>"[t]he primary purpose of tracing the provenance of an object or entity is normally to provide contextual and circumstantial evidence for its original production or discovery..."</i></blockquote>which if you think for a moment sounds like the idealized version of metadata. Technology has caused the current churn in how copyright is viewed; perhaps someday descendants of current search/match algorithms will provide an automated provenance for any work appearing online: "This is the work of so-and-so; the style is in the school of such-and-such; the classical themes of thus-and thus are mirrored in the work." and so on.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: He should</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130421/14043222791/fox-uses-bogus-dmca-claims-to-censor-cory-doctorows-book-about-censorship.shtml#c237</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Baldaur Regis]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 08:58:13 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130421/14043222791/fox-uses-bogus-dmca-claims-to-censor-cory-doctorows-book-about-censorship.shtml#c237</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Sadly, the only response to the assertions of posturing lawyers is to drag in another layer of attorneys. Traditional - honorable - remediations such as pillow fights or drinking contests are unavailing once the nuclear legal option is deployed.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Diet?</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130401/20330222541/long-history-specious-dmca-claims-this-is-definitely-one-them.shtml#c66</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Baldaur Regis]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 10:05:30 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130401/20330222541/long-history-specious-dmca-claims-this-is-definitely-one-them.shtml#c66</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Mountain Dew was once colorfully described as 'hillbilly piss'. Just acknowledging you drink it gives you mad hacker cred.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130417/10325622744/canadian-house-member-removed-threats-she-didnt-make-facebook-group-she-didnt-join.shtml#c186</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Baldaur Regis]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 09:40:09 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130417/10325622744/canadian-house-member-removed-threats-she-didnt-make-facebook-group-she-didnt-join.shtml#c186</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Yes. That is EXACTLY how I imagine Canadian government works, except with more beer and less big anime eyes.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130417/10325622744/canadian-house-member-removed-threats-she-didnt-make-facebook-group-she-didnt-join.shtml#c138</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Baldaur Regis]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 08:07:11 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130417/10325622744/canadian-house-member-removed-threats-she-didnt-make-facebook-group-she-didnt-join.shtml#c138</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Anytime a politician "insists that the government did indeed understand how [something technological] operates", a puppy gets kicked.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130410/08175622662/french-politician-wants-to-restrict-how-cheaply-companies-can-sell-goods-online-compared-to-physical-shop-prices.shtml#c426</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Baldaur Regis]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 08:05:10 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130410/08175622662/french-politician-wants-to-restrict-how-cheaply-companies-can-sell-goods-online-compared-to-physical-shop-prices.shtml#c426</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The gentleman from France perhaps forgets that the creation of town centers devastated the door-to-door trade. Who speaks for the peddlers? And at what point in searching history do we stop and say 'this fits my ideal of commerce; let's use this system from the Middle Ages'?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>dig if you will the response</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130410/10503022663/john-steele-to-court-you-have-no-evidence-that-ive-done-anything-wrong.shtml#c240</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Baldaur Regis]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 13:37:44 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130410/10503022663/john-steele-to-court-you-have-no-evidence-that-ive-done-anything-wrong.shtml#c240</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>this is what it sounds like<br />
when lawyers lawyer up.</i>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130407/21003122619/eric-holder-american-library-association-wikipedia-are-americas-worst-porn-enablers.shtml#c154</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Baldaur Regis]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 9 Apr 2013 07:55:49 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130407/21003122619/eric-holder-american-library-association-wikipedia-are-americas-worst-porn-enablers.shtml#c154</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[First, +10 for using 'skeevy'.<br />
<br />
Second, I'll stick with the only publication that's reliably delivered smut (and toilet paper) for over one hundred years - the Sears catalog.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>