<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Latest Techdirt Comments</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Drones</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/11032823096/how-low-can-drones-go.shtml#c902</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew D. Todd]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 02:17:55 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/11032823096/how-low-can-drones-go.shtml#c902</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I hate to dribble out corrections like this, but the above items (91.119 and 91.195) apply when no other minimums are specified. In other words, they would apply to helicopters over urban areas, and it is doubtful whether they would apply to helicopters in rural/isolated areas, where fixed-wing aircraft have lower minimums.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Look Around You</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/22543223166/modest-proposal-going-piracy-neutral.shtml#c314</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt Williams]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 02:12:06 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/22543223166/modest-proposal-going-piracy-neutral.shtml#c314</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I think someone's clearly been watching <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Look_Around_You" rel="nofollow">Look Around You</a>.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Necessity is the mother of invention</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20130510/00083123031/cool-new-platform-supporting-artists-patreon-jack-conte.shtml#c62</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Crosbie Fitch]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 02:11:51 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20130510/00083123031/cool-new-platform-supporting-artists-patreon-jack-conte.shtml#c62</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I've been working in this area for some time: <a href='http://digitalproductions.co.uk/index.php?id=233' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://digitalproductions.co.uk/index.php?id=233</a><br />
<br />
It's amazing how these simple, but radical revenue mechanisms aren't believed as necessary until they are implemented, used, and successful. Only then are they eventually recognised as indispensable, and in hindsight people wonder "Why weren't these things in existence much sooner?"]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Drones</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/11032823096/how-low-can-drones-go.shtml#c888</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew D. Todd]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 02:08:31 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/11032823096/how-low-can-drones-go.shtml#c888</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[However, additional sections (Parts 91.119 [for VFR] and 91.195 [for IFR]) specify a minimum altitude for all aircraft (helicopters included) of 1000 feet above the highest obstacle within five miles, except during landing and takeoff]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: paywall</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20130510/00083123031/cool-new-platform-supporting-artists-patreon-jack-conte.shtml#c54</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 02:05:35 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20130510/00083123031/cool-new-platform-supporting-artists-patreon-jack-conte.shtml#c54</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[[b he has the secret sauce ingredient in her [/b]<br />
<br />
Perhaps the project will grow and have a life of its own, and in time be the origin of a hole line of creative offspring]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Teenagers</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130506/10364522962/eric-schmidt-still-fan-figuring-out-way-to-erase-past.shtml#c332</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 02:02:31 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130506/10364522962/eric-schmidt-still-fan-figuring-out-way-to-erase-past.shtml#c332</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[You can erase any data that is under your control, but getting the Internet to forget requires forcing other people to erase any data on you that they might have.<br />
Why should I have to remove photos of a riotous party just because you want it forgotten while I don't?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Bilderberg</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130506/10364522962/eric-schmidt-still-fan-figuring-out-way-to-erase-past.shtml#c319</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Julian Perez]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 02:01:38 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130506/10364522962/eric-schmidt-still-fan-figuring-out-way-to-erase-past.shtml#c319</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[There's nothing secretive about what is essentially a foreign policy organization. This is the most idiotic conspiracy theory of the fringe "Alex Jones" set (I'm not using his name for effect: he actually DOES believe in it). <br />
<br />
<a href="http://skeptoid.com/episodes/4225" rel="nofollow">Skeptoid.com: the Bilderberg Group </a><br />
<br />
<blockquote>The Bilderberg Group tells us who they are, when and where they meet, what their purpose is, and in broad strokes what they discuss. Referring to it as some sort of secret society strains credibility. Their stated purpose obviously makes very good sense for people in their position. Which is more likely: They are what they say they are and what we'd expect them to be, or everything we see about them is an illusion and they're actually running our lives and planning our destruction? Beware any conspiracy theory that claims to predict future events. Not one has ever been right.</blockquote>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130425/17042522839/how-gema-is-still-worst-collective-rights-organization-world.shtml#c944</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 01:34:29 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130425/17042522839/how-gema-is-still-worst-collective-rights-organization-world.shtml#c944</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[You fail to realize that the piracy issue is what forces us into an incredibly deflationary environment that in the end will hurt you as the consumer.<br />
<br />
Yeah, bank on Spotify and prepare for what will happen to your carefully curated playlists once Spotify doesn't work the way _you_ want it to work any longer.<br />
<br />
I'll be sitting there laughing my butt off.<br />
<br />
And your reality distortion field as to what the revenues as a musician are/have been is incredibly strong. How many parents did you hear tell their children to take up a career as a composer/musician? Ever wonder why that is? Because it's a tough business and that's fine. But nowadays we have to deal with cheapskates such as yourself which is not making this market any better.<br />
<br />
If you need backup numbers go read around on <a href='http://www.thetrichordist.com' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://www.thetrichordist.com</a> a bit. You'll find plenty of facts backing up my case.<br />
<br />
You and the tech lobby are the ones fantasizing about some form of socialist culture society without even beginning to understand (or even wanting to understand) how the culture economy works.<br />
<br />
But go on... dream...]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Drones</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/11032823096/how-low-can-drones-go.shtml#c874</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew D. Todd]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 01:32:23 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/11032823096/how-low-can-drones-go.shtml#c874</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The Federal Air Regulations (Part 91.79 ) specifies a minimum altitude over towns, congested areas, congregations of people, etc., for fixed wing aircraft of 1000 feet over any obstacles within 2000 feet horizontal distance. In open country, or over water, the requirement shifts to 500 altitude, or 500 feet "from any person, vessel, vehicle, or structure." The terms for helicopters are much vaguer, under the test of "hazard to persons or property."]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Great</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/02350923170/new-bill-would-stop-patent-trolls-hiding-behind-shell-companies.shtml#c199</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zakida Paul]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 01:28:26 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/02350923170/new-bill-would-stop-patent-trolls-hiding-behind-shell-companies.shtml#c199</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Now, what about tax avoiders?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/22543223166/modest-proposal-going-piracy-neutral.shtml#c296</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zakida Paul]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 01:27:28 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/22543223166/modest-proposal-going-piracy-neutral.shtml#c296</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[So sad that Mike has been reduced to requiring a disclaimer at the end of his article.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/22543223166/modest-proposal-going-piracy-neutral.shtml#c272</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zakida Paul]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 01:25:53 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/22543223166/modest-proposal-going-piracy-neutral.shtml#c272</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[100s?  It is many more than that, my friend.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: That's assuming pirates could make anywhere near equal value.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/22543223166/modest-proposal-going-piracy-neutral.shtml#c251</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 01:23:07 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/22543223166/modest-proposal-going-piracy-neutral.shtml#c251</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Yeah, if I made a movie like that I'd never let it get broadcast..<br />
<br />
Blue even when you try to re-frame the issue you do it wrong.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20130510/00083123031/cool-new-platform-supporting-artists-patreon-jack-conte.shtml#c47</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zakida Paul]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 01:22:28 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20130510/00083123031/cool-new-platform-supporting-artists-patreon-jack-conte.shtml#c47</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Having said all that, I hope the venture succeeds and wish the guy all the best with it.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20130510/00083123031/cool-new-platform-supporting-artists-patreon-jack-conte.shtml#c42</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zakida Paul]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 01:21:16 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20130510/00083123031/cool-new-platform-supporting-artists-patreon-jack-conte.shtml#c42</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I am unsure about this.  A 'subscription' model for crowd funding 'ongoing production' doesn't sound like the kind of thing I would be interested in.  I would much prefer to look at each project on merit and then decide if it is something I want to contribute to and how much I want to contribute.<br />
<br />
PledgeMusic works just fine for that.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c1902</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Karl]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 00:59:12 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c1902</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<em>I'm asking Mike to admit that this would weaken some of the rights that copyright holders have as far as anticircumvention is concerned.</em><br />
<br />
So, Joe, can you point to anywhere in the copyright statutes that says that copyright holders have a right to control <em>all access to</em> the works that they authored?<br />
<br />
No, you can't, because that was never a right that was granted to them.<br />
<br />
And, clearly, Congress did not intend to grant copyright holders those rights. That's why they explicitly included a "savings clause" in 1201(c): "Nothing in this section shall affect rights, remedies, limitations, or defenses to copyright infringement, including fair use, under this title."<br />
<br />
This bill would merely clarify that intent - nothing more.<br />
<br />
Furthermore, as it stands, this statute <em>applies to much more than copyrighted material.</em> Let's take the classic example: "jailbreaking" your phone so that you are able to switch to a different carrier. If you did this, what access to copyrighted works are you gaining?<br />
<br />
The answer: <strong>none.</strong> "Jailbreaking" your phone does not result in access to <em>any material whatsoever</em> that is within the scope of copyright, as defined in 17 USC 102.<br />
<br />
In other words: the DMCA anti-circumvention provisions grant rights to people who have no copyright interests whatsoever.<br />
<br />
This is a major flaw in the law as it stands. You said, and I agree, that the intent is to allow copyright holders to protect themselves against infringement. But it is overreaching as it stands, and this bill would simply rectify the situation.<br />
<br />
<em>As far as the 106 rights go, all I've heard are conclusory statements that DRM does absolutely nothing to prevent piracy.</em><br />
<br />
That's not really the issue. Anti-circumvention measures (not merely DRM) may help prevent piracy - but, of course, shutting down public libraries would also help prevent piracy. The plain fact is that anti-circumvention provisions do not serve the public welfare. Anti-circumvention measures may help prevent activity that is infringing, but they also bypass all of the limitations on copyright rights that are Constitutionally necessary.<br />
<br />
Plus, as I said, anti-circumvention measures are unlawful even regarding material that is not covered by copyright law.<br />
<br />
Also, replying to another comment:<br />
<br />
<em>making it legal to traffic in technologies that can be used to circumvent access controls would make it easier to infringe.</em><br />
<br />
This is aboslutely false. How easy it is to infringe depends entirely upon how easy it is to actually circumvent the particular access controls. Whether that is legal or illegal makes little difference. I mean, for fuck's sake, people print DeCSS on <em>T-shirts.</em> It can't get more easy than that.<br />
<br />
What it would do is make it easier to "traffic in technologies" that don't infringe. But nothing in this bill would make it any more difficult for copyright holders to enforce their rights. It would simply legalize activities that never infringed on their rights in the first place. If someone makes something that can bypass copy protection for the purposes of infringement, they can still get sued, and they can still face criminal charges. And it is not any harder for either copyright holder or the govenrnment to bring these charges against them.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Pirate the Beatles, Upload Crap of Your Own... Awesome...</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/22543223166/modest-proposal-going-piracy-neutral.shtml#c249</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[JamesF]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 00:57:43 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/22543223166/modest-proposal-going-piracy-neutral.shtml#c249</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[You notice how these guys trot out the same crap every time. Wouldn't it be nice if all the copyright trolls all agreed to bugger off and sue each other to death for 'stealing' each others 'arguments'?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: whatever</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/22543223166/modest-proposal-going-piracy-neutral.shtml#c239</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 00:55:32 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/22543223166/modest-proposal-going-piracy-neutral.shtml#c239</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Never mind that, even his math is off. The timestamps say it took me 6 minutes.<br />
<br />
RIAA mathematics, ladies and gentlemen!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Police State</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/18102623141/so-its-come-to-this-seven-high-school-students-arrested-throwing-water-balloons.shtml#c1932</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tobias Harms]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 00:55:25 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/18102623141/so-its-come-to-this-seven-high-school-students-arrested-throwing-water-balloons.shtml#c1932</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[That opinion has not been approved by the Voice. Please report to your local reeducation center...]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>at least the videos exist still</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/17321623162/released-video-silva-beating-shows-his-last-moments-video-actual-beating-still-missing.shtml#c720</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 00:50:29 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/17321623162/released-video-silva-beating-shows-his-last-moments-video-actual-beating-still-missing.shtml#c720</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[the sherriff says he's seen them.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>