<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Latest Techdirt Comments</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/00554723091/more-details-emerge-key-legal-fight-over-dmca-abuse.shtml#c296</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 05:28:39 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/00554723091/more-details-emerge-key-legal-fight-over-dmca-abuse.shtml#c296</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[the DMCA has been nothing other than the Congress sponsored entertainment industries method of shutting down anything and anyone they didn't like, regardless of whether there had been any wrong doings. it was purposefully left as it is so that those industries could do maximum damage in all instances and have no recourse against it when it had legitimate sites or items closed/removed. if they were made to pay for all the wrong instances, there would be many more legitimate items and sites still flourishing, as they would have taken much more care over the closures wanted and not wasted money. the really annoying thing is, if the situation happens in reverse, all hell is let lose and law suits started by the industries demand ridiculous sums. it shows how one sided the law is and, to my mind, why it was introduces as it is, a payback from Congress for the lobbying and campaign contributions to them! typical of today's politics but disgraceful none the less!!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/06034223155/quack-professor-releases-dumbest-violent-video-game-theory-ever.shtml#c72</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arsik Vek]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 05:24:15 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/06034223155/quack-professor-releases-dumbest-violent-video-game-theory-ever.shtml#c72</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Holy balls (to oppose the Testicilians).... this guy is nuts.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/15581423160/prenda-gets-some-tiny-bit-good-news-as-it-may-get-out-two-critical-cases.shtml#c169</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 05:23:36 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/15581423160/prenda-gets-some-tiny-bit-good-news-as-it-may-get-out-two-critical-cases.shtml#c169</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[80K is too little. They could have got millions. Prenda will have to pay heavily in their attempt to get out of this mess. <br />
<br />
Best case scenario.... (for teh lulz) <br />
They spend major amounts of cash, get banned from practicing law and have to pay fines/charges that exceed what assets they have.<br />
<br />
Individually bankrupt and banned from their profession.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/00493523143/ridiculous-timing-obama-administration-responds-to-spying-ap-pushing-journalist-shield-law-that-wouldnt-matter.shtml#c306</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jay]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 05:22:48 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/00493523143/ridiculous-timing-obama-administration-responds-to-spying-ap-pushing-journalist-shield-law-that-wouldnt-matter.shtml#c306</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[So did Congress in the McCarthyist Darrell Issa who was given a report before this thing blew up.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: No Nutella for me</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/01450023148/makers-nutella-force-fan-who-created-world-nutella-day-to-shut-it-down-updated.shtml#c758</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Niall]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 05:19:51 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/01450023148/makers-nutella-force-fan-who-created-world-nutella-day-to-shut-it-down-updated.shtml#c758</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Couldn't you have picked a closer day, like one in the near future, not 8 months away? :(]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: TIL...</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/01450023148/makers-nutella-force-fan-who-created-world-nutella-day-to-shut-it-down-updated.shtml#c733</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Niall]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 05:16:20 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/01450023148/makers-nutella-force-fan-who-created-world-nutella-day-to-shut-it-down-updated.shtml#c733</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Ooo, where are they? I don't know of any in Scotland...]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: TIL...</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/01450023148/makers-nutella-force-fan-who-created-world-nutella-day-to-shut-it-down-updated.shtml#c726</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Niall]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 05:16:18 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/01450023148/makers-nutella-force-fan-who-created-world-nutella-day-to-shut-it-down-updated.shtml#c726</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Ooo, where are they? I don't know of any in Scotland...]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Exact opposite...</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/18345423136.shtml#c3430</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ahow628]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 05:14:24 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/18345423136.shtml#c3430</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I guess I imagine this as the exact opposite of what SHOULD be happening: If you accept federal funds, you cannot restrict free speech in any manner. <br />
<br />
I thought I remember someone suing libraries for not blocking porn and that got shot the down because of this reasoning.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>ROTFLMAO</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/01321523153/kitchen-nightmares-lawyers-threaten-infamous-samy-amy-if-they-talk-about-their-experience-show.shtml#c425</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Corwin]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 05:08:29 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/01321523153/kitchen-nightmares-lawyers-threaten-infamous-samy-amy-if-they-talk-about-their-experience-show.shtml#c425</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[This is so funny ... A media company that wants to shut up the people that THEY talk about?<br />
<br />
Free speech, yeah right]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130521/12175523157/nyc-says-renting-out-your-place-via-airbnb-is-running-illegal-hotel.shtml#c464</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[PaulT]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 05:05:55 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130521/12175523157/nyc-says-renting-out-your-place-via-airbnb-is-running-illegal-hotel.shtml#c464</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["nothing I can say will change it."<br />
<br />
Sure it can. Just provide me with logical reasoning, factual evidence and be open to reasonably discuss any issues I have with those things provided. I can't guarantee that I'll agree with you, but at least I'll see your point of view.<br />
<br />
The problem with a lot of discussions here is that the people who oppose the articles rarely bring any of those things (although the times they do are often very enlightening).]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c1789</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Some Other AC]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 05:02:15 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c1789</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[By "rooting" your phone you are either unlocking the bootloader, or bypassing the bootloader(think Motorola and most Verizon Wireless 'Droid phones). Either way, from research and playing that i have done with my Android devices, you can do all kinds of things the carriers/manufacturers don't want or intend for you to.  <br />
Also, a number of ROMs for android provide support for different base bands, most of the time they are carrier specific, but with knowledge and patience, you could conceivably allow a Sprint branded device access to Verizon Wireless' network.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: You don't get it</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/01321523153/kitchen-nightmares-lawyers-threaten-infamous-samy-amy-if-they-talk-about-their-experience-show.shtml#c414</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 04:58:28 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/01321523153/kitchen-nightmares-lawyers-threaten-infamous-samy-amy-if-they-talk-about-their-experience-show.shtml#c414</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[That's still got fuck all to do with the "Steisand[sic]" effect.  Are you sure you know what it is?  Maybe the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Streisand_effect" rel="nofollow">wikipedia article</a> will help.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/11032823096/how-low-can-drones-go.shtml#c114</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 04:57:04 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/11032823096/how-low-can-drones-go.shtml#c114</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Aerial Curtilage: You heard It Here first.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>privacy's dead</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/11032823096/how-low-can-drones-go.shtml#c103</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Corwin]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 04:51:41 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/11032823096/how-low-can-drones-go.shtml#c103</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[get over it.<br />
<br />
<br />
Now if only all surveillance equipment could store everything forever, and make it absolutely transparently public, that would change the world for the better.<br />
<br />
Because the data that models my whole life is worth less than the combined value of everyone else's, and NO sane human can say that theirs is.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/00493523143/ridiculous-timing-obama-administration-responds-to-spying-ap-pushing-journalist-shield-law-that-wouldnt-matter.shtml#c295</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 04:49:49 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/00493523143/ridiculous-timing-obama-administration-responds-to-spying-ap-pushing-journalist-shield-law-that-wouldnt-matter.shtml#c295</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[citation needed.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>legality vs voyeurism</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/11032823096/how-low-can-drones-go.shtml#c94</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[me]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 04:48:46 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/11032823096/how-low-can-drones-go.shtml#c94</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[1)I think there'a an argument for tresspassing a/or voyeuerism here as described.<br />
<br />
2)I agree with the option of it having an accident during it's incursion.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>legality vs voyeurism</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/11032823096/how-low-can-drones-go.shtml#c86</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[me]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 04:48:28 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/11032823096/how-low-can-drones-go.shtml#c86</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[1)I think there'a an argument for tresspassing a/or voyeuerism here as described.<br />
<br />
2)I agree with the option of it having an accident during it's incursion.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130521/12175523157/nyc-says-renting-out-your-place-via-airbnb-is-running-illegal-hotel.shtml#c457</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[horse with no name]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 04:42:54 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130521/12175523157/nyc-says-renting-out-your-place-via-airbnb-is-running-illegal-hotel.shtml#c457</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I won't bite.  Your mind is clearly already made up, nothing I can say will change it.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Please...make. it. stop.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c1779</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[RT Cunningham]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 04:39:47 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c1779</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I just read every comment on this article and 90 percent (or more) of it was either Average Joe's inexcusable stupidity or people responding to his inexcusable stupidity.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/11032823096/how-low-can-drones-go.shtml#c77</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bt Garner]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 04:38:52 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/11032823096/how-low-can-drones-go.shtml#c77</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I don't see how this is any different that trees and such.  For example, if a neighbor has a tree in his yard but its branches stretch into my yard, I am entitled to prune those branches so that they do not damage my house.  Even if I just find those branches to be a nuisance, I can still prune them.  I believe the same policy would apply here.  If you are damaging my property, or begin a nuisance, you should be entitled to correct the problem.<br />
<br />
I would think a can of spray epoxy would be enough to take care of the problem.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>