<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Latest Techdirt Comments</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c946</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shmerl]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 14:14:10 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c946</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[You claim that dropping section 1201  (which is a fence around DRM) will weaken DRM, which will weaken copyright protection, which might lead to copyright infringement. Too far fetched of a claim. DRM is already one level removed from copyright. DMCA/1201 is one level more removed from copyright. DMCA/1201 doesn't protect copyright. It protects DRM. I.e. it's a preemptive policing of the second order (where DRM is a preemptive policing of the first order).<br />
<br />
So you are talking about some non tangible potential of affecting copyrights, while you ignore that DMCA/1201 very concretely violates users ability to exercise fair use. Therefore dropping DMCA/1201 will restore concrete users' rights and will not really affect any copyrights. Ignoring this is hypocrisy.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c921</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 14:12:52 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c921</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Exactly. Further more, there are uses that copyrighted material may that are allowed by law, therefore, making something available for uses allowed by low, would now be legal.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/19190923142/if-youre-going-to-illegally-seize-citizens-cell-phones-least-make-sure-youre-grabbing-right-ones.shtml#c758</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[rapnel]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 14:10:55 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/19190923142/if-youre-going-to-illegally-seize-citizens-cell-phones-least-make-sure-youre-grabbing-right-ones.shtml#c758</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[What the fuck?  It was a safety checkpoint.  It worked perfectly.<br />
<br />
On a more serious note, police are not gods, they have a job, they are supposed to know how to do their job, they get paid to know how to do their job, they exist to serve and protect and if they fail to uphold the core mission of their existence then they've failed.<br />
<br />
There's a bigger picture here.  Stop smelling the flowers and pay attention.  You're not all wrong but you must admit that neither were the police all right.<br />
<br />
Cameras and questions are valid.  Violence as a response is not.  Especially so when the "law" is, by default, skewed to the wielder.<br />
<br />
Those "same citizens" are the ones going out of their way, as mere citizens, to address the wrongs of power.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Setting the record straight</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/13573923121/retired-lt-col-violent-media-has-bred-generation-killers.shtml#c1050</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jay]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 14:02:46 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/13573923121/retired-lt-col-violent-media-has-bred-generation-killers.shtml#c1050</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[In 1953, the US ousted the Iranian PM who was democratically elected for a CIA puppet dictator that happened to be a religious fundie group.<br />
<br />
The US also implemented Saddam in Iraq to help in the 70s.<br />
<br />
Both groups hated each other which can't be said enough.<br />
<br />
The US, being run by neocons, ignored Afghanistan and Al Qaeda even though Rumsfeld was given Bin Laden on a silver platter and he opted to ignore it.<br />
<br />
The public was lied to with Bush admitting that he committed the War effort to try to privatize Social Security (it's in his autobiography).<br />
<br />
He never should have been president.  He had the longest vacation of any president.  He increased our deficit to fund two illegal wars.  He destroyed civil liberties which Obama has continued when there are far better alternatives.<br />
<br />
Saddam was nothing more than a target for neocons for oil and the US got kicked out for having a private force (Blackwater) running like an occupation and killing people in the name of the US.<br />
<br />
Meanwhile, Cheney makes BILLIONS off of the war effort for guns and murder while the soldiers get the mental health issues.<br />
<br />
And when we look at the costs....  The explosions of democracies from the removal of the status quo...<br />
<br />
I can't say it was worth taking out a dictator that we installed in the first place.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c912</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[silverscarcat]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 14:01:13 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c912</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I'm sorry, no, wait, I'm NOT sorry at all, that clause really is total B.S. and goes against nature.<br />
<br />
If you own something, you can DO WHAT YOU WANT WITH IT!<br />
<br />
The first sale doctrine, the Supreme Court's ruling on the matter of buying something and then re-selling and doing what you want with it, states that copyright law does NOT trump a person's right to do with property as they please.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: You may be next, Pirate Mike!</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c908</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:59:35 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c908</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>your constant defense of KNOWN criminals like infringer-millionaire Dotcom of Mega;</i><br />
<br />
If he was being tried in the UK your post would be in contempt of court.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/13573923121/retired-lt-col-violent-media-has-bred-generation-killers.shtml#c1031</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:58:56 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/13573923121/retired-lt-col-violent-media-has-bred-generation-killers.shtml#c1031</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>Given how much Grossman is ridiculed for his thesis, perhaps musicians in particular and people in general should abandon the belief in the phrase 'Music has charms to soothe the savage breast'?</blockquote><br />
Yes, they should.<br />
<br />
<blockquote> It is possible to persuade people to buy and to soothe their rage, but impossible to provoke passion and persuade to kill?</blockquote><br />
Not impossible, but highly unlikely in the context of violent media. You need something more personal, or at least more profitable, to manipulate a person into killing.<br />
<br />
<blockquote>On Killing is on the Marine Corps Commandant required reading list.</blockquote><br />
Which no doubt lends validity to its content and leads to a much healthier attitude toward shooting the enemy in the head.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c900</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[silverscarcat]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:58:18 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c900</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[You know, most of us are rolling our eyes at you.<br />
<br />
Because, honestly, AJ, if you buy something, shouldn't you *OWN* the thing?<br />
<br />
And, according to the First Sale Doctrine, which TRUMPS copyright law, once you buy something, you can do what you WANT to it, no questions asked.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130502/18364622931/ma-teen-arrested-held-without-bail-posting-supposed-terrorist-threat-facebook.shtml#c964</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:55:49 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130502/18364622931/ma-teen-arrested-held-without-bail-posting-supposed-terrorist-threat-facebook.shtml#c964</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The mayor has a facebook page <a href='http://www.facebook.com/pages/Mayor-Steve-Zanni/285400194822570' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">www.facebook.com/pages/Mayor-Steve-Zanni/285400194822570</a>  if anyone would like to leave a comment :)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130507/06201422976/chicago-blackhawks-fire-reporter-over-silly-old-youtube-videos.shtml#c753</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stan]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:54:42 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130507/06201422976/chicago-blackhawks-fire-reporter-over-silly-old-youtube-videos.shtml#c753</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[well i guess female figure skaters/cheerleaders/icecapades skaters are exploited as well according to your logic. Women are exploited for sure but ice cleaners are not one of them.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: worker factories</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/18345423136/doj-dept-education-to-colleges-start-restricting-free-speech-campus-kiss-your-federal-funding-goodbye.shtml#c1125</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ockham's Stubble]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:53:51 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/18345423136/doj-dept-education-to-colleges-start-restricting-free-speech-campus-kiss-your-federal-funding-goodbye.shtml#c1125</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It's notable that many students coming to universities (especially "access" universities serving first-in-family college-goers) eagerly want to be 'trained' for jobs rather than become critically thinking, broadly knowledgeable citizens... this will not help.<br />
<br />
But I think we need pushback from more than First Amendment grounds, because that only protects the *right* to express potentially objectionable or offensive ideas.  Universities have a *duty* to expose minds to such things, IMO.  To my mind, that's a core mission of universities: to intellectually challenge its students.  And a necessary part of that is to make them uncomfortable with their present beliefs &amp; attitudes, so they are motivated to examine them carefully.  Of course, there are promising ways to do this, and there are crude ways... and there is actual harassment.  But I wouldn't rely on a hastily drawn-up law to distinguish between those.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/19190923142/if-youre-going-to-illegally-seize-citizens-cell-phones-least-make-sure-youre-grabbing-right-ones.shtml#c741</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:53:00 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/19190923142/if-youre-going-to-illegally-seize-citizens-cell-phones-least-make-sure-youre-grabbing-right-ones.shtml#c741</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[lol<br />
<br />
everytime I read these stories, no matter how obnoxious the person recording is [claimed to be]....<br />
<br />
i put 100% of the blame/fault on the cop when these things happen.<br />
<br />
these guys are walking around with a very easy to use tool capable of ending your life in a split second.  if cops cannot keep their cool with someone filming them.. what do the same cops do when things get even more heated?  beat someone to death?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130521/12175523157/nyc-says-renting-out-your-place-via-airbnb-is-running-illegal-hotel.shtml#c79</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[PlagueSD]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:52:49 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130521/12175523157/nyc-says-renting-out-your-place-via-airbnb-is-running-illegal-hotel.shtml#c79</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[There's a LOT of stupid laws in the US. Just google "stupid state laws" and have a laugh...]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>There has been an update posted on Facebook</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/01450023148/makers-nutella-force-fan-who-created-world-nutella-day-to-shut-it-down.shtml#c487</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[tawsenior]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:51:08 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/01450023148/makers-nutella-force-fan-who-created-world-nutella-day-to-shut-it-down.shtml#c487</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[WORLD NUTELLA DAY: A POSITIVE CONCLUSION <br />
<br />
Positive direct contact between Ferrero and Sara Rosso, owner of the non-official Nutella fan page World Nutella Day, has brought an end to the case.<br />
Ferrero would like to express to Sara Rosso its sincere gratitude for her passion for Nutella, gratitude which is extended to all fans of the World Nutella Day.<br />
The case arose from a routine brand defense procedure that was activated as a result of some misuse of the Nutella brand on the fan page.<br />
Ferrero is pleased to announce that today, after contacting Sara Rosso and finding together the appropriate solutions, it immediately stopped the previous action.<br />
Ferrero considers itself fortunate to have such devoted and loyal fans of its Nutella spread, like Sara Rosso.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c876</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zakida Paul]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:50:16 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c876</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Wait, I thought unlocking was illegal but rooting was fine?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c860</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zakida Paul]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:49:42 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c860</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Which is utterly ridiculous.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Cookies</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121116/16481921080/house-republicans-copyright-law-destroys-markets-its-time-real-reform.shtml#c3658</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe Dirt (Deer-tay)]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:48:51 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121116/16481921080/house-republicans-copyright-law-destroys-markets-its-time-real-reform.shtml#c3658</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I want a cookie!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c837</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:47:53 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c837</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[rather than ask Congress that when you have actually bought something, why would you not own it, perhaps the thing to ask them is on what occasions do the members of Congress consider that anything they have bought is not actually owned by them? how many items have they bought that they think they are not entitled to sell on, give away or part exchange, should they choose to? how many items have they, their families or any of the children bought that they then think they dont own but are actually only renting or have a license to use it until the producer decides you cant use it any more or makes using it impossible?<br />
<br />
maybe if they were to ask themselves questions like these, they may then understand what the hell people are talking about and why they get SO FUCKING ANNOYED WHEN THEY ARE STOPPED FROM DOING WHAT THEY WANT WITH SOMETHING THEY HAVE PAID OUT HARD EARNED CASH FOR!!!!!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c830</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[rapnel]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:47:41 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c830</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I suppose you want to allow anyone you'd like to stay in your home too? Friggen kids.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: From the other side...</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130509/02140223018/new-data-exposes-scammy-hospital-pricing-now-lets-crowdsource-some-more.shtml#c632</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[DP2u]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:45:06 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130509/02140223018/new-data-exposes-scammy-hospital-pricing-now-lets-crowdsource-some-more.shtml#c632</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[This argument does not hold true for the uninsured.  Doctors and hospitals should be able to provide pricing information to the uninsured in advance or providing services (except emergencies).  As Steven Brill's article makes clear, it is the uninsured and underinsured who are being taken advantage of by health care providers.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>