<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Latest Techdirt Comments</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/11552823150/major-hollywood-studios-all-sent-bogus-dmca-takedowns-concerning-pirate-bay-documentary.shtml#c145</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[jupiterkansas]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 13:43:35 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/11552823150/major-hollywood-studios-all-sent-bogus-dmca-takedowns-concerning-pirate-bay-documentary.shtml#c145</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[And yet you keep coming back for more.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130505/14372422951/court-finds-fantasy-stories-obscene.shtml#c405</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Watchit]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 13:43:27 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130505/14372422951/court-finds-fantasy-stories-obscene.shtml#c405</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Some people obviously haven't been fanfiction.net, they'd probably have a heart attack! People who fantasize the rape and torture of children are sick and need help, but thankfully their stories are just that, fantasy. Instead of throwing the books at people, why not try and help them instead?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/11200723149/war-journalists-doj-claimed-fox-news-reporter-was-aider-abettor-co-conspirator-with-leaker.shtml#c468</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 13:41:52 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/11200723149/war-journalists-doj-claimed-fox-news-reporter-was-aider-abettor-co-conspirator-with-leaker.shtml#c468</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Where's YOUR proof of anything Weenie Board?<br />
<br />
"Got Proof?"]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/11200723149/war-journalists-doj-claimed-fox-news-reporter-was-aider-abettor-co-conspirator-with-leaker.shtml#c451</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 13:41:26 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/11200723149/war-journalists-doj-claimed-fox-news-reporter-was-aider-abettor-co-conspirator-with-leaker.shtml#c451</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[this is another example of a government (and one that was supposed to urge whistle blowers to come forward as they would be better protected than at any other time) doing whatever it can to stifle reports of what it has been up to when it has been up to no good! it is doing whatever it deems necessary to keep things from the public. the DoJ are becoming better and better at lying through their teeth, blaming whatever they can on to the person they have their sights on at the time and trumping up whatever 'evidence' needed to ensure the person has no way out! i wonder if someone can explain to me the difference between this sort of situation and how it was during the scary times of 'reds under the beds' days? of Khrushchev's times? of Hitler's times? it seems to me that what is going on now is to try to frighten everyone into such a state that no one dare open their mouth about anything. that everyone will be spying on and grassing on their neighbours. that everyone is having everything as far as freedom and privacy taken from them, little by little and any resistance is squashed by jailing all that dare say or do different to 'the party line'!!!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/11552823150/major-hollywood-studios-all-sent-bogus-dmca-takedowns-concerning-pirate-bay-documentary.shtml#c130</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 13:41:14 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/11552823150/major-hollywood-studios-all-sent-bogus-dmca-takedowns-concerning-pirate-bay-documentary.shtml#c130</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Don't worry about the false DMCA notices. The copyright agents have been refining their algorithms for several years now, and those same agencies have all sorts of good faith in the ability of their algorithms to know what's infringing and what's not. Therefore, it's perfectly fine that they've sent completely off-base notices that any human with 10 seconds to spare could realize was wrong.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/11200723149/war-journalists-doj-claimed-fox-news-reporter-was-aider-abettor-co-conspirator-with-leaker.shtml#c440</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[deep throat]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 13:40:10 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/11200723149/war-journalists-doj-claimed-fox-news-reporter-was-aider-abettor-co-conspirator-with-leaker.shtml#c440</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I take it you haven't noticed all the I.R. Security Cameras in all the parking garages have you?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Obscenity</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130505/14372422951/court-finds-fantasy-stories-obscene.shtml#c384</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 13:39:46 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130505/14372422951/court-finds-fantasy-stories-obscene.shtml#c384</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>"<i>Not just *who* is looking at it, but *when* they are looking at it, and *where* they looked at it. 'Contemporary community standards'. Who, when, and where are very important for determining a 'contemporary community standard'.</i>"</blockquote><br />
<br />
Same thing. The "who" in question is the people who are members of a particular community at a particular time. Same content, different people, different legal outcome.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c1086</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Julian Perez]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 13:39:43 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c1086</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[You know what would eliminate the idea copyright holders and trade organizations like Business Europe hate the blind? <br />
<br />
<i>If they stop hating the blind. </i><br />
<br />
Seriously, only 1% of all books are available for the blind to read. There is as yet no exception to copyright to make them available for the blind and they're <i>lobbying against it. </i><br />
<br />
Let me repeat that for you, parasite: they are lobbying against the right of works to be modified so they are accessible to the disabled.<br />
<br />
That's the evilest thing I've ever heard of, and you're in favor of it. This is why you're called an extremist. This is why your copyright monopolism must end. You call copyright a right. Nobody has any rights; only responsibilities. Fail in your responsibilities, your rights are taken away...as they should be.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c629</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 13:38:23 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c629</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Craigslist has been used for illegal acts, e.g. fraud and solicitation. It is likely that Craigslist will be used in such crimes again. Should the .org registrar be charged with solicitation?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/11552823150/major-hollywood-studios-all-sent-bogus-dmca-takedowns-concerning-pirate-bay-documentary.shtml#c123</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[jackn]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 13:37:29 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/11552823150/major-hollywood-studios-all-sent-bogus-dmca-takedowns-concerning-pirate-bay-documentary.shtml#c123</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Always funny when the haters resort to calling others haters. Thats when you know that you won!<br />
<br />
Great job Mike.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/11552823150/major-hollywood-studios-all-sent-bogus-dmca-takedowns-concerning-pirate-bay-documentary.shtml#c106</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Idiotic FUD?]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 13:35:38 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/11552823150/major-hollywood-studios-all-sent-bogus-dmca-takedowns-concerning-pirate-bay-documentary.shtml#c106</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[How exactly is this blatant act of censorship "Idiotic FUD?"<br />
<br />
Do you HONETSLY expect anyone to believe that somehow those 4 companies DON'T EVEN KNOW what copyrights they own, and this was some sort of "accident?"<br />
<br />
Maybe you bought that bullshit...but I find it hard to believe that someone at each of these 4 companies looked through a list of what they own, saw The Pirate Bay's movie on it and said "yup, this one's ours...fire a DMCA notice."<br />
<br />
Which is it? Gross incompetence? Or deliberate asshatery?<br />
<br />
(It's a rhetorical question...both are applicable)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/11552823150/major-hollywood-studios-all-sent-bogus-dmca-takedowns-concerning-pirate-bay-documentary.shtml#c89</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 13:34:33 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/11552823150/major-hollywood-studios-all-sent-bogus-dmca-takedowns-concerning-pirate-bay-documentary.shtml#c89</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[No. He's making it sound like the only thing that happens is abuse, when in fact such abuse is the exception and not the rule. It's completely putting things OUT of perspective in order to continue his march to destroy and discredit anyone and anything that's pro-copyright. I don't care if he calls out abuses. I care that he never concedes that the vast, vast, vast, vast, vast, vast, vast, vast, vast, vast, vast, vast, vast, vast, vast majority of the time it's actually legitimate and in fact it's a pirate who intentionally violates someone else's rights that gets away with it. Where's the perspective? There has never been, and there will never be any sort of perspective with Mike Masnick. Never. Never fucking ever. All we will ever get is his hate-fueled bullshit like this. It's really sad. If there's 100,000,000 legitimate notices and 1 illegitimate one, that illegitimate one will be the only thing he talks about, and he'll make it seem like that 1 notice discredits the entire notion of copyright top to bottom. It's so dumb it hurts. ALL things can and are abused. And the pirates are the worst abusers of them all, purposefully and greedily violating other people's rights. But where's a single article chastising a single pirate? There are none. Yet he pretends like piracy is not OK. What a fucking joke.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c606</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Fenderson]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 13:33:10 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c606</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I can't answer for Mike, but personally, yes, domain registrars should be able to register domain names for anybody. They should not be involved with determining who is or is not a criminal.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Recording</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/18383623114/your-word-against-ours-how-fbis-no-electronic-recording-policy-rigs-game-destroys-its-credibility.shtml#c306</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[btr1701]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 13:32:09 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/18383623114/your-word-against-ours-how-fbis-no-electronic-recording-policy-rigs-game-destroys-its-credibility.shtml#c306</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Key takeaway from this article: If the FBI won't record its interviews with you, then you should record them yourself. If they object, decline to participate in the interview.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>&quot;Traditional News&quot; Only Source for Investigative Reporting?</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/11200723149/war-journalists-doj-claimed-fox-news-reporter-was-aider-abettor-co-conspirator-with-leaker.shtml#c432</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 13:30:14 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/11200723149/war-journalists-doj-claimed-fox-news-reporter-was-aider-abettor-co-conspirator-with-leaker.shtml#c432</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[We've heard this trope from the newspapers, that without them there would be no serious investigative reporting. I wonder if there's at least a little more truth to that than we give them credit for: a large news corporation like the AP or Newscorp may be able to fight back against the government in a case like this more than a lone blogger would be able to.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/11552823150/major-hollywood-studios-all-sent-bogus-dmca-takedowns-concerning-pirate-bay-documentary.shtml#c75</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zakida Paul]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 13:27:25 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/11552823150/major-hollywood-studios-all-sent-bogus-dmca-takedowns-concerning-pirate-bay-documentary.shtml#c75</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[To be fair, if Taco Bell is anything like McDonalds, I probably would as it is such a rare occurrence.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/11552823150/major-hollywood-studios-all-sent-bogus-dmca-takedowns-concerning-pirate-bay-documentary.shtml#c51</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 13:27:04 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/11552823150/major-hollywood-studios-all-sent-bogus-dmca-takedowns-concerning-pirate-bay-documentary.shtml#c51</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA['I'm sure these were all just more "accidents"'<br />
<br />
you've got to be freakin' kiddin me! there is about as much chance of that as of me being a spaceman!! it was done on purpose. it will be done again on purpose for this or maybe other films as well. it's done because they can. it's done because there is no punishment. it's done to try to suppress something they, yet again and as usual, dont like! it's done in particular because it's about TPB!<br />
<br />
as for the twat on post number 1, there is never a take down notice that results in a file sharer (you call a pirate) getting nothing but a slap on the wrist! your paymasters harass as many as possible for as much as possible, even though they lose next to nothing!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Obscenity</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130505/14372422951/court-finds-fantasy-stories-obscene.shtml#c380</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[DCX2]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 13:26:41 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130505/14372422951/court-finds-fantasy-stories-obscene.shtml#c380</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Not just *who* is looking at it, but *when* they are looking at it, <b>and</b> *where* they looked at it.  "Contemporary community standards".  Who, when, and where are very important for determining a "contemporary community standard".<br />
<br />
Note that the court ruling specifically and explicitly mentions that the city and state (Albany, Georgia).  The Feds will shop around for a community which has a very low standard for "obscene".  They did the same thing to Paul F. Little, aka Max Hardcore.<br />
<br />
Using GA also puts it under Federal jurisdiction, since the data crossed state lines via the Internet access of a web site.<br />
<br />
IMO, "contemporary" should have nothing to do with it, and the "community" in question should be the logical community where such works as this are available/advertised/provided, NOT the physical community where the work was ultimately consumed.  Otherwise you end up in the situation where the literary work in your glove box goes from legal to illegal as you enter the city limits of e.g. Albany, GA.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c603</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 13:25:20 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c603</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Are you seriously asking how a registrar could know what the most notorious criminal infringement website is up to after they were told by authorities about it? You're missing the point. This isn't about them knowing about it ahead of time. It's about them being told by authorities what the domain name had been used for and may be used for again and then them refusing to cooperate. You sure you're a lawyer? The TF article explains this.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/11200723149/war-journalists-doj-claimed-fox-news-reporter-was-aider-abettor-co-conspirator-with-leaker.shtml#c422</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 13:23:25 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/11200723149/war-journalists-doj-claimed-fox-news-reporter-was-aider-abettor-co-conspirator-with-leaker.shtml#c422</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[He is suggesting that "an aider and abettor and/or co-conspirator" is a criminal and thus in terms of investigation it is fair game to pull his records if they have a suspicion.<br />
<br />
When we are talking US intelligence and anti-crime units it is a mess of lawlessness and internal fighting. It has been so, at least since the patriot act. What the AC is doing is just spitting acid (probably LSD) and appealing to the added safety the lawlessness provides...]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>