<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Latest Techdirt Comments</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/16402423161/first-hand-account-judicial-smackdown-prenda-minnesota.shtml#c310</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 08:42:27 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/16402423161/first-hand-account-judicial-smackdown-prenda-minnesota.shtml#c310</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[average_joe really hates it when due process is enforced by the courts.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: just love you command of english</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/16402423161/first-hand-account-judicial-smackdown-prenda-minnesota.shtml#c296</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 08:39:11 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/16402423161/first-hand-account-judicial-smackdown-prenda-minnesota.shtml#c296</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<b>)...the sentence does work perfectly in English. the</b><br />
<br />
'the' with a capital T please, such as The for the start of a new sentence.<br />
<br />
your , followed by brackets is not correct either, being superfluous.<br />
<br />
"about how a judge in Minnesota" capital for "judge" making it Judge as well.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>A good overview</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/11032823096/how-low-can-drones-go.shtml#c532</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Suzanne Lainson]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 08:38:46 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/11032823096/how-low-can-drones-go.shtml#c532</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.thefiscaltimes.com/Articles/2013/05/21/Whats-Grounding-the-Commercial-Drone-Industry.aspx#page1" rel="nofollow">What</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Over 100C!!!</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/06034223155/quack-professor-releases-dumbest-violent-video-game-theory-ever.shtml#c370</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Watchit]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 08:38:46 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/06034223155/quack-professor-releases-dumbest-violent-video-game-theory-ever.shtml#c370</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[No point on an old laptop. It was when it overheated in the middle of a game I decided to give my balls a break and buy a desktop. It's graphics card runs at a cool 60C!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Just go ALL PRENDA, ALL THE TIME.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/16402423161/first-hand-account-judicial-smackdown-prenda-minnesota.shtml#c295</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 08:37:41 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/16402423161/first-hand-account-judicial-smackdown-prenda-minnesota.shtml#c295</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[You mad, Nora? Still obsessed with calling everyone children I see. Are you trying to project something?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: privacy's dead</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/11032823096/how-low-can-drones-go.shtml#c520</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 08:36:34 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/11032823096/how-low-can-drones-go.shtml#c520</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>Now if only all surveillance equipment could store everything forever, and make it absolutely transparently public, that would change the world for the better.<br />
<br />
Because the data that models my whole life is worth less than the combined value of everyone else's, and NO sane human can say that theirs is.</i><br />
<br />
If the parties were on an equal footing, you might well be right. As things stand, private individuals may end up made of glass, while important government agencies stay pretty smoky.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Why am I not surprised?</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/00554723091/more-details-emerge-key-legal-fight-over-dmca-abuse.shtml#c356</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 08:36:30 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/00554723091/more-details-emerge-key-legal-fight-over-dmca-abuse.shtml#c356</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[So... he's not allowed to have an opinion on the matter? That what you're saying?<br />
<br />
Still mad that John Steele got what he deserved, I see.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/16402423161/first-hand-account-judicial-smackdown-prenda-minnesota.shtml#c277</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[DannyB]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 08:36:14 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/16402423161/first-hand-account-judicial-smackdown-prenda-minnesota.shtml#c277</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[John Steele just hates it and thinks it is unfair that judges are so biased against perpetrating multiple simultaneous frauds upon the court while using the court as a tool in an extortion shakedown.<br />
<br />
This bias on the part of the judges is brazenly obvious.<br />
<br />
This bias is unfair to the John Steel who has stated he has a goal of making $10,000 per day from extortion shakedown settlement letters.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/16402423161/first-hand-account-judicial-smackdown-prenda-minnesota.shtml#c259</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[DannyB]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 08:34:04 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/16402423161/first-hand-account-judicial-smackdown-prenda-minnesota.shtml#c259</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Less than average joe writes:<blockquote>Wow, you guys really obsess over these guys. You do realize that there's all kinds of dirtbags out there who do way worse things, right?</blockquote>Yes, there are bigger dirtbags that do way worse.  Let me give an example.<blockquote>In an attempt to defend their activities, Hansmeier referenced the the actions of the RIAA and MPAA.</blockquote>Look judge, there are bigger criminals than Prenda, see?<br />
<br />
They got away with this copyright trolling extortion shakedown racket and abuse of the court system to send "settlement letters" for a long time before the courts caught on.  So why shouldn't we be able to get away with it too?<br />
<br />
But the RIAA/MPAA were smart enough to see the end of copyright trolling, and switched to Sick Strikes instead.<br />
<br />
But TechDirt is not obsessed with Prenda.  It covers lots of other great topics.  DMCA takedown abuse.  DMCA criminalizing unlocking and circumventing for legal purposes.  Hollywood violating its own most holy copyright laws.  Hollywood buying the government and encouraging corruption.  And many other interesting topics than just Prenda.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: privacy's dead</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/11032823096/how-low-can-drones-go.shtml#c515</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 08:33:59 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/11032823096/how-low-can-drones-go.shtml#c515</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The problem in this instance of privacy is there still is a (quite) reasonable expectation of privacy in one's own house. You shouldn't be expected to have someone filming you without your knowledge in your own house. <br />
<br />
In my opinion, any "drone" that points a recording device within range to get a decently clear picture or video should be considered trespassing. The problem is when technolgy keeps improving, that may turn from 50 ft to 500 ft pretty quickly....]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130521/12175523157/nyc-says-renting-out-your-place-via-airbnb-is-running-illegal-hotel.shtml#c532</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[tqk]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 08:33:27 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130521/12175523157/nyc-says-renting-out-your-place-via-airbnb-is-running-illegal-hotel.shtml#c532</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>There is a pretty hard and fixed line in the legal sand regarding hotels versus rental units. There is the very basic question of fitness for use, zoning, and all that.</blockquote><br />
That's what they like you to believe, but how well is any of that enforced?  Search "hotel fire calgary".  That was a supposedly professionally managed and bylaw compliant hotel which had padlocked chains disabling the fire exits.  That's in Canada, not some "third world hellhole" country.<br />
<br />
This entire discussion is BS.  Just as cops don't really protect anyone (they just get to clean up the resultant mess), protectionist bylaws don't make commercial establishments act safer or better for their customers.  They just keep out competition and allow the chosen few to keep their rates high.  Protectionism is a very popular tactic for politicians and their friends, but its value to us is specious (based on pretense; deceptively pleasing) at best.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/18102623141/so-its-come-to-this-seven-high-school-students-arrested-throwing-water-balloons.shtml#c36</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arsik Vek]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 08:30:34 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/18102623141/so-its-come-to-this-seven-high-school-students-arrested-throwing-water-balloons.shtml#c36</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Clearly all those petitions to ban dihydrogen monoxide were right.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Just go ALL PRENDA, ALL THE TIME.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/16402423161/first-hand-account-judicial-smackdown-prenda-minnesota.shtml#c240</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[DannyB]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 08:28:46 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/16402423161/first-hand-account-judicial-smackdown-prenda-minnesota.shtml#c240</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Each exciting episode of Prenda Law:<br />
1. is more entertaining than most Hollywood tripe<br />
2. is reality<br />
3. has no commercials<br />
4. can be freely shared and discussed<br />
5. costs nothing<br />
6. is public domain<br />
7. is educational<br />
8. and really rankles you because of the the preceding items<br />
<br />
But why go all Prenda, all the time?  There are so many other clowns to laugh at.  I'll give you a hint:<blockquote>In an attempt to defend their activities, Hansmeier referenced the the actions of the RIAA and MPAA.</blockquote>Look judge, there are bigger criminals than us, see?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/16402423161/first-hand-account-judicial-smackdown-prenda-minnesota.shtml#c224</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[PRMan]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 08:27:37 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/16402423161/first-hand-account-judicial-smackdown-prenda-minnesota.shtml#c224</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Ready to confess, Joe?  Go ahead...  Sounds interesting...]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/06034223155/quack-professor-releases-dumbest-violent-video-game-theory-ever.shtml#c353</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[el_segfaulto]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 08:27:36 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/06034223155/quack-professor-releases-dumbest-violent-video-game-theory-ever.shtml#c353</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Wow, I got married a few months ago. Hopefully my liver can repair the damage that I did to it in my 20's!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/06034223155/quack-professor-releases-dumbest-violent-video-game-theory-ever.shtml#c348</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[bob]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 08:27:30 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/06034223155/quack-professor-releases-dumbest-violent-video-game-theory-ever.shtml#c348</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[how long before average joe or out of the blue say this bloke is talking sense.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Way to slander .. Mrs Judge..</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/16402423161/first-hand-account-judicial-smackdown-prenda-minnesota.shtml#c209</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 08:27:20 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/16402423161/first-hand-account-judicial-smackdown-prenda-minnesota.shtml#c209</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It would also be considered "contempt' of court and not admissible if it had come from anyone else, and I guess this judge is too stupid to excuse herself from further proceedings and be replaced by someone,, you know.... competent !!!!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/16402423161/first-hand-account-judicial-smackdown-prenda-minnesota.shtml#c198</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 08:27:12 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/16402423161/first-hand-account-judicial-smackdown-prenda-minnesota.shtml#c198</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[darryl just hates it when due process is enforced, too.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/06034223155/quack-professor-releases-dumbest-violent-video-game-theory-ever.shtml#c347</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rikuo]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 08:26:38 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/06034223155/quack-professor-releases-dumbest-violent-video-game-theory-ever.shtml#c347</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Someone turn this into a picture, I want it for my avatar.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Well, at least there's some resistance here to spying.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/11032823096/how-low-can-drones-go.shtml#c503</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chronno S. Trigger]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 08:26:18 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/11032823096/how-low-can-drones-go.shtml#c503</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[You were so close to being logical, but you just had to drop it to make jabs at Google.<br />
<br />
Now if we ignore your constant, insane ravings against Google, you're right.  We already have laws that could cover this, and laws against destroying things that happen to be flying over your house.<br />
<br />
Added bonus: when I read this story a few days ago, that article went out of it's way to mention the drone's camera was pointed in the window.  That runs afoul of laws that even cover cameras not on your property.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>