<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Latest Techdirt Comments</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c224</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 08:38:21 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c224</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[From what I understand, in a case where few pieces of data from a hard drive can be retrieved (from someone attempting to destroy it) the less data you can get out of it the more incriminating that out of context data tends to be in courts.<br />
<br />
But that's in cases where the DEFENDANT does something to try to hide/destroy evidence against themselves on the hard drive, not the reverse with the prosecution doing that.<br />
<br />
Are the DOJ dumb enough to think this will be treated the same way as if Kim Dotcom destroyed the evidence?<br />
<br />
It would seem that due to the 1st ten amendments that the evidence the DOJ gathered is now inadmissible in court, which could destroy their whole case if this happens to the rest of the evidence on the other servers. Unless the judge is a real moron who doesn't read the constitution (entirely possible).]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Some clarification</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130606/11475923344/sweden-makes-it-illegal-to-take-photos-private-environments-without-permission.shtml#c318</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Benny L]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 08:36:12 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130606/11475923344/sweden-makes-it-illegal-to-take-photos-private-environments-without-permission.shtml#c318</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[So what would happen if the harassment law was amended such that you could sue for harassment even if you didn't know you were being harassed? How could that possibly work? (And note here that there are different laws for harassment and libel.) Anybody who disliked someone could claim to have been harassed for just about anything thought up after the fact.<br />
<br />
Also, did you even read my coment properly? The risk of "criminalising ordinary behaviour" is just about nonexistent.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130614/11384823471/how-overclassification-makes-secrets-less-likely-to-remain-secret.shtml#c162</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 08:34:40 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130614/11384823471/how-overclassification-makes-secrets-less-likely-to-remain-secret.shtml#c162</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Do to the reward/punishment structure in place, overclassification is inevitable.<br />
<br />
Overclassification causes little penalty for the worker.  It's a little harder to work with but your setup to handle it.<br />
<br />
Under classification causes a huge shit storm that can days to sort out.<br />
<br />
So naturally, shit storms are avoided]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130614/11384823471/how-overclassification-makes-secrets-less-likely-to-remain-secret.shtml#c156</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lord Binky]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 08:34:24 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130614/11384823471/how-overclassification-makes-secrets-less-likely-to-remain-secret.shtml#c156</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[That's why classification was used as a part of access, the other being need-to-know. Otherwise they just need many many more tiers of classifications to make it work, somewhere around 100 would be a good starting point.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c201</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 08:33:49 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c201</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It would be a pity if they did that, Leaseweb is a business, the government prevented those servers from being paid for. The court should find against the government not leaseweb.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c187</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 08:33:28 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c187</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[TOS would not trump need to preserve evidence the same way your ownership of an apartment would not allow you to clean and rerent it if it were a crime scene.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: DOJ's response</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c178</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 08:32:37 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c178</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Holder waves his hand and says...<br />
<br />
"These are not the servers you're looking for"...]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>If you think that's bad</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130614/11384823471/how-overclassification-makes-secrets-less-likely-to-remain-secret.shtml#c145</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[peter]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 08:30:00 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130614/11384823471/how-overclassification-makes-secrets-less-likely-to-remain-secret.shtml#c145</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[You should see the utter trivia which falls under the ITAR regulations.  Classified a 'munition /dual use technology' and almost treated as if it was secret includes, a battery charger, an RS232 cable,a truck engine.<br />
<br />
ITAR, America's joke on the world.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c170</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 08:29:55 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c170</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It is only a bizarre move if the point was actually to try DotCom for some sort of actual crime, which it was not. This case was, pure and simple, about keeping DotCom tied up in legal proceeding in yet another attempt by the entertainment industry to try to limit/prevent serious competition. With the destruction of the data, even if he wins, potential clients are going to be quite leery of using any service he provides for fear of something like this happening again.<br />
<br />
At the end of the day, it's the consumers and content creators who are going to lose out, just as the entertainment industry wanted all along.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: As usual, Misunderstander Mike misunderstands purpose.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130614/11384823471/how-overclassification-makes-secrets-less-likely-to-remain-secret.shtml#c140</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 08:29:48 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130614/11384823471/how-overclassification-makes-secrets-less-likely-to-remain-secret.shtml#c140</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Would you PLEASE ban this idiot for life? Really, letting worthless asshole out_of_the_blue speak serves no purpose whatsoever.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: As usual, Misunderstander Mike misunderstands purpose.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130614/11384823471/how-overclassification-makes-secrets-less-likely-to-remain-secret.shtml#c136</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Roberts]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 08:28:47 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130614/11384823471/how-overclassification-makes-secrets-less-likely-to-remain-secret.shtml#c136</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[If you want to classify more things in order to impress people, you can still give them a less classified status. There are levels of classification for a reason.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/12553023511/nsa-boss-asks-congress-legal-immunity-companies-that-help-nsa-spy-everyone.shtml#c676</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[special-interesting]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 08:27:54 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/12553023511/nsa-boss-asks-congress-legal-immunity-companies-that-help-nsa-spy-everyone.shtml#c676</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[My apologies Ms. Hilton. No offense is intended.<br />
<br />
<br />
Correction; the Mr Johnson voice was supposed to be a Agent Smith voice from the movie The Matrix. (The Wachowski Brothers, of Babylon 5 fame) The neutral, almost robotic, yet still human, monotone voice that seemed critical of everything human. Used in an anti-ironic manner.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c155</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lord_Unseen]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 08:27:02 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c155</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It doesn't really matter what it says in the TOS. It was evidence in a criminal case. I wouldn't be surprised if the court orders some kind of penalty against them for destruction of evidence.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: @&quot;PaulT&quot;, compulsive yapper.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/01121423439/hollywood-studios-keep-saying-its-employees-must-get-paid-now-may-be-forced-to-pay-its-interns.shtml#c910</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 08:26:55 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/01121423439/hollywood-studios-keep-saying-its-employees-must-get-paid-now-may-be-forced-to-pay-its-interns.shtml#c910</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[He gets paid in midichlorians.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>If you think that's bad</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130614/11384823471/how-overclassification-makes-secrets-less-likely-to-remain-secret.shtml#c125</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[peter]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 08:25:40 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130614/11384823471/how-overclassification-makes-secrets-less-likely-to-remain-secret.shtml#c125</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[You should see the utter trivia which falls under the ITAR regulations.  Classified a 'munition /dual use technology' and almost treated as if it was secret includes, a battery charger, an RS232 cable,a truck engine.<br />
<br />
ITAR, America's joke on the world.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c148</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 08:25:13 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c148</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I see what you did there.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c135</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 08:25:05 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c135</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Which can, funnily enough, <i>also</i> be laid at the feet of the DoJ.  This is hilarious to watch, from a "comedy of errors" point of view.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>DOJ's response</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c144</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 08:25:05 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c144</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Shake magic 8-ball to figure out which response to use:<br />
<br />
1) Those files needed to be deleted for national security.<br />
2) There was nothing important on those servers. <br />
3) They had nothing to do with this case and no evidence was harmed. <br />
4) We didn't do it. LeaseWeb did.<br />
<br />
Course then follow that up with the classic:<br />
You need to trust us cause we're the DOJ. Just extradite Dotcom already so we can hold our kangaroo court.<br />
<br />
<br />
I'm still putting my bet on more charges magically showing up if he is extradited to the US.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Definition</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130611/09013223404/wipo-intellectual-monopolies-not-needed-innovation-informal-economy.shtml#c220</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zeissmann]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 08:24:18 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130611/09013223404/wipo-intellectual-monopolies-not-needed-innovation-informal-economy.shtml#c220</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I just love that "definition". If you haven't understood what it means, let me disentangle it for you. It basically says that informal economy is the thing that lies on the lower end of the scale of an economic property called "formality", which is defined as "non-informality".]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/01121423439/hollywood-studios-keep-saying-its-employees-must-get-paid-now-may-be-forced-to-pay-its-interns.shtml#c907</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nathaniel Bonini]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 08:23:34 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/01121423439/hollywood-studios-keep-saying-its-employees-must-get-paid-now-may-be-forced-to-pay-its-interns.shtml#c907</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Nothing gets done about it because there is a never ending line of people who will do these jobs for less and less compensation.  The unions are the only thing standing in the way of the studios to stop paying for labor and residuals.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>