<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Latest Techdirt Comments</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title>Fiber</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121006/10153520628/time-warner-cable-suddenly-forced-to-compete-kansas-city-complains-google-has-unfair-advantage.shtml#c1543</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Izzy]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 20:42:58 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121006/10153520628/time-warner-cable-suddenly-forced-to-compete-kansas-city-complains-google-has-unfair-advantage.shtml#c1543</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Please google, keep laying fiber a bit more south near olathe.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/10230323518/nsa-claims-surveillance-programs-aided-stopping-50-attacks-details-lacking.shtml#c871</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 20:41:53 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/10230323518/nsa-claims-surveillance-programs-aided-stopping-50-attacks-details-lacking.shtml#c871</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It's funny because Mike has answered the troll's questions on many occasions, then came to the conclusion that the answers would just be ignored unless the troll was given the answer they were looking for. Since they refuse to acknowledge Mike's answers and spam the site with this nonsense there is no reason to even acknowledge their posts. Just report and move on.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>That's nice, but WE live in terminally predatory capitalism.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130611/09013223404/wipo-intellectual-monopolies-not-needed-innovation-informal-economy.shtml#c55</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[out_of_the_blue]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 20:40:33 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130611/09013223404/wipo-intellectual-monopolies-not-needed-innovation-informal-economy.shtml#c55</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["Appropriation efforts must also be considered in light of the social systems -- specifically family structures, community networks and commercial clusters -- within which the IE operates. Knowledge flows are characterized by trust, reputation, reliability, social and cultural signaling, and the willingness to pool resources and collaborate."<br />
<br />
Used to be that way here, too. But that era is over for us.<br />
<br />
"Intellectual property" is a valid notion even though the now predatory Born Rich are using it for obvious evil. Your arguments are basically futile from the start because The Rich control every market and entire economy, are almost to the point of "privatizing" basic public properties such as roads and water. Existing monopolies are THE major point, so overwhelming in degree that carping about small pieces of the societal milieu is just stupid. You're here nearly every weekday, minion, complaining about what The Rich do, without apparently ever grasping the central fact.<br />
<br />
Adam Smith is no longer relevant: in the stage of capitalism here the "invisible hand" is totally visible, and it's a mailed fist. We need revolutionaries who see the big picture, not another "report is a valuable contribution" blah blah, "debates" going nowhere.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Informal Economy is such a loaded term</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130611/09013223404/wipo-intellectual-monopolies-not-needed-innovation-informal-economy.shtml#c41</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ChurchHatesTucker]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 20:39:59 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130611/09013223404/wipo-intellectual-monopolies-not-needed-innovation-informal-economy.shtml#c41</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Let's call it what it is: A free market.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130618/11332223519/states-attorneys-general-want-to-special-exception-to-blame-sites-actions-users.shtml#c671</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 20:27:38 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130618/11332223519/states-attorneys-general-want-to-special-exception-to-blame-sites-actions-users.shtml#c671</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Hey Mike, I know that completely blocking comments isn't your thing, but this is actually legitimate spam now.  I don't think anyone would mind if you <i>actually</i> censored this guy advertising his whatever.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/10465223506/british-intelligence-spied-g20-officials-phone-calls-emails-during-2009-summit.shtml#c560</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[BentFranklin]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 20:21:23 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/10465223506/british-intelligence-spied-g20-officials-phone-calls-emails-during-2009-summit.shtml#c560</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The domestic public has always accepted that we spy on foreign interests.  But now that the domestic public is being spied upon, does that mean the spies now consider the domestic public to be foreign?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/11500923509/its-come-to-this-commentators-arguing-that-press-commits-crime-exposing-nsa-surveillance.shtml#c649</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 20:19:59 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/11500923509/its-come-to-this-commentators-arguing-that-press-commits-crime-exposing-nsa-surveillance.shtml#c649</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Probably because you're indistinguishable from a spambot.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130618/11332223519/states-attorneys-general-want-to-special-exception-to-blame-sites-actions-users.shtml#c648</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[davnel]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 20:19:38 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130618/11332223519/states-attorneys-general-want-to-special-exception-to-blame-sites-actions-users.shtml#c648</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I would suggest you re-read the first amendment. This guy has the right to his own opinion, whether you like it or not. The First Amendment basically gives him the right to express opinions you absolutely loath, freely, and without restraint. Your brand of censorship IS NOT ACCEPTABLE!<br />
.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/14341223521/google-without-admitting-it-gets-fisa-orders-files-lawsuit-to-challenge-fisa-gag-orders.shtml#c375</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 20:17:26 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/14341223521/google-without-admitting-it-gets-fisa-orders-files-lawsuit-to-challenge-fisa-gag-orders.shtml#c375</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Imaginary conspiracies, paranoia, persecution. What's next?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/01375623502/retired-federal-judge-explains-why-fisa-court-should-not-be-trusted.shtml#c549</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[BentFranklin]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 20:15:00 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/01375623502/retired-federal-judge-explains-why-fisa-court-should-not-be-trusted.shtml#c549</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[What are the names of these FISA judges?  How do we know they even exist?  How do we know the FISA court isn't really <a href="http://www.staples.com/product_606396" rel="nofollow">this</a> or <a href="http://carolhardick.files.wordpress.com/2011/08/2001_hal5.jpg" rel="nofollow">this</a>?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Lead, follow or get out of the way.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130611/09013223404/wipo-intellectual-monopolies-not-needed-innovation-informal-economy.shtml#c25</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[artp]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 20:14:29 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130611/09013223404/wipo-intellectual-monopolies-not-needed-innovation-informal-economy.shtml#c25</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[And the monopolies aren't doing any of them. They don't have to. They are monopolies.<br />
<br />
As a friend of mine once said when told that he wouldn't be satisfied if he had the world on a string, "Gold string!"]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130612/12373623425/mpaas-chris-dodd-will-be-chair-free-speech-week.shtml#c1585</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[jimman]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 20:06:21 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130612/12373623425/mpaas-chris-dodd-will-be-chair-free-speech-week.shtml#c1585</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[insert bad joke here.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130618/11332223519/states-attorneys-general-want-to-special-exception-to-blame-sites-actions-users.shtml#c623</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Telco Guy]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 20:05:58 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130618/11332223519/states-attorneys-general-want-to-special-exception-to-blame-sites-actions-users.shtml#c623</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Hi, can someone give me this guy's IP address? I am in a position where I can match it to a subscriber. I think if we dox this creep maybe he will shut up or at least join the debate on an adult level.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/11500923509/its-come-to-this-commentators-arguing-that-press-commits-crime-exposing-nsa-surveillance.shtml#c643</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 20:05:56 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/11500923509/its-come-to-this-commentators-arguing-that-press-commits-crime-exposing-nsa-surveillance.shtml#c643</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Back in your box moron.<br />
I read some of your drivel, and you were wrong.<br />
<br />
I'm not from the US and IANAL... But the reason you disagree is that you clearly have your own interpretation of the law... and it is wrong.<br />
Your BS article is all about Kim Dotcom, who at this point has not been served with anything, and almost certainly had nothing to do with any piracy, other than providing the platform on which piracy was performed.<br />
Your argument is about as logical as charging MS or Apple with conspiricy to comit ect. for allowing their OS to connect to the site, or indeed the internet at all.<br />
<br />
You don't have to like pirates to see that the law is being played fast and loose for the benefit of hollywood.<br />
<br />
The same Safe Harbour exceptions that these AGs want to remove, are the ones that basically mean the case against Kim Dotcom is fairly bogus. You may disagree with the existing safe harbour laws, but at the end of the day it is the current law.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/11212323508/how-knowing-government-is-spying-you-changes-how-you-act.shtml#c1663</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[BentFranklin]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 20:02:43 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/11212323508/how-knowing-government-is-spying-you-changes-how-you-act.shtml#c1663</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[This article is the best counterpoint to anyone who brags they have nothing to hide.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/11212323508/how-knowing-government-is-spying-you-changes-how-you-act.shtml#c1631</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 19:59:16 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/11212323508/how-knowing-government-is-spying-you-changes-how-you-act.shtml#c1631</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[This is a private, non-government site. Mike has the right to deny you access. By circumventing his attempts to deny you access, you are in violation of the law. According to most of the trolls around here it doesn't matter how easy it was to circumvent his measures, you are guilty and should be hung. How does it feel to be a filthy hacker criminal?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Wow. This is bad on so many levels.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/14341223521/google-without-admitting-it-gets-fisa-orders-files-lawsuit-to-challenge-fisa-gag-orders.shtml#c358</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Uriel-238]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 19:59:09 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/14341223521/google-without-admitting-it-gets-fisa-orders-files-lawsuit-to-challenge-fisa-gag-orders.shtml#c358</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Let us say that I provide a service that offers a quantifiable amount of discretion: I promise I will use your metadata for research purposes, but only after your identity has been trimmed from it, and it doesn't get viewed by human beings until it's thoroughly anonymized (humans look at statistics, but not the data itself).<br />
<br />
Then the DoJ sends me an NSA order to hand over all my data, which, as part of my business model, I'm obligated to my end-users to keep private. Then they gag me from actually saying that I turned all that data over. Ergo:<br />
~ If I obey the order, I betray my client base.<br />
~ If I refuse the order, I am in contempt of justice.<br />
<br />
Yeah, the NSA really fucked over our tech community since we just <i>cannot</i> trust service in US jurisdiction ever again to keep our data private.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/11500923509/its-come-to-this-commentators-arguing-that-press-commits-crime-exposing-nsa-surveillance.shtml#c618</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[BentFranklin]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 19:59:05 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/11500923509/its-come-to-this-commentators-arguing-that-press-commits-crime-exposing-nsa-surveillance.shtml#c618</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The comparison to Wikileaks is apt:  The government has to prosecute both of them or neither.  It looks like they are choosing both.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Used Games</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130616/20142123500/games-war-designer-cliff-bleszinski-used-games-must-be-killed-order-unsustainable-aaa-development-to-live.shtml#c1650</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[nasch]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 19:54:09 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130616/20142123500/games-war-designer-cliff-bleszinski-used-games-must-be-killed-order-unsustainable-aaa-development-to-live.shtml#c1650</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i> I'm also against DRM when it's purpose is to try and prevent copying and/or piracy (Something that can't be done).</i><br />
<br />
What other purpose could DRM have?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130618/11332223519/states-attorneys-general-want-to-special-exception-to-blame-sites-actions-users.shtml#c584</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 19:43:18 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130618/11332223519/states-attorneys-general-want-to-special-exception-to-blame-sites-actions-users.shtml#c584</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<a href='http://prism-break.org/' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://prism-break.org/</a><br />
<br />
Pick your poison mate.<br />
<br />
There are several options to circumvent even governments.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>