<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Latest Techdirt Comments</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/10230323518/nsa-claims-surveillance-programs-aided-stopping-50-attacks-details-lacking.shtml#c767</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 14:36:36 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/10230323518/nsa-claims-surveillance-programs-aided-stopping-50-attacks-details-lacking.shtml#c767</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Here's a question. Let's assume for the sake of argument that PRISM did, in fact, prevent terrorist attacks.<br />
Even if that was the case, the only reason it (hypothetically) worked was because the terrorists, like the American public, were unaware that their every action was being recorded for future reference.<br />
Given that PRISM is now publicly known, how can its continued existence be justified? "It stopped terrorist attacks in the past" is insufficient, because now terrorists know to avoid being monitored by it.<br />
<br />
Offhand, I'd say the NSA is due for massive budget cuts. They're clearly overfunded and desperate to remain that way. The NSA's budget is classified (of course), but a bit of searching shows that it was around $8 billion in 2008, with a few pundits estimating it to currently be at least $10 billion. $5 billion would probably be more appropriate.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Free speech is NOT links to infringing content.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130612/12373623425/mpaas-chris-dodd-will-be-chair-free-speech-week.shtml#c1466</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Milton Freewater]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 14:35:23 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130612/12373623425/mpaas-chris-dodd-will-be-chair-free-speech-week.shtml#c1466</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["Re: Free speech is NOT links to infringing content."<br />
<br />
Of course it is.<br />
<br />
Free speech means that the government cannot define content as infringing as an excuse to punish us for accessing it.<br />
<br />
Free speech has nothing to do with content creators trying to stop other people from plagarizing and unfairly redistributing their work. But that's apples and oranges.<br />
<br />
50 psycho posts per day on TechDirt do not make your same old BS overreach one bit more legitimate. You will always be wrong, and people who agree with you will always be a bigger threat to content creators and users than "piracy."]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/11500923509/its-come-to-this-commentators-arguing-that-press-commits-crime-exposing-nsa-surveillance.shtml#c227</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 14:33:36 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/11500923509/its-come-to-this-commentators-arguing-that-press-commits-crime-exposing-nsa-surveillance.shtml#c227</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Torch the idiotic system, revolution and rebuild, as humanity has always done.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/11212323508/how-knowing-government-is-spying-you-changes-how-you-act.shtml#c678</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 14:32:20 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/11212323508/how-knowing-government-is-spying-you-changes-how-you-act.shtml#c678</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The author of that column, John Bolton, is an American.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: OK, someone help me out here...</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130612/16480623431/us-chamber-commerce-bollywood-is-so-successful-without-strong-copyrights-that-it-will-fail-unless-india-strengthens-its.shtml#c363</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 14:31:25 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130612/16480623431/us-chamber-commerce-bollywood-is-so-successful-without-strong-copyrights-that-it-will-fail-unless-india-strengthens-its.shtml#c363</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The Chamber of Commerce <b>is not</b> the Department of Commerce.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/00483923515/nsas-lockbox-has-no-lock.shtml#c663</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 14:28:13 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/00483923515/nsas-lockbox-has-no-lock.shtml#c663</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[So, you think you should be allowed to know exactly what the NSA and/or the FBI is doing. And you should be allowed to scrutinize it. At the end of the Yellowbrick road you will find your fantasy land.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/11500923509/its-come-to-this-commentators-arguing-that-press-commits-crime-exposing-nsa-surveillance.shtml#c202</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 14:25:14 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/11500923509/its-come-to-this-commentators-arguing-that-press-commits-crime-exposing-nsa-surveillance.shtml#c202</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The United States is the government.  The people are its servants. Big Brother knows better than you.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/11212323508/how-knowing-government-is-spying-you-changes-how-you-act.shtml#c658</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 14:24:02 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/11212323508/how-knowing-government-is-spying-you-changes-how-you-act.shtml#c658</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>When you have no real downtime -- no time when you can be free from prying eyes, it messes with your brain in a really profound way.</blockquote><br />
<br />
Do you realize you've just made the case against Christianity?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Nintendo welcomes used games</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130616/20142123500/games-war-designer-cliff-bleszinski-used-games-must-be-killed-order-unsustainable-aaa-development-to-live.shtml#c1564</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Phillip]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 14:23:59 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130616/20142123500/games-war-designer-cliff-bleszinski-used-games-must-be-killed-order-unsustainable-aaa-development-to-live.shtml#c1564</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I wasn't saying it does. That is the only thing that is currently restricted. the latest shooter/sports/game etc they have one time use codes to try to capture money if you sell the game, and the new owner wants to play online.<br />
<br />
So with nintendo having shit for online support people don't care and the codes weren't worth the cost in infrastructure and support to implement. As far as I know there aren't any games on the 360/wii(u)/ps3 that tried to restrict single player. Some added "free" access to DLC or one time codes for "online" but that is it. This is all that people will be able to do with Sony or nintendo. Unless either company tried to stop a 3rd party there isn't DRM on either system is all I was pointing out since neither will do this with their games. Sony said they'll let publishers do whatever they think might work, and at the moment there is almost no 3rd part on the Wii U so it remains to be seen what if anything will happen]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: OK, someone help me out here...</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130612/16480623431/us-chamber-commerce-bollywood-is-so-successful-without-strong-copyrights-that-it-will-fail-unless-india-strengthens-its.shtml#c340</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 14:23:33 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130612/16480623431/us-chamber-commerce-bollywood-is-so-successful-without-strong-copyrights-that-it-will-fail-unless-india-strengthens-its.shtml#c340</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The US corporations and government think that they should rule the world.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Hey, Mike: India has 1,210,193,422 people! Should be FOUR times Hollywood!</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130612/16480623431/us-chamber-commerce-bollywood-is-so-successful-without-strong-copyrights-that-it-will-fail-unless-india-strengthens-its.shtml#c337</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Keroberos]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 14:23:16 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130612/16480623431/us-chamber-commerce-bollywood-is-so-successful-without-strong-copyrights-that-it-will-fail-unless-india-strengthens-its.shtml#c337</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><i>Four times the population should -- if the simplistic measure that Mike makes is valid -- mean four times the production.</i></blockquote>No, Population size has very little to do with <b><i>market</i></b> size. Anyone that understands even the most basic of economic principles knows that production of goods in a market is tied the the ability of that market to consume it. Excessive overproduction leads to market crashes. I don't see anywhere in the article where Mike measured India's film industry against anything. He used the only valid measure in economics; India's film industry seems to be successful and profitable at its current production levels. He used a <b><i>comparison</i></b> of the numbers of films produced in India vs. the number made in the US to help illustrate that point.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Sexually Transmitted Diseases</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20050609/1751216.shtml#c3652</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Linda M Silver]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 14:22:56 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20050609/1751216.shtml#c3652</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Email me asap; all boyfriends, girlfriends, married boyfriends &amp; gays 1989 to present. Email or call 7038435389]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/11500923509/its-come-to-this-commentators-arguing-that-press-commits-crime-exposing-nsa-surveillance.shtml#c191</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 14:20:13 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/11500923509/its-come-to-this-commentators-arguing-that-press-commits-crime-exposing-nsa-surveillance.shtml#c191</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The Federal Reserve is part of the problem, I agree!<br />
<br />
The other parts of the problem are the 16th and 17th Amendments passed by those early 20th century "Progressives"<br />
<br />
16th concentrates massive amounts of money in one place, the Federal Government.  Money leads to power and power leads to corruption.<br />
<br />
17th allowed mob rule eliminating the ability of individual states to have a say in how the federal government is run.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>You know what also is pretty clear...</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/11500923509/its-come-to-this-commentators-arguing-that-press-commits-crime-exposing-nsa-surveillance.shtml#c177</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 14:18:38 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/11500923509/its-come-to-this-commentators-arguing-that-press-commits-crime-exposing-nsa-surveillance.shtml#c177</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The 4th amendment.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Traitor Mike</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/11500923509/its-come-to-this-commentators-arguing-that-press-commits-crime-exposing-nsa-surveillance.shtml#c165</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 14:15:42 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/11500923509/its-come-to-this-commentators-arguing-that-press-commits-crime-exposing-nsa-surveillance.shtml#c165</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[They still have milkmen?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: OK, someone help me out here...</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130612/16480623431/us-chamber-commerce-bollywood-is-so-successful-without-strong-copyrights-that-it-will-fail-unless-india-strengthens-its.shtml#c322</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[That One Guy]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 14:15:35 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130612/16480623431/us-chamber-commerce-bollywood-is-so-successful-without-strong-copyrights-that-it-will-fail-unless-india-strengthens-its.shtml#c322</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[You forget, US government/corporate(not that there's much of a difference these days) thinking is that <b>every</b> country should do what the US tells them, with two of those 'suggestions' being 'never compete with US interests', and 'never make US law look bad by providing counter-examples', something that Bollywood is currently doing quite well.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/11500923509/its-come-to-this-commentators-arguing-that-press-commits-crime-exposing-nsa-surveillance.shtml#c149</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 14:12:14 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/11500923509/its-come-to-this-commentators-arguing-that-press-commits-crime-exposing-nsa-surveillance.shtml#c149</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[We as a country are screwed]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/11500923509/its-come-to-this-commentators-arguing-that-press-commits-crime-exposing-nsa-surveillance.shtml#c129</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lance]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 14:11:20 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/11500923509/its-come-to-this-commentators-arguing-that-press-commits-crime-exposing-nsa-surveillance.shtml#c129</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I reject his premise. Greenwald didn't violate 18USC798. The information release was not "prejudicial to the safety or interest of the United States" because WE are the United States, and WE need to know our gov't. is doing this crap. Neither was it "for the benefit of any foreign government to the detriment of the United States". <br />
 So no law has been violated. I do agree that it is a first amm. violation to prosecute the publisher if he did not personally break a law in obtaining the information.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/11500923509/its-come-to-this-commentators-arguing-that-press-commits-crime-exposing-nsa-surveillance.shtml#c123</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 14:10:24 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/11500923509/its-come-to-this-commentators-arguing-that-press-commits-crime-exposing-nsa-surveillance.shtml#c123</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[forgive me for being so ill informed, but: <br />
<br />
why would anyone ever want to purposefully contravene the Constitution, when it is what your country is built on and what people hold most dear?<br />
<br />
why would anyone ever want to bring in a law that makes contravening any part of the Constitution legal?<br />
<br />
even more to the point, why is a person(s) who wants to bring in a law that contravenes the Constitution even allowed to try??<br />
<br />
sounds a bit sus to me!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>So wait...</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/11500923509/its-come-to-this-commentators-arguing-that-press-commits-crime-exposing-nsa-surveillance.shtml#c116</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[That One Guy]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 14:09:17 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/11500923509/its-come-to-this-commentators-arguing-that-press-commits-crime-exposing-nsa-surveillance.shtml#c116</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[1. Government commits crime.<br />
2. Government classifies any data or evidence relating to said crime.<br />
3. Government makes it illegal to leak or even talk about classified information.<br />
4. Government finds itself in the position of being completely unaccountable for anything it does, as to expose their actions to public scrutiny and the possibility of justice one has to first break the law to do so, and even then evidence is forbidden from being presented, as it's 'classified', making any court case against the government impossible.<br />
<br />
And the <i>whistleblowers</i> are supposed to be the enemies of the country?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>