<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Latest Techdirt Comments</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Is that it?</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c211</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 06:30:55 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c211</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Well try again then.<br />
It's clearly stating that despite Kim making a bad move and being a dick, there's a strong case for others to support him.<br />
<br />
I bet you were home schooled...]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: &quot;I believe in sharing knowledge and ideas for the good of society.&quot;</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c190</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 06:29:37 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c190</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[How much money are you paid for this crap?<br />
<br />
The only thing more insane than your comments are the people who pay you money to do this.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c189</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 06:29:11 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c189</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Maybe it' that, maybe if the DoJ's crazy secondary liability ideas don't get kicked to the curb Google is likely in the firing lines.<br />
<br />
How do you manage to post so often without actually reading the article?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c159</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[OldGeezer]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 06:28:12 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c159</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[My bank's web site has been doing this for some time. I would think that the fact that this is such a common practice shows that there is nothing unique or patentable. Patents on such general concepts can only be used for one thing: trolling. I seriously doubt that anyone was even aware of Dotcom's patent and made a decision to steal it. This is not going to help him in his legal problems. It just makes him look so hypercritical.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Is that it?</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c171</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 06:28:12 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c171</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I read the article. What the fuck does this mean:<br />
<br />
<i>That's actually a pretty good reason for the tech industry to think about participating in the case even if they don't like Dotcom at all and don't want to be associated with him.</i><br />
<br />
To me, it implies that it's OK for these companies to capitulate to a patent troll because the ends justify the means.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c157</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Akari Mizunashi]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 06:27:06 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c157</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Well, as unpleasant as the demand looks, it's a sad state of affairs that those who are in this world have to use threats like this all the time.<br />
<br />
Personally, I see this as no different than Google's buyouts of patents. "Don't sue us or else!"<br />
<br />
I mean, by now everyone should know these laws aren't about protection of "rights".]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: &amp;quot;reasonably monetize what might be considered infringement under the law&amp;quot;</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c316</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 06:26:58 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c316</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I'm sorry to do this, but someone has to:<br />
<br />
Slavery was proven to work for more than two thousand years.<br />
<br />
Should we stick to that?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Already Long Established By Pete Abrams</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20130510/00083123031/cool-new-platform-supporting-artists-patreon-jack-conte.shtml#c203</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[harknell]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 06:25:20 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20130510/00083123031/cool-new-platform-supporting-artists-patreon-jack-conte.shtml#c203</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Pete Abrams, the creator of the webcomic "Sluggy Freelance" has had a system in place for a very long time called "The Defenders of the Nifty", which is essentially a subscription system to help him continue to make the comic. While he does have some special extras for these people, and gives them some info in advance, they primarily just want to support his work. If you have a strong enough fanbase this can work well--part of that "1000 True Fans" idea that came out a few years ago.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c154</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 06:24:08 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c154</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[But, but... this is different. It's <i>Kim Dotcom!!!</i>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Is that it?</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c135</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Howard]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 06:22:55 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c135</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[read the fuckin' article you chump]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c114</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 06:22:17 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c114</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[This is patent trolling at its finest, not even thinly veiled:<br />
<blockquote><em>I have this patent, see, and you infringe on it. It would be a shame if I had to go to court with you over it... why don't you just cooperate with me?</em></blockquote>Where, with most patent trolls, "cooperate" means "fork over some money", in this case it means... fork over some money.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c104</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 06:20:36 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c104</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["Kim Dotcom Threatens To Sue Google, Facebook And Twitter Over 2-Factor Authentication Patent If They Don't Help Him"<br />
<br />
Dumbass.<br />
<br />
That is all.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>&quot;reasonably monetize what might be considered infringement under the law&quot;</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c303</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[out_of_the_blue]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 06:20:14 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c303</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[OOOH, what a GREAT euphemism for "steal"! Props where due: ALL HAIL PIRATE MIKE!<br />
<br />
Anyhoo, this is LICENSING: "They're basically <b>licensing</b> the copyrights from certain popular works". -- SO LICENSING WORKS, OKAY? Due props plus some cash thrown their way are about all most creators ask.<br />
<br />
Just stick to traditional copyright, kids: it's proven for more than a hundred years to work. -- And on the other side, DON'T STEAL, that's been proven wrong for millenia.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c85</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 06:20:06 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c85</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>If this was any one else except the sainted Kim Dotcom, you would be all over them for being weasels and patent trolls. <br />
<br />
Is that it?</i><br />
<br />
Understand that not only is Masnick a shameless piracy apologist- he's also Dotcom's own 'mini-me'. You'll see nothing but adulation here.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Odd</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c280</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[horse with no name]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 06:18:54 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c280</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<b> the licensor controls the re-use rights.</b><br />
<br />
All that experience, and no clue!<br />
<br />
You don't know the content of the license that Amazon is obtaining.  You also still miss the point that Amazon would hold the rights to these stories, which they could then <b>sell to the licensor</b> to be developed into movies or other shows, etc.<br />
<br />
You seem to be thinking that Amazon's license would be very limited in scope, similar to someone making toys.  I doubt that would be the case, because it would keep them from hitting the financial jackpot.  This process looks more like crowdsourcing future TV scripts to me.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Is that it?</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c68</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[horse with no name]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 06:14:29 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c68</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[If this was any one else except the sainted Kim Dotcom, you would be all over them for being weasels and patent trolls.  <br />
<br />
Is that it?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c64</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 06:14:01 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c64</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i> Remember, Dotcom has been hit with racketeering claims, and I would think that anything that implies "give me money or I'll sue" isn't the best move for someone already facing racketeering charges.</i><br />
<br />
I'm sure the prosecutor is grateful to Dotcom for his assistance in his own prosecution.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: &amp;quot;I believe in sharing knowledge and ideas for the good of society.&amp;quot;</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c44</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roger]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 06:11:22 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c44</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[out_of_the_blue wrote:<br />
<br />
"If you're against copyright, quit putting your name on posts! You don't own the idea!<br />
02:00:36[c- 1-0]"<br />
<br />
Ownership and attribution are entirely separate concerns. Duh.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Just like a book deal, but worse</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c263</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[PaulT]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 06:10:59 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c263</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I agree. However, I wouldn't be surprised if the exclusivity was a condition of the licences being granted in the first place (i.e. perhaps the licence was only granted to books exclusively published by Amazon). We can only guess as to the behind the scenes wrangling that was needed to even get this far.<br />
<br />
However, as I've said elsewhere here, the author ultimately has the choice as to whether to accept this deal, upload for free anywhere or to publish a version with the copyrighted references removed, with the many other methods available. While there's still a choice, I don't see why this is too much of a problem. If an author doesn't like the deal, they don't have to take it - they just won't be able to legally monetise the work they based on copyrighted material while it still references that material.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: &quot;I believe in sharing knowledge and ideas for the good of society.&quot;</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c39</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 06:07:55 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c39</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[You believe Kim Dotcom stole the servers he let people use?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>