<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Latest Techdirt Comments</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title>Re: Put your Prenda time into developing views on copyright.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/16530423522/arizona-court-skeptical-medical-excuse-prenda-lawyers.shtml#c99</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Trelly]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 20:46:23 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/16530423522/arizona-court-skeptical-medical-excuse-prenda-lawyers.shtml#c99</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[So the title of this article contains the word Prenda. For whatever reason, you decided to read the story and comment on it.<br />
<br />
It should be obvious to you that these stories bring people in since you are feeding the machine yourself.<br />
<br />
And ... thanks!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Put your Prenda time into developing views on copyright.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/16530423522/arizona-court-skeptical-medical-excuse-prenda-lawyers.shtml#c87</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 20:45:21 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/16530423522/arizona-court-skeptical-medical-excuse-prenda-lawyers.shtml#c87</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[90 words until Mike.<br />
Google not mentioned.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/13581923535/microsoft-capitulates-removes-online-drm-xbox-one.shtml#c995</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 20:44:36 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/13581923535/microsoft-capitulates-removes-online-drm-xbox-one.shtml#c995</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Dang. First Windows 8, now this. This is definitely Microsoft's year for smugly trying to force stupid stuff on their potential customers, suffering massive backlash, and then eating humble pie.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/13581923535/microsoft-capitulates-removes-online-drm-xbox-one.shtml#c973</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[anon]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 20:44:31 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/13581923535/microsoft-capitulates-removes-online-drm-xbox-one.shtml#c973</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It seems that the "one-time system set-up with a new Xbox One" is to download a "day one" patch that will disable the built-in DRM. Thereafter, you don't need to go online to activate any game.<br />
<br />
Hopefully this patch is mandatory for everyone and that this policy change won't be undone at a future date.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Expected Techhive to be one of Mike's piratey pals...</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130619/01031623524/more-details-emerge-as-states-attorneys-general-seek-to-hold-back-innovation-internet.shtml#c285</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[JMT]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 20:40:51 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130619/01031623524/more-details-emerge-as-states-attorneys-general-seek-to-hold-back-innovation-internet.shtml#c285</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>"While television stations and newspapers would be easily prosecutable for such behavior..."</i><br />
<br />
Hard to take seriously someone who compares a search engine to TV and newspapers. Not hard for Blue though...]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Direct TV Ripoff Artists</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20040312/1522218.shtml#c1278</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stacey]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 20:37:59 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20040312/1522218.shtml#c1278</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I have the best programming Direct TV has to offer and I pay a prime rate for this service. One of my genie receivers started giving me trouble about 6 months into my 2 year contract. After being on the phone for over 2 hours per call many times they decided to send out a service tech. That is when she told me I had to pay for the service call and any equipment needed to repair the service. I stated I have the $7.99 a month protection plan, she responded that will reduce the service call to $0 but I would still need to pay for any equipment (average cost 100.00+). She also said the service calls are only 8 am to noon or noon to 4pm mon- fri. Now let me get this straight I pay for a service, I pay for the equipment and I pay for the protection plan each month totaling well over $200.00 but yet it covers nothing. In addition my time away from work, time spent on the phone have no value and if I want out I have to pay! This sounds like a completely one sided game and the only looser is me! They need to pay or make some serious changes, how do I complain to the right people?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130619/10395523531/next-time-someone-says-twitter-is-killing-deep-thinking-with-short-quick-messages-show-them-this.shtml#c458</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 20:37:00 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130619/10395523531/next-time-someone-says-twitter-is-killing-deep-thinking-with-short-quick-messages-show-them-this.shtml#c458</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Civilization has changed dramatically over the last 200 years, but the people living in it haven't changed in well over 2000. People are people, throughout the world, and throughout time.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/16530423522/arizona-court-skeptical-medical-excuse-prenda-lawyers.shtml#c67</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 20:33:31 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/16530423522/arizona-court-skeptical-medical-excuse-prenda-lawyers.shtml#c67</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[out_of_the_blue, average_joe, horse with no name and John Steele just hate it when due process is enforced.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/02025423448/company-claims-patent-pop-up-ads-sues-porn-travel-companies.shtml#c351</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[totalz]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 20:30:03 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/02025423448/company-claims-patent-pop-up-ads-sues-porn-travel-companies.shtml#c351</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I do get pop-under from time to time, but the ads pic are already blocked, and usually that window will close itself!<br />
<br />
Talk about the innovation of scams, US of A is always on top...]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Put your Prenda time into developing views on copyright.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/16530423522/arizona-court-skeptical-medical-excuse-prenda-lawyers.shtml#c50</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 20:29:41 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/16530423522/arizona-court-skeptical-medical-excuse-prenda-lawyers.shtml#c50</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[DIAF you POS troll. So sick of you.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/11215823532/supreme-court-says-pharmas-pay-delay-agreements-may-violate-antitrust-law.shtml#c84</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 20:27:14 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/11215823532/supreme-court-says-pharmas-pay-delay-agreements-may-violate-antitrust-law.shtml#c84</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Put your Prenda time into developing views on copyright.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/16530423522/arizona-court-skeptical-medical-excuse-prenda-lawyers.shtml#c34</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[sophisticatedjanedoe]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 20:26:45 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/16530423522/arizona-court-skeptical-medical-excuse-prenda-lawyers.shtml#c34</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I begged you!<br />
<br />
(On the other hand, thank you: one can reply anything to a soon-be-flagged post as an excuse to check "Email me" checkbox.)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Put your Prenda time into developing views on copyright.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/16530423522/arizona-court-skeptical-medical-excuse-prenda-lawyers.shtml#c20</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[out_of_the_blue]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 20:23:33 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/16530423522/arizona-court-skeptical-medical-excuse-prenda-lawyers.shtml#c20</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It's obvious that you relish these follies sheerly because of their copyright trolling, but don't kid yourself that whatever happens to this bunch of lawyers has any import for the everyday good of copyright. You just desperately want to claim a victory in the area, and this is close as you get.<br />
<br />
<br />
<i>Take a loopy tour of <b>Techdirt.com!</b> You always end up same place!</i><br />
<a href='http://techdirt.com/' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://techdirt.com/</a><br />
ZOMG! Yet another item on Prenda Law! A staple in the <i>soporific</i> "At The Bench" series. Mike sez (short version): <b>"Wow. Wow. Wow. ... The story is gripping.</b>"<br />
<a href='http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130303/23353022182/prenda-law-sues-critics-defamation.shtml' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130303/23353022182/prenda-law-sues-critics-defamation.shtml</a><br />
<i>16:22:52[r-485-7]</i>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/13581923535/microsoft-capitulates-removes-online-drm-xbox-one.shtml#c950</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[totalz]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 20:19:44 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/13581923535/microsoft-capitulates-removes-online-drm-xbox-one.shtml#c950</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Smart to delay buy...<br />
<br />
Rules are rules, but M$ can bend them anytime anyway it wants!  So is $ony!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: So...</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130619/01031623524/more-details-emerge-as-states-attorneys-general-seek-to-hold-back-innovation-internet.shtml#c260</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 20:10:39 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130619/01031623524/more-details-emerge-as-states-attorneys-general-seek-to-hold-back-innovation-internet.shtml#c260</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[We don't blame AT&amp;T because someone used the phone to help them commit a crime.  Better?  Good enough analogy for you?<br />
<br />
Or do you want to be a bigger Luddite?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: &quot;laws against unpaid internships are kind of silly&quot;</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/01121423439/hollywood-studios-keep-saying-its-employees-must-get-paid-now-may-be-forced-to-pay-its-interns.shtml#c1535</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 20:06:46 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/01121423439/hollywood-studios-keep-saying-its-employees-must-get-paid-now-may-be-forced-to-pay-its-interns.shtml#c1535</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>No, I believe that they're the copyright equivalent of Rush Limbaugh "dittoheads." Someone comes up with an idiotic talking point, and they all repeat it.</i><br />
<br />
Oh, you mean like: "SOPA will break the internet"? Or "SOPA will put Justin Bieber in jail"? Something like that?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>From Star Wars...</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/10213023529/fbi-admits-to-using-drones-to-spy-americans.shtml#c774</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[MAC]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 20:05:36 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/10213023529/fbi-admits-to-using-drones-to-spy-americans.shtml#c774</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[We are witnessing the death of the Republic to thunderous applause.<br />
<br />
However, in our case, it's probably apathy and indifference.<br />
<br />
No time for politics, gotta make my car payment, mortgage payment, get next to the cute blond, take the kids to school...<br />
<br />
There are so many excuses. <br />
<br />
Then, all of sudden and before you know it:<br />
<br />
It's 3 am:<br />
KNOCK! KNOCK! KNOCK! BAM!<br />
Don't worry sir, this is for your own protection. Just put your hands behind your back while we put this black hood over your head...<br />
Your family? What family...]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Lots of room to debate drones</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/10213023529/fbi-admits-to-using-drones-to-spy-americans.shtml#c756</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[art guerrilla]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 20:01:57 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/10213023529/fbi-admits-to-using-drones-to-spy-americans.shtml#c756</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[1. i can imagine drones making a VERY useful technology for society in general...<br />
<br />
2. with the exception of search &amp; rescue ops (which should not necessarily be a police/military function), i can ONLY imagine horrific consequences for this technology in the hands of the police-military (difficult to tell apart these days: our mercenaries, oops, military 'police' countries a half a planet away, and our police make war on the citizens here...<br />
<br />
3. all we have to do to understand how police-military use of drones within the US, is to see how they are used on the rest of the world...   which many legal minds and moral leaders (all four of them!) make an arguable case for the use of drones constituting war crimes...<br />
if its a war crime 'over there', why ain't it a war crime 'over here' ? ? ?<br />
<br />
4. lastly, the MOST scary prospect in this inhumane drone usage (and -not coincidentally- 'warrantless wiretapping', 'TIA' shit), is establishing the 'legal/moral principle' (sic), that use of unobtrusive, undetectable surveillance techniques make the 4th amendment obsolete...<br />
<br />
*aside* from the mere factoid that 99%+ of our kongresskritters piss on the constitution and bill of rights on *at least* a three-month basis; *aside* from how our modern 'papers and effects' have mutated to a digital world unanticipated, BUT WHICH SHOULD STILL BE COVERED; and *aside* from the dubious value of these insane systems; i am looking in my popular science speculation crystal ball, and it ain't too long out where we have 'nanobots' of various scales...<br />
if we establish the 'principle' that unobtrusive surveillance is 'okay', then what is to stop The They (tm) from putting a nanobot up your butt ? ? ? <br />
<br />
nothing but a threadbare pair of tidy whities...<br />
<br />
art guerrilla<br />
aka ann archy<br />
eof]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>What is seldom?</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/10213023529/fbi-admits-to-using-drones-to-spy-americans.shtml#c731</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[MAC]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 19:57:31 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/10213023529/fbi-admits-to-using-drones-to-spy-americans.shtml#c731</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[What exactly do they mean by seldom or limited?<br />
<br />
What exactly do they mean? 0.005 percent seems like a reasonable figure for seldom and limited.<br />
<br />
If it is just 0.005 percent of the population was watched by a drone then do the math:<br />
300,000,000 X 0.005 = 1500000. <br />
<br />
That's 1.5 million people!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: The Real Enemy</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/10213023529/fbi-admits-to-using-drones-to-spy-americans.shtml#c727</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[MAC]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 19:52:10 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/10213023529/fbi-admits-to-using-drones-to-spy-americans.shtml#c727</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[You got it wrong; they are 'sworn' to uphold.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>