<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Latest Techdirt Comments</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/03160923172/chinese-hacks-google-database-surveillance-targets-highlight-how-dumb-technology-backdoors-are.shtml#c61</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 15:16:13 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/03160923172/chinese-hacks-google-database-surveillance-targets-highlight-how-dumb-technology-backdoors-are.shtml#c61</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I like how this Magical Christmas Land thinking seems to permeate the paradox crumple-zones in both Government and Business.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Circumvent FOIA</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/03160923172/chinese-hacks-google-database-surveillance-targets-highlight-how-dumb-technology-backdoors-are.shtml#c51</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 15:14:53 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/03160923172/chinese-hacks-google-database-surveillance-targets-highlight-how-dumb-technology-backdoors-are.shtml#c51</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Given the FOIA request success track record, if you believe you're being spied on by the U.S. government, it's probably a lot more effective to just hack into Google and find out if you are than to request this information under FOIA.<br />
<br />
So, yeah, this makes perfect sense to me!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Return to active duty</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/17321623162/released-video-silva-beating-shows-his-last-moments-video-actual-beating-still-missing.shtml#c229</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 15:13:40 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/17321623162/released-video-silva-beating-shows-his-last-moments-video-actual-beating-still-missing.shtml#c229</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><i>The May 20th [KERO 23 ABC] linked article has the same line</i></blockquote><br />
<br />
Not sure if you're agreeing with me or not.  I think that May 20th <i>KERO 23ABC News</i> bit is just sourced from the May 13th <i>Californian</i> article.  I can't find anything more recent in the <i>Californian</i>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>After hearing the things my kids try to pawn off on me as excuses...</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/01321523153/kitchen-nightmares-lawyers-threaten-infamous-samy-amy-if-they-talk-about-their-experience-show.shtml#c450</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 15:12:16 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/01321523153/kitchen-nightmares-lawyers-threaten-infamous-samy-amy-if-they-talk-about-their-experience-show.shtml#c450</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I always wondered that if those 2 were in some kind of 'gangster/mob boss' type trouble, and if they keep themselves in the limelight, maybe they won't get bumped off and not thought twice about. <br />
<br />
However, if they are well known accross the country, the hit men wouldn't dare expose themselves to this much pagentry. <br />
<br />
Naa...they are just a couple of old people determined not to just 'fade away as a nobody'.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/19190923142/if-youre-going-to-illegally-seize-citizens-cell-phones-least-make-sure-youre-grabbing-right-ones.shtml#c1199</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 15:12:14 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/19190923142/if-youre-going-to-illegally-seize-citizens-cell-phones-least-make-sure-youre-grabbing-right-ones.shtml#c1199</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[(That is, my ability to uncover the truth behind a potential murder rests at the mercy of the very suspects of murder thanks to the actions of those suspected who took the potential evidence. The very suspects of murder have taken it upon themselves to steal the alleged evidence convicting them of murder. Once that alleged evidence is in the possession of those suspects those suspects need to be presumed guilty until proven innocent. They now hold the burden of proving their innocence).]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/16402423161/first-hand-account-judicial-smackdown-prenda-minnesota.shtml#c1239</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[anonymouse]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 15:11:12 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/16402423161/first-hand-account-judicial-smackdown-prenda-minnesota.shtml#c1239</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Yes there are worse cases out there, but there are many sites to go and read about them if you can find them.<br />
<br />
 This is of specific interest to the readers of this site as regards the illegal use of copyright laws.<br />
And the site would not be posting these stories if it did not attract the people who use the site to comment about how much fun they are having reading these stories, If it does not interest you techdirt has many other stories about other subjects regarding copyright violations and misuses etc.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/19190923142/if-youre-going-to-illegally-seize-citizens-cell-phones-least-make-sure-youre-grabbing-right-ones.shtml#c1185</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 15:07:23 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/19190923142/if-youre-going-to-illegally-seize-citizens-cell-phones-least-make-sure-youre-grabbing-right-ones.shtml#c1185</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Even if, as you  said, the cops are innocent, which is highly unlikely, for them to put themselves in a situation where my ability to uncover the truth is at their mercy is unacceptable and warrants the presumption of guilt until proven innocent. Anything less is unjust. The moment the cops took the potentially incriminating evidence against them my ability to uncover the truth rests at their mercy. They can claim the footage never existed, though that's very very unlikely. There is no good reason this person would lie about the footage they shot. They can essentially do what they want, some bogus forensic analysis circus could all be fabricated, and my ability to uncover the truth rests at their mercy. We, as a society, should as a rule presume guilt under these circumstances unless innocence is proven. Anything less encourages future cops to wrongfully take evidence potentially incriminating them and makes it advantageous for cops to do so. Unacceptable.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/19190923142/if-youre-going-to-illegally-seize-citizens-cell-phones-least-make-sure-youre-grabbing-right-ones.shtml#c1166</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 15:01:35 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/19190923142/if-youre-going-to-illegally-seize-citizens-cell-phones-least-make-sure-youre-grabbing-right-ones.shtml#c1166</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[If we make it a rule that guilty cops who confiscate and destroy evidence against them can get away with it we are all worse off. Allowing these police officers not to be convicted of murder makes this rule a reality. That's unacceptable.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: It's like Tethering all over again</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20130521/20101423164/att-says-you-can-use-any-video-streaming-app-you-want-just-as-soon-as-it-can-get-meter-running.shtml#c206</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[DannyB]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 14:59:19 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20130521/20101423164/att-says-you-can-use-any-video-streaming-app-you-want-just-as-soon-as-it-can-get-meter-running.shtml#c206</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[You miss the point complete.<br />
<br />
Going over your data plan limit is entirely unrelated to whether you can use your data for your phone or your laptop.  You can do one without the other.<br />
<br />
I used it a lot on my laptop and never went over my cap.  Never came close.<br />
<br />
Aren't the carriers supposed to warn you when you are getting close to your limit anyway?  Didn't the FCC require this?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/16402423161/first-hand-account-judicial-smackdown-prenda-minnesota.shtml#c1222</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 14:58:28 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/16402423161/first-hand-account-judicial-smackdown-prenda-minnesota.shtml#c1222</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["In parting, she addressed Paul Hansmeier, once again saying, "I believe you to be in violation of a whole lot of rules." She then repeated her earlier statement that she was forwarding the case folder to the Lawyers Board.<br />
<br />
And that was the end. Judge Alton then called a recess before the next case."<br />
<br />
I beg to differ, if she refers this to the Lawyer's Board it is only the beginning.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: It's like Tethering all over again</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20130521/20101423164/att-says-you-can-use-any-video-streaming-app-you-want-just-as-soon-as-it-can-get-meter-running.shtml#c200</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[DannyB]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 14:56:56 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20130521/20101423164/att-says-you-can-use-any-video-streaming-app-you-want-just-as-soon-as-it-can-get-meter-running.shtml#c200</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[That's what I did.<br />
<br />
I used my own means to tether like there was no tomorrow and never heard diddly squat from AT&amp;T.  I didn't exceed my plan limit on data.  In fact, I never usually even come close -- including when tethering.<br />
<br />
Unfortunately, most people cannot just "use their own means" to implement tethering to a custom app.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/19190923142/if-youre-going-to-illegally-seize-citizens-cell-phones-least-make-sure-youre-grabbing-right-ones.shtml#c1157</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 14:56:26 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/19190923142/if-youre-going-to-illegally-seize-citizens-cell-phones-least-make-sure-youre-grabbing-right-ones.shtml#c1157</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[You do not, under any circumstances, murder someone and then take the footage to hide your guilt. That's what the cops did here. Those recording the footage had no reason to lie. The cops forcefully took the footage because they knew darn well they were guilty. They should be responsible for having strong evidence (footage) proving their innocence and they failed to provide any. They took what they thought was the only incriminating footage against them (though they failed, apparently) and destroyed it. It would violate rule utility principles to just let them get away with this. As a rule we as a society need to make it known that, under these circumstances, cops have a huge burden to prove their innocence, a burden they have failed to meet. Otherwise future cops will have no problems doing the same thing. I want convictions. What the cops did here is wrong. They should be presumed guilty.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Their loss</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20130521/20101423164/att-says-you-can-use-any-video-streaming-app-you-want-just-as-soon-as-it-can-get-meter-running.shtml#c185</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[PRMan]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 14:54:21 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20130521/20101423164/att-says-you-can-use-any-video-streaming-app-you-want-just-as-soon-as-it-can-get-meter-running.shtml#c185</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Sprint has unlimited everything and doesn't play these sorts of games...]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/19190923142/if-youre-going-to-illegally-seize-citizens-cell-phones-least-make-sure-youre-grabbing-right-ones.shtml#c1137</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 14:52:30 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/19190923142/if-youre-going-to-illegally-seize-citizens-cell-phones-least-make-sure-youre-grabbing-right-ones.shtml#c1137</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[(of wrongfully confiscating potentially incriminating evidence against the cops *)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/18265123163/reporters-find-exposed-personal-data-via-google-threatened-with-cfaa-charges.shtml#c603</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[alanbleiweiss]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 14:52:23 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/18265123163/reporters-find-exposed-personal-data-via-google-threatened-with-cfaa-charges.shtml#c603</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[A citation for it? yeah half the search marketing industry. As an SEO audit professional I routinely encounter it.  They list URLs, but beneath them, where a description of the file would go is a statement <br />
<br />
<blockquote>A description for this result is not available because of this site's robots.txt</blockquote>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/19190923142/if-youre-going-to-illegally-seize-citizens-cell-phones-least-make-sure-youre-grabbing-right-ones.shtml#c1117</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 14:50:30 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/19190923142/if-youre-going-to-illegally-seize-citizens-cell-phones-least-make-sure-youre-grabbing-right-ones.shtml#c1117</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[You're not  making any sense. Why would Tello need an attorney for doing nothing wrong? You still have done nothing to absolve the police of guilt and, if anything, your post supports their guilt.<br />
<br />
What's suspicious here is the fact that the phone was being quarantined until the cops had a chance to get a hold of it and erase evidence potentially incriminating them before any potential information leaked. That's unacceptable. Given the current circumstances it would unjustly violate rule utility principles not to convict these police officers with murder. If we as a society do not convict police officers with murder under these circumstances then we have made it advantageous to guilty police officers under these circumstances to get a hold of evidence and either destroy it or put it through some investigative circus (ie: the FBI forensic analysis circus) than for them to allow the person shooting the footage to publicly release copies. No, we as a society should, as a rule, discourage this sort of unacceptable behavior (of wrongfully confiscating potentially incriminating evidence) and punish these police officers presuming their guilt. Anything less is an outrageous injustice. I want murder convictions. I want future cops to know that, under these circumstances, you better not take any evidence potentially incriminating you unless you first have very good evidence supporting your innocence (video footage). Some forensic analysis circus doesn't count. This is an outrage. I want convictions here.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Return to active duty</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/17321623162/released-video-silva-beating-shows-his-last-moments-video-actual-beating-still-missing.shtml#c226</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Trails]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 14:44:31 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/17321623162/released-video-silva-beating-shows-his-last-moments-video-actual-beating-still-missing.shtml#c226</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The May 20th <a href="http://www.turnto23.com/news/local-news/cellphone-video-of-alleged-beating-death-of-david-silva-to-be-released" rel="nofollow">linked article</a> has the same line you mentioned above:<br />
<br />
<blockquote>It is common to place law enforcement officers on paid leave during investigations of arrest-related deaths, but the Californian reported the deputies involved remain on duty.<br />
<br />
"We're following the same protocol, as far as the administrative process is concerned, that we'd follow in similar-type incidents," sheriff's spokesman Ray Pruitt said.</blockquote>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/03160923172/chinese-hacks-google-database-surveillance-targets-highlight-how-dumb-technology-backdoors-are.shtml#c38</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[lordbinky]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 14:43:28 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/03160923172/chinese-hacks-google-database-surveillance-targets-highlight-how-dumb-technology-backdoors-are.shtml#c38</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Obviously the hackers would have never thought of this until people brought it up. Thanks alot guys....]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Use Your Own Content</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/01382223168/new-york-times-tells-startup-it-cant-even-mention-ny-times.shtml#c578</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[anonymouse]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 14:43:22 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/01382223168/new-york-times-tells-startup-it-cant-even-mention-ny-times.shtml#c578</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[How can you steal something from someone when it is readily available to all at no cost. with no advertising either.<br />
<br />
and your confusion shows the problem with everyone, not even the lawyers knowing what is covered by fair use and what is not.<br />
<br />
The reason i believe this is fair use is the fact that they claim it took 6 months to create , while scroll is releasing software that does the same in an hour, how are you going to be able to compare when you cannot use the original.<br />
<br />
And this is not about generating money from the content, the content is used as an example, which is allowed in fair use laws i believe or hope as nobody seems to know at the moment.<br />
<br />
Also the artwork you mention previously was stolen to generate money from advertising, this is not the case here.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Their loss</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20130521/20101423164/att-says-you-can-use-any-video-streaming-app-you-want-just-as-soon-as-it-can-get-meter-running.shtml#c166</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 14:41:13 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20130521/20101423164/att-says-you-can-use-any-video-streaming-app-you-want-just-as-soon-as-it-can-get-meter-running.shtml#c166</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I nearly purchased a Galaxy S4 through AT&amp;T, but after hearing this news I decided firmly against it and will go with a different provider.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>