<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Latest Techdirt Comments</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/21222323165/another-ca-cop-thinks-cell-phone-might-be-dangerous-weapon.shtml#c267</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 09:24:59 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/21222323165/another-ca-cop-thinks-cell-phone-might-be-dangerous-weapon.shtml#c267</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[(or if this person is one of the people, or from a group of people, the group being questioned by cops might 'snitch' on and this person is potentially intimidating the group being questioned. Again, without context, this is difficult to judge)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>From the  &quot;just-what-we-need,-more-laws&quot; department</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/18284623180/yet-another-anti-patent-troll-bill-introduced-congress.shtml#c141</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steph Kennedy, IPTT]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 09:23:09 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/18284623180/yet-another-anti-patent-troll-bill-introduced-congress.shtml#c141</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I'll never be convinced that the government is the right place to solve this problem, beyond cleaning up the USPTO so stupid patents don't get granted in the first place.  But it is encouraging I suppose that at least the noise level is high enough now to convince people that patent trolling is a real and very serious issue facing American businesses!<br />
<br />
Besides, Cornyn is a hometown boy for me so you gotta side with a Texan if at all possible!<br />
<br />
Just sayin',<br />
<br />
IPTT]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Turnabout is fair play</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/17515223193/riaa-copyright-reform-we-need-is-to-make-everyone-else-copyright-cops.shtml#c757</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[DannyB]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 09:22:42 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/17515223193/riaa-copyright-reform-we-need-is-to-make-everyone-else-copyright-cops.shtml#c757</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[&gt; THAT'S A LIE! -- I can look at MOST OF the content on Rapidshare<br />
&gt; or whatever "file host", and KNOW beyond doubt that it's not authorized.<br />
<br />
Either you can or cannot tell if it is authorized.  Let's examine each.<br />
<br />
1. You can tell if it is authorized or not.<br />
<br />
Then why do your paymasters take down their own videos and music that is authorized?<br />
<br />
If it is unauthorized, can you tell if it is fair use?  A song incidentally in the background (in poor quality) of someone's video of their child.<br />
<br />
And, as someone else points out, if you can absolutely tell, then why do you file bogus takedowns on content that is not even yours?  There should be a gigantic penalty for that.<br />
<br />
<br />
2. You cannot tell if it is fair use.<br />
<br />
Then how can you expect anyone else to tell?<br />
<br />
You are therefore full of #$%@! for saying you can tell.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Chilling...</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/18225323199/president-obama-is-troubled-about-chilling-effects-his-own-administration-is-causing-to-journalism.shtml#c558</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mr. Applegate]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 09:22:28 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/18225323199/president-obama-is-troubled-about-chilling-effects-his-own-administration-is-causing-to-journalism.shtml#c558</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[For those of us who know history we may not need to 'look up' the quote.<br />
<br />
Second point, not that I agree with the patriot act at all because I don't, but Obama is no better, he supported it's renewal and did you not read in this very article?<blockquote>'The Obama administration has used the Espionage Act against more cases of whistleblowing to the press than all other Presidents combined. That's not about "striking the right balance." '</blockquote>so Obama is just as bad, if not worse when it comes to protecting our liberties.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Innovation?  Try Predation!</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c622</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 09:21:55 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c622</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[You missed the point Einstein. I'm suggesting that she's a writer like Marcus Carab is a singer.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: &quot;Don't ask the meaning of a folly, ask only what it accomplishes.&quot;</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/21222323165/another-ca-cop-thinks-cell-phone-might-be-dangerous-weapon.shtml#c258</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 09:20:59 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/21222323165/another-ca-cop-thinks-cell-phone-might-be-dangerous-weapon.shtml#c258</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Why am I not surprised at all that you can pull Ayn Rand quotes out of your ass?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/21222323165/another-ca-cop-thinks-cell-phone-might-be-dangerous-weapon.shtml#c235</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 09:20:05 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/21222323165/another-ca-cop-thinks-cell-phone-might-be-dangerous-weapon.shtml#c235</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[To clarify, the metal box was an actual part of the phone, not just used for storing it.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Too many thieves and pirates break ANY business model.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/17515223193/riaa-copyright-reform-we-need-is-to-make-everyone-else-copyright-cops.shtml#c753</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ruben]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 09:16:30 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/17515223193/riaa-copyright-reform-we-need-is-to-make-everyone-else-copyright-cops.shtml#c753</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[How's this: the RIAA and their ilk are the biggest pussies out there.<br />
<br />
They're too scared to go after infringers directly for whatever reason(possibly, as has been pointed out repeatedly, that they truly are their biggest customers), and instead go for this underhanded DMCA takedown and six strikes. Then they whine about how it's not working.<br />
<br />
No one respects copyright. It's just insanely overreaching.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Just another politician.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/15495123189/ron-paul-doesnt-win-ronpaulcom-is-guilty-reverse-domain-hijacking.shtml#c331</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[silverscarcat]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 09:15:40 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/15495123189/ron-paul-doesnt-win-ronpaulcom-is-guilty-reverse-domain-hijacking.shtml#c331</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Ron Paul's been consistent with most of his positions over the years.<br />
<br />
Which is, despite his ideas at times, the biggest draw to him.<br />
<br />
There's some hypocrisy, but we're human, we're all hypocrites, but at the same time, he was always against wars like Afghanistan, Iraq, Vietnam, the bombings that Clinton did in in the late 90s, he was against the sanctions of Iraq, stating that something bad would happen to the US (back in 1998 he called that).  He warned against the Housing Bubble Collapse in 2003/2004, he wanted to get rid of paper money and replace it with coined money (as it's harder to manipulate), even if I disagree with his position on it needing to be gold or silver, at least he's always been consistent about it.<br />
<br />
Paul wanted to pull troops home from around the world and turn the money that the US was spending on foreign entanglements towards our infrastructure...<br />
<br />
So, yeah, his ideas might not always be the best ones, but looking at his record, he was the best candidate that never became President.<br />
<br />
Also, he never voted for raising pay for members of Congress.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/21222323165/another-ca-cop-thinks-cell-phone-might-be-dangerous-weapon.shtml#c220</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 09:11:12 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/21222323165/another-ca-cop-thinks-cell-phone-might-be-dangerous-weapon.shtml#c220</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Oops, responded to the wrong person. Meant to make an addendum to my last post about watching part two of the video.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/21222323165/another-ca-cop-thinks-cell-phone-might-be-dangerous-weapon.shtml#c202</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 09:10:41 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/21222323165/another-ca-cop-thinks-cell-phone-might-be-dangerous-weapon.shtml#c202</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I think these issues can be a bit more subtle. It's hard to tell (I haven't watched all three videos yet to know) the extent that the person recording is associated with the group. I can see why the cop would ask the person in part two to either sit down or stand further away otherwise the cop would be unable to turn his back to the cameraman (who can then potentially attack the cop or remove evidence from the scene when no one is moving). It's also hard to tell what previous engagements exist, there could have been prior contexts where this person has had issues with the cops on similar issues and that's why the cops just want this person out of the way.<br />
<br />
Also, if the person is not associated with the group there could be an issue of privacy if the camera holder is really close to the cops discussing the matter. Perhaps the group being questioned by the cops don't want cameras on them. Granted, they are in a public place but when being questioned by cops they maybe asked private questions or questions that they may not want on tape, especially if those questions involve giving the cops useful information on other people who may retaliate.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Too many thieves and pirates break ANY business model.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/17515223193/riaa-copyright-reform-we-need-is-to-make-everyone-else-copyright-cops.shtml#c743</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gwiz]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 09:10:41 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/17515223193/riaa-copyright-reform-we-need-is-to-make-everyone-else-copyright-cops.shtml#c743</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i> Attacks of all kinds are about the only response. </i><br />
<br />
<br />
Bullshit, Blue.<br />
<br />
You have been refuted so many times that it's becoming pathetic. Any argument that disproves what you say you simply ignore and pretend it doesn't exist.<br />
<br />
It must be getting pretty hard to type with your head buried that far in the sand.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/21222323165/another-ca-cop-thinks-cell-phone-might-be-dangerous-weapon.shtml#c199</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Leigh Beadon]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 09:10:37 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/21222323165/another-ca-cop-thinks-cell-phone-might-be-dangerous-weapon.shtml#c199</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I've often wondered... Would it be illegal to <em>tell</em> a cop that your cellphone is live-streaming and cloud-saving the footage, even if it wasn't? (Occurred to me after a scene in Cory Doctorow's Makers, when a journalist whose phone actually <em>is</em> doing that puts a cop on the spot -- "you're being watched live right now" -- and gets him to back down)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Bad idea</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20121101/03265320901/eff-reminds-us-that-open-wifi-isnt-bad-thing-should-actually-be-encouraged.shtml#c670</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[anonymous]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 09:06:55 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20121101/03265320901/eff-reminds-us-that-open-wifi-isnt-bad-thing-should-actually-be-encouraged.shtml#c670</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[If all of the bandwidth in the world was shared, people wouldn't have space for larger downloads because it would ALL be choked by EVERYONE. I like to download and watch videos and I like them quick.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/21222323165/another-ca-cop-thinks-cell-phone-might-be-dangerous-weapon.shtml#c179</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymouse]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 09:04:58 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/21222323165/another-ca-cop-thinks-cell-phone-might-be-dangerous-weapon.shtml#c179</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Finger guns are no laughing matter...<br />
<br />
<a href='http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QJzni-eqOiw' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QJzni-eqOiw</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/21222323165/another-ca-cop-thinks-cell-phone-might-be-dangerous-weapon.shtml#c158</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 09:04:25 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/21222323165/another-ca-cop-thinks-cell-phone-might-be-dangerous-weapon.shtml#c158</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Watch part two of the video.<br />
<br />
<a href='http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GmZkN2PFhAw' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GmZkN2PFhAw</a><br />
<br />
I'm not necessarily siding with the cops but the person recording this thing also seems to be annoying and possibly interfering.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/21222323165/another-ca-cop-thinks-cell-phone-might-be-dangerous-weapon.shtml#c152</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 09:03:48 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/21222323165/another-ca-cop-thinks-cell-phone-might-be-dangerous-weapon.shtml#c152</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Next they'll be arresting 7 year olds for throwing imaginary hand grenades.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Copyright</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/01382223168.shtml#c1346</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[nasch]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 09:03:08 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/01382223168.shtml#c1346</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>Not intending to commit a crime is not a defense for committing a crime. Even if Scroll Kit weren't intending to monetize this, though they clearly are, the effect would be that they are actually benefitting commercially, directly from this promotional material. </i><br />
<br />
Commercial use is only part of one of the four factors used to determine fair use.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/21222323165/another-ca-cop-thinks-cell-phone-might-be-dangerous-weapon.shtml#c144</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jessie]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 09:02:20 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/21222323165/another-ca-cop-thinks-cell-phone-might-be-dangerous-weapon.shtml#c144</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Come on.  Have you seen pictures of these guns?  They are pointed down the length of the camera, coming out the top near where the old school antenas would be.  The cameras on most all phones are located on the front or back of the camera, not the top.  <a href='http://www.hoax-slayer.com/cell-phone-guns.shtml' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://www.hoax-slayer.com/cell-phone-guns.shtml</a><br />
<br />
Unfortunately, I suspect we'll have to wait for a tragic event, probably involving the loss of life of a cell phone owner to see anything done to stop this.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/01382223168.shtml#c1330</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[nasch]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 09:02:15 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/01382223168.shtml#c1330</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i> It's about using copyrighted content to promote a commercial service without permission. </i><br />
<br />
The point is that if it's fair use (and of course you can disagree about that) then permission isn't required.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>