<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Latest Techdirt Comments</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/18102623141/so-its-come-to-this-seven-high-school-students-arrested-throwing-water-balloons.shtml#c1406</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 12:14:37 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/18102623141/so-its-come-to-this-seven-high-school-students-arrested-throwing-water-balloons.shtml#c1406</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>Can you actually trespass at a public school?</i><br />
<br />
Yeah. If you are an adult from the outside and don't have any legitimate reason to be there, the school administration has every right to deny you access to school grounds.<br />
<br />
Of course, Kevin Hines, as a parent of a student, certainly had every right to be at the school.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Pure Half-Assed CYA ...</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/18265123163/reporters-find-exposed-personal-data-via-google-threatened-with-cfaa-charges.shtml#c276</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Josh in CharlotteNC]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 12:09:03 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/18265123163/reporters-find-exposed-personal-data-via-google-threatened-with-cfaa-charges.shtml#c276</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<a href='http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wget' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wget</a><br />
"Typical usage of GNU Wget consists of invoking it from the command line"<br />
<br />
We all know that anyone using the command line instead of a GUI is a dirty hacker.<br />
/s]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/18265123163/reporters-find-exposed-personal-data-via-google-threatened-with-cfaa-charges.shtml#c270</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 12:08:49 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/18265123163/reporters-find-exposed-personal-data-via-google-threatened-with-cfaa-charges.shtml#c270</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ROFL I know of at least a few thousand sources that can be abused with a Google search. There is no wall just some clever keywords and search operators.<br />
<br />
You'd be pretty surprised what you can find by just playing around with them. <br />
I blame boredom.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Actually...</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/18265123163/reporters-find-exposed-personal-data-via-google-threatened-with-cfaa-charges.shtml#c246</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[silverscarcat]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 12:08:11 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/18265123163/reporters-find-exposed-personal-data-via-google-threatened-with-cfaa-charges.shtml#c246</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It's a concussed Goldfish attention span, not a normal goldfish's attention span.<br />
<br />
Don't you watch The Daily Show man?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/18102623141/so-its-come-to-this-seven-high-school-students-arrested-throwing-water-balloons.shtml#c1392</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 12:07:52 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/18102623141/so-its-come-to-this-seven-high-school-students-arrested-throwing-water-balloons.shtml#c1392</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[gawd what a bunch of sissies!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Water Blasts are nice, but...</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/11032823096/how-low-can-drones-go.shtml#c745</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[GeneralEmergency]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 12:04:45 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/11032823096/how-low-can-drones-go.shtml#c745</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[.<br />
<br />
A matching receiver typically comes with the transmitter.  Once again, both for less than $100. You could attach a USB Video capture dongle to the receiver and record some of his flight video on a notebook PC, then loop it back to him via your more powerful transmitter.   This would likely confuse him enough to end the flight quickly in a crash.  But work fast, his flight will typically last only 8 to 12 minutes.<br />
<br />
.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/01382223168/new-york-times-tells-startup-it-cant-even-mention-ny-times.shtml#c432</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 12:03:47 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/01382223168/new-york-times-tells-startup-it-cant-even-mention-ny-times.shtml#c432</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[NYT Subscription cancelled, what a bunch of fucking assholes, they don't deserve my money.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Skycrime</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/11032823096/how-low-can-drones-go.shtml#c743</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 11:58:17 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/11032823096/how-low-can-drones-go.shtml#c743</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Back when airplanes were a new thing, farmers used to shoot at them with their shotguns according to the same kind of logic you employ here.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/18102623141/so-its-come-to-this-seven-high-school-students-arrested-throwing-water-balloons.shtml#c1382</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 11:56:01 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/18102623141/so-its-come-to-this-seven-high-school-students-arrested-throwing-water-balloons.shtml#c1382</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<a href='https://duckduckgo.com/?q=water+balloon+injury' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">https://duckduckgo.com/?q=water+balloon+injury</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/18102623141/so-its-come-to-this-seven-high-school-students-arrested-throwing-water-balloons.shtml#c1362</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dirkmaster]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 11:54:47 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/18102623141/so-its-come-to-this-seven-high-school-students-arrested-throwing-water-balloons.shtml#c1362</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Hit by a water-ballon HURTS??????  A LOT?????<br />
<br />
Are you f'ing insane? They weren't frozen, for dog's sake. My 18 month old granddaughter was hit by a water balloon this weekend. No tears, only giggles and "again!". So either she's tougher than Wolverine, or you have the pain threshold of an amoeba.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Passerby - NOT a silly fight.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/00554723091/more-details-emerge-key-legal-fight-over-dmca-abuse.shtml#c406</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[MLE]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 11:53:24 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/00554723091/more-details-emerge-key-legal-fight-over-dmca-abuse.shtml#c406</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Thank you Ben.  Free speech issues in general are very important to me, so I am glad this is being discussed here.  I am taking objection to the fact that the underlying discussions which led to the DMCA issue are being unnecessarily maligned as a silly squabble or a cat fight.  The protections of free speech are most important when it is concerning speech we do not agree with, obviously, and that's why Gina went to such extremes to shut Dr Amy down.  The underlying debate is not something that should be brushed off as ladies' hysteria.  It doesn't need to be mentioned at all, in fact.  Just please don't minimize something that is literally a matter of life and death.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Don't go out of your way to write a scraper program!</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/18265123163/reporters-find-exposed-personal-data-via-google-threatened-with-cfaa-charges.shtml#c226</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Watchit]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 11:53:10 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/18265123163/reporters-find-exposed-personal-data-via-google-threatened-with-cfaa-charges.shtml#c226</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I don't understand the first point?<br />
<br />
your second point: why would someone imply that someone else is liable to be sued if not to threaten to sue? even if said threat is empty? <br />
<br />
Also, I don't think the article implies charges are imminent. It's implied that <i>if</i> the companies decide to sue it will be laughed out of court, so it's unlikely that they actually will.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>NYT Legal Dept. MO / Perverse Incentives</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/01382223168/new-york-times-tells-startup-it-cant-even-mention-ny-times.shtml#c408</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[GMacGuffin]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 11:52:41 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/01382223168/new-york-times-tells-startup-it-cant-even-mention-ny-times.shtml#c408</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I have dealt with the NYT over claimed copyright issues regarding its content.  What I surmise as a result is:<br />
<br />
The NYT Legal Dept. is focused on 1) Protecting the NYT brand and content, without any thought whatsoever to the big picture; and 2) justifying the legal department's own existence, which includes sending at-times meritless threat letters.<br />
<br />
They also have shown a penchant for black/white thinking; refusal to negotiate or consider circumstances; and for making absolute threats of suit, but rarely actually pulling the trigger and suing.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: The story that just keeps on giving</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/15164823159/bad-day-prenda-continues-judge-rejects-stay-adds-1k-per-day-each-day-they-dont-pay-up.shtml#c608</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[btr1701]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 11:51:10 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/15164823159/bad-day-prenda-continues-judge-rejects-stay-adds-1k-per-day-each-day-they-dont-pay-up.shtml#c608</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[&gt; They have one judge who is trying to bully<br />
&gt; from the bench and make an example, by being <br />
&gt; investigator, judge, and jury all in one.<br />
<br />
And yet nothing Wright cited here is false.<br />
<br />
Prenda did file an 11th-hour appeal with the wrong court.<br />
<br />
They did create the crisis for which they're now seeking relief.<br />
<br />
The judge was perfectly correct to deny their motion and sanction them for non-compliance.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Actually...</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/18265123163/reporters-find-exposed-personal-data-via-google-threatened-with-cfaa-charges.shtml#c224</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[kitsune361]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 11:49:45 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/18265123163/reporters-find-exposed-personal-data-via-google-threatened-with-cfaa-charges.shtml#c224</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I hope they DoJ goes after the reporters for CFAA violations <i>and wins</i>. If the DoJ refuses to go after them, it shows a definite double standard (weev is a troll/AT&amp;T is more important that TerraCom). That and the court battle would be epic, and due to the more sympathetic defendants has a better shot at appeal then weev's case.<br />
<br />
Also, as evidenced by the DoJ subpoenas of AP and FoxNews' phone records, the one surefire way to make sure "how abusive these laws are" gets into the goldfish-sized attention span of the professional news media is to use those laws <i>against</i> the professional news media.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/18102623141/so-its-come-to-this-seven-high-school-students-arrested-throwing-water-balloons.shtml#c1339</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 11:49:03 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/18102623141/so-its-come-to-this-seven-high-school-students-arrested-throwing-water-balloons.shtml#c1339</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[bow and lick others boots if you want to... I will not, my kids will not, and your part of the problem...<br />
<br />
Heres a question, why dont you have a record now? you used a biological weapon and potentially put anothers life in jeopardy. You should be at the police station asking to be locked up.... Or is this another cause of you dont deserve it but everybody else does... which is it sunshine...]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Don't go out of your way to write a scraper program!</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/18265123163/reporters-find-exposed-personal-data-via-google-threatened-with-cfaa-charges.shtml#c210</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[alanbleiweiss]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 11:48:15 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/18265123163/reporters-find-exposed-personal-data-via-google-threatened-with-cfaa-charges.shtml#c210</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[oh crap there's what appears to be a bomb over there.  Fuck I better hide my eyes and not say anything.<br />
<br />
OOTB you are the personification of troll=stupidity]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Timbo</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/06034223155/quack-professor-releases-dumbest-violent-video-game-theory-ever.shtml#c469</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[AC Unknown]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 11:47:59 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/06034223155/quack-professor-releases-dumbest-violent-video-game-theory-ever.shtml#c469</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Because this "professor" (and I use the term loosely in this case) is in South Korea, not the USA.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/16402423161/first-hand-account-judicial-smackdown-prenda-minnesota.shtml#c1202</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rikuo]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 11:47:36 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/16402423161/first-hand-account-judicial-smackdown-prenda-minnesota.shtml#c1202</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Here's what happened.<br />
<br />
Prenda lawyers send out letters in an attempt to make cash. <br />
Judge at one of the cases smells something fishy and, after many shenanigans, asks the Prenda team for their side of the tale, to try and defend themselves.<br />
They say no.<br />
They say they won't talk.<br />
<br />
This is the end of due process for them, at least where they're concerned. They had ample opportunity to set the record straight, but willingly and knowingly said they won't talk. Therefore, the only evidence before Judge Wright and other judges, the only evidence before them that they could look at and rule on, was evidence that pointed to Prenda's guilt. By pleading the fifth, by not talking, Team Prenda didn't enter anything to contest that. <br />
<br />
I'm not a lawyer and I'm able to understand that much. What about you?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Computer Fraud and Abuse</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/18265123163/reporters-find-exposed-personal-data-via-google-threatened-with-cfaa-charges.shtml#c197</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chronno S. Trigger]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 11:47:02 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/18265123163/reporters-find-exposed-personal-data-via-google-threatened-with-cfaa-charges.shtml#c197</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Google isn't involved, but I can understand where AC's confusion comes from.<br />
<br />
"While the reporters claim to have discovered the data with a simple Google search, the firms' lawyer claims they used "automated" means..."<br />
<br />
Referencing the company Google and then the telco firm without the name can be confusing.  High school level reading skills are required to properly understand that without having to read it two or three times.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>