<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Latest Techdirt Comments</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title>Re: Even Mike can't help misreading the Constitution</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/15445423110/framework-copyright-reform.shtml#c1414</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[That One Guy]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 04:52:54 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/15445423110/framework-copyright-reform.shtml#c1414</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I see your various arguments regarding copyright being a 'natural right', and raise you Karl's very well put refutation of them:<br />
<br />
<a href='http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130412/16073622693/julie-samuels-favorite-techdirt-posts-week.shtml#c618' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130412/16073622693/julie-samuels-favorite-techdirt-posts-week.shtml#c618</a><br />
<br />
(Funnily enough, the first quote from that post is <i>also</i> from Wheaton v. Peters, but it most certainly does not imply copyright was merely recognizing a natural right, but rather created one that wasn't there before).]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: FM Radios</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130510/13023123037/lots-people-dont-turn-off-their-devices-when-they-fly.shtml#c1257</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 04:51:48 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130510/13023123037/lots-people-dont-turn-off-their-devices-when-they-fly.shtml#c1257</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[most (virtually all) radio receivers use a "Local oscillator" along with a mixer that converts the incoming frequency to an "Intermediate frequency" the IF stage is where most of the gain of the receiver is, as well as the selectivity filters, then it goes to the detector stage where it is converted into Audio.<br />
<br />
TV receivers also have local oscillators, it used to be used by the radio detection people who could tell if you had a TV or radio without the license for it.<br />
<br />
Also used by the military to detect and track the location of the enemy even if they are not transmitting, as the receivers also emit specific radio frequencies.<br />
<br />
Single Side band radio's also have another oscillator called a "beat frequency oscillator, required to re-insert the 'carrier' wave of an other Amplitude modulated signal.<br />
<br />
Also frequency synthesisors have multiple oscillators and mixers designed to provide a wide range of frequencies from the local oscillator chain.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Could'a swore I already covered this...</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/12483923107/nz-supreme-court-will-review-kim-dotcoms-extradition-case.shtml#c831</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[That One Guy]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 04:39:07 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/12483923107/nz-supreme-court-will-review-kim-dotcoms-extradition-case.shtml#c831</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Anyway, in those articles there are these funny little things called 'links', they generally take the form of blue words, slightly more bolded than the surrounding text, and you can use those to go to the pages/articles that the TD ones are based upon, if you have a strong objection to reading the TD writeups on them.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/06185923116/rice-university-professor-skynets-gonna-take-ur-jerbs.shtml#c107</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Real Michael]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 04:26:23 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/06185923116/rice-university-professor-skynets-gonna-take-ur-jerbs.shtml#c107</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Actually, there may be some validity to Professor Vardi's predictions. Among some of the things that already exist: robots stocking inventory in some warehouses (e.g. Amazon), automated checkout lines and kiosks where you do everything yourself, etc.<br />
<br />
Foxconn plans to replace 500,000+ workers with robots:<br />
<a href='http://singularityhub.com/2011/12/13/chinese-company-continues-plan-to-replace-workforce-with-500000-robots/' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://singularityhub.com/2011/12/13/chinese-company-continues-plan-to-replace-workforce-with-500000-robots/</a><br />
<br />
South Korea plans to replace 30,000 English teachers with robots by the end of the decade:<br />
<a href='http://it.toolbox.com/blogs/future-guide/replacing-human-teachers-with-robots-36644' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://it.toolbox.com/blogs/future-guide/replacing-human-teachers-with-robots-36644</a><br />
<br />
Now don't get me wrong, some jobs are probably better left to machines, but eventually the economy is going to burst and the fallout isn't going to be pretty. Unemployment is already at record highs, people are graduating from college only to find themselves living back at home (and in debt) and there's hardly any job creation, let alone security. Even where they don't use robots, employers find ways to dance around keeping people employed long-term so as to not have to pay benefits; it's much easier for them to hire a contractor who will outsource the cheaper labor, then replace as necessary.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/06185923116/rice-university-professor-skynets-gonna-take-ur-jerbs.shtml#c104</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Torg]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 04:06:29 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/06185923116/rice-university-professor-skynets-gonna-take-ur-jerbs.shtml#c104</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[There isn't anything that humans can do that machines are naturally incapable of doing, just things that we haven't yet figured out how to make machines do. That you talk about people moving to other jobs shows that you haven't fully considered the ramifications of us figuring out how to make machines do everything. For there to be other jobs there needs to be something humans are better than machines at, and eventually if not necessarily by 2045 there will be no such thing. The greatest human in history is the lower bound of how good at something it may be physically possible to be, and since physical possibility is what matters with technology, future humanity will at a minimum be mass-producing Einsteins, Beethovens, and Leonardo da Vincis. This is going to be less like assembly line workers vs. assembly line robots and more like Homo erectus vs. Homo sapiens.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: no, actually, modern music DOES suck</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20040330/0046215.shtml#c21023</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cherie Smith]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 03:59:25 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20040330/0046215.shtml#c21023</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I'm only 14 years old and I d e s p I s e nowadays music, I'm not a lonely nerd or anything who doesn't know what its like to be popular and get stoned with the popular gangs and rave to the top hot music on the charts, but, how am I supposed to rave to shit that has no tune whatsoever. Seriously they play a guitar and think there a fucking rockstar! They makes songs that anyone can make up. I don't know how anyone can enjoy this type of music! I say its time to go back round the cirle and listen to the beautiful amazing music from history. Whether its the glam rock 70's- Gary Glitter-Do you wanna touch, Bowie-Diamond Dogs, or the frickern elvis and johnny cash times! Me and my friends were at a party and put on johnny be good and we danced our asses of too it! Everyone was just staring at first but then they got into it and was mint! Where's the nowadays rock bands? The wanted? One direction. People 'love' 1D but personally I don't know the names to any of the songs haha! Where's the class U2 music? Or van halen, europe, bon jovi? Joan Jett I love rock n roll was an absolute class song, don't hear music like that anymore:( Madonna-Holiday + all the rest of her unreal outstanding songs! But its not just the music! Its the style, the fashion that comes along with it too. On the music videos people are wearing 'GEEK' tops and 'JERK' tops and looking exactly the same as eachother. Why can't singers have there own style anymore. Their should be people like Adam Ant out there! Not every singer dressing the same. God help us. I come from such an uncool  decade. But its not just me. People in my school and that I know are listening to rhythm is a dancer,and mr vain by culture beat and n trance set you free... Stop thinking about frickern money and think about how fabulous you can make the music + style era be!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110215/10434313108/dailydirt-diy-junk-food.shtml#c56</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wolfy]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 03:54:42 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110215/10434313108/dailydirt-diy-junk-food.shtml#c56</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Just what humans need. More poisonous crap. At Home.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Am I not surprised</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/14465423109/aps-attempt-drming-news-shuts-down.shtml#c119</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[That One Guy]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 03:42:54 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/14465423109/aps-attempt-drming-news-shuts-down.shtml#c119</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Sorry, but we've already got our share of paranoid nutjobs here, so go, spread your madness on some other site that is 'suffering' due to lack of sufficient crazy.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121106/21382720956/gema-gets-bailed-out-germanys-parliament-allowed-to-proceed-with-venue-killing-rate-hikes.shtml#c978</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[dwilawyer.com]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 03:38:40 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121106/21382720956/gema-gets-bailed-out-germanys-parliament-allowed-to-proceed-with-venue-killing-rate-hikes.shtml#c978</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[A DUI Lawyer saved my future... Thank you for what you do]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/12483923107/nz-supreme-court-will-review-kim-dotcoms-extradition-case.shtml#c809</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[G Thompson]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 03:37:47 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/12483923107/nz-supreme-court-will-review-kim-dotcoms-extradition-case.shtml#c809</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>as more outs and more appeal levels than almost any court system on the planet</i> <br />
<br />
Interestingly the court systems where There are better and more appeal levels and work more with procedural fairness (what the US Systems DOES NOT HAVE) are the New Zealand and Australian ones... Based off the English system... Canada isn't far behind those two either.. the UK sadly has become more US like in its judicial processes.<br />
<br />
Kim would NEVER have a fair trial in the US court systems, and the notion of a fair trial nowadays with anything to do with high profile criminal or civil cases in the US is ONLY when it suits the USG's purposes. Your (the US's) societal system is crumbling already, you're just too blinkered and close to understand what you have lost over the last 30yrs]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/12483923107/nz-supreme-court-will-review-kim-dotcoms-extradition-case.shtml#c806</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[G Thompson]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 03:32:48 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/12483923107/nz-supreme-court-will-review-kim-dotcoms-extradition-case.shtml#c806</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>Remember, extradition doesn't equate to guilt.</i><br />
<br />
Correct, his guilt has already retrospectively been decided beforehand by your Grand Jury (called a Star Chamber everywhere else). The extradition is just to allow the GJ process to get to do what it does best, convict everyone and their ham sandwich based on third party unreliable unauthentic hearsay and rhetoric]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Let me get this straight.....</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/02413623115/bogus-lawsuit-plus-threats-to-those-who-write-about-it-leads-to-epic-response.shtml#c738</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[theta1138]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 03:31:29 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/02413623115/bogus-lawsuit-plus-threats-to-those-who-write-about-it-leads-to-epic-response.shtml#c738</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Yeah, IANAL but on LJ the discussion has trended towards "How legal is this business in the first place anyway?" He could be violating P.I. licensing laws, he could be made an accessory to any action his clients take on his information depending on the state, he could blow any legitimate court proceedings for any number of reasons... it just seems ill-thought-out.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Even Mike can't help misreading the Constitution</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/15445423110/framework-copyright-reform.shtml#c1393</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Crosbie Fitch]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 03:25:22 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/15445423110/framework-copyright-reform.shtml#c1393</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>the power to <strong>issue</strong> "exclusive rights"</blockquote>'Grant', 'create', 'issue', 'bestow'?<br />
<br />
The Constitution actually says 'SECURE'.<br />
<br />
How can one who so evidently misreads the Constitution criticise others for misreading the Constitution?<br />
<br />
See my comments here: <a href='https://freedom-to-tinker.com/blog/abridy/copyrights-fundamental-rights-and-the-constitution/' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">https://freedom-to-tinker.com/blog/abridy/copyrights-fundamental-rights-and-the-constitution/</a><br />
<br />
The author clearly has a natural (common law) right to exclude others from their writings.<br />
<br />
Per <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wheaton_v._Peters#Result" rel="nofollow">Wheaton v Peters</a><br />
<br />
<em>while the common law undoubtedly protected the right to one</em>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130510/13023123037/lots-people-dont-turn-off-their-devices-when-they-fly.shtml#c1256</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[G Thompson]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 03:13:41 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130510/13023123037/lots-people-dont-turn-off-their-devices-when-they-fly.shtml#c1256</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I'll let you into a few secrets.. I'm a licensed 747-300/400 Avionics Engineer (from way back in early 90's) and you are ABSOLUTELY UNEQUIVICALLY WRONG! <br />
<br />
All electronics in aircraft are shielded, there have been none, zilch, nada, Zero cases of ANY consumer electronic devices causing ANY problems whatsoever with any aircraft sub systems or external systems like TACAN, etc anywhere on the planet in the history of air travel.<br />
<br />
There is already a quasi Faraday cage around every single commercial aircraft anyway.. it's caused by the friction of going through the air at speed above 150mph giving off a static charge. There are even subsystems on the aircraft to compensate for this problematic static charge and faraday effect.<br />
<br />
Whether the instruments are in the cockpit (in commercial airliners the cockpit holds the least amount of computers.. in fact most computers etc in 747's etc are normally in a hold above the front wheel truck) is irrelevant to any interference from devices that barely come close to matching background radiation (sunspots cause more problems than anything else ever).]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Maybe it's because found other ways:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/14465423109/aps-attempt-drming-news-shuts-down.shtml#c110</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wolfy]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 02:42:55 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/14465423109/aps-attempt-drming-news-shuts-down.shtml#c110</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[You mean the so-called "clean coal" sites, don't you?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/06185923116/rice-university-professor-skynets-gonna-take-ur-jerbs.shtml#c88</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wolfy]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 02:39:20 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/06185923116/rice-university-professor-skynets-gonna-take-ur-jerbs.shtml#c88</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[What is needed is a different economic model. Money is too concentrated in too few hands by the current model. When fewer people are working, even fewer people will have money. Iain M. Banks in his "Culture" novels explores a society where machine do a great deal of the labor, but people work at things they enjoy, and there is no money.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/16203623112/nintendo-exchanges-goodwill-control-issues-mass-monetization-claims-lets-play-videos.shtml#c274</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 02:31:20 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/16203623112/nintendo-exchanges-goodwill-control-issues-mass-monetization-claims-lets-play-videos.shtml#c274</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<a href='http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6yX4io2O4EI' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6yX4io2O4EI</a> TotalBiscuit (A popular youtube video game reviewer) Put up a well informed take on this.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/12483923107/nz-supreme-court-will-review-kim-dotcoms-extradition-case.shtml#c774</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[horse with no name]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 01:48:21 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/12483923107/nz-supreme-court-will-review-kim-dotcoms-extradition-case.shtml#c774</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[If you think he isn't going to get a fair trial, I think we need to all hang it up. The US justice system has more outs and more appeal levels than almost any court system on the planet, and is generally stocked with decent judges.  Further, unless something really significant is going on, cases are open, recorded, and sometimes even broadcast live.  <br />
<br />
If Kim can't get some semblance of a fair trial, then society as a whole is done.  It's sad that your entire justification for hoping a criminal can hide in another country is because you think your own legal system is so broken that letting walk is better.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/02413623115/bogus-lawsuit-plus-threats-to-those-who-write-about-it-leads-to-epic-response.shtml#c724</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 01:46:57 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/02413623115/bogus-lawsuit-plus-threats-to-those-who-write-about-it-leads-to-epic-response.shtml#c724</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Don't forget JonMon, too.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/15583223111/congress-grandstanding-over-google-glass-privacy-concerns-next-up-privacy-concerns-over-your-eyes.shtml#c2216</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Suzanne Lainson]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 01:44:47 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/15583223111/congress-grandstanding-over-google-glass-privacy-concerns-next-up-privacy-concerns-over-your-eyes.shtml#c2216</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[More about it.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://techcrunch.com/2013/05/09/the-google-glass-wink-feature-is-real/" rel="nofollow">The Google Glass Wink Feature Is Real | TechCrunch</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>