<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Latest Techdirt Comments</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: What a whiney baby + @ &quot;Oh, you didn</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/18103323179/filmmaker-behind-pirate-bay-documentary-says-bogus-dmca-takedowns-take-away-his-free-speech.shtml#c837</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[d_brown]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 17:43:49 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/18103323179/filmmaker-behind-pirate-bay-documentary-says-bogus-dmca-takedowns-take-away-his-free-speech.shtml#c837</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["It's a perfectly cromulent argument from the view of one who MAKES stuff"<br />
<br />
Why don't you speak for yourself instead of putting words in somebody else's mouth? <br />
<br />
The only things you make are your posts on this blog, which you have given away for years. <br />
<br />
"copyright recognizes that no one else has a right to copy works"<br />
<br />
It does something entirely different, as everyone in any IP industry knows. Again, stop pretending to speak for people who you aren't.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>DOJ is Partisan</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/02514123171/partisanship-over-spying-journalists-is-stupid-spying-journalists-is-bad-period.shtml#c205</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 17:41:17 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/02514123171/partisanship-over-spying-journalists-is-stupid-spying-journalists-is-bad-period.shtml#c205</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[When a "party" is put in the WH, it gets to pick it's Atty Gen/DOJ players.<br />
<br />
Thus, outrage of a DOJ that has the power to tap my phone without a warrant, tap 1st Amendment Protected reports, monitor this post &amp; put me in jail for their reasons MUST go straight to the President's desk (R or D) for hiring the people who carry out such activities.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Read for comprehension!</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1967</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 17:41:03 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1967</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[finally, we get one accurate sentence from you.  <br />
<br />
<i>' I mean, I'm stupid and you're smart,so it should be simple for you.'</i><i></i>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>What are you on?</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1959</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 17:39:39 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1959</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[You must be high on something.  Tell me the number of your local police station so you can turn yourself in for doing illicit drugs.  You're clearly a danger to yourself and those around you.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: What a whiney baby + @ &quot;Oh, you didn</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/18103323179/filmmaker-behind-pirate-bay-documentary-says-bogus-dmca-takedowns-take-away-his-free-speech.shtml#c813</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[d_brown]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 17:38:03 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/18103323179/filmmaker-behind-pirate-bay-documentary-says-bogus-dmca-takedowns-take-away-his-free-speech.shtml#c813</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["and income is what allows speech"<br />
<br />
No. Speech does not require income.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130424/00010122821/adam-savage-why-copyright-trademark-holders-need-to-get-over-their-obsession-with-control.shtml#c142</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 17:37:59 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130424/00010122821/adam-savage-why-copyright-trademark-holders-need-to-get-over-their-obsession-with-control.shtml#c142</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Honestly, I've always thought it was less about "control" and more about thinking the thing they own is valuable in a way that means it needs to be hoarded.  They don't realize that A) their thing is not, in itself, really all that valuable in the grand scheme of things and B) giving the thing they own away freely increases its value.  The value they're assigning to their works is both artificial and inflated... and if you think about it, if it really were the "valuable property" they want to believe it is, they'd damned well be paying property tax on it.  (I desperately want some lawmaker to suddenly start talking about taxing corporations' intellectual property as if it were real property because I want to see all the back-pedaling from the bizarre inflation that goes on when they talk about what they've lost to piracy.)<br />
<br />
I've written this before on a techdirt article, so forgive me for repeating myself, but if the people who owned Star Trek in the early 70s had come down like a ton of bricks on the fans who were throwing cons where they charged people entry, printing and selling zines, and creating and selling art (the way Paramount's lawyers totally would do today and sometimes sort of try to do, only to be slapped down by the fans), Star Trek would not be the fat-and-sassy cash cow Paramount is milking to this day.  STAR TREK WOULD BE COMPLETELY, UTTERLY FORGOTTEN. Paramount considered Star Trek worthless, you could have bought the whole thing for about a hundred grand; it was beneath Paramount's notice so they didn't care what the little people did with it.  Considered worthless and given freely away, Star Trek became an incredibly valuable "franchise" (a phrase I detest).  The fans gave it worth.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Yes, it's trolling and yes, it's ridiculous</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1934</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 17:37:47 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1934</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[What color is the sky where you live anyway?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Look...</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/02455423183/prenda-lawyer-says-georgia-court-should-ignore-judge-wrights-order-because-look-hackers.shtml#c412</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hephaestus]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 17:31:36 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/02455423183/prenda-lawyer-says-georgia-court-should-ignore-judge-wrights-order-because-look-hackers.shtml#c412</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[OMG ... a disney flick reference on techno site ... well done.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Political Parties, partisan politics and we</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/02514123171/partisanship-over-spying-journalists-is-stupid-spying-journalists-is-bad-period.shtml#c183</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Old Man in The Sea]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 17:29:46 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/02514123171/partisanship-over-spying-journalists-is-stupid-spying-journalists-is-bad-period.shtml#c183</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Political parties are there only to polarise the issues not provide solutions.<br />
<br />
Partisan politics are the polarisation of issues not the solution.<br />
<br />
When we can see everything that the government does (every door opened, every document available, every meeting entered and every communication revealed) then and only then would we be able to trust them with spying on us. We would see exactly what is going on.<br />
<br />
This will never happen as there are "too many secrets". Movie reference anyone?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Yes, it's trolling and yes, it's ridiculous</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1918</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 17:29:17 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1918</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["<br />
 Masnick's weasely narrative is totally unnecessary and only serves to make him look like a bigger jerk than usual."<br />
<br />
which takes some doing !!!!!<br />
<br />
Masnick probably has been taking lessons off Kim fatbastard..]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/02514123171/partisanship-over-spying-journalists-is-stupid-spying-journalists-is-bad-period.shtml#c177</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hephaestus]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 17:25:08 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/02514123171/partisanship-over-spying-journalists-is-stupid-spying-journalists-is-bad-period.shtml#c177</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[or seriously stupid ... wait ... that would mean that over 90% of the voting population is stupid.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: What a melange! Think hit EVERY one of your wacky notions!</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130424/00010122821/adam-savage-why-copyright-trademark-holders-need-to-get-over-their-obsession-with-control.shtml#c125</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[out_of_the_blue]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 17:24:00 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130424/00010122821/adam-savage-why-copyright-trademark-holders-need-to-get-over-their-obsession-with-control.shtml#c125</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[@"Quit pushing your idea of "morality", OOTB. what may be "moral" to you is "immoral" to someone else."<br />
<br />
There are absolute standards that derive from the facts of existence, it's not all relative and up for grabs the way you commie-pirates want.<br />
<br />
Sticking to copyright: while Disney may have "stolen" from fairy tales (no one complained), the labor of thinking up, working out, and producing Mickey Mouse was nearly all due to Walt Disney (and his gang of slave-artists to draw the many images), so the resulting film is ALL his. -- And to ENJOY the product of his work, you only had to pay a nickel! If you don't want to pay, you don't have to, but you've then NO right to enjoy the content. THAT'S A MORAL DEAL, plain and simple.  -- Of course Disney is bad example for later years, but was absolutely true up to 28 years from creation date.<br />
<br />
And no, I'm not going to shut up. But you just keep pushing your immorality of taking what you haven't created, because that too serves MY purposes!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/02514123171/partisanship-over-spying-journalists-is-stupid-spying-journalists-is-bad-period.shtml#c163</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Squid Lips]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 17:23:29 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/02514123171/partisanship-over-spying-journalists-is-stupid-spying-journalists-is-bad-period.shtml#c163</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[At what point is the Congressional approval rating low enough for us to decide that the partisan lockdown we've been in for the last 50 years is unacceptable? I would have said somewhere below 10%, but we've been below 10% for about as long as I can remember.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Thankyou TechDirtBag Censors</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1893</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 17:23:07 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1893</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[For highlighting the post most worth reading.<br />
<br />
Really appreciate the "ADVERTISING" and your efforts to promote those particular posts.<br />
<br />
Thanks again.. keep up the good work..]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/02514123171/partisanship-over-spying-journalists-is-stupid-spying-journalists-is-bad-period.shtml#c159</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[PRMan]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 17:22:52 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/02514123171/partisanship-over-spying-journalists-is-stupid-spying-journalists-is-bad-period.shtml#c159</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Unless you have a warrant because the person is a suspected criminal...]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Prior Art</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1869</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 17:18:10 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1869</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[like the difference between using a carburettor and fuel injection for a car engine.<br />
<br />
they are both doing the same job (feeding fuel to the engine) but with 2 different METHODS.<br />
<br />
But I don't expect you to understand the difference, you've been worshiping masnick for too long.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Alternativly, the birth of 3 factor authenication</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1868</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 17:14:16 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1868</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[well done idiot, you listed 3 "ways" to do something, but nothing ON THE FUCKING METHOD INVOLVED in making them a reality.<br />
<br />
and as you should well know, (but clearly do not) patents are A METHOD to achieve a result, NOT THE FUCKING result itself.<br />
<br />
This one apparently is "A METHOD OF PASSWORD" authentication.<br />
<br />
Notice it is not THE method, or the only method possible, but it is simply A METHOD.<br />
<br />
for example, "A method of supplying fuel to an internal combustion engine" Might describe the method of using a type of carburettor, ANOTHER METHOD might be using a form of FUEL Injector. <br />
<br />
You don't patent 'feeding fuel to an engine' you patent A METHOD of feeding fuel into an engine.<br />
<br />
Therefore this is a method of password authentication, it is NOT the method. <br />
<br />
Just as prior art does not apply between carburation and fuel injection it does not apply here.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130424/00010122821/adam-savage-why-copyright-trademark-holders-need-to-get-over-their-obsession-with-control.shtml#c100</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ezekial]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 17:13:43 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130424/00010122821/adam-savage-why-copyright-trademark-holders-need-to-get-over-their-obsession-with-control.shtml#c100</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[This, from the guy who censors the brand name of everything they use on Mythbusters. Guess he wouldnt want one of them to sue for using their product in a way they didnt want him to.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>$3K used to be what a college degree cost...</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110311/01434213446/dailydirt-tuition-debt-is-chumps.shtml#c7</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 17:13:19 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110311/01434213446/dailydirt-tuition-debt-is-chumps.shtml#c7</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Some day, the college tuition boom will pop. Hopefully. Maybe.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Yes, it's trolling and yes, it's ridiculous</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1856</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 17:13:12 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1856</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Honestly? You never speak honestly.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>