<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Latest Techdirt Comments</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title>FFS!</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130505/14372422951/court-finds-fantasy-stories-obscene.shtml#c174</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew Norton]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 12:01:00 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130505/14372422951/court-finds-fantasy-stories-obscene.shtml#c174</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[We here in Georgia are sick and tired of all this crap. We're tired of <a href="http://www.piratepartyofgeorgia.org/2013/05/the-south-should-not-be-synonymous-with.html" rel="nofollow">the South being synonymous with stupidity</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/11200723149/war-journalists-doj-claimed-fox-news-reporter-was-aider-abettor-co-conspirator-with-leaker.shtml#c18</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[rw]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 11:55:36 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/11200723149/war-journalists-doj-claimed-fox-news-reporter-was-aider-abettor-co-conspirator-with-leaker.shtml#c18</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[In order to have an effective police state, you must first control the press, then we can kill that damn, annoying Constitution thing.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c392</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 11:55:06 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c392</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>Are you arguing is that I can't name my kid, say, Jack because that name was used by a notorious criminal </i><br />
<br />
speaking of full retard...]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Again, sheerly an anti-copyright WEDGE for Mike.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c842</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 11:52:00 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c842</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["I'm merely pointing out that Mike hasn't said anything of substance.<br />
<br />
He claims that the this group "has written a ridiculous letter with little basis in fact, arguing that this treaty for the blind would be 'casting aside' the 'international copyright infrastructure.'" But then he never actually explains why that's not true. No substance."<br />
<br />
I read it for myself. Business Europe never presents any factual evidence behind why they think this will affect things. I don't know why that needs to be spelled out in detail since you can just click and read the letter. <br />
<br />
As for substance, you're right in that regard. He didn't cycle in enough information to really make this into a debatable issue.<br />
<br />
"He claims that the proposal would "provide extremely limited situations in which copyright restrictions would be limited for the sake of making it easier for vision-impaired people to access works." But he never bothers to back that up textually. No substance."<br />
<br />
That's a debate for the treaty, not the letter.<br />
<br />
"It's just a bunch of faith-based, conclusory statements. I'm pointing out that he's a total hypocrite when he castigates others for making faith-based assertions because he does the same with alarming frequency. I'm pointing out that the whole point of this article is merely to discredit a group that he disagrees with (despite him not appearing to actually understand the substance of the arguments or counterarguments). It's total bullshit. I'm calling him out for it."<br />
<br />
Your original post had some merit because you were right, there wasn't much fiber to this post, but if you're going to call him out for anything, I don't understand why you think filling your response with insults is going to merit any attention.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130505/14372422951/court-finds-fantasy-stories-obscene.shtml#c168</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 11:51:22 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130505/14372422951/court-finds-fantasy-stories-obscene.shtml#c168</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The whole basis of censorship is that the censors opinion determines what you can publish. They cannot describe what will offend them, but you offend them at your peril.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Mike's Position (my opinion of it anyway).</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c826</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ed the Engineer]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 11:46:11 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c826</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It seems to me that Mike has presented some fairly clear positions on Copyright.<br />
  1)Copyright law needs reform, with an eye toward a balance between encouraging content creating, protecting the public good.  <br />
  2) Businesses need to review what is in their own best interest. <br />
    A)Are they punishing their paying customers attempting to fight piracy?<br />
    B)Are there ways to increase profits while ignoring piracy.<br />
    C) Are they ignoring potential markets, by failing to give the customer what he wants, when and how he wants it?<br />
<br />
I am sure I have missed a bunch of things, and perhaps I have gotten something wrong.  But this is what I have taken away from Mikes posts, and why I comeback.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c391</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 11:44:41 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c391</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[This is hardly secondary liability any more. I would reckon that we are not even talking tertiary liability! The Pirate Bay was ruled to "encourage infringement". That is in itself a secondary or tertiary liability to actual infringement and/or facilitating infringement. In this case, the registrar of the name is sued for the notoriety of the names past. That is so far removed from the crime at hand that you can essentially sue utility plants or W3C for having created the www protocol!<br />
<br />
I am completely in line with .se on this one. As they state:<br />
".SE will naturally respond to the prosecutor]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Someone doesn't understand the mechanics of an MMO</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20130508/06065623001/new-hope-how-going-free-to-play-brought-redemption-to-star-wars-mmo.shtml#c495</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ltlw0lf]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 11:44:35 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20130508/06065623001/new-hope-how-going-free-to-play-brought-redemption-to-star-wars-mmo.shtml#c495</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>I don't think our friend Blue understands how important those 70% 'freeloaders' are for a f2p MMO (I'll give him a hint--MMO = massively MULTIPLAYER online). If only a very few are playing, the game becomes almost impossible to play because you can't find anyone to play with (almost all the content worth playing needs multiple people to experience it--especially endgame content and PvP). With every MMO I've played, the main reason I quit was the lack of decent people playing at the time of day I was playing it. Those 'freeloaders' are providing a service in the game by creating a large player base which makes the game more valuable to the ones who are willing and able to pay. This is why their revenue doubled. At the rate things were going, if they didn't go f2p the game would have been dead in a year (and it's kinda hard to get any profit from a dead MMO).</i><br />
<br />
Even EvE, where every moment you spend in LowSec/NullSec you wish there were less people playing the game at that particular moment, wouldn't be awesome without the number of players it has.<br />
<br />
The only reason EvE hasn't gone F2P is that there is still a bunch of folks willing to pay $35 for two months to play it (and considerably less considering you can pay in advance or with ISK.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Simple Answer</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/18383623114/your-word-against-ours-how-fbis-no-electronic-recording-policy-rigs-game-destroys-its-credibility.shtml#c280</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 11:44:11 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/18383623114/your-word-against-ours-how-fbis-no-electronic-recording-policy-rigs-game-destroys-its-credibility.shtml#c280</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[You have the right to remain silent, Do you have the ability??]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c803</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 11:43:59 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c803</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["Of course, it does no such thing. All it does is provide extremely limited situations in which copyright restrictions would be limited for the sake of making it easier for vision-impaired people to access works."<br />
<br />
<i>I know this is just another brainless FUD piece so you can attempt to discredit these pro-copyright people by making it sound like they hate the blind, but your argument that "it does no such thing" would be much more effective if you actually quoted the text of the proposed limitations and exceptions. You could also add something productive to the conversation by telling us your proposed solution to this problem. Or are you only capable of hit pieces like this that add ABSOLUTELY NOTHING POSITIVE to the debate?</i><br />
<br />
"The level of freakout from these giant companies over helping the blind is really quite incredible."<br />
<br />
<i>Your portrayal of these people as hating the blind is what I find to be "really quite incredible," as in, completely not believable and only reflective of your own deep-seated hatred of others who don't think the same as you. Again, if you cited the text and/or told us your suggestions, that would be a lot more productive. As it is, you just come across as a whiny blogger who is only capable of publishing mindless crap in a desperate attempt to discredit others. Add something positive to the discussion for once. Take a concrete stand yourself rather than just shitting on everyone else's beliefs. Seriously, you come across as writing for disgruntled eighth graders.</i><br />
<br />
Nailed it, AJ]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c380</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Milton Freewater]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 11:43:37 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c380</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["Nothing the MPAA can ever do will make a dent in Internet piracy"<br />
<br />
That's not true.There are plenty of things they are doing successfully right now - streaming albums in advance, for instance. Which is why we have more reason than ever to be suspicious of radical new legal responses.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130505/14372422951/court-finds-fantasy-stories-obscene.shtml#c157</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rikuo]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 11:41:14 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130505/14372422951/court-finds-fantasy-stories-obscene.shtml#c157</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I can't link to it, as I don't know where I heard it, but I heard of a recent case where a guy was jailed for looking at real child porn. He got out, but was re-jailed for looking at child porn again - except this time, it was hentai. As in drawn pictures of little girls (described as elves hundreds of years old, but with the looks of young girls). <br />
In my opinion, that was bullshit as well. As horrible as real child porn is, drawings are..well, drawings. I can draw two stick figures in a compromising position, and if I happen to put the text "8 years old" on the one with a dress, does that make it illegal child porn? What if I draw a vertical line next to the 8, making the girl 18?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c791</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Josh in CharlotteNC]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 11:40:47 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c791</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[If that's you, Joe, those are weasel words.  Answer the question.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: An appropriate defense</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130505/14372422951/court-finds-fantasy-stories-obscene.shtml#c136</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Karl]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 11:38:25 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130505/14372422951/court-finds-fantasy-stories-obscene.shtml#c136</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<em>Exhibit A: A random collection of comments from Youtube.</em><br />
<br />
Followed by Exhibit B: the flagged comments from Sophisticatedjanedoe's Favorite Posts of the Week.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130505/14372422951/court-finds-fantasy-stories-obscene.shtml#c132</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zakida Paul]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 11:33:32 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130505/14372422951/court-finds-fantasy-stories-obscene.shtml#c132</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The fact that this work is making a stir like this will make it a much sought after piece.  Some of the most acclaimed works ever have been hugely controversial.  Think novels like Lolita.<br />
<br />
Mark my words, all this censorship will do is increase the popularity of the piece.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130507/17274422984/house-judiciary-committee-sets-up-first-hearing-copyright-reform.shtml#c540</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Bradley]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 11:32:46 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130507/17274422984/house-judiciary-committee-sets-up-first-hearing-copyright-reform.shtml#c540</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[No, copyright doesn't prevent you or me from saying a darn thing. It prevents you from using my speech without permission, or me using your speech without permission. In other words, it prevents our rights to our own speech.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/16203623112/nintendo-exchanges-goodwill-control-issues-mass-monetization-claims-lets-play-videos.shtml#c374</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[DCX2]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 11:32:29 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/16203623112/nintendo-exchanges-goodwill-control-issues-mass-monetization-claims-lets-play-videos.shtml#c374</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[There's a lot of Wii games worth buying.<br />
<br />
Twilight Princess is still amazing.  Super Mario Galaxy 1 and 2.  If you like Resident Evil 4, the Wii version is the absolute best version of all.  Okami is pretty good on the Wii too.  Tales of Symphonia: Dawn of the New World is an epic RPG.<br />
<br />
Basically, if you think there are no good Wii games, you just aren't looking.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c372</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Glen]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 11:31:18 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c372</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Very true, by glad I mean, sad, sickened and disgusted.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Again, sheerly an anti-copyright WEDGE for Mike.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c783</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[average_joe]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 11:30:56 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c783</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>Yet, for some reason, you envision Techdirt readers as an obedient, unthinking cult, hanging on Masnick's every word and regarding him as their "leader".</i><br />
<br />
I think that because it's true. It gets proven daily.<br />
<br />
<i>Mike and his guest bloggers just relay reports of outrageous things that the IP industry is up to, and they often express their opinions about it, and we all chime in with ours. It's as simple as that. He doesn't have us under mind control. He's not our "leader". One misstep and we'll turn on him...for that one post, which is how it should be.</i><br />
<br />
You're one of the few regulars who is capable of independent thought. I appreciate that.<br />
<br />
Along those lines, let me ask you this. Do you agree with me that Mike has said practically nothing of substance in this post and instead is just making another attempt to discredit copyright holders without actually even looking at their arguments?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Congress shall make no law...</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130507/17274422984/house-judiciary-committee-sets-up-first-hearing-copyright-reform.shtml#c534</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Bradley]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 11:28:40 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130507/17274422984/house-judiciary-committee-sets-up-first-hearing-copyright-reform.shtml#c534</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[No, copyright doesn't prevent you or me from saying a darn thing. It prevents you from using my speech without permission, or me using your speech without permission. In other words, it prevents our rights to our own speech.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>