<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Latest Techdirt Comments</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c669</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Josh in CharlotteNC]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 14:59:08 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c669</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i> that the registar knows is criminal, </i><br />
<br />
Do you have a plausible way for the registrar to determine that in advance of the site existing?  Something that doesn't involve time-travel, perhaps?<br />
<br />
"the Pirate Bay" is just a name.  Are you arguing that simply having a domain name that includes words that might indicate referral to a previously criminal action is in and of itself illegal?  Are you implying that if Bernie Madhoff writes a book, he can't register berniemadhoffponzischeme.com to promote it, because it might refer to something illegal? <br />
<br />
Two words:<br />
Prior Restraint]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/12190223151/prendas-paul-hansmeier-asks-appeals-court-to-delay-sanctions-appeals-court-says-no-try-again.shtml#c87</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anon E. Mous]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 14:59:07 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/12190223151/prendas-paul-hansmeier-asks-appeals-court-to-delay-sanctions-appeals-court-says-no-try-again.shtml#c87</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I would guess that was an attempt to not have to take their appeal before Judge Wright in the District Court, I am sure they knew then weren't going to have any success with it before him<br />
<br />
Although in my hypothetical scenario of them trying to appeal before him for a stay, Judge Wright falls out of his chair and starts rolling around on the floor laughing hysterically along with everyone in the gallery and then after the 10 minutes of hilarity he slams his gavel down and say's "DENIED" <br />
<br />
Of course we then see the Prenda gang out front of the court house hats in hand asking people for spare change!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>They're just making that up...</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/11200723149/war-journalists-doj-claimed-fox-news-reporter-was-aider-abettor-co-conspirator-with-leaker.shtml#c563</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[tawsenior]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 14:57:25 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/11200723149/war-journalists-doj-claimed-fox-news-reporter-was-aider-abettor-co-conspirator-with-leaker.shtml#c563</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[FOX doesn't have any real reporters!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/11552823150/major-hollywood-studios-all-sent-bogus-dmca-takedowns-concerning-pirate-bay-documentary.shtml#c329</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[gorehound]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 14:56:23 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/11552823150/major-hollywood-studios-all-sent-bogus-dmca-takedowns-concerning-pirate-bay-documentary.shtml#c329</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[And if it were possible I would be suing those damn MAFIAA the maximum amount possible for each and every infraction.<br />
<br />
Yes MAFIAA you are permanently Censored from my Wallet.Non-MAFIAA Local and Indie you are very welcome here and I will gladly support you.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/12190223151/prendas-paul-hansmeier-asks-appeals-court-to-delay-sanctions-appeals-court-says-no-try-again.shtml#c74</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anon E. Mous]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 14:55:58 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/12190223151/prendas-paul-hansmeier-asks-appeals-court-to-delay-sanctions-appeals-court-says-no-try-again.shtml#c74</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[So I see in a comment at Popehat that Padraigin Browne is Paul Hansmeier]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/12190223151/prendas-paul-hansmeier-asks-appeals-court-to-delay-sanctions-appeals-court-says-no-try-again.shtml#c55</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anon E. Mous]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 14:54:45 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/12190223151/prendas-paul-hansmeier-asks-appeals-court-to-delay-sanctions-appeals-court-says-no-try-again.shtml#c55</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Well I guess when your earnings take a hit from the Copyright Troll game, it's always nice to have another way to make some quick cash, and apparently being an objector in a class action is a good way to make up those much need funds.<br />
<br />
I guess one scheme is as good as another when your looking to score some easy cash. The fact that they got hung out to dry in the one instance I am where of was when they were looking for a 30k donation ( and I used the word donation loosely ) to drop their objection to another class settlement and the lawyer involved on the other side called them out for it as did the Judge over seeing that case as well.<br />
<br />
Much like the Prenda saga, these guys seem to have all sorts schemes to get easy cash, and even though they have been chastised in class actions and in the copyright trolling cases they show no real signs of stopping any of their activities, of course this is my opinion but sure seems like an accurate perception of things.<br />
<br />
Does Hansmeier have any objector to a class action that isn't related to anyone involved with Prenda law. <br />
<br />
Padraigin Browne is his wife. She is his so called "client" in the Objector filing on the Groupon class action settlement, and his client (collusion at it's finest!)<br />
<br />
How long they have been Objectors in the class action lawsuit game. I have a funnt feeling this is not just the second one, and they may have been doing this for sometime (of course this is just my opinion)<br />
<br />
The gall these guys have to keep on participating in activities that in my opinion are questionable seems to know no bounds, and it seems that the more you peel the onion back the more it stinks.<br />
<br />
If I also recall right wasn't Gibbs involved in that earlier class action with the 30k demand as well? I could swear I read that.<br />
<br />
Why does it seem the usual cast of characters keep popping up in these various cases, as much as they all seem to say, "well I know nothing of this", and "don't know that person" or "have any history with such and such", it always seems to be that no matter where you look they are all entangled together in some capacity.<br />
<br />
I really do have to wonder just how many class action suits they have been Objectors in when they involve large settlements. There must be a way to find out through some filing or through the filed documents to the payees of class action settlements.<br />
<br />
I would suffice to guess in my opinion that this little money making venture has been going on quite a while and that they have been using this objector status to ring up some quick cash to not file an objection.<br />
<br />
Of course this is a little bit speculation and opinion on my part but I wouldn't doubt the class action settlement objector and the copyright troll game have been their only avenues of money generation, I am sure there are more that we aren't aware of just yet.<br />
<br />
I am amazed the way these guys operate, it almost seems like they know every way possible to make a quick buck..my opinion of course]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/11552823150/major-hollywood-studios-all-sent-bogus-dmca-takedowns-concerning-pirate-bay-documentary.shtml#c311</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[RD]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 14:52:58 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/11552823150/major-hollywood-studios-all-sent-bogus-dmca-takedowns-concerning-pirate-bay-documentary.shtml#c311</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Ok so what have you learned? You have learned that:<br />
<br />
A) the *IAA's have issued false DMCA takedowns that are ILLEGAL and a violation of the law, but since this only happens (according to you) in about .1% of cases, its perfectly OK to ignore BREAKING THE LAW since *most* of them are not. <br />
<br />
which leads you to the inescapable conclusion that:<br />
<br />
B) It is PERFECTLY OK to violate the law, as long as that violation is a MINOR amount compared to the whole.<br />
<br />
Which means that:<br />
<br />
C) You have ZERO principles and following the law is OPTIONAL for you, and it's simply a matter of negotiating by what degree of violation you are engaged in.<br />
<br />
Which brings us to the final conclusion:<br />
<br />
Since the VAST MAJORITY of people (ie the population) are NOT engaged in infringing activities, the few "outliers" are too small to have an impact, and therefore its OK for them to violate the law in THE EXACT SAME MANNER IN PROPORTION that you are swinging in here to defend the *IAA's EXACT SAME actions.<br />
<br />
So by your own logic, you shouldn't be supporting those who go after infringers. QED.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/11552823150/major-hollywood-studios-all-sent-bogus-dmca-takedowns-concerning-pirate-bay-documentary.shtml#c286</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 14:52:53 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/11552823150/major-hollywood-studios-all-sent-bogus-dmca-takedowns-concerning-pirate-bay-documentary.shtml#c286</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Proving that the event would be an anomaly!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/11552823150/major-hollywood-studios-all-sent-bogus-dmca-takedowns-concerning-pirate-bay-documentary.shtml#c275</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Josh in CharlotteNC]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 14:48:43 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/11552823150/major-hollywood-studios-all-sent-bogus-dmca-takedowns-concerning-pirate-bay-documentary.shtml#c275</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[15 "vast"s? Weren't you just accusing me of hyperbole last week?  Keep up the hypocrisy Joe, you're amusing me.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/11552823150/major-hollywood-studios-all-sent-bogus-dmca-takedowns-concerning-pirate-bay-documentary.shtml#c256</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[mr. sim]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 14:48:41 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/11552823150/major-hollywood-studios-all-sent-bogus-dmca-takedowns-concerning-pirate-bay-documentary.shtml#c256</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[i wish the studio had the money to file a copyright infringement claim for each one of those bogus DCMA notices. each separate claim or "infringement" would have the ridiculous damages making the studio billions, and then they could double dip by suing for anti competitive behavior.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130505/14372422951/court-finds-fantasy-stories-obscene.shtml#c532</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 14:45:58 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130505/14372422951/court-finds-fantasy-stories-obscene.shtml#c532</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Also from Hitchens: "Is there anyone you find eloquent enough to decide for you what you could read? [Anyone] you would give the job to decide for you? To relieve you from the responsibility of hearing what you might have to hear?"]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/11552823150/major-hollywood-studios-all-sent-bogus-dmca-takedowns-concerning-pirate-bay-documentary.shtml#c246</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Josh in CharlotteNC]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 14:44:29 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/11552823150/major-hollywood-studios-all-sent-bogus-dmca-takedowns-concerning-pirate-bay-documentary.shtml#c246</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i> Why don't you ever mention the millions and millions of valid takedown notices that reflect a pirate getting nothing but a slap on the wrist. </i><br />
<br />
Why do you continue to willfully ignore the thousands of abusive DMCA notices that reflect abusive lawyers causing damage to free speech rights and not even getting a slap on the wrist?  If you really support the rule of law, the huge numbers of these abuses should interest you.  Yet, you turn a blind eye to them.  Don't keep spreading FUD, as you're really bad at it and it is as transparent as glass.  Just keep trolling and evading questions, cause we all know how useless you really are.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130505/14372422951/court-finds-fantasy-stories-obscene.shtml#c517</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 14:44:00 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130505/14372422951/court-finds-fantasy-stories-obscene.shtml#c517</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[No one. Duh. They should all be legal.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Paul Hansmeier to the Court</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/12190223151/prendas-paul-hansmeier-asks-appeals-court-to-delay-sanctions-appeals-court-says-no-try-again.shtml#c35</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jay]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 14:42:14 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/12190223151/prendas-paul-hansmeier-asks-appeals-court-to-delay-sanctions-appeals-court-says-no-try-again.shtml#c35</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>Can I has extension please?</i><br />
<br />
<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gvdf5n-zI14" rel="nofollow">Nope</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/12190223151/prendas-paul-hansmeier-asks-appeals-court-to-delay-sanctions-appeals-court-says-no-try-again.shtml#c22</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[kenichi tanaka]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 14:38:42 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/12190223151/prendas-paul-hansmeier-asks-appeals-court-to-delay-sanctions-appeals-court-says-no-try-again.shtml#c22</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Paul Hansmeier is an idiot. As an attorney, he should be very familiar with the fact that no court in this country will allow him to proceed, whether it's criminal law or whether it's a lawsuit, as long as he's being investigated by state or Federal agencies.<br />
<br />
Not only does it create a conflict but it opens things up for any client of theirs to demand a new trial based on their attorney's predicament with an ongoing criminal investigation, especially when that attorney is the subject or a criminal investigation.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c658</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 14:36:31 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c658</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Where can you obtain a working crystal ball, all the one I have tried seem to have been damaged in the post! Without one how are future criminalw identified?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>I like it...</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/11552823150/major-hollywood-studios-all-sent-bogus-dmca-takedowns-concerning-pirate-bay-documentary.shtml#c230</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jay]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 14:32:34 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/11552823150/major-hollywood-studios-all-sent-bogus-dmca-takedowns-concerning-pirate-bay-documentary.shtml#c230</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[You know what?  I like that...  <br />
<br />
The DMCA was invented to create consumer rights to be taken away by ART.<br />
<br />
I think I'll use that to explain all forms of takedown from now on.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130505/14372422951/court-finds-fantasy-stories-obscene.shtml#c500</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 14:24:41 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130505/14372422951/court-finds-fantasy-stories-obscene.shtml#c500</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Sorry about the broken link.<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medicalization" rel="nofollow">Click here</a> for medicalization article.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/11552823150/major-hollywood-studios-all-sent-bogus-dmca-takedowns-concerning-pirate-bay-documentary.shtml#c210</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Some Guy]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 14:21:16 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/11552823150/major-hollywood-studios-all-sent-bogus-dmca-takedowns-concerning-pirate-bay-documentary.shtml#c210</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[In place of art we now have Automated Rights Trampling (ART). See, there's no need to complain, they're just giving us ART!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130505/14372422951/court-finds-fantasy-stories-obscene.shtml#c477</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 14:20:35 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130505/14372422951/court-finds-fantasy-stories-obscene.shtml#c477</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Why not just leave the people alone instead. Society is <a href="url" rel="nofollow">medicalized</a> enough as it without writers of lemon fanfics being treated in the same manner as schizophrenics.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>