<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Latest Techdirt Comments</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/18243923466/hollywoods-new-talking-point-gatekeepers-are-awesome.shtml#c408</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 12:42:08 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/18243923466/hollywoods-new-talking-point-gatekeepers-are-awesome.shtml#c408</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Quick, look in your mirror.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/02025423448/company-claims-patent-pop-up-ads-sues-porn-travel-companies.shtml#c16</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 12:41:34 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/02025423448/company-claims-patent-pop-up-ads-sues-porn-travel-companies.shtml#c16</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Am I the only one feeling ambivalent toward this?<br />
<br />
<br />
One one hand, it is patent trolling.<br />
<br />
<br />
On the other hand, anything that gets us less pop-up ads is fine by me :)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: @&quot;PaulT&quot;, compulsive yapper.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/01121423439/hollywood-studios-keep-saying-its-employees-must-get-paid-now-may-be-forced-to-pay-its-interns.shtml#c1235</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 12:40:52 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/01121423439/hollywood-studios-keep-saying-its-employees-must-get-paid-now-may-be-forced-to-pay-its-interns.shtml#c1235</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[every single writer who works in media either online or off will tell you how wildly inaccurate virtually every single assumption you just made is...]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/18243923466/hollywoods-new-talking-point-gatekeepers-are-awesome.shtml#c396</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 12:40:27 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/18243923466/hollywoods-new-talking-point-gatekeepers-are-awesome.shtml#c396</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The hidden agenda is we have to stop this self publishing movement before it takes away most of out market.<br />
I will post again the link <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/04/hugh_howey_self_publishing_is_the_future_and_great_for_writers/" rel="nofollow"> Hugh Howey on self publishing</a>, which is the result of an informal survey of book authors that have gone the self publishing route.<br />
The main point that comes out is that many more authors can earn some money, about the same as most published authors, on a smaller fan base, and therefore sales.<br />
Obviously the respondents self selected, but the point is a large number were making money from ebooks without being well known.<br />
The definite conclusion from the article is that for ebooks, an author is best going the self published route, at least at first.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/18243923466/hollywoods-new-talking-point-gatekeepers-are-awesome.shtml#c389</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 12:36:38 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/18243923466/hollywoods-new-talking-point-gatekeepers-are-awesome.shtml#c389</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The greater the persuasive force of third party papers mentioned here, the longer the TD articles mocking same.  Mr. Pessach's "essay" must have struck a raw nerve indeed...]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: @&quot;PaulT&quot;, compulsive yapper.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/01121423439/hollywood-studios-keep-saying-its-employees-must-get-paid-now-may-be-forced-to-pay-its-interns.shtml#c1227</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 12:36:36 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/01121423439/hollywood-studios-keep-saying-its-employees-must-get-paid-now-may-be-forced-to-pay-its-interns.shtml#c1227</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I don't know. I think that an entry level wage for a writer is probably around $30,000. Add to that employer payroll taxes of around 20% (I assume Masnick treats you as an independent contractor, rather than a bonafide employee). Then most companies contribute modestly toward health insurance, so call that $4,000. That adds up to about $40,000/year based on fifty, forty hour weeks; which is about $20/hour. As you are a bit more than entry level and (presumably) part-time; the rate should be somewhat higher- $25-$30 per hour at a minimum. Assuming the writer worked 40 hours per week to produce those articles, I'd say a minimum of $3200/moth for an inexperienced writer and double that for an experienced one.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/02025423448/company-claims-patent-pop-up-ads-sues-porn-travel-companies.shtml#c10</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[fogbugzd]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 12:35:14 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/02025423448/company-claims-patent-pop-up-ads-sues-porn-travel-companies.shtml#c10</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[There was a "Pop-Up Killer" application in 1999, which suggests that the popups predated the patent application.  <br />
<br />
You can read the original patent at <a href='http://www.google.com/patents/US7353229' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/patents/US7353229</a> . To my untrained eye it looks like this is a patent for the idea of using mechanisms already in JavaScript and Java applets to present advertising. Reading the article as a programmer I didn't see much in the way of how to do popups other than "Use the tools that are already provided."  <br />
<br />
JavaScript and the ability to do pupups and popunders was released by Netscape in 1997.  I am sure that by the time the '229 patent was filed there were a lot of tutorials that explained how to do pupup and popnder ads and did it better than this paptent.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130608/03355523371/warning-letters-under-uks-three-strikes-plan-unlikely-to-be-sent-out-before-2016-if-ever.shtml#c275</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 12:34:53 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130608/03355523371/warning-letters-under-uks-three-strikes-plan-unlikely-to-be-sent-out-before-2016-if-ever.shtml#c275</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[He has retired with the]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/10213023529/fbi-admits-to-using-drones-to-spy-americans.shtml#c374</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 12:31:45 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/10213023529/fbi-admits-to-using-drones-to-spy-americans.shtml#c374</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[And if you don't say something and spread the awareness, the government will figure the populace don't care.  With that in mind, I can see them doing far worse over time.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/10213023529/fbi-admits-to-using-drones-to-spy-americans.shtml#c353</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 12:27:53 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/10213023529/fbi-admits-to-using-drones-to-spy-americans.shtml#c353</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Who cares. They already have helicopters and satellites that can look down upon you. If they send up a helicopter it probably takes 3 cops. If they send up a drone, it takes one with a  joystick. Saves the taxpayers money. <br />
<br />
What do you honestly think they are going to do with these drones? Spy on you? Are you really that important? I'll bet my left one that they will use them to watch the borders for illegals, Chase bank robbers, Watch known drug houses, etc etc. Wow what a horrible idea. <br />
<br />
If you don't want to be seen nude in your backyard than don't go outside without clothes on. <br />
<br />
Stop bitching about everything that the government does. You elected them. If you don't like it than run for your local seat.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/10213023529/fbi-admits-to-using-drones-to-spy-americans.shtml#c343</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 12:26:53 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/10213023529/fbi-admits-to-using-drones-to-spy-americans.shtml#c343</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[actually the drones are far less worrying. They are just a convenient way of removing the focus from the real surveillance problems.<br />
<br />
Btw. Merkel was digging a bit at Obama in Berlin on the surveillance cases: "There needs to be a balance and we will continue to work with USA to find the right balance."<br />
Obama instantly answered that "USA already had found the right balance."...<br />
<br />
Given how this balance is individual for every person on earth I call bull on that...]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: china</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/10213023529/fbi-admits-to-using-drones-to-spy-americans.shtml#c341</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 12:22:10 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/10213023529/fbi-admits-to-using-drones-to-spy-americans.shtml#c341</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It was across it. But I wasn't aware that Prenda finished the tunnel. <br />
<br />
Hell, that could save alot of miles.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/18243923466/hollywoods-new-talking-point-gatekeepers-are-awesome.shtml#c366</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[jupiterkansas]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 12:18:27 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/18243923466/hollywoods-new-talking-point-gatekeepers-are-awesome.shtml#c366</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[So the system that gives you lots of stuff to choose from is bad, and a system that severely limits what's available to you is good.<br />
<br />
If you presume the consumer can't decide anything for themselves, this makes sense.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/18243923466/hollywoods-new-talking-point-gatekeepers-are-awesome.shtml#c360</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 12:18:15 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/18243923466/hollywoods-new-talking-point-gatekeepers-are-awesome.shtml#c360</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[He said major labels, leaving the smaller labels as his "Africa's diamond". He is not wrong, even though you can easily argue that all labels was part of the problem in the past. The guy is clearly not knowledgeable about how to do business in the new market and that is the only reason why he is complaining!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/10213023529/fbi-admits-to-using-drones-to-spy-americans.shtml#c324</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gwiz]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 12:17:37 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/10213023529/fbi-admits-to-using-drones-to-spy-americans.shtml#c324</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Lol. Blue showed up 3 minutes after your comment saying exactly that:<br />
<br />
<a href='http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/10213023529/fbi-admits-to-using-drones-to-spy-americans.shtml#c203' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/10213023529/fbi-admits-to-using-drones-to-spy-americans.shtml#c203</a><br />
<br />
Predictable troll is predictable.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Where can I torrent the &quot;best of surveillance&quot; video?</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/10213023529/fbi-admits-to-using-drones-to-spy-americans.shtml#c321</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 12:16:33 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/10213023529/fbi-admits-to-using-drones-to-spy-americans.shtml#c321</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Have to calibrate those cameras somehow and what better than perky nipples?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Lots of room to debate drones</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/10213023529/fbi-admits-to-using-drones-to-spy-americans.shtml#c319</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Boojumbunn]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 12:14:13 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/10213023529/fbi-admits-to-using-drones-to-spy-americans.shtml#c319</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Honestly, there is a lot of room to debate when and how the use of drones is appropriate inside the US and what is done with the data after a drone is flown.<br />
<br />
     I know it's not against the law for an unmarked police car, for example, to follow me down the road as I drive.   A manned drone seems, on the surface, to be an extension of this.   However a drone is not restricted to the same paths and views that a car is (which is one of the strengths of a drone.)    In my mind, this raises the following questions.<br />
<br />
1.  If a person is nude sunbathing in the privacy of their own, fenced, backyard and a police drone flies over.. what protections exist to prevent that part of that video from being kept, perused, taken home, posted on youtube, etc...  Can an FOI be used to get copies of drone flight video's?<br />
<br />
2.  If damage is done by a drone (breaks window, shorts power line) who is responsible?   <br />
<br />
3.   What type of encryption will be used to protect flight controls for drones from being hacked?   What sort of encryption for video streams to prevent from being recorded by third parties?<br />
<br />
4.   What restrictions will be placed on the correct use of drones?   can building and safety use it (as they have been using google maps) to look into peoples backyards for code violations?   Will a warrant be needed to use them?   Can they only be used to follow individuals or can the forestry service use them to look for fires/drugs/poachers/etc?<br />
<br />
5.   What laws will be in place for private use of drones?   To the best of my knowledge, if your not using them for commercial purpose you can fly video drones right now below 500ft.   but if your using them for commercial purpose then it's against FAA regulations.<br />
<br />
   So in my mind, there are lots of questions that need to be asked BEFORE we begin general use of drones within the borders of the united states.  I hope they are being considered.<br />
<br />
                      Boojum the brown bunny]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Umm, Google has you all accustomed to its spying.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/10213023529/fbi-admits-to-using-drones-to-spy-americans.shtml#c298</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 12:13:44 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/10213023529/fbi-admits-to-using-drones-to-spy-americans.shtml#c298</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I imagine people are aware of the pitfalls of google and how it makes money. However, others don]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/10213023529/fbi-admits-to-using-drones-to-spy-americans.shtml#c278</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 12:12:00 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/10213023529/fbi-admits-to-using-drones-to-spy-americans.shtml#c278</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Have another report vote ootb for another post having no bearing on the topic. <br />
------------<br />
<br />
I have come to the realization that nothing involving the present day scandals can be believed when I hear politicians mouths move. <br />
<br />
The investigations into the NLS have already shown that any time the system can be abused it will be.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: china</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/10213023529/fbi-admits-to-using-drones-to-spy-americans.shtml#c255</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 12:11:51 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/10213023529/fbi-admits-to-using-drones-to-spy-americans.shtml#c255</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Ummm...  [Quickly removes tinfoil hat, dons thinking cap.]  China physically occupies a different continent?  Yup.  That's the correctest answer.  I'm sure.  Ahhh...  Is this a trick question?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>