<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Latest Techdirt Comments</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/14341223521/google-without-admitting-it-gets-fisa-orders-files-lawsuit-to-challenge-fisa-gag-orders.shtml#c424</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Niall]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 02:57:19 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/14341223521/google-without-admitting-it-gets-fisa-orders-files-lawsuit-to-challenge-fisa-gag-orders.shtml#c424</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Does that mean he runs on solar power? Can we ship him to the South Pole for the next three months? :)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: An excellent piece of defending without admitting:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/14341223521/google-without-admitting-it-gets-fisa-orders-files-lawsuit-to-challenge-fisa-gag-orders.shtml#c400</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Niall]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 02:56:06 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/14341223521/google-without-admitting-it-gets-fisa-orders-files-lawsuit-to-challenge-fisa-gag-orders.shtml#c400</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Google! Derp! Google! Bawk!<br />
<br />
There, I managed to contribute more to this than your ongoing Google paranoia.<br />
<br />
Seriously, if you were picking on other 'big search' or ad-monetised content (FB etc) you might seem reasonable, but you seem incapable of moving off your MS-sponsored talking points.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130608/03355523371/warning-letters-under-uks-three-strikes-plan-unlikely-to-be-sent-out-before-2016-if-ever.shtml#c62</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 02:49:42 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130608/03355523371/warning-letters-under-uks-three-strikes-plan-unlikely-to-be-sent-out-before-2016-if-ever.shtml#c62</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[In September 2010, I wrote to the minister responsible, Ed Vaizey and got a response, not written by him, which included <br />
<br />
"... whilst the specific figures may have been questioned there has not been a serious attempt from any side to deny that this widespread infringement is causing harm to the creative industries, which is why it should be tackled as quickly as possible"<br />
<br />
and also <br />
<br />
"Figures are not available for the losses from unlawful file-sharing in other content industries such as publishing as you rightly mentioned, business software or computer games, but it is clear that they are all suffering significant losses."<br />
<br />
Apparently if you discount all the people and studies that have pointed out the decided lack of harm to the creative industries from copyright infringement you end up with a situation where no 'side' has made a serious attempt to deny such. Maybe there had only been jocular attempts to do so.<br />
Also, lack of even estimates of loss, indicate significant losses.<br />
<br />
Of course back then they were careful to note that<br />
".. the provisions of the Act are designed to build gathering of impartial evidence and real feedback on impact to all parties..."<br />
and that<br />
"This process will continue as Ofcom researches benchmark levels of copyright infringement and assesses the initial impact of the two initial obligations.  These assessments from Ofcom will provide the sort of evidence that you want to see and that the Government agrees it would need to have before taking any steps that would impact on people]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130608/03355523371/warning-letters-under-uks-three-strikes-plan-unlikely-to-be-sent-out-before-2016-if-ever.shtml#c46</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 02:48:21 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130608/03355523371/warning-letters-under-uks-three-strikes-plan-unlikely-to-be-sent-out-before-2016-if-ever.shtml#c46</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[hey are waiting until after the election, so that they can then find jobs for any MPs that lose their seats.<br />
/sarc]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Legislative process</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/17490723465/leaked-nsas-talking-points-defending-nsa-surveillance.shtml#c1232</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven William]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 02:43:04 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/17490723465/leaked-nsas-talking-points-defending-nsa-surveillance.shtml#c1232</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Maybe we should just cut to the chase and save everyone time, money and energy and make everything illegal and a crime, then the attorneys aka legislators can start working backwards and pass new "laws" telling us what we are allowed to do that is no longer illegal? Seeing as there are now more laws on the books than a man or woman could count in a lifetime, and ignorance of the law is no excuse (unless you are a federal judge (think A. Howard Matz [recently retired], a cop or a persecutor) it seems "a prudent thing."<br />
<br />
A PS Fact: Do to so many so called "laws" the fact is "You're (Probably) a Federal Criminal."]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:  Imagine doing that to a judge.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/17490723465/leaked-nsas-talking-points-defending-nsa-surveillance.shtml#c1207</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven William]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 02:34:37 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/17490723465/leaked-nsas-talking-points-defending-nsa-surveillance.shtml#c1207</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[They and you have the same right to shoot at any one claiming a right that doesn't exist while in the attempt of a false arrest. The men in your story may believe they are acting within the law, as in a law unto themselves, but many a dead person has. It all comes down to how fast can you shoot? A violation or attempt of a violation of a fundamental right always does. U.S. v John Bad Elk.<br />
<br />
We are now a nation of the rule of men, not the rule of laws.<br />
<br />
FACT: There are no rights recognized in Federal Courts, except to plead for bail.<br />
<br />
The so-called rules of law are for the poor, the uneducated and working class. Everyone else is privileged, entitled, exempt or immune from so-called rules of law.  How ya like those rules?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/10230323518/nsa-claims-surveillance-programs-aided-stopping-50-attacks-details-lacking.shtml#c923</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[techflaws]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 02:34:28 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/10230323518/nsa-claims-surveillance-programs-aided-stopping-50-attacks-details-lacking.shtml#c923</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Enjoy your tiny echo chamber, LOL!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/10230323518/nsa-claims-surveillance-programs-aided-stopping-50-attacks-details-lacking.shtml#c922</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[techflaws]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 02:33:38 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/10230323518/nsa-claims-surveillance-programs-aided-stopping-50-attacks-details-lacking.shtml#c922</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Enjoy your tiny echo chamber, LOL!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/10230323518/nsa-claims-surveillance-programs-aided-stopping-50-attacks-details-lacking.shtml#c902</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[techflaws]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 02:33:17 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/10230323518/nsa-claims-surveillance-programs-aided-stopping-50-attacks-details-lacking.shtml#c902</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Enjoy your tiny echo chamber, LOL!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/10230323518/nsa-claims-surveillance-programs-aided-stopping-50-attacks-details-lacking.shtml#c890</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[techflaws]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 02:30:59 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/10230323518/nsa-claims-surveillance-programs-aided-stopping-50-attacks-details-lacking.shtml#c890</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Enjoy your tiny echo chamber, LOL!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: End of Governement</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/17490723465/leaked-nsas-talking-points-defending-nsa-surveillance.shtml#c1189</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven William]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 02:22:59 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/17490723465/leaked-nsas-talking-points-defending-nsa-surveillance.shtml#c1189</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It will not be the "[e]nd of Government!!!" It will however be the end of bad government, of arbitrary government, of abusive government. <br />
<br />
"I carried out my orders until arrested. I had no sense that I was spying, and I ask that this be taken into account in deciding my verdict." ~Witold Pilecki]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>McCarthyism has nothing on terrorism</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/10230323518/nsa-claims-surveillance-programs-aided-stopping-50-attacks-details-lacking.shtml#c878</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[techflaws]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 02:21:28 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/10230323518/nsa-claims-surveillance-programs-aided-stopping-50-attacks-details-lacking.shtml#c878</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>Only 50?</i><br />
<br />
Well, it took Osama only 1 to make the Americans turn their freedom-loving country into a police state.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Fisa Act</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/17490723465/leaked-nsas-talking-points-defending-nsa-surveillance.shtml#c1186</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven William]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 02:16:35 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/17490723465/leaked-nsas-talking-points-defending-nsa-surveillance.shtml#c1186</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Recommend you read ACLU v. National Sec. Agency, 493 F. 3d 644 for an enlightening insight about FISA through the Dissenting opinion by the Honorable RONALD LEE GILMAN, Circuit Judge.<br />
<br />
And now two brief sponsored messages, one for the Voting Cattle and two for the Sheepeople, who live near a steeple, that don't fly a flag of the yellow. Red, White and Blue cuts through all party lines. Like truth, justice and the American way. <br />
<br />
<a href='http://youtu.be/NwztaQgv3-Y' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://youtu.be/NwztaQgv3-Y</a><br />
<br />
<a href='http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H6b70TUbdfs' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H6b70TUbdfs</a><br />
<br />
Spying on Citizens within America is Spying. And Treason of their Oath of the Office.<br />
<br />
First they came for the Facebooks,<br />
and I didn't speak out because I wasn't "Facebooker."<br />
<br />
Then they came for the Twitters,<br />
and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a "Twitterer."<br />
<br />
Then they came for the Youtubes,<br />
and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a "Youtuber."<br />
<br />
Then they came for me,<br />
and there was no one left to speak for me.<br />
<br />
<a href='http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x_UV2Mao2-E' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x_UV2Mao2-E</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130611/00503223401/public-outcry-taiwan-kills-their-version-sopa.shtml#c62</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[silverscarcat]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 02:04:59 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130611/00503223401/public-outcry-taiwan-kills-their-version-sopa.shtml#c62</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[And you hate it when copyright law isn't expanded stupidly.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/00483923515/nsas-lockbox-has-no-lock.shtml#c716</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 02:02:39 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/00483923515/nsas-lockbox-has-no-lock.shtml#c716</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[actually, it IS possible to explain it. In simple english:<br />
no warrant: who you call<br />
warrant: what you said]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130608/03355523371/warning-letters-under-uks-three-strikes-plan-unlikely-to-be-sent-out-before-2016-if-ever.shtml#c21</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 01:57:39 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130608/03355523371/warning-letters-under-uks-three-strikes-plan-unlikely-to-be-sent-out-before-2016-if-ever.shtml#c21</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[average_joe, horse with no name and out_of_the_blue just hate it when due process is enforced.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130611/00503223401/public-outcry-taiwan-kills-their-version-sopa.shtml#c58</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Just John]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 01:43:58 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130611/00503223401/public-outcry-taiwan-kills-their-version-sopa.shtml#c58</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Please feel free to show where he states he hates copyright. IIRC, he has even stated that copyright should exist, contrary to those like me who thinks it creates ultimately more problems because of abuses than it help.<br />
<br />
The most I have seen is Mike discussing his dislike of copyright abuse, not copyright enforcement.<br />
<br />
Personally, I will not go back to the US, and will stay in Taiwan, until the government gets its collective head out of its ass and starts enforcing the original "for the public good" copyright viewpoint, instead of allowing the **AA's to push their abusive views on the general public.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130612/12373623425/mpaas-chris-dodd-will-be-chair-free-speech-week.shtml#c1609</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 01:37:54 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130612/12373623425/mpaas-chris-dodd-will-be-chair-free-speech-week.shtml#c1609</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Most honest people would actually consider that they were doing wrong if they were rightly removed for undue harrassment.<br />
<br />
You however, labour under the delusion that you are owed discussion when you have no legitimate argument to address.<br />
<br />
You refuse to face the undisputable fact that you're wrong. In that regard, you are a coward.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Debtors</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130605/18192323331/dhs-finally-releases-2011-report-civil-liberties-impact-suspicionless-electronic-device-searches-says-agent-hunches-trump.shtml#c882</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryan]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 01:35:55 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130605/18192323331/dhs-finally-releases-2011-report-civil-liberties-impact-suspicionless-electronic-device-searches-says-agent-hunches-trump.shtml#c882</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Looks like you guys over there in the US have been providing data for our government over here in the UK! Looks like none of us have any right to be private anymore!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130618/11332223519/states-attorneys-general-want-to-special-exception-to-blame-sites-actions-users.shtml#c768</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 00:54:08 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130618/11332223519/states-attorneys-general-want-to-special-exception-to-blame-sites-actions-users.shtml#c768</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Yes... Aiding and abetting... Both of which require the act to be done with knowledge and intent, neither of which can you actually prove in this case. That is rather the point, I'd think. Completely outside the problems of illegally seized evidence and jurisdiction issues.<br />
<br />
The fact that you just out and out dismiss any counter arguments does not make you 'right.']]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>