<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Latest Techdirt Comments</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1829</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[horse with no name]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 16:08:23 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1829</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<b> I had looked around last night when I wrote this and looked for prior art, but having not found any</b><br />
<br />
How about something as simple as the cold war era nuclear launch systems, which requires a presidential password and two separate operators, on two consoles, signalling to one central system to launch?<br />
<br />
It's very basic, but it is a dual authorization / confirmation system.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Disagreements...</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130424/00010122821/adam-savage-why-copyright-trademark-holders-need-to-get-over-their-obsession-with-control.shtml#c9</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jay]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 16:07:46 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130424/00010122821/adam-savage-why-copyright-trademark-holders-need-to-get-over-their-obsession-with-control.shtml#c9</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i> Companies don't get to define fair use.</i><br />
<br />
I don't agree.  If you read <a href="http://billmoyers.com/content/the-powell-memo-a-call-to-arms-for-corporations" rel="nofollow">The Lewis Powell Memo</a> you see that corporations frame the arguments regarding copyright and fair use.  Most people have takedowns and other issues occur without ever trying a fair use defense in court.  There are no teeth to the people having such a defense so it's useless.<br />
<br />
We remember that Kim Dotcom along with other victims of domain seizures have had no judicial review in their illegal takedowns.<br />
<br />
<i>The host also (again, oddly) claims that fair use is mostly based on a court case from 1982 (which one?!?) and that people fear to test it.</i><br />
<br />
I'm going to go on a limb and think they're talking about <a href="https://w2.eff.org/legal/cases/betamax" rel="nofollow">Sony v Universal</a> and its fair use rulings.  Yes, that's 1984.  But it just doesn't vibe that they're talking about a 1982 ruling unless they simply got the year wrong.<br />
<br />
What corporations have successfully done is privatize the judicial system over the past 40 years.  This privatization was to be written with SOPA where corporations have more rights than people.  Even now, we discuss all of the videos and takedowns issued with no fair use.  That's the problem.  We indeed have given corporations a lot of decisions.  It's no wonder that the MPAA feels entitled to push both major parties to do what they want given how it's worked tremendously well for a LOOOONG time.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Research</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/10303023175/magic-hat-brewery-sues-west-sixth-brewing-using-number-six-their-logo.shtml#c233</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 16:05:54 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/10303023175/magic-hat-brewery-sues-west-sixth-brewing-using-number-six-their-logo.shtml#c233</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Ok/ aftr sveril hourz uf carfuuul ressrch i musst adnit thhat thees canz luuk a lots aslike.<br />
<br />
speclly wen the 6 it bning chugedd]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/10290323174/vod-service-acetrax-shuts-down-germany-customers-movies-are-lost-due-to-drm.shtml#c466</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 16:03:39 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/10290323174/vod-service-acetrax-shuts-down-germany-customers-movies-are-lost-due-to-drm.shtml#c466</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Wait, I can get a movie *with* DRM?! Holy crap, I didn't know what I was missing all these years!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/02514123171/partisanship-over-spying-journalists-is-stupid-spying-journalists-is-bad-period.shtml#c62</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 15:55:56 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/02514123171/partisanship-over-spying-journalists-is-stupid-spying-journalists-is-bad-period.shtml#c62</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Anyone who thinks otherwise is either naive or in denial.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/10303023175/magic-hat-brewery-sues-west-sixth-brewing-using-number-six-their-logo.shtml#c223</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[QuietgyInTheCorner]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 15:55:30 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/10303023175/magic-hat-brewery-sues-west-sixth-brewing-using-number-six-their-logo.shtml#c223</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[After carefully comparing the two logos, I can definately see how the similarity could cause "brand confusion". (Can I take the blindfold off now?)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Carolyn Joyce Carty</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080602/0026361287.shtml#c373</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[amber Relph]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 15:55:09 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080602/0026361287.shtml#c373</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Unfortunately, I know this woman Carolyn Carty who claims to have wrotten this poem as a 6yo child prodigy.. I share a child with her son..<br />
These people are frauds, and outright lunatics!!<br />
Carolyn also claims to be the secret love child of Marilyn Monroe, and JFK too..<br />
I just thought Id share that lol!<br />
She is a mentally unstable methamphetamine addict, who lives off the government ssi and welfare.<br />
I didn't think she was" with it" enough to even make a claim like that lmao!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Hendrix Foresaw This</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/10303023175/magic-hat-brewery-sues-west-sixth-brewing-using-number-six-their-logo.shtml#c206</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[A. Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 15:54:53 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/10303023175/magic-hat-brewery-sues-west-sixth-brewing-using-number-six-their-logo.shtml#c206</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Props for the Hendrix reference - you beat me to it.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Innovation?  Try Predation!</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c523</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jennifer]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 15:38:51 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c523</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I'd love to monetize my fanfics, but the deal Amazon is offering is nothing short of predacious. <br />
<br />
I do 100% of the work, and reap only 20 - 35% of the profits?  That's insanity.  Do Amazon and the franchise owners really deserve 65 - 80% of my profits just for sitting back in their comfortable chairs puffing cigars made out of hundred dollar bills?  <br />
<br />
The Constitution is supposed to promote the creation of art.  So that's why they had to some forms of art illegal, to promote art.  Yeaaaaah.  <br />
<br />
Nice try, Amazon--you're not getting a cent of my money.  I'll wait till the Pirate Party gets copyright terms down to 5 years, then sell my own work for 100% of the profits.  C ya!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Extend the hand of friendship.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/02455423183/prenda-lawyer-says-georgia-court-should-ignore-judge-wrights-order-because-look-hackers.shtml#c401</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 15:35:38 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/02455423183/prenda-lawyer-says-georgia-court-should-ignore-judge-wrights-order-because-look-hackers.shtml#c401</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Dogs will sometimes eat motions...right out of the cat's litter box.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: What a whiney baby + @ &quot;Oh, you didn</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/18103323179/filmmaker-behind-pirate-bay-documentary-says-bogus-dmca-takedowns-take-away-his-free-speech.shtml#c797</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[That One Guy]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 15:33:45 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/18103323179/filmmaker-behind-pirate-bay-documentary-says-bogus-dmca-takedowns-take-away-his-free-speech.shtml#c797</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[But he didn't spend 100 million doing it, so obviously it doesn't count. /s]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Chewbacca Defense</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/02455423183/prenda-lawyer-says-georgia-court-should-ignore-judge-wrights-order-because-look-hackers.shtml#c387</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 15:33:35 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/02455423183/prenda-lawyer-says-georgia-court-should-ignore-judge-wrights-order-because-look-hackers.shtml#c387</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Spank it! Spank it quick!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Press conference - Sheriff Donny Youngblood discusses Silva case</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/17321623162/released-video-silva-beating-shows-his-last-moments-video-actual-beating-still-missing.shtml#c892</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 15:31:27 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/17321623162/released-video-silva-beating-shows-his-last-moments-video-actual-beating-still-missing.shtml#c892</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/10303023175/magic-hat-brewery-sues-west-sixth-brewing-using-number-six-their-logo.shtml#c188</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 15:30:06 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/10303023175/magic-hat-brewery-sues-west-sixth-brewing-using-number-six-their-logo.shtml#c188</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[By the way, what is it with this sudden popularity of the # sign anyway?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Extend the hand of friendship.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/02455423183/prenda-lawyer-says-georgia-court-should-ignore-judge-wrights-order-because-look-hackers.shtml#c371</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zem]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 15:29:12 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/02455423183/prenda-lawyer-says-georgia-court-should-ignore-judge-wrights-order-because-look-hackers.shtml#c371</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[These guys need our help. It's time we extended the hand of friendship and remind them of the excuses that always worked in the past. I will go first.<br />
<br />
"Your honour, the dog ate my motion"]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/10303023175/magic-hat-brewery-sues-west-sixth-brewing-using-number-six-their-logo.shtml#c166</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Darryl]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 15:28:31 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/10303023175/magic-hat-brewery-sues-west-sixth-brewing-using-number-six-their-logo.shtml#c166</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Are you sure the second can has a 6 on it?  The can just might be upside down.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>New name...</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/10303023175/magic-hat-brewery-sues-west-sixth-brewing-using-number-six-their-logo.shtml#c163</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ahow628]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 15:26:39 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/10303023175/magic-hat-brewery-sues-west-sixth-brewing-using-number-six-their-logo.shtml#c163</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Saw someone on Twitter say they should change their name to Magic Asshat...]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/10303023175/magic-hat-brewery-sues-west-sixth-brewing-using-number-six-their-logo.shtml#c161</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 15:25:10 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/10303023175/magic-hat-brewery-sues-west-sixth-brewing-using-number-six-their-logo.shtml#c161</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[And the call ends up being answered at the White House.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Yes, it's trolling and yes, it's ridiculous</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1827</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[average_joe]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 15:22:08 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1827</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>I read "Nowhere do the charges even attempt to show any specific *criminal* infringement." as "Nowhere in the charges are there any evidence presented to support specific criminal infringement". And there isn't.<br />
<br />
He didn't say "He is not being charged with specific *criminal* infringement". If he did, you'd have a point, also the subject has been discussed extensively when his indictment was news.</i><br />
<br />
I read it as him denying that there's any specific criminal infringement shown, emphasis on "criminal." That count of the indictment shows specific criminal infringement. It's criminal under Section 506(a)(1)(C) even though it's only one film.<br />
<br />
The text of the indictment demonstrates some of the evidence behind the charge:<blockquote>On or about October 25, 2008, VAN DER KOLK uploaded an infringing copy of a copyrighted motion picture entitled "Taken 2008 DVDRip Repack [A Release Lounge H264 By Micky22].mp4" to Megaupload.com and e-mailed the URL link for the file to another individual. An infringing copy of this copyrighted work was still present as of October 27, 2011, on a server in the Eastern District of Virginia controlled by the Mega Conspiracy.</blockquote>The allegation is that Bram van der Kolk uploaded it personally. The others are alleged to be accomplices (that's the 18 U.S.C. 2 bit in the text I quoted above). Accomplices are treated as though they committed the act themselves. Thus, all are charged with specific CRIMINAL infringement. This is shown and alleged in the indictment. <br />
<br />
I'd love to hear why Mike thinks otherwise, but I suspect, as per ALWAYS, he's gone now (or you're him), and we won't get any answer from him directly. Why he can't discuss and/or admit this stuff puzzles me no end. It's OK to admit that something is alleged and shown in the indictment. But for some reason he has to defend and protect Kim and the Gang. Wonder why...]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Yes, it's trolling and yes, it's ridiculous</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1812</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Karl]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 15:22:03 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1812</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<em>He denied it just two weeks ago:</em><br />
<br />
Except that the entire focus of the article was on the <strong>aiding and abetting</strong> charges. In order to show that Megaupload "aided and abetted" criminal infringement <em>done by their users,</em> they have to show that <em>a specific user</em> committed criminal infringement.<br />
<br />
And they have not done that. So, Mike is entirely correct.<br />
<br />
Separately, that specific allegation - even if true - probably doesn't rise to the level of <em>criminal</em> infringement. But that allegation was not the basis of the <em>aiding and abetting</em> charges, so it's irrelevant to that discussion.<br />
<br />
So, once again, you have shown that <em>you</em> are the one that is "slimy and dishonest" (your words).]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>