<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Latest Techdirt Comments</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title>Re: Expected Techhive to be one of Mike's piratey pals...</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130619/01031623524/more-details-emerge-as-states-attorneys-general-seek-to-hold-back-innovation-internet.shtml#c352</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[S. T. Stone]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 03:30:13 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130619/01031623524/more-details-emerge-as-states-attorneys-general-seek-to-hold-back-innovation-internet.shtml#c352</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>Service providers, even if a mere free-to-use physical bulletin board, DO in fact have SOME degree of responsibility to police their area.</i><br />
<br />
While true, said policing goes hand-in-hand with the notion that a service provider can]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/16530423522/arizona-court-skeptical-medical-excuse-prenda-lawyers.shtml#c222</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[That Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 03:28:15 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/16530423522/arizona-court-skeptical-medical-excuse-prenda-lawyers.shtml#c222</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Actually IIRC, and by all means correct me if I am wrong, this case is from a mass Doe suit in DC where the Judge told them to NOT USE the data they got in response to the subpoenas before they were finally quashed.<br />
<br />
I think this is the reason Mr. Harris has been so vehement in his demand they reveal how they got his information, because it would open a much larger can of worms and set 2 Judges in 2 District upon them.<br />
<br />
I await my external brain SJD to arrive and confirm I am remembering correctly.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20130604/21150823320/help-explain-why-phone-unlocking-is-important-to-you-why-it-should-be-legal.shtml#c1995</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Malor]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 03:25:28 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20130604/21150823320/help-explain-why-phone-unlocking-is-important-to-you-why-it-should-be-legal.shtml#c1995</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Well, I'd say they own the phone outright, period.  But they also have an financial obligation they must fulfill.  The carriers can already make their life super-difficult for not paying the $250 fee, or whatever it is.  There is a huge, nasty industry in the US devoted to collecting debt. <br />
<br />
I'd say that's enough.  Once they sign the paperwork, the phone belongs to them, and they can do any damn thing they want with it.  They're already on the hook if they break it, so they've got the responsibilities of ownership.  They should also get the benefits.  <br />
<br />
And then if they try to cheat their phone provider, well, there are tons of legal remedies available.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Immunity</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130619/01031623524/more-details-emerge-as-states-attorneys-general-seek-to-hold-back-innovation-internet.shtml#c329</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dannie Blaze]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 03:22:49 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130619/01031623524/more-details-emerge-as-states-attorneys-general-seek-to-hold-back-innovation-internet.shtml#c329</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Allow me to summarize in the form of song lyrics:<br />
<br />
Spent so much time <br />
Not looking for an answer<br />
But someone else to blame<br />
As long as you don't take the drop<br />
To you it's all the same]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20130604/21150823320/help-explain-why-phone-unlocking-is-important-to-you-why-it-should-be-legal.shtml#c1966</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Malor]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 03:20:50 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20130604/21150823320/help-explain-why-phone-unlocking-is-important-to-you-why-it-should-be-legal.shtml#c1966</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[My unlocking story:  I spent $600 on a phone (a Galaxy Nexus, imported from Europe) that would work on any GSM carrier, and would allow me to run whatever I want.  (in other words, it's unlocked at two levels; it's both compatible with all GSM frequencies in use, and also offers me full control over the user-visible software running on the phone.)<br />
<br />
I thought this was a fairly ridiculous price, and a law requiring that phones be fully unlocked would have meant I could have spent far less.  <br />
<br />
Now, it's gotten better since I bought my Galaxy Nexus, as you can now get equivalent unlocked phones for $400 direct from Google, but that's still about $200 or $250 too much.  Even cheapies should be easily portable.  Note that I do NOT mean subsidized phones; those only look cheap.  I mean the actual cheapies, the ones you can buy for $100 to $150, should be usable with any carrier using that technology. <br />
<br />
Note that simply allowing unlocks is not enough, because at least with AT&amp;T and T-Mobile, the phones they sell themselves will be deliberately crippled, so as not to work well on their competitors' frequencies.  I'm not sure this legislation can be modified to fix that problem, but if it's in scope, it's something Congress should be thinking about.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/13581923535/microsoft-capitulates-removes-online-drm-xbox-one.shtml#c1105</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Donglebert the Needlessly Obtuse]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 03:08:27 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/13581923535/microsoft-capitulates-removes-online-drm-xbox-one.shtml#c1105</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The interesting bit will be all those extra in-game downloads in disc based games.  Every time a disc gets sold on, the downloads get bought again.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/18243923466/hollywoods-new-talking-point-gatekeepers-are-awesome.shtml#c982</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[average_joe]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 02:56:21 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/18243923466/hollywoods-new-talking-point-gatekeepers-are-awesome.shtml#c982</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Out_of_the_blue trying to defend years of bad practice by hollywood and the large music corps. For shame, usual shill moves.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: I still have my bootleg recording</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130606/04315023339/pianist-storms-off-stage-claims-fans-filming-his-performance-mean-record-labels-wont-give-him-contract.shtml#c828</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Niall]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 02:39:48 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130606/04315023339/pianist-storms-off-stage-claims-fans-filming-his-performance-mean-record-labels-wont-give-him-contract.shtml#c828</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[If he can't find an 8-track player, how is he then going to copy it?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130620/00581223542/ftc-planning-to-go-after-patent-trolls.shtml#c20</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anon E. Mous]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 02:37:07 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130620/00581223542/ftc-planning-to-go-after-patent-trolls.shtml#c20</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It really is time for this to occur, the fact that you have cases like SCO vs. IBM that have clogged the court for years and keep on clogging up the court is beyond ridiculous.<br />
<br />
It seems it now isn't about invention and buying patents to make your product better, it is more off add to your patents to game you chances in settlements with threat of a lawsuit.<br />
<br />
While this is a great step there are a lot else that could be done to alleviate the plaque of patent trolls. The patent office needs to be cleaned up and the rules and regs on patent approval need to be revamped.<br />
<br />
Otherwise there are far too many shady lawyers and companies who will keep gaming the system to achieve large settlements while abusing the patent system.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: This sucks</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/13581923535/microsoft-capitulates-removes-online-drm-xbox-one.shtml#c1085</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Niall]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 02:34:16 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/13581923535/microsoft-capitulates-removes-online-drm-xbox-one.shtml#c1085</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Everyone within the Fourth-Amendment-free zone *would* have decent broadband by now if you had decent (sorry, actual) competition between ISPs. At the current rate, I'd give it a 50/50 chance in 10 years, although it would still be shocking if not.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130619/10395523531/next-time-someone-says-twitter-is-killing-deep-thinking-with-short-quick-messages-show-them-this.shtml#c501</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Niall]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 02:17:34 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130619/10395523531/next-time-someone-says-twitter-is-killing-deep-thinking-with-short-quick-messages-show-them-this.shtml#c501</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Can I point out that large numbers of (northern) European Christians are actually Protestants? Poland is the only substantial Catholic population in north Europe. (Ireland is kinda small.)<br />
<br />
Eastern Europe has various flavours of Orthodox Christianity - you know, the bit where the Roman Empire survived until the 1450s.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Linux on PS3</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/13581923535/microsoft-capitulates-removes-online-drm-xbox-one.shtml#c1073</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 02:14:33 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/13581923535/microsoft-capitulates-removes-online-drm-xbox-one.shtml#c1073</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I always tought it was because of the Other Os feature enabling to bipass blu ray region lock thanks to Geohot s key. So Sony took the path of the lesser of two massive liabilities: Customers or MPAA.<br />
<br />
Bringing us right here: will the lack of region locking allow us to use blu ray discs from any region in the PS4? Is that part of the Non Region locked promisse?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Linux on PS3</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/13581923535/microsoft-capitulates-removes-online-drm-xbox-one.shtml#c1065</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 01:55:19 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/13581923535/microsoft-capitulates-removes-online-drm-xbox-one.shtml#c1065</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[And the funny thing is that those supercomputers are still around, working 24\7, on old model ps3s , while Microsoft couldnt make the 360 good enought to dont overheat while working alone. Worse yet, in a few years even the current 360 will be out of production but due to high failure rates who allowed MS to sell people 2 or 3 Xboxs people wont be able to enjoy their once beloved games, since MS seems to have very little respect for old titles a la the first Xboxs games are right now. Sony at least is offering Gaikai, a signal that this question was alread given the necessary atention due to consumers opinion.<br />
<br />
Its funny how the reestruration plan from Sony, who put the chairs of the Games division on the control is called ONE SONY, and then their main competitor goes ahead and calls their product awkwardly XBOX ONE.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: STASI rises from the grave in electronic form.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/09064523528/germanys-spies-have-nsa-envy-working-their-own-comprehensive-snooping-system.shtml#c106</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 01:51:52 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/09064523528/germanys-spies-have-nsa-envy-working-their-own-comprehensive-snooping-system.shtml#c106</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The only people it keeps safe are those that agree with the government, and only while they agree with the government.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Oh, I doubt the mythical exculpatory evidence!</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c1071</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 01:47:18 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c1071</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Or, as the RIAA do, find the person or people amongst the rulemakers who will add such a rule in exchange for "donations" of vast amounts of cash.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/13581923535/microsoft-capitulates-removes-online-drm-xbox-one.shtml#c1055</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim Griffiths]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 01:40:28 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/13581923535/microsoft-capitulates-removes-online-drm-xbox-one.shtml#c1055</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I'm sorry but Microsoft just spent a week of prime media coverage making fools of themselves defending the DRM they just removed and running around with their tail between their legs after Sony pulled the rug out from under them. <br />
<br />
I could buy this idea more (and don't get me wrong this is something we do see a lot) if Microsoft had done it at their E3 press conference. But they didn't, this seems far more reactionary as a result. I don't think Microsoft would have wasted this press coverage, took a beating on stock prices, handed the narrative over to Sony and took a beating in the eyes of the non-informed gaming public just to sell people on a type of DRM that is, effectively, already widely accepted in services like steam. <br />
<br />
Microsoft wanted this, invested in this, expected it to work and had one of the worst console announcements ever as a result.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Expected Techhive to be one of Mike's piratey pals...</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130619/01031623524/more-details-emerge-as-states-attorneys-general-seek-to-hold-back-innovation-internet.shtml#c328</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 01:40:24 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130619/01031623524/more-details-emerge-as-states-attorneys-general-seek-to-hold-back-innovation-internet.shtml#c328</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["Blue and his grifter pals want money coming without responsibility"<br />
<br />
Fixed that for you. Your side didn't see any threat in file sharing until you realised you could use it to bilk the public. Then it was "piracy", needing new laws to allow you to extort innocent people.<br />
<br />
A large amount of the innovations your industries use online, you didn't pay for or tried to stop without just cause, but now you expect the profits you mistakenly think you deserve.<br />
<br />
"...grifters who don't trade value for value."<br />
<br />
You speak of yourself, it cannot be denied.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130619/01031623524/more-details-emerge-as-states-attorneys-general-seek-to-hold-back-innovation-internet.shtml#c323</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 01:31:02 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130619/01031623524/more-details-emerge-as-states-attorneys-general-seek-to-hold-back-innovation-internet.shtml#c323</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[When will people wake up to the fact that trying to stop crime by removing a means hurts those that obey the laws, and do almost nothing to stop the criminals? At best such actions only reduce the visibility of crime.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: NOW HIRING</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/16530423522/arizona-court-skeptical-medical-excuse-prenda-lawyers.shtml#c213</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 01:29:27 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/16530423522/arizona-court-skeptical-medical-excuse-prenda-lawyers.shtml#c213</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Better than Charles Carreon? I don't know about that; both of them have pretty rabid attack dogs.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130619/10395523531/next-time-someone-says-twitter-is-killing-deep-thinking-with-short-quick-messages-show-them-this.shtml#c499</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim Griffiths]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 01:28:34 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130619/10395523531/next-time-someone-says-twitter-is-killing-deep-thinking-with-short-quick-messages-show-them-this.shtml#c499</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Shakespeare was writing popular entertainment in the language of the time. His work would have been no harder for a contemporary to understand in terms of the language than anything on TV right now. We have to do a lot of extra work when reading it to understand it these days and this often gives the wrong impression to people of his genius. When we are separated from people by time and language and contemporary thought we can be tricked into thinking that they are somehow better, more experiences and deeper thinkers than our contemporaries but when you look you see that <i>they</i> thought the same of the people who came before them. <br />
<br />
A hundred years from now there will be someone like you, separated from us by thought time and language who will be cherry picking the best and brightest and bemoaning how we no longer talk or think in such ways. You called other people here arrogant for disagreeing with you but the fact is that people are people and there are <i>more</i> people than ever and alive right now are exactly the kind of people that you, born a hundred years from now, would hero worship while ignoring the fact that such people are around you right now thinking great thoughts, producing great works of endless creativity.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>