<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Latest Techdirt Comments</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130505/14372422951/court-finds-fantasy-stories-obscene.shtml#c1135</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 21:01:11 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130505/14372422951/court-finds-fantasy-stories-obscene.shtml#c1135</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote> It isn't about just the content of the book or my reading it, rather the concern is the effects of that book on society as a whole and certain impressionable members who may choose to act differently after reading it.</blockquote><br />
Like I said in an earlier post, censorship is always about what <i>others</i> can't handle. It's never how "this book will turn me into a monster", but how the book will turn <i>others</i> into monsters. Such arrogance!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: The story that just keeps on giving</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/15164823159/bad-day-prenda-continues-judge-rejects-stay-adds-1k-per-day-each-day-they-dont-pay-up.shtml#c415</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 20:59:15 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/15164823159/bad-day-prenda-continues-judge-rejects-stay-adds-1k-per-day-each-day-they-dont-pay-up.shtml#c415</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I would seriously hope you'd attempt to learn the law properly, especially after the last article.<br />
<br />
In a civil trial with no jury, the judge <i>is</i> judge and jury.  And when it comes to admitting evidence, he is also investigator...a judge is in charge of reviewing all evidence.  If he simply accepts documents and testimony with no overview, he is failing at his job.<br />
<br />
The extra money penalty is punishment for 1) completely and utterly failing to follow proper channels for such things, and 2) to enforce the deadline.<br />
<br />
Yet again, if Prenda chose to follow proper legal procedure they might have received a stay.  If they posted bond at the deadline, there would be no additional fines.  But they failed to do both, despite what proper procedure and basic common sense should tell them.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/14172323158/judge-not-impressed-prenda-alan-cooper-lawsuit.shtml#c493</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[That Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 20:57:54 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/14172323158/judge-not-impressed-prenda-alan-cooper-lawsuit.shtml#c493</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Mr. Cooper was NOT a party to the case in Judge Wrights courtroom.  He was a 3rd party asked to appear and offer testimony.  He or his lawyer are not being paid for those appearances.<br />
<br />
In the MN case, Cooper filed alleging they stole his identity and to hold them accountable for that.  As the Prenda train derails someone would have attempted to sue Alan Cooper who signed the copyright transfers for the shell company and Mr. Cooper would have been left holding the bag for a company he knew nothing about.<br />
<br />
She literally did NOTHING to help Mr. Cooper, because she failed to read and understand Judge Wrights order and predecided that Cooper was a bad guy like the other people.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110311/01552013459/dailydirt-weapons-sky.shtml#c37</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Baldaur Regis]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 20:55:49 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110311/01552013459/dailydirt-weapons-sky.shtml#c37</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><i>Cost prohibitive and impractical, the Airborne Laser would likely have cost $92,000/hour to fly if it had worked.</i></blockquote>Pfft. $92,000 is what, three toilet seats?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>No</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130502/18364622931/ma-teen-arrested-held-without-bail-posting-supposed-terrorist-threat-facebook.shtml#c1170</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Justin]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 20:54:08 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130502/18364622931/ma-teen-arrested-held-without-bail-posting-supposed-terrorist-threat-facebook.shtml#c1170</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[He's not a terrorist.....he's not a threat.....he is however....a douche bag!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/13573923121/retired-lt-col-violent-media-has-bred-generation-killers.shtml#c1215</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 20:48:57 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/13573923121/retired-lt-col-violent-media-has-bred-generation-killers.shtml#c1215</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[All those words and not one bit of evidence for the claim that violent media consumption leads to violent behavior in real life.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/01450023148/makers-nutella-force-fan-who-created-world-nutella-day-to-shut-it-down-updated.shtml#c627</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[RadialSkid]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 20:46:03 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/01450023148/makers-nutella-force-fan-who-created-world-nutella-day-to-shut-it-down-updated.shtml#c627</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I responded to this Nutella story yesterday with a short, but concise video: <a href='http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VJjjx0lijF0' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VJjjx0lijF0</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>747 designed and built in the 1960's</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130510/13023123037/lots-people-dont-turn-off-their-devices-when-they-fly.shtml#c1575</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 20:44:48 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130510/13023123037/lots-people-dont-turn-off-their-devices-when-they-fly.shtml#c1575</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[certainly it cannot be considered 'modern' in terms of avionics and electronics sub-systems..]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Don't Trust &quot;FIRE&quot;</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/18345423136/doj-dept-education-to-colleges-start-restricting-free-speech-campus-kiss-your-federal-funding-goodbye.shtml#c1603</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 20:44:05 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/18345423136/doj-dept-education-to-colleges-start-restricting-free-speech-campus-kiss-your-federal-funding-goodbye.shtml#c1603</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I disagree with your assessment of FIRE.  They support things like students' right to put up an "obscenity wall", and I can't see the right wing throwing their support behind that.  I also see on their site an article supporting a university's "sex week" and the use of student fees to fund it without the students being able to opt out.  If you read the article, a Republican state senator is opposing it.  I guess FIRE's conservatism is just really, REALLY stealthy?<br />
<br />
"designed to stifle the free exchange of information in higher education"<br />
<br />
What are you TALKING about?  Where on earth do you see them trying to stifle information?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>In The Wright Residence...</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/15164823159/bad-day-prenda-continues-judge-rejects-stay-adds-1k-per-day-each-day-they-dont-pay-up.shtml#c407</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 20:43:46 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/15164823159/bad-day-prenda-continues-judge-rejects-stay-adds-1k-per-day-each-day-they-dont-pay-up.shtml#c407</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["Hi honey, I'm home! What's for dinner?"<br />
<br />
"Oh, we're still working on that big can of whup-ass you opened up earlier, you handsome man you."]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130510/13023123037/lots-people-dont-turn-off-their-devices-when-they-fly.shtml#c1574</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 20:41:18 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130510/13023123037/lots-people-dont-turn-off-their-devices-when-they-fly.shtml#c1574</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["There is already a quasi Faraday cage around every single commercial aircraft anyway"<br />
<br />
there is also a RESONANT CAVITY within the aircraft, btw what is this bullshit about 'faraday cages' and "static electricity".. ?? <br />
<br />
Engineer, or technician ?<br />
<br />
did you design any of these sub-systems, or were you involved in their design, or did you 'fix' aircraft ? There is a huge difference.. clearly you lack significant electronics design knowledge, and you also clearly have not reviewed all the relevant information and testing on the subject, because if you had you would know better.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>In The Steele Residence...</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/15164823159/bad-day-prenda-continues-judge-rejects-stay-adds-1k-per-day-each-day-they-dont-pay-up.shtml#c384</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 20:40:28 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/15164823159/bad-day-prenda-continues-judge-rejects-stay-adds-1k-per-day-each-day-they-dont-pay-up.shtml#c384</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["Hi honey. How was your day?"<br />
<br />
"Mpph. Another day, another Order To Show Cause. Did you pack up those suitcases yet?"<br />
<br />
"I'm trying, but those porno dollars are so...sticky."]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Window dressing to conceal shift from payoffs to coercion.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/00493523143/ridiculous-timing-obama-administration-responds-to-spying-ap-pushing-journalist-shield-law-that-wouldnt-matter.shtml#c29</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[out_of_the_blue]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 20:35:38 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/00493523143/ridiculous-timing-obama-administration-responds-to-spying-ap-pushing-journalist-shield-law-that-wouldnt-matter.shtml#c29</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[My over-view: for decades now "journalists" have been paid off in a variety of ways -- actual cash for stories, access to "unnamed sources" for inside tips, or embeds to cover the wars, all so long as slanted for propaganda -- but NOW gov't is switching over to brute force, telling all are under surveillance and that even normal questions can get you charged for espionage.<br />
<br />
There's so obviously an agenda behind the recent spate of "revelations" that even National Review has caught on:<br />
<br />
<a href='http://www.nationalreview.com/campaign-spot/348942/all-obamas-scandals-are-ultimately-about-information-control-jim-geraghty' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://www.nationalreview.com/campaign-spot/348942/all-obamas-scandals-are-ultimately-about-information-control-jim-geraghty</a><br />
<br />
"There]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c1630</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Karl]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 20:34:11 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c1630</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Yeah, that was me. I'm on a phone.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/14172323158/judge-not-impressed-prenda-alan-cooper-lawsuit.shtml#c489</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesse]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 20:33:48 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/14172323158/judge-not-impressed-prenda-alan-cooper-lawsuit.shtml#c489</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[High court lo court]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Following instructions</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/02413623115/bogus-lawsuit-plus-threats-to-those-who-write-about-it-leads-to-epic-response.shtml#c960</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 20:33:16 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/02413623115/bogus-lawsuit-plus-threats-to-those-who-write-about-it-leads-to-epic-response.shtml#c960</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Except it wasn't the 17 big brother he was trying to get drunk, it was the 17 year old sisters he was plying with alcohol so he could fuck them....]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/00493523143/ridiculous-timing-obama-administration-responds-to-spying-ap-pushing-journalist-shield-law-that-wouldnt-matter.shtml#c24</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 20:31:19 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/00493523143/ridiculous-timing-obama-administration-responds-to-spying-ap-pushing-journalist-shield-law-that-wouldnt-matter.shtml#c24</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Where can I get myself one of these invisible shields?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c1625</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Karrl]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 20:31:04 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c1625</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<em> Currently, copyright holders have a legally enforceable claim against those that circumvent access controls.</em><br />
<br />
No, they don't. The only rights granted to copyright holders are in 17 USC 106. 17 USC 501 does not say it's infringement. This bill would not limit this in any way.<br />
<br />
Whatever claims are held are the Ugovernment's. This is criminal law.<br />
<br />
Furthermore, weakening the rights held by copyright holders does not necessarily weaken copyright itself. Granting owners those rights is not the primary purpose of copyright.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c1612</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Karrl]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 20:30:56 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c1612</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<em> Currently, copyright holders have a legally enforceable claim against those that circumvent access controls.</em><br />
<br />
No, they don't. The only rights granted to copyright holders are in 17 USC 106. 17 USC 501 does not say it's infringement. This bill would not limit this in any way.<br />
<br />
Whatever claims are held are the government's. This is criminal law.<br />
<br />
Furthermore, weakening the rights held by copyright holders does not necessarily weaken copyright itself. Granting owners those rights is not the primary purpose of copyright.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: You don't get it</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/01321523153/kitchen-nightmares-lawyers-threaten-infamous-samy-amy-if-they-talk-about-their-experience-show.shtml#c391</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 20:25:17 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/01321523153/kitchen-nightmares-lawyers-threaten-infamous-samy-amy-if-they-talk-about-their-experience-show.shtml#c391</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["Meanwhile, the more the couple is allowed to stay in the news, the better one would think it would be for the TV show."<br />
<br />
Reading is hard.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>