<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Latest Techdirt Comments</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title>Re: From the other side...</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130509/02140223018/new-data-exposes-scammy-hospital-pricing-now-lets-crowdsource-some-more.shtml#c632</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[DP2u]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:45:06 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130509/02140223018/new-data-exposes-scammy-hospital-pricing-now-lets-crowdsource-some-more.shtml#c632</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[This argument does not hold true for the uninsured.  Doctors and hospitals should be able to provide pricing information to the uninsured in advance or providing services (except emergencies).  As Steven Brill's article makes clear, it is the uninsured and underinsured who are being taken advantage of by health care providers.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c823</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jay]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:44:31 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c823</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>And please address my point and explain whether you agree that this will indeed weaken copyright holders' rights.</i><br />
<br />
The public benefits from weakened damages, increased production, and other added benefits.  Copyright is not weakened.  It's more in line with the demands of the public that benefits.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130521/12175523157/nyc-says-renting-out-your-place-via-airbnb-is-running-illegal-hotel.shtml#c65</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:43:32 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130521/12175523157/nyc-says-renting-out-your-place-via-airbnb-is-running-illegal-hotel.shtml#c65</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I know right. I mean seriously who wouldn't look that up.  Except that they a abusing a law intended for something else entirely but I am sure you just skipped that part.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130505/14372422951/court-finds-fantasy-stories-obscene.shtml#c1076</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[art guerrilla]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:42:14 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130505/14372422951/court-finds-fantasy-stories-obscene.shtml#c1076</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[how 'bout 'causing actual harm to children' by droneing them (an arguable war krime)to death from half a planet away ?<br />
<br />
a 'good' or an 'evil' ?<br />
most would say 'evil' (why am i guessing you will make excuses for your war-kriminal betters?), but NONE of the perps of these krimes against humanity will EVER see an indictment, much less trial, much less prison...<br />
<br />
what does that tell you ?<br />
<br />
(assuming you have an open mind)<br />
<br />
OUR SOCIETY IS IRRETRIEVABLY CORRUPTED<br />
<br />
but, heh, let's jail some poor puke who gets a hard-on for kiddie stories...<br />
*snort*<br />
<br />
(why is it we jail child rapists for longer than child killers ? who does this make sense to ?)<br />
<br />
PRIORITIES, kampers, priorities...<br />
<br />
art guerrilla<br />
aka ann archy<br />
eof]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c812</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[average_joe]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:42:10 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c812</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I thought he was talking about copyright holders' rights under the DMCA, but even if he means the rights under Section 106, those would clearly be weakened as well. Permitting the trafficking of technologies that can be used to circumvent access controls would weaken copyright rights since people would obviously use them for infringement despite infringement being illegal. He's trying to say that by taking away these copyright holders' protections, their rights will somehow not be weakened. It's silly. I don't care if you or he or anyone is for this proposal, but at least admit that it weakens copyright holders' rights.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130502/18364622931/ma-teen-arrested-held-without-bail-posting-supposed-terrorist-threat-facebook.shtml#c937</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Trent]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:41:31 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130502/18364622931/ma-teen-arrested-held-without-bail-posting-supposed-terrorist-threat-facebook.shtml#c937</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[This kid clearly needs to work on his limited vocabulary. He will never make it in the rap game with the small amount of adjectives he currently has in his arsenal. It really speaks volumes about out education system. This is what was got from no child left behind?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130521/12175523157/nyc-says-renting-out-your-place-via-airbnb-is-running-illegal-hotel.shtml#c52</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[rapnel]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:40:34 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130521/12175523157/nyc-says-renting-out-your-place-via-airbnb-is-running-illegal-hotel.shtml#c52</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I suppose you want to own your cell phone too?  Hippies.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130521/12175523157/nyc-says-renting-out-your-place-via-airbnb-is-running-illegal-hotel.shtml#c49</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:40:09 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130521/12175523157/nyc-says-renting-out-your-place-via-airbnb-is-running-illegal-hotel.shtml#c49</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[C'mon man don't dump on someone just because they assume them laws on a particular are sensable, even if the laws have been on the books for decades or whatever.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130521/12175523157/nyc-says-renting-out-your-place-via-airbnb-is-running-illegal-hotel.shtml#c48</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:40:04 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130521/12175523157/nyc-says-renting-out-your-place-via-airbnb-is-running-illegal-hotel.shtml#c48</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Overuse of ellipses, "lol", random capitalization of "Blogger"...<br />
<br />
Yep, I'm afraid you're a fucking moron.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130521/12175523157/nyc-says-renting-out-your-place-via-airbnb-is-running-illegal-hotel.shtml#c38</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:39:49 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130521/12175523157/nyc-says-renting-out-your-place-via-airbnb-is-running-illegal-hotel.shtml#c38</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA['overzealous enforcement officials'<br />
<br />
that needs changing so it reads what it really means <br />
<br />
'over-bribed enforcement officials' would probably be nearer the mark!<br />
<br />
so, a little bit of clarification, please. if you 'can't rent out your place for less than 29 days' how do other places (hotels, guest houses etc) get on when someone wants a 2 week break only? are they forced to stay 2 more weeks against their will? are they forced not to come at all, because staying a shorter period would turn the break/holiday into a crime? do the accommodating establishments have to lie about the length of stay for all guests and lose payments for half the year? like a lot of laws, there is no rhyme or reason for them in today's society, but they hang around on purpose for just such situations!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c799</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[average_joe]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:38:44 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c799</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>What copyrights are being weakened, buskahosa?</i><br />
<br />
Allowing the trafficking of technologies that can be used to circumvent access controls would weaken copyright holders' rights--both their exclusive rights under Section 106 and their anticircumvention rights under Section 1201. The fact that Mike supports this should tell you that it weakens copyright rights.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/18345423136/doj-dept-education-to-colleges-start-restricting-free-speech-campus-kiss-your-federal-funding-goodbye.shtml#c1112</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:37:26 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/18345423136/doj-dept-education-to-colleges-start-restricting-free-speech-campus-kiss-your-federal-funding-goodbye.shtml#c1112</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ticky tacky<br />
   ticky tacky<br />
       hummmmmmm]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c786</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:36:58 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c786</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[He already explained that in his post.  I am trying to figure out what you meant.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c767</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[average_joe]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:36:08 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c767</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[As the law stands, it's illegal to circumvent access controls or to traffic in such access controls. This protects copyright holders' exclusive rights. Removing those protections would weaken those rights. Hence, Mike's support of the proposal. That it would still be illegal to infringe misses the point that this would make it EASIER to infringe.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c758</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:34:18 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c758</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Under <i>current US law</i>, rooting your Android phone is against the DMCA.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: average_joe</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c749</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[average_joe]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:34:00 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c749</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I haven't backpedaled one inch. Rather than admit that this would weaken copyright holders' rights, Mike has run away. Nor has he, or will he, explain how this won't weaken copyright holders' exclusive rights under Section 106. For example, the proposal would amend Section 1201(2)(A), the antitrafficking provision, to make it illegal only to traffic in circumvention tools that are intended to facilitate infringement (as opposed to facilitate circumvention, as it is now). This means that tools for circumvention could be freely trafficked in. Saying that it's still illegal to use those tools to infringe is silly. Of course people would use them to infringe. This would weaken "copyrights" since it would make it even easier to infringe. I'd love for Mike to address this, but that would involve discussing the merits of some claim he made.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Duh...</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/18345423136/doj-dept-education-to-colleges-start-restricting-free-speech-campus-kiss-your-federal-funding-goodbye.shtml#c1101</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gothenem]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:33:31 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/18345423136/doj-dept-education-to-colleges-start-restricting-free-speech-campus-kiss-your-federal-funding-goodbye.shtml#c1101</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[In 1984.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: average_joe</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c740</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[silverscarcat]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:33:15 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c740</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I think gerbils could be taught to understand better.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c727</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[silverscarcat]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:32:03 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c727</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[What copyrights are being weakened, buskahosa?<br />
<br />
Just because it'll allow me to use MY property that *I* legally purchased the way *I* want to and not the way *THEY* want me to doesn't mean that it weakens copyright.<br />
<br />
If I buy a cellphone, a PS3, or a 3DS right now, they are region/service locked and breaking that lock is against the law, even if I legally purchase a game/service from another region/service provider so that I can play/use the game/service.<br />
<br />
I'm pretty sure that's wrong.<br />
<br />
Or did you miss the case where the Supreme Court slapped down the textbook publisher and said first sale doctrine trumps your copyright?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Don't do this for us, please</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/18345423136/doj-dept-education-to-colleges-start-restricting-free-speech-campus-kiss-your-federal-funding-goodbye.shtml#c1089</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[TaCktiX]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:31:17 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/18345423136/doj-dept-education-to-colleges-start-restricting-free-speech-campus-kiss-your-federal-funding-goodbye.shtml#c1089</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I wish I had gone to that college.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>