<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Latest Techdirt Comments</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title>Re: Wrong angle</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/18345423136/doj-dept-education-to-colleges-start-restricting-free-speech-campus-kiss-your-federal-funding-goodbye.shtml#c907</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Fenderson]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 10:56:10 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/18345423136/doj-dept-education-to-colleges-start-restricting-free-speech-campus-kiss-your-federal-funding-goodbye.shtml#c907</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote> the concern is effectively dealing with sexual assault</blockquote><br />
<br />
Fine, but just because their goal is reasonable does not mean their methods are.<br />
<br />
<blockquote> Neither the DoJ nor the DoE is trying to curtail students' rights of free speech.</blockquote><br />
<br />
If that's the case, then write the rules in a way that doesn't allow these rights to be curtailed.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/19190923142/if-youre-going-to-illegally-seize-citizens-cell-phones-least-make-sure-youre-grabbing-right-ones.shtml#c443</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[DCX2]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 10:55:28 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/19190923142/if-youre-going-to-illegally-seize-citizens-cell-phones-least-make-sure-youre-grabbing-right-ones.shtml#c443</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[So what if she was looking to get arrested?<br />
<br />
Did she violate the law?  This is a yes or no question.  If the answer is "no", they have ZERO grounds to confiscate her property or arrest her.<br />
<br />
If the police officers can't deal with some cranky woman, they don't deserve to be police officers.  If you can't take the heat, get out of the kitchen.<br />
<br />
This woman is doing us a favor.  She is highlighting the police officers who don't deserve the badge.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/19190923142/if-youre-going-to-illegally-seize-citizens-cell-phones-least-make-sure-youre-grabbing-right-ones.shtml#c420</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 10:54:35 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/19190923142/if-youre-going-to-illegally-seize-citizens-cell-phones-least-make-sure-youre-grabbing-right-ones.shtml#c420</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>Not that I support what the cops did, but it looks like they weren't paying any attention to her until she started being a bitch.</i><br />
<br />
Sorry, but 'being a bitch' is covered by freedom of speech.  John Adams was a total bitch, he was a mouthy bastard who was obnoxious and disliked even by his friends, but especially hated by the Loyalists and Tories who comprise TPTB.  The mouthy bastards of the world are the best ones to make the world a better place because they are so angry at injustice that it kinda makes 'em crabby, so they do the work to make things better.  This is an American tradition.<br />
<br />
The cops are supposed to protect and serve even people who are bitches.  They're supposed to know how to handle it, because they're professionals who have been trained in interfacing properly with the public, even members of the public who do not like the police (often for good reasons, such as being good citizens who keep getting targeted by racial profilers, which can be very frustrating.)<br />
<br />
When the bitches are properly shut-the-fuck-up, the rest of us suffer.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/13573923121/retired-lt-col-violent-media-has-bred-generation-killers.shtml#c905</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Groove Tiger]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 10:54:30 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/13573923121/retired-lt-col-violent-media-has-bred-generation-killers.shtml#c905</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["Retired Lt. Col.: Violent Media Has Bred A Generation Of Killers"<br />
<br />
Really? I thought the military did that.<br />
<br />
*BURN*]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130505/14372422951/court-finds-fantasy-stories-obscene.shtml#c933</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 10:53:36 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130505/14372422951/court-finds-fantasy-stories-obscene.shtml#c933</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>"Any basic text on sexual urges will tell you that there is a big difference between pre and post pubescent desires."</blockquote><br />
<br />
I don't doubt it, but it's quite irrelevant. A book describing illegal sex with a minor is describing illegal conduct whether the minor is 6 or 16. One may be more disturbing than the other, but they're both works of fiction and no one is being hurt or forced to read the books.<br />
<br />
Don't like it? Just close the book!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Liability Slipery Slope</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c895</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 10:52:37 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c895</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Next will come the Quantum liability prosecutions....<br />
<br />
Somewhere, in Some Universe (not ours), in some possible space time continuum, You may have infringed on a Copyright (where in our universe the law has been expanded ever upward to cover all possible quantum possible uses, including differences in time, space, temporal mechanics, or other currently unknown quantum phenomenon).<br />
<br />
Since you have been accused, by nature of quantum mechanics, therefor you are guilty, all your possessions are forfeit to the **AA, your children will be held as indentured servants to the **AA for 100 years past the current youngest child's death.. aka Death + 100 years, and all your IP will be assimilated by the **AA's.<br />
<br />
Welcome to your future, now go get a job and start paying your debt to the **AA's (debt to society is a foreign concept, as we asked, but nobody from "society" bothered to respond... guess there weren't that many left).<br />
<br />
This message brought to you by your friendly tinfoil hat wearing conspiracy theorist...]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/19190923142/if-youre-going-to-illegally-seize-citizens-cell-phones-least-make-sure-youre-grabbing-right-ones.shtml#c399</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Fenderson]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 10:50:50 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/19190923142/if-youre-going-to-illegally-seize-citizens-cell-phones-least-make-sure-youre-grabbing-right-ones.shtml#c399</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[If she was interfering with the police, then they should have detained or arrested her for that (not confiscate any memory cards and such). If she wasn't, then they should have ignored her. How unpleasant or provocative she was shouldn't enter into it.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/19190923142/if-youre-going-to-illegally-seize-citizens-cell-phones-least-make-sure-youre-grabbing-right-ones.shtml#c393</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 10:50:07 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/19190923142/if-youre-going-to-illegally-seize-citizens-cell-phones-least-make-sure-youre-grabbing-right-ones.shtml#c393</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<b>NYPD's own Patrol Guide.</b><br />
<blockquote>b. None of the following constitutes probable cause for arrest or detention of an onlooker unless the safety of officers or other persons is directly endangered or the officer reasonably believes they are endangered or the law is otherwise violated:<blockquote><br />
(1) Speech alone, even though crude and vulgar<br />
(2) Requesting and making notes of shield numbers or names of officers<br />
(3) Taking photographs, videotapes or tape recordings<br />
(4) Remaining in the vicinity of the stop or arrest</blockquote></blockquote><br />
<br />
You assert,]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/01321523153/kitchen-nightmares-lawyers-threaten-infamous-samy-amy-if-they-talk-about-their-experience-show.shtml#c153</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[crade]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 10:49:45 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/01321523153/kitchen-nightmares-lawyers-threaten-infamous-samy-amy-if-they-talk-about-their-experience-show.shtml#c153</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Either way, evidence that reality shows are rigged doesn't seem to really affect the people who like them much..]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: As a supporter of on line education...</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/18345423136/doj-dept-education-to-colleges-start-restricting-free-speech-campus-kiss-your-federal-funding-goodbye.shtml#c898</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 10:46:21 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/18345423136/doj-dept-education-to-colleges-start-restricting-free-speech-campus-kiss-your-federal-funding-goodbye.shtml#c898</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Homeschooling for college students. <br />
<br />
Sounds good to me!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/19190923142/if-youre-going-to-illegally-seize-citizens-cell-phones-least-make-sure-youre-grabbing-right-ones.shtml#c383</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Fenderson]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 10:45:14 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/19190923142/if-youre-going-to-illegally-seize-citizens-cell-phones-least-make-sure-youre-grabbing-right-ones.shtml#c383</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>But the fault lies with those making the recordings.</blockquote><br />
<br />
No, the fault lies with the officers. It may not be <i>wise</i> to act like an asshole, but it's not <i>illegal</i>. The cops must be held to a higher standard and have a thick enough skin that they can ignore the assholes.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/18345423136/doj-dept-education-to-colleges-start-restricting-free-speech-campus-kiss-your-federal-funding-goodbye.shtml#c877</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 10:45:08 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/18345423136/doj-dept-education-to-colleges-start-restricting-free-speech-campus-kiss-your-federal-funding-goodbye.shtml#c877</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[This. <br />
<br />
This is why these things are so scary - you won't even have to offend an over-sensitive wanker.<br />
<br />
You just have to be caught doing something that <i>someone else </i> thinks would offend an over-sensitive wanker.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130505/14372422951/court-finds-fantasy-stories-obscene.shtml#c916</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 10:44:22 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130505/14372422951/court-finds-fantasy-stories-obscene.shtml#c916</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I don't need to "read up a bit" to know that people can be trained. Your claim is that people can be trained into molesting children, for which you offer no proof whatsoever. You're no different than the idiots who think watching violent movies and playing violent video games turns teenagers into murderers.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/13573923121/retired-lt-col-violent-media-has-bred-generation-killers.shtml#c903</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ruben]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 10:44:01 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/13573923121/retired-lt-col-violent-media-has-bred-generation-killers.shtml#c903</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[How about Australia as an example. In the 90's they passed comprehensive gun control, and as a result, violent gun crime is almost nil.<br />
<br />
<a href='http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_control_in_Australia#Measuring_the_effects_of_firearms_laws_in_Australia' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_control_in_Australia#Measuring_the_effects_of_firearms_laws_in_Australia</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/01321523153/kitchen-nightmares-lawyers-threaten-infamous-samy-amy-if-they-talk-about-their-experience-show.shtml#c145</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 10:42:15 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/01321523153/kitchen-nightmares-lawyers-threaten-infamous-samy-amy-if-they-talk-about-their-experience-show.shtml#c145</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The show is pretty upfront about the dinner services being more crowded than usual because "word that Gordon Ramsay is in the restaurant has gotten out." I don't suspect that the diners are hired, but they are probably more selective in their tastes than the usual clientele at these restaurants, being Gordon Ramsay fans and all. Or perhaps they're just more inclined to complain, being Gordon Ramsay fans and all.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/19190923142/if-youre-going-to-illegally-seize-citizens-cell-phones-least-make-sure-youre-grabbing-right-ones.shtml#c370</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[McCrea]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 10:41:08 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/19190923142/if-youre-going-to-illegally-seize-citizens-cell-phones-least-make-sure-youre-grabbing-right-ones.shtml#c370</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>"I'm not able to view video at work"</i><br />
<br />
She was fine at the start, but when she "paced" (walked along with) the male and then the female officer it was spooky behavior.  Then she confronted them.<br />
<br />
The cop asked her to stand "down there" rather than the 5 feet away she was when she was argumentatively questioning them. (Her first question was possibly legitimate, and she got a sufficient answer to it "Safety check".  Her second question "who's safety is in danger" was subjectively argumentative.   She refused to move and refused to give her ID.<br />
<br />
I'm quite good here with the cops, again.  I should have to recommend that a watcher stand at least 20 feet away (30 would be better), not pace around the cops, and not harass them with rhetorically questions, and lastly comply when the ask you to move away.<br />
<br />
In this case, it might be sufficient to be concise.  "She confronted the cops. She shouldn't have."]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Meanwhile, in DC....</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/19190923142/if-youre-going-to-illegally-seize-citizens-cell-phones-least-make-sure-youre-grabbing-right-ones.shtml#c365</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 10:37:19 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/19190923142/if-youre-going-to-illegally-seize-citizens-cell-phones-least-make-sure-youre-grabbing-right-ones.shtml#c365</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Hooray for Little Brother.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Turning off electronics</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130510/13023123037/lots-people-dont-turn-off-their-devices-when-they-fly.shtml#c1553</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[DB Cooper]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 10:36:58 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130510/13023123037/lots-people-dont-turn-off-their-devices-when-they-fly.shtml#c1553</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Modern aircraft no longer use hydrolics with pipes traveling the length of the plane, they use a fly by wire system where computers send signals to hydrolic units. Until all aircraft are rewired with sheilded cable to prevent intrussion of signals from your electronic devices there is a possibility of causing problems with the planes flight control. If by chance it happened while flying at 35,000 feet there is plenty of room to correct the problem but not so while taking off and landing. The new true 4G wireless systems actually present the most danger to the aircraft. The true 4G system CAN and do jam GPS signals (operates in L Band or over 100khz frqs) so I'm sorry that turning your toys off inconvieniences you but shut up and deal with it.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Duh...</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/18345423136/doj-dept-education-to-colleges-start-restricting-free-speech-campus-kiss-your-federal-funding-goodbye.shtml#c872</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 10:35:44 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/18345423136/doj-dept-education-to-colleges-start-restricting-free-speech-campus-kiss-your-federal-funding-goodbye.shtml#c872</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Moran, 30 yars is tew decadez.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Ummmm 9/11</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/13573923121/retired-lt-col-violent-media-has-bred-generation-killers.shtml#c889</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[JWW]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 10:35:28 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/13573923121/retired-lt-col-violent-media-has-bred-generation-killers.shtml#c889</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Not only did you not count 9/11 in your 2012 grouping, you didn't even count it in your 2002 grouping (where it would belong)!!<br />
<br />
It represents a massive outlier in the number killed, but to be fair about the data it really should be in there.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>