<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Latest Techdirt Comments</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Nothing to see here</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/01121423439/hollywood-studios-keep-saying-its-employees-must-get-paid-now-may-be-forced-to-pay-its-interns.shtml#c684</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim Griffiths]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 07:06:28 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/01121423439/hollywood-studios-keep-saying-its-employees-must-get-paid-now-may-be-forced-to-pay-its-interns.shtml#c684</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["The issue here isn't dealing with troll"<br />
<br />
I.e. your "is" is irrelevant to my proposed action for the reasons I then stated.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/10230323518/nsa-claims-surveillance-programs-aided-stopping-50-attacks-details-lacking.shtml#c956</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 07:01:45 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/10230323518/nsa-claims-surveillance-programs-aided-stopping-50-attacks-details-lacking.shtml#c956</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I thought it was only one, then it was a dozen across multiple countries and now it's 50. Keep ramping up those numbers because it doesn't matter if it's 1,000 a year, you're still dealing with a lower number than people drowning in their swimming poos each year and you use this as a reason to violate my 4th amendment rights. Fuck you and your reasoning.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Nothing to see here</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/01121423439/hollywood-studios-keep-saying-its-employees-must-get-paid-now-may-be-forced-to-pay-its-interns.shtml#c675</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 06:59:45 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/01121423439/hollywood-studios-keep-saying-its-employees-must-get-paid-now-may-be-forced-to-pay-its-interns.shtml#c675</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><i>I'd much prefer if</i></blockquote>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Nothing to see here</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/01121423439/hollywood-studios-keep-saying-its-employees-must-get-paid-now-may-be-forced-to-pay-its-interns.shtml#c657</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Howard]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 06:59:33 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/01121423439/hollywood-studios-keep-saying-its-employees-must-get-paid-now-may-be-forced-to-pay-its-interns.shtml#c657</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Explained better than I could.<br />
<br />
The other point is that if you look at the length of the replies, you'll notice that they take up a prominent part of the comment section, and it's annoying to have to browse through all the pointless trollbashing to find good comments.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130611/00503223401/public-outcry-taiwan-kills-their-version-sopa.shtml#c101</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ninja]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 06:57:30 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130611/00503223401/public-outcry-taiwan-kills-their-version-sopa.shtml#c101</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Indeed Epic win for the Taiwanese! What we need now is to reach a critical mass of awareness everywhere to stop the censorship flow and start reacting.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/01121423439/hollywood-studios-keep-saying-its-employees-must-get-paid-now-may-be-forced-to-pay-its-interns.shtml#c648</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 06:56:32 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/01121423439/hollywood-studios-keep-saying-its-employees-must-get-paid-now-may-be-forced-to-pay-its-interns.shtml#c648</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The executives just want everything for free, freetards.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/01121423439/hollywood-studios-keep-saying-its-employees-must-get-paid-now-may-be-forced-to-pay-its-interns.shtml#c627</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 06:49:08 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/01121423439/hollywood-studios-keep-saying-its-employees-must-get-paid-now-may-be-forced-to-pay-its-interns.shtml#c627</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[but ... but ... but ... how are big executives supposed to get paid lots of money for doing nothing if they have to actually pay those they owe money to?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Nothing to see here</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/01121423439/hollywood-studios-keep-saying-its-employees-must-get-paid-now-may-be-forced-to-pay-its-interns.shtml#c624</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim Griffiths]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 06:48:25 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/01121423439/hollywood-studios-keep-saying-its-employees-must-get-paid-now-may-be-forced-to-pay-its-interns.shtml#c624</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The issue here isn't dealing with troll, if you ignore him he won't go away and may even escalate his insanity but at the moment every thread is the same old crap. Techdirt takes the view that the trolls can spirt interesting debate, which they often can, but <i>this</i> can't and it's just bubbling over with the same people saying the same things over and over. Repeating the same actions and expecting different results is madness, the troll is mad but the rest of us show know better. I'd much prefer if we could just act like these troll posts are the dog crap they are and avoid treading on them while we get on with our lives.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Translated to Swedish Chef</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130606/11475923344/sweden-makes-it-illegal-to-take-photos-private-environments-without-permission.shtml#c176</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 06:48:14 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130606/11475923344/sweden-makes-it-illegal-to-take-photos-private-environments-without-permission.shtml#c176</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Here-a oon Techdurt ve-a'fe-a hed stureees ebuoot hoo zee ubeeqooity ooff deegitel cemeres is chungeeng zee vey ve-a luuk et poobleec ifents und ert. Boot es hes elsu becume-a cleer, zee ebeelity tu teke-a phutus ooff mure-a oor less iferytheeng ve-a see-a breengs veet it certeeen prublems -- ispeceeelly iff vhet ve-a see-a ere-a puleece-a. Su it ves perheps inefeeteble-a thet zee puleeticiuns vuoold stert tu get infulfed, in oorder tu &qoout;sulfe-a&qoout; sume-a ooff thuse-a prublems. Here-a's a rezeer ixtreme-a ixemple-a frum Svedee, es repurted by TechHeefe-a:<br />
<br />
<i><br />
Svedee's perleeement hes futed in fefur ooff a lev thet buns tekeeng peectoores und feelming in a preefete-a infurunment veethuoot furst getteeng permeessiun frum peuple-a in ettendunce-a. Creetics sey zee lev is tuu embeegoouoos.<br />
<br />
Zee Svedeesh Cummeettee-a oon Joosteece-a seeed zee lev, vheech gues intu iffffect Jooly 1, is needed seence-a phutugrephs oor mufeees secretly shut in preefete-a setteengs cun sereeuoosly feeulete-a un indeefidooel's preefecy, und prutecshun hes beee inedeqooete-a.<br />
</i><br />
<br />
Vell, thet mey be-a trooe-a, boot it's herd tu see-a hoo ixectly thees is gueeng tu vurk iff yuoo vunt tu teke-a a peectoore-a in a fery crooded ruum, sey -- hoo ixectly ere-a yuoo sooppused tu get iferyune-a thet meeght be-a in a phutu, tu egree-a? Dues it hefe-a tu be-a in vreeting su thet yuoo cun prufe-a it? Und vhet ebuoot iff it's nut a ruum, boot steell a &qoout;preefete-a infurunment&qoout;? Cume-a tu theenk ooff it, vhet ixectly is thet, unyvey? Frum zee erteecle-a: <br />
<br />
<i><br />
Zee lev duesn't speceeffy vhet cunsteetootes cunsent oor deffeene-a a preefete-a infurunment. Fur ixemple-a, vhet heppens iff a juoorneleest infeetes a booseeness ixecooteefe-a tu a recepshun in zee juoorneleest's hume-a und secretly phutugrephs zee ixecooteefe-a cummeetting a creeminel ect, esked Mereea Ferm, member ooff perleeement fur zee Greee Perty, dooreeng zee debete-a.<br />
</i><br />
<br />
Thet underleenes hoo thees is leekely tu be-a used: tu stup refeleshuns ooff vrung-dueeng by poobleec feegoores in preefete-a pleces. Et leest zee noo legeesleshun is evere-a thet thees is un issooe-a:<br />
<br />
<i><br />
Un ixcepshun frum creeminel leeebility is mede-a iff zee ect is joosteeffieble-a in feeoo ooff its poorpuse-a und oozeer curcoomstunces, und thet prufeesiun incloodes juoorneleestic vurk, eccurdeeng tu zee cummeettee-a.<br />
</i><br />
<br />
Boot unteel zee ixect leemits ooff thet prufeesiun ere-a deffeened, elung veet vhet &qoout;joosteeffieble-a&qoout; meuns, it seems inefeeteble-a thet zee noo lev veell hefe-a a cheelling iffffect oon infesteegetife-a juoorneleesm in Svedee. Thet's rezeer iruneec, seence-a yuoo meeght ixpect thet zee eboondunce-a ooff deegitel cemeres tudey vuoold leed tu zee reech und pooerffool beeeng cooght oooot und celled tu eccuoont mure-a oofftee, nut less. Bork Bork Bork!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Hypocrites United!</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/01121423439/hollywood-studios-keep-saying-its-employees-must-get-paid-now-may-be-forced-to-pay-its-interns.shtml#c606</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Spaceman Spiff]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 06:47:03 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/01121423439/hollywood-studios-keep-saying-its-employees-must-get-paid-now-may-be-forced-to-pay-its-interns.shtml#c606</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Fox, the MPAA, RIAA, Universal, and all of their ilk are complete hypocrites! They seem to think that the universe operates under the principle that "what's mine is mine, and what's yours is mine also"... :-(  It is time we taught them a new principle - "if you screw with me, you get the shaft"...]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Mike's unpaid minions are unpaid. Mike is a hypocrite.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/01121423439/hollywood-studios-keep-saying-its-employees-must-get-paid-now-may-be-forced-to-pay-its-interns.shtml#c589</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 06:46:01 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/01121423439/hollywood-studios-keep-saying-its-employees-must-get-paid-now-may-be-forced-to-pay-its-interns.shtml#c589</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["Mike's unpaid minions are unpaid."<br />
<br />
WONDERFUL!!!<br />
<br />
What's the next headline, fucktard?<br />
<br />
"Mike's paid minions are paid."<br />
<br />
You always have so much value to add. Thanks for the entertainment. Usually, you'd have to find a bus full of retards for stuff this brilliant.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130606/11475923344/sweden-makes-it-illegal-to-take-photos-private-environments-without-permission.shtml#c155</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 06:42:12 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130606/11475923344/sweden-makes-it-illegal-to-take-photos-private-environments-without-permission.shtml#c155</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[lol at #1. So you know how the NSA's 'activities' has been revealed as of late? Yeah, Sweden't been doing the same thing for quite a few years now so no, it does not solve any privacy problems. "2006/07:63" if you feel like looking it up.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Wouldn't it be simpler . . .</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130606/11475923344/sweden-makes-it-illegal-to-take-photos-private-environments-without-permission.shtml#c131</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 06:41:59 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130606/11475923344/sweden-makes-it-illegal-to-take-photos-private-environments-without-permission.shtml#c131</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Better yet, have the government, with support from the MPAA record everything.<br />
They can put cameras everywhere and constantly record all activity everywhere.<br />
<br />
Rather than allowing someone to take pictures, cameras would be banned entirely and if you wanted a picture of something, you could submit a request (paying a modest fee) to get a copy of that image licensed to you for viewing on the device of your choosing for up to 30 days (I suppose they could license it to you for any period of time - priced accordingly).<br />
<br />
They could also use "windowing" to make it more appealing to actually be there for an event while it is happening live. By only allowing people to license an image 28 days or more after an event happens, they could ensure that people would go to events rather than just looking of images of it. This would really help the transportation industry - and also corn farmers because people like to eat popcorn at airports.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Reminds me of 1984</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/11212323508/how-knowing-government-is-spying-you-changes-how-you-act.shtml#c3144</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 06:27:38 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/11212323508/how-knowing-government-is-spying-you-changes-how-you-act.shtml#c3144</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Its not a police state, it's called Fascism.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: It's not all about &quot;working&quot;, but about STATING MORALITY.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130606/11475923344/sweden-makes-it-illegal-to-take-photos-private-environments-without-permission.shtml#c113</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[DannyB]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 06:27:02 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130606/11475923344/sweden-makes-it-illegal-to-take-photos-private-environments-without-permission.shtml#c113</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Oh, and about dissent.  If you know of any posts on TechDirt that are constructive dissent or a discussion involving differing opinions, please point those posts out.  I don't see any.<br />
<br />
Mike:  How about a new feature?  When a post is reported enough times, hide not only the post, but all of its replies.  (Like this one you are reading now.)  That would make the constructive or even merely funny posts more visible.  It would cut down on the vast amount of non-productive noise.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Mike's unpaid minions are unpaid. Mike is a hypocrite.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/01121423439/hollywood-studios-keep-saying-its-employees-must-get-paid-now-may-be-forced-to-pay-its-interns.shtml#c586</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[PaulT]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 06:23:43 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/01121423439/hollywood-studios-keep-saying-its-employees-must-get-paid-now-may-be-forced-to-pay-its-interns.shtml#c586</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[IIRC, he's one of the people who was whining a couple of years ago on threads about the Huffington Post (the site was sold and people who had willingly donated articles tried demanding a cut despite having posted the articles for nothing). Blue, or people like him, tried defending this claiming that Huffington had somehow exploited the people who willingly gave their content for no promise of anything other than exposure through the site, which they received in full.<br />
<br />
The arguments are not only nonsensical and based on random assumptions, they're not even new.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Mike's unpaid minions are unpaid. Mike is a hypocrite.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/01121423439/hollywood-studios-keep-saying-its-employees-must-get-paid-now-may-be-forced-to-pay-its-interns.shtml#c570</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 06:23:33 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/01121423439/hollywood-studios-keep-saying-its-employees-must-get-paid-now-may-be-forced-to-pay-its-interns.shtml#c570</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Unpaid? Far from it. Everyday we come to this site so we can feel like <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130529/19425723249/amsterdams-rijksmuseum-does-digital-archives-right-hi-res-downloads-suite-online-editing-tools.shtml#c121" rel="nofollow">this guy</a>:<br />
<br />
<i>"You know, I like you OOTB. I know that others don't but I really do. I know that no matter how many times a day I stick a drill bit up my nose in a day, I can come here, read your comments, and realize that there's somebody stupider than me. For that, OOTB, I thank you."</i>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: NSA Surveillance</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/10465223506/british-intelligence-spied-g20-officials-phone-calls-emails-during-2009-summit.shtml#c582</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[btrussell]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 06:23:17 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/10465223506/british-intelligence-spied-g20-officials-phone-calls-emails-during-2009-summit.shtml#c582</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["I'm not going anywhere, Mike."<br />
<br />
Where would you go?<br />
<br />
You can't get a job and no school will accept you.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: @&quot;PaulT&quot;, compulsive yapper.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/01121423439/hollywood-studios-keep-saying-its-employees-must-get-paid-now-may-be-forced-to-pay-its-interns.shtml#c562</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 06:17:51 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/01121423439/hollywood-studios-keep-saying-its-employees-must-get-paid-now-may-be-forced-to-pay-its-interns.shtml#c562</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Actually, I thought that was fairly accurate. out_of_the_blue won't read the stories elsewhere because then he wouldn't get a kick out of make-believing that he's achieved any moral victories over us lowly paying customers.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130606/11475923344/sweden-makes-it-illegal-to-take-photos-private-environments-without-permission.shtml#c89</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 06:17:45 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130606/11475923344/sweden-makes-it-illegal-to-take-photos-private-environments-without-permission.shtml#c89</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<b>1. What problem does this law need to solve?<br />
 2. How is this possibly going to solve it?<br />
 3. Aren't there alternatives that are less likely to cause collateral damage and if not, is solving the problem of #1 worth the damage?</b><br />
<br />
1. Personal privacy<br />
2. By making you ask permission<br />
3. Yes, and no.<br />
<br />
It is very simply, just like there are signs up in supermarkets saying.<br />
<br />
"Entry is an acceptance that you are willing to have your bags searched".<br />
<br />
in this case it would be,<br />
<br />
Entry into this location is permission to take photos.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>