<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Latest Techdirt Comments</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/18243923466/hollywoods-new-talking-point-gatekeepers-are-awesome.shtml#c389</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 12:36:38 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/18243923466/hollywoods-new-talking-point-gatekeepers-are-awesome.shtml#c389</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The greater the persuasive force of third party papers mentioned here, the longer the TD articles mocking same.  Mr. Pessach's "essay" must have struck a raw nerve indeed...]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: @&quot;PaulT&quot;, compulsive yapper.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/01121423439/hollywood-studios-keep-saying-its-employees-must-get-paid-now-may-be-forced-to-pay-its-interns.shtml#c1227</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 12:36:36 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/01121423439/hollywood-studios-keep-saying-its-employees-must-get-paid-now-may-be-forced-to-pay-its-interns.shtml#c1227</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I don't know. I think that an entry level wage for a writer is probably around $30,000. Add to that employer payroll taxes of around 20% (I assume Masnick treats you as an independent contractor, rather than a bonafide employee). Then most companies contribute modestly toward health insurance, so call that $4,000. That adds up to about $40,000/year based on fifty, forty hour weeks; which is about $20/hour. As you are a bit more than entry level and (presumably) part-time; the rate should be somewhat higher- $25-$30 per hour at a minimum. Assuming the writer worked 40 hours per week to produce those articles, I'd say a minimum of $3200/moth for an inexperienced writer and double that for an experienced one.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/02025423448/company-claims-patent-pop-up-ads-sues-porn-travel-companies.shtml#c10</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[fogbugzd]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 12:35:14 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/02025423448/company-claims-patent-pop-up-ads-sues-porn-travel-companies.shtml#c10</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[There was a "Pop-Up Killer" application in 1999, which suggests that the popups predated the patent application.  <br />
<br />
You can read the original patent at <a href='http://www.google.com/patents/US7353229' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/patents/US7353229</a> . To my untrained eye it looks like this is a patent for the idea of using mechanisms already in JavaScript and Java applets to present advertising. Reading the article as a programmer I didn't see much in the way of how to do popups other than "Use the tools that are already provided."  <br />
<br />
JavaScript and the ability to do pupups and popunders was released by Netscape in 1997.  I am sure that by the time the '229 patent was filed there were a lot of tutorials that explained how to do pupup and popnder ads and did it better than this paptent.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130608/03355523371/warning-letters-under-uks-three-strikes-plan-unlikely-to-be-sent-out-before-2016-if-ever.shtml#c275</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 12:34:53 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130608/03355523371/warning-letters-under-uks-three-strikes-plan-unlikely-to-be-sent-out-before-2016-if-ever.shtml#c275</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[He has retired with the]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/10213023529/fbi-admits-to-using-drones-to-spy-americans.shtml#c374</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 12:31:45 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/10213023529/fbi-admits-to-using-drones-to-spy-americans.shtml#c374</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[And if you don't say something and spread the awareness, the government will figure the populace don't care.  With that in mind, I can see them doing far worse over time.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/10213023529/fbi-admits-to-using-drones-to-spy-americans.shtml#c353</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 12:27:53 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/10213023529/fbi-admits-to-using-drones-to-spy-americans.shtml#c353</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Who cares. They already have helicopters and satellites that can look down upon you. If they send up a helicopter it probably takes 3 cops. If they send up a drone, it takes one with a  joystick. Saves the taxpayers money. <br />
<br />
What do you honestly think they are going to do with these drones? Spy on you? Are you really that important? I'll bet my left one that they will use them to watch the borders for illegals, Chase bank robbers, Watch known drug houses, etc etc. Wow what a horrible idea. <br />
<br />
If you don't want to be seen nude in your backyard than don't go outside without clothes on. <br />
<br />
Stop bitching about everything that the government does. You elected them. If you don't like it than run for your local seat.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/10213023529/fbi-admits-to-using-drones-to-spy-americans.shtml#c343</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 12:26:53 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/10213023529/fbi-admits-to-using-drones-to-spy-americans.shtml#c343</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[actually the drones are far less worrying. They are just a convenient way of removing the focus from the real surveillance problems.<br />
<br />
Btw. Merkel was digging a bit at Obama in Berlin on the surveillance cases: "There needs to be a balance and we will continue to work with USA to find the right balance."<br />
Obama instantly answered that "USA already had found the right balance."...<br />
<br />
Given how this balance is individual for every person on earth I call bull on that...]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: china</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/10213023529/fbi-admits-to-using-drones-to-spy-americans.shtml#c341</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 12:22:10 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/10213023529/fbi-admits-to-using-drones-to-spy-americans.shtml#c341</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It was across it. But I wasn't aware that Prenda finished the tunnel. <br />
<br />
Hell, that could save alot of miles.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/18243923466/hollywoods-new-talking-point-gatekeepers-are-awesome.shtml#c366</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[jupiterkansas]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 12:18:27 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/18243923466/hollywoods-new-talking-point-gatekeepers-are-awesome.shtml#c366</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[So the system that gives you lots of stuff to choose from is bad, and a system that severely limits what's available to you is good.<br />
<br />
If you presume the consumer can't decide anything for themselves, this makes sense.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/18243923466/hollywoods-new-talking-point-gatekeepers-are-awesome.shtml#c360</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 12:18:15 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/18243923466/hollywoods-new-talking-point-gatekeepers-are-awesome.shtml#c360</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[He said major labels, leaving the smaller labels as his "Africa's diamond". He is not wrong, even though you can easily argue that all labels was part of the problem in the past. The guy is clearly not knowledgeable about how to do business in the new market and that is the only reason why he is complaining!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/10213023529/fbi-admits-to-using-drones-to-spy-americans.shtml#c324</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gwiz]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 12:17:37 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/10213023529/fbi-admits-to-using-drones-to-spy-americans.shtml#c324</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Lol. Blue showed up 3 minutes after your comment saying exactly that:<br />
<br />
<a href='http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/10213023529/fbi-admits-to-using-drones-to-spy-americans.shtml#c203' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/10213023529/fbi-admits-to-using-drones-to-spy-americans.shtml#c203</a><br />
<br />
Predictable troll is predictable.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Where can I torrent the &quot;best of surveillance&quot; video?</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/10213023529/fbi-admits-to-using-drones-to-spy-americans.shtml#c321</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 12:16:33 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/10213023529/fbi-admits-to-using-drones-to-spy-americans.shtml#c321</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Have to calibrate those cameras somehow and what better than perky nipples?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Lots of room to debate drones</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/10213023529/fbi-admits-to-using-drones-to-spy-americans.shtml#c319</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Boojumbunn]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 12:14:13 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/10213023529/fbi-admits-to-using-drones-to-spy-americans.shtml#c319</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Honestly, there is a lot of room to debate when and how the use of drones is appropriate inside the US and what is done with the data after a drone is flown.<br />
<br />
     I know it's not against the law for an unmarked police car, for example, to follow me down the road as I drive.   A manned drone seems, on the surface, to be an extension of this.   However a drone is not restricted to the same paths and views that a car is (which is one of the strengths of a drone.)    In my mind, this raises the following questions.<br />
<br />
1.  If a person is nude sunbathing in the privacy of their own, fenced, backyard and a police drone flies over.. what protections exist to prevent that part of that video from being kept, perused, taken home, posted on youtube, etc...  Can an FOI be used to get copies of drone flight video's?<br />
<br />
2.  If damage is done by a drone (breaks window, shorts power line) who is responsible?   <br />
<br />
3.   What type of encryption will be used to protect flight controls for drones from being hacked?   What sort of encryption for video streams to prevent from being recorded by third parties?<br />
<br />
4.   What restrictions will be placed on the correct use of drones?   can building and safety use it (as they have been using google maps) to look into peoples backyards for code violations?   Will a warrant be needed to use them?   Can they only be used to follow individuals or can the forestry service use them to look for fires/drugs/poachers/etc?<br />
<br />
5.   What laws will be in place for private use of drones?   To the best of my knowledge, if your not using them for commercial purpose you can fly video drones right now below 500ft.   but if your using them for commercial purpose then it's against FAA regulations.<br />
<br />
   So in my mind, there are lots of questions that need to be asked BEFORE we begin general use of drones within the borders of the united states.  I hope they are being considered.<br />
<br />
                      Boojum the brown bunny]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Umm, Google has you all accustomed to its spying.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/10213023529/fbi-admits-to-using-drones-to-spy-americans.shtml#c298</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 12:13:44 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/10213023529/fbi-admits-to-using-drones-to-spy-americans.shtml#c298</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I imagine people are aware of the pitfalls of google and how it makes money. However, others don]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/10213023529/fbi-admits-to-using-drones-to-spy-americans.shtml#c278</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 12:12:00 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/10213023529/fbi-admits-to-using-drones-to-spy-americans.shtml#c278</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Have another report vote ootb for another post having no bearing on the topic. <br />
------------<br />
<br />
I have come to the realization that nothing involving the present day scandals can be believed when I hear politicians mouths move. <br />
<br />
The investigations into the NLS have already shown that any time the system can be abused it will be.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: china</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/10213023529/fbi-admits-to-using-drones-to-spy-americans.shtml#c255</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 12:11:51 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/10213023529/fbi-admits-to-using-drones-to-spy-americans.shtml#c255</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Ummm...  [Quickly removes tinfoil hat, dons thinking cap.]  China physically occupies a different continent?  Yup.  That's the correctest answer.  I'm sure.  Ahhh...  Is this a trick question?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Where can I torrent the &quot;best of surveillance&quot; video?</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/10213023529/fbi-admits-to-using-drones-to-spy-americans.shtml#c243</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Edward Teach]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 12:11:43 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/10213023529/fbi-admits-to-using-drones-to-spy-americans.shtml#c243</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I bet that there's a lot of surveillance of topless beaches, clothing-optional beaches, beaches in general, and swimming pools in expensive parts of the towns where drones are based.<br />
<br />
I bet there's just *tons* of surveillance done over by sorority row, too.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Umm, Google has you all accustomed to its spying.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/10213023529/fbi-admits-to-using-drones-to-spy-americans.shtml#c236</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[FormerAC]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 12:11:14 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/10213023529/fbi-admits-to-using-drones-to-spy-americans.shtml#c236</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[You keep repeating this as if it were relevant.<br />
<br />
Here are a few reasons, off the top of my head, why it isn't...<br />
1.)  I don't have to use Google.  I can use different products.<br />
2.)  Google is a private company.  They cannot arrest me.<br />
3.)  The FBI/NSA are part of my government.  They have the power to arrest me.<br />
4.)  The FBI/NSA have a long history of lying about who they are spying on and abusing their powers.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Here's a Pirate Bay &quot;enabler&quot; who's been disintermediated from society!</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/18243923466/hollywoods-new-talking-point-gatekeepers-are-awesome.shtml#c346</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[RD]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 12:07:42 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/18243923466/hollywoods-new-talking-point-gatekeepers-are-awesome.shtml#c346</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["I'll just jam it in as otherwise won't be brought up."<br />
<br />
It's not your blog to bring anything up in. You dont get to just unilaterally change the topic or derail conversations because you have some weird huge hard-on for Mike and all things copyright. Start your own fucking blog if you don't like it here.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Mike's unpaid minions are unpaid. Mike is a hypocrite.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/01121423439/hollywood-studios-keep-saying-its-employees-must-get-paid-now-may-be-forced-to-pay-its-interns.shtml#c1212</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Fenderson]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 12:07:12 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/01121423439/hollywood-studios-keep-saying-its-employees-must-get-paid-now-may-be-forced-to-pay-its-interns.shtml#c1212</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I have seen no proof. I believe it is a hunch based on writing styles and themes, which are similar. In my view, that's not solid enough evidence to say they're the same person. Also, it doesn't matter in the slightest if they are.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>