<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Latest Techdirt Comments</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title>Fair Trial Possible In Kern County?</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/18051923103/footage-lethal-beating-deleted-seized-phone-sheriff-asks-fbi-to-take-over-investigation.shtml#c1016</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 04:24:35 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/18051923103/footage-lethal-beating-deleted-seized-phone-sheriff-asks-fbi-to-take-over-investigation.shtml#c1016</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[According to a report today, not everyone in Kern County has been exposed to media coverage of David Silva's death.  A significant number of people recently interviewed at the Kern County Fairgrounds hadn't heard the news yet.<br />
<br />
<br />]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/14465423109/aps-attempt-drming-news-shuts-down.shtml#c239</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ninja]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 04:24:12 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/14465423109/aps-attempt-drming-news-shuts-down.shtml#c239</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Hah. People use aggregators like they breathe nowadays. If you aren't there it's not a problem, there are others that are. The real question news outfits should be asking is how to make their content be relevant to the people using those aggregators so they'll choose to give higher priority to your content.<br />
<br />
It's about time they move completely online (leaving some higher price printed version for those who are willing to pay for it) and monetize on eyeballs and pre/freemium content.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Old</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130513/09590723059/this-weeks-bad-photoshopping-lesson-comes-scientology.shtml#c571</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[anonymouse]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 04:20:33 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130513/09590723059/this-weeks-bad-photoshopping-lesson-comes-scientology.shtml#c571</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Seriously i don't know why any site would even give them a small bit of attention, they are irrelevant in today's society and the only way to remove them is to ignore them the same as any cult.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: The problem with moral absolutism</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130508/10233423003/bug-allows-same-sex-marriage-nintendo-game-nintendo-releases-patch-to-fix-it.shtml#c3751</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Real Michael]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 04:20:07 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130508/10233423003/bug-allows-same-sex-marriage-nintendo-game-nintendo-releases-patch-to-fix-it.shtml#c3751</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[There has to be a general moral standard, otherwise there would be no reason to place limitations on things and prohibitive actions, e.g. walking around in public naked. Moral relativism is akin to saying that people's sense of right vs wrong is merely an abstraction, a self-delusion, if you will, and that standards in public decency and laws can be decided upon arbitrarily (without the consent of the governed, I might add).<br />
<br />
As far as certain people's sexual habits, right, it's not for us to say who's allowed to do what, but nor is it the public school system's to indoctrinate our children into believing whatever they want them to.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/22104223137.shtml#c1064</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 04:18:54 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/22104223137.shtml#c1064</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[do I have a web page or post articles, I am simply a commenter, you don't have to know my name.<br />
<br />
BTW: you notice you too are an Anonymous Coward..<br />
<br />
the real reason is I don't really give a flying fuck, and I am not putting myself up as someone who is working for some "cause". As this 'writer' has done.<br />
<br />
Or they just have too much shame for their friends to know who they are and how stupid there cause is.<br />
<br />
Nor do I go to great efforts to hide my name as this person has done.. <br />
<br />
But if you 'represent' something, and you don't have the balls to put your name on it, then you should reconsider your impact.<br />
<br />
Because no one will take notice of someone who runs a blog but is too gutless to put their name to it.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Regardless of their decision...</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/09430123119/eu-commission-sued-refusing-to-reveal-trade-agreement-documents-they-shared-with-lobbyists.shtml#c63</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ricebowl]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 04:18:23 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/09430123119/eu-commission-sued-refusing-to-reveal-trade-agreement-documents-they-shared-with-lobbyists.shtml#c63</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I think we can expect appeals, wailing, protestation and an upsurge in complaints and press-attention as to the loss of freedom, security, etc.<br />
<br />
The only difference is that their siding <em>against</em> transparency will legitimise the protestations and complaints.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/09430123119/eu-commission-sued-refusing-to-reveal-trade-agreement-documents-they-shared-with-lobbyists.shtml#c48</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 04:10:09 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/09430123119/eu-commission-sued-refusing-to-reveal-trade-agreement-documents-they-shared-with-lobbyists.shtml#c48</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[sadly i predict that it will not side with transparency.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Post No. 16</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/22104223137.shtml#c1059</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 04:10:04 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/22104223137.shtml#c1059</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Nah, that would be <i>your</i> province.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/09430123119/eu-commission-sued-refusing-to-reveal-trade-agreement-documents-they-shared-with-lobbyists.shtml#c45</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 04:09:20 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/09430123119/eu-commission-sued-refusing-to-reveal-trade-agreement-documents-they-shared-with-lobbyists.shtml#c45</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[and i wouldn't be surprised if, as usual, the court finds against Corporate Europe Observatory. the last thing anyone in a high position wants, regardless of whether it is a person or a organisation/body, is for the public to know what is going on. this is the flavour of 'negotiations' now. the biggest group is the public. the easiest way to stop bad deals is for the public to find out what is happening and how they will be affected in relation to the businesses that are part of the negotiations. even if the court sides with Corporate Europe Observatory, it will be a useless decision if representative groups looking after the public's interests are still omitted from talks or not allowed to have meaningful input that is actually taken notice of. it will be even worse in the talks between the EU and the USA. the EU will be expected to give everything that the USA demands (not asks for! demands!) whilst the USA will expect to give absolutely nothing to the EU, especially when it comes to copyright, patent and trademark violations. all will be to protect, reimburse and profitise USA companies, particularly the entertainment industries and big Pharma companies so generics are prohibited!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/09430123119/eu-commission-sued-refusing-to-reveal-trade-agreement-documents-they-shared-with-lobbyists.shtml#c21</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 03:59:59 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/09430123119/eu-commission-sued-refusing-to-reveal-trade-agreement-documents-they-shared-with-lobbyists.shtml#c21</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["If the judges side with transparency, it could have a major impact on how the imminent TAFTA/TTIP negotiations between the EU and US are conducted."<br />
<br />
We can hope...]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: How droll</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/22104223137.shtml#c1055</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 03:45:57 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/22104223137.shtml#c1055</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["Personal" level? Yeah, do you want to explain how Wright made this "personal"? I'm genuinely curious how you think Wright's overstepped his entitled boundaries. I'm even more curious why you think this is a far, far more grievous "issue" than extortionists demanding money so they don't tell your neighbours about alleged pornographic habits.<br />
<br />
That "i dunno, just shut up and let me sue people, neener neener neener" shenanigans on the part of Prenda raises less of an alarm bell than a judge acting no different than any other judge would when annoyed is a pretty good indication how much skin you have in the game and which side you're playing for.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/22104223137.shtml#c1030</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 03:44:05 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/22104223137.shtml#c1030</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Coon]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130518/17573523139/funniestmost-insightful-comments-week-techdirt.shtml#c186</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 03:42:37 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130518/17573523139/funniestmost-insightful-comments-week-techdirt.shtml#c186</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Gay.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/22104223137.shtml#c1019</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lucy]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 03:40:29 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/22104223137.shtml#c1019</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Wow,  the reasoning with this character is something else.  Here,  let's try this:<br />
<br />
Dear Sir or Madame horse with no name,<br />
<br />
 You have not offered your full name,  address,  phone number, or any other personal identifications.  Because of this,  anything you have to say it's moot.  You are not a real person.  You do not have real thoughts.  Nothing you pretend to think has merit.  Most importantly,  because you are hiding behind a horse with no name, you forfeit your 1st amendment right to be heard. You  are afraid. (Because I said so.)<br />
<br />
Lastly, Lucy is not my real name.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130206/06521321890/games-workshop-proves-it-would-rather-bully-authors-than-be-culture-participant.shtml#c997</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 03:30:42 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130206/06521321890/games-workshop-proves-it-would-rather-bully-authors-than-be-culture-participant.shtml#c997</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Your game writers (why did you lose Alessio?) suck, Your models are (flaming phonix?) lame, and your best games were (Goth, Necro, Mord) Specialist Game. There is no creative culture left at Games Workshop. You don't have the vision to create continuity between games (goth ~ epic ~40k ~ necro ~ inquisitor). You make game rules designed to boost profits (high attrition, low tactics). You have developed a complex Dark Age Sci-fi setting that you do practically nothing interesting with. You have a fantasy franchise that could destroy Dungeons and Dragons; but you never support your gaming books with any diversity in your miniature line or create continuity between the two. GW stores are a joke and promote the worst kind of gaming culture. This one employee model for stores is pathetic and frankly everyone just feels sorry for the guy that has to deal with that bullshit. <br />
I could go on all day about how you guys have set back table top gaming 15 years. You guys are going the way of cardboard punches and Avalon Hill. I remember when people used to fight over space in game shops to play Necromunda; twenty kids going crazy for bits and new figs to buy. You could have built Necromunda into a 30-40 fig skirmish game; but no, you guys dropped it. Dropped Necromunda when you could have opened the gates for Genstealer cults, Ademptus Arbities, PDF forces, Traitor Guard, Choas Cults, Eldar Corsairs, Exodites, Rebel Grots, Mutant Zombies, Robot Rebels, Penal Legions, Hive Gang Militia, House Knights, Riot Anarchists, Redemption Crusaders. There is a lot of diversity there that you just don't use. <br />
The last original thing you guys did was Tau and how long ago was that?<br />
My point is that I'm 31 years old, I have some money now, and I really love tabletop gaming. The way you guys are looking right now I don't believe I will be introducing my kids to GW gaming. It is overpriced, consumerist, dumb downed, uncreative, and frankly doesn't even come close to being counter culture cool anymore. <br />
The truth is all my demographic wants is a single specialist shelf at the game store and the ability to throw some Genstealer Cultists at a Guard Army. We wouldn't care if we got slaughtered, if we blew the tread off a Land Raider we would call it a victory. A chance to pair a squad of PDF forces with a Marine Chapter or play a skirmish campaign where Eldar Exodites fight off a Rebel Grot Revolution. You could launch every one on those factions with only three different troop types, and a couple of equipment variations; everything else you need is supplied by your existing miniature line (captured Rhinos, stolen Sentinels, modified skimmers and trucks).]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: How droll</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/22104223137.shtml#c1001</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[horse with no name]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 03:05:13 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/22104223137.shtml#c1001</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Yup, I said he would be lucky to keep his job.  I don't think he will be punished (ie, brought into a court of law and charged with anything) but his taking this all to a personal level will likely get him in some serious trouble as it related to his ability to sit on the bench.<br />
<br />
If you want to call that punishment, well.. yeah.  But I don't want to suggest that he is going to jail (aka, getting punished).<br />
<br />
Any other posts you would like me to explain for you?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: How droll</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/22104223137.shtml#c976</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 03:00:14 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/22104223137.shtml#c976</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[how has mantxk trashed his rep? Oh wait you're attAacking mike and stop copyright trolls because you cannot defeat their actual arguments<br />
<br />
carry on then]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Eric's comment</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130518/17573523139/funniestmost-insightful-comments-week-techdirt.shtml#c161</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[horse with no name]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 02:57:54 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130518/17573523139/funniestmost-insightful-comments-week-techdirt.shtml#c161</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<b>If that were true then how the heck are terrorists already benefiting from infringement when there is already a legal product available</b><br />
<br />
They benefit because they have no costs related to creating the product.  They are the ones selling cheap as a result.<br />
<br />
Why terrorists all of a sudden?  Are you calling Kim Dotcom a terrorist now?  After all, he has profited grandly from selling access other people's work without paying for it.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Eric's comment</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130518/17573523139/funniestmost-insightful-comments-week-techdirt.shtml#c144</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 02:48:14 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130518/17573523139/funniestmost-insightful-comments-week-techdirt.shtml#c144</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[for making it that way *]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Eric's comment</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130518/17573523139/funniestmost-insightful-comments-week-techdirt.shtml#c143</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 02:47:47 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130518/17573523139/funniestmost-insightful-comments-week-techdirt.shtml#c143</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[and if there are no legal alternatives available then it is the fault of IP law and IP holders for making it such that way. They should be blamed and IP law should be changed to ensure that legal alternatives are always available. That's how you stop the terrorists.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>