<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Latest Techdirt Comments</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Again, sheerly an anti-copyright WEDGE for Mike.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c423</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[average_joe]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 08:56:51 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c423</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I'm just pointing out that this is yet a mindless FUD piece that adds nothing to debate and exists only to fan the flames of hatred towards copyright holders. It's not ego. I seriously wonder how Mike was second in his class at Cornell yet seems incapable of actually being a positive force in the debate.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Again, sheerly an anti-copyright WEDGE for Mike.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c417</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[average_joe]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 08:55:34 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c417</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>You're claiming you do?</i><br />
<br />
No. Nobody has such perfect information, yet they are able to have an opinion on what copyright should look like. That's why it's such a bullshit excuse from Mike. He clearly has all sorts of deeply-felt opinions about copyright despite not having perfect information. He just pulls out that excuse when anyone challenges him to state a concrete position on copyright policy.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>NOW true free to play - star trek online</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20130508/06065623001/new-hope-how-going-free-to-play-brought-redemption-to-star-wars-mmo.shtml#c442</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[santa clause]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 08:55:34 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20130508/06065623001/new-hope-how-going-free-to-play-brought-redemption-to-star-wars-mmo.shtml#c442</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[go try star trek online and get a really true free to play game , if you invest the time and effort everything inthe game is truly free. OR if you want osmehting quicker a few bucks and your golden....]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Again, sheerly an anti-copyright WEDGE for Mike.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c409</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 08:55:01 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c409</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I agree with you on this one and heaven knows that happens rarely.<br />
<br />
However, politicians are working in a mining field where "hurting business" is a way to lose campaign funds and ultimately an election. When Business Europe, a pretty irrelevant forum is actively campaigning, not against the treaty itself, but more against its supporters, politicians start fearing loosing funds and start to rethink their position even when the opinion is a complete non-sequitor. The important thing is how massive the stakeholders are pro- or con-. Since this is a vote for no to the treaty, it will count for politicians even though the message is bullocks.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Techdirt continually mistakes &quot;loss leader&quot; with &quot;FREE&quot;.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20130508/06065623001/new-hope-how-going-free-to-play-brought-redemption-to-star-wars-mmo.shtml#c430</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 08:54:23 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20130508/06065623001/new-hope-how-going-free-to-play-brought-redemption-to-star-wars-mmo.shtml#c430</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[ok, blue boy, where did the extra income come from.<br />
<br />
Hmmm....  paying subscriptions are at 500K, down from where they once were, yet their monthly income has doubled.<br />
<br />
Since the monthly subscription fees haven't gone up, where's the extra coming from?<br />
<br />
Care to comment, or does that break your reality?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Again, sheerly an anti-copyright WEDGE for Mike.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c386</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chuck Norris' Enemy (deceased)]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 08:52:59 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c386</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>Yeah, he doesn't have 100% perfect information...</i><br />
<br />
You're claiming you do?  Or the politicians that pass copyright legislation?  So naive.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Again, sheerly an anti-copyright WEDGE for Mike.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c381</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 08:46:43 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c381</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I wouldn't say "flaming" so much as reminding everyone that your noble attempts to debate Mike Masnick are overshadowed by your immense ego.<br />
<br />
I don't know how you go on with your life, Joe, if this is the most important thing.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Someone doesn't understand the mechanics of an MMO</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20130508/06065623001/new-hope-how-going-free-to-play-brought-redemption-to-star-wars-mmo.shtml#c407</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[dennis deems]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 08:46:30 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20130508/06065623001/new-hope-how-going-free-to-play-brought-redemption-to-star-wars-mmo.shtml#c407</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><i>the more players you have, the more value your game has for your players.</i></blockquote>So very much this.  As a trivial example, most of the members of the kinship I was in were free players.  I was a subscriber and I also made more than a few micropayments for convenience.  The presence of the free players meant more opportunities for all of us to run instances and raids, more crafters to help out kinnies with gear, more people bringing new members into the kinship, more people to have fun with on the kin chat.  Win-win-win.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Stop calling readers and fans &quot;consumers&quot; !</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/15445423110/framework-copyright-reform.shtml#c1838</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aaron Wolf]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 08:44:04 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/15445423110/framework-copyright-reform.shtml#c1838</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Mike, you went so far as to criticize the term "users" but then went on to use the far *worse* term "consumers"<br />
<br />
"Every creator is also a consumer of content" NO. "content" is a problematic word itself, but if we accept that physical metaphor, the content is NOT consumed here!<br />
<br />
Reading and copying etc. do NOT consume things!!!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c378</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 08:37:00 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c378</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It's pretty obvious what you are trying to do.<br />
<br />
- You post inflammatory remarks with no substance whatsoever, attacking Mike and this community.<br />
- You only answer to comments devoid of substance or cling onto other comments that are also likely to cause a reaction (staying true to the first point, as always).<br />
- Finally, for that extra zest, you even bothered to sign in.<br />
<br />
There is only one possible conclusion here.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>So...</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c20</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[silverscarcat]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 08:34:40 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c20</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[If he has/had a website that had infringing stuff on it, he wouldn't care if it got taken down for no reason then, right?<br />
<br />
but I think a more apt thing is this...<br />
<br />
If someone at his home had something that was given to them, even if it was legally bought, from someone else, his house was raided, everything confiscated by some military then his house burned down while he can only watch in horror...<br />
<br />
Well, at least he'd know how Kim Dotcom feels.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c356</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 08:34:34 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c356</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Why do you hate the blind?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>thanks</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121018/01054720744/hollywood-accounting-how-19-million-movie-makes-150-million-still-isnt-profitable.shtml#c1919</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thanks]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 08:34:00 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121018/01054720744/hollywood-accounting-how-19-million-movie-makes-150-million-still-isnt-profitable.shtml#c1919</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bGQP-vQ_OPg" rel="nofollow"><a href='http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bGQP-vQ_OPg' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bGQP-vQ_OPg</a></a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Again, sheerly an anti-copyright WEDGE for Mike.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c344</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[gorehound]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 08:33:58 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c344</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Screwing Over Blind People because these Corporate Groups are a bunch of greedy Assholes.How low can you stoop Assholes ! Going after the Blind who really need the help of others..................Your damn Copyright Maximalist BS is going to End one way or the other.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Actually...</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130518/17573523139/funniestmost-insightful-comments-week-techdirt.shtml#c252</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 08:33:54 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130518/17573523139/funniestmost-insightful-comments-week-techdirt.shtml#c252</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Just because you didn't learn anything doesn't mean nobody else did, you fruit loop.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Again, sheerly an anti-copyright WEDGE for Mike.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c337</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 08:32:18 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c337</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Wouldn't want to limit copyright wherein it would allow blind people to read. What a selfish position. Maybe disabled folk should just try harder to not be disabled, because we all know that copyright will probably cure them of their ailments.<br />
<br />
Copyright rules!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c312</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[jupiterkansas]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 08:31:45 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c312</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It's almost like they can't see the harm they are causing for fear of the harm that might be caused to them.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c296</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[silverscarcat]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 08:30:38 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c296</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>I know this is just another brainless FUD piece</i><br />
<br />
And you and your masters would know that, since you perfected that art decades ago, wouldn't you?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c281</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[average_joe]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 08:30:17 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c281</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Yeah, asking Mike to discuss the actual text of the proposal and their actual position on what they think is wrong with it is derailing the conversation. Not. This is just another "they hate the blind" article that adds nothing positive to the debate about copyright. Mike's specialty, unfortunately. Mike's incapable of anything else, I'm sad to say.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Again, sheerly an anti-copyright WEDGE for Mike.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c267</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[average_joe]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 08:27:51 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c267</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I know you're flaming and you have nothing to add to the conversation, but if there's something you'd like to debate me on I'd be happy to oblige. I will directly answer your direct questions without weasel words and without running away. Bring it on.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>