<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Latest Techdirt Comments</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: &amp;quot;I believe in sharing knowledge and ideas for the good of society.&amp;quot;</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c2019</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[horse with no name]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 18:51:46 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c2019</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Yes, and John Gotti was just a simple businessman and carpenter.<br />
<br />
Would you like to buy this bridge?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Excelsior / Regents</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110311/01434213446/dailydirt-tuition-debt-is-chumps.shtml#c154</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 18:51:09 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110311/01434213446/dailydirt-tuition-debt-is-chumps.shtml#c154</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Excelsior is legit, though not very prestigious.  They are, however, very good at accepting transfer credit from other properly-accredited sources. None of that "you have to take OUR version of Comp120" shit.<br />
<br />
Historically, I think their biggest market was US military folk -- who would go to school part-time, get moved around a lot, and graduate from Regents (old name) with a combination of transfer credit and guided-reading-up-on-your-own credit-by-exam.<br />
<br />
Linder got a pretty generic Associates with a funny name by transferring credit from a variety of sources.  His trick was to find cheap or free classes that he could transfer. If he'd been better at AP or CLEP exams it might have been even easier.<br />
<br />
I expect Excelsior is watching and considering MOOC developments very closely, and could be one of the pioneers in transforming MOOC completions into degrees from an accredited institution.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Summation in 7 x 5-7-5</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/02413623115/bogus-lawsuit-plus-threats-to-those-who-write-about-it-leads-to-epic-response.shtml#c1001</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Not a Doe but I play one on TV]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 18:50:35 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/02413623115/bogus-lawsuit-plus-threats-to-those-who-write-about-it-leads-to-epic-response.shtml#c1001</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Ex-Turbine figurehead<br />
Hires WAAmbulance chaser<br />
To sue blog chatters<br />
<br />
Blames fat, poor, alone<br />
On allegations of perv<br />
Just short of statute<br />
<br />
Demands settlement<br />
Annoints self process server<br />
(Stalker more like it)<br />
<br />
"Does" worried, with cause:<br />
5 mill? for discussing case<br />
Of screaming drunk girl? <br />
<br />
Popehat brings counsel<br />
Case demolished, point by point<br />
Lawyer to lawyer<br />
<br />
Somerville: small town<br />
Gossip has gone national<br />
Jonmon: new Prenda<br />
<br />
Turns adage on head,<br />
That no such thing as bad press<br />
Streisand sings for him]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110311/01434213446/dailydirt-tuition-debt-is-chumps.shtml#c131</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Mighty Buzzard]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 18:48:54 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110311/01434213446/dailydirt-tuition-debt-is-chumps.shtml#c131</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Oh but it is. The only thing a college gives you in the way of information that the great, wide Internet doesn't is a piece of paper.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Is there really a market for paid-for fan fiction?</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c572</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 18:47:52 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c572</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Until the invention of the internet, fans paid for fanfic.  The zine publisher wasn't supposed to make a profit, in fact if she made a profit, it was expected that she'd roll it over into the next fanfic she published to lower the cost.  <br />
<br />
That said: when printing costs took off in the mid-80s, a fan could find herself paying $30, $40, $50 for a zine with full-color covers, fancy binding, and full-color illustrations.  Beauty and the Beast fandom (the TV show with Ron Perlman &amp; Linda Hamilton) was the first to see these very opulent, romantic, and expensive zines published: you'd see full-color zines with fancy raised printing, metallic overlay printing, even a lace-and-crystal embellished zine was sold.  <br />
<br />
I put out an X-Files zine with a nice B&amp;W cover on heavy stock, acid-free pages, with perfect binding--I charged $20, did not make a profit, and I had to do four printings to supply demand.  It wasn't that big of a zine, only about 200 pages. It was considered a well-priced zine at the time, so people were spending more for other zines.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110311/01434213446/dailydirt-tuition-debt-is-chumps.shtml#c112</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Mighty Buzzard]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 18:47:45 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110311/01434213446/dailydirt-tuition-debt-is-chumps.shtml#c112</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Easy, yes. Intelligent, no. You might just as well weed them out by eye color for most jobs.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110311/01434213446/dailydirt-tuition-debt-is-chumps.shtml#c90</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 18:47:34 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110311/01434213446/dailydirt-tuition-debt-is-chumps.shtml#c90</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["College is also entirely unnecessary for the vast majority of jobs"<br />
<br />
And clearly, a job is the only reason to seek higher education ... what a simplistic attitude.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110311/01434213446/dailydirt-tuition-debt-is-chumps.shtml#c78</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Mighty Buzzard]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 18:45:27 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110311/01434213446/dailydirt-tuition-debt-is-chumps.shtml#c78</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Some do but quite a lot of them pay better than you'd think. Plumber, electrician, and HVAC guys all make a hell of a lot more than I did at my first sysadmin job, as do most union jobs.  For that matter, sysadmin isn't really helped by having a degree beyond basic coding ability and that can be picked up for free online.<br />
<br />
Most business positions have no need of what they had to learn for a business degree. Accountants and lawyers being pretty much the only exception.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Lowered expectations</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/09382823173/chicago-school-system-foia-requests-stonewalling-obfuscation-paper-shredding.shtml#c304</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bergman]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 18:41:00 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/09382823173/chicago-school-system-foia-requests-stonewalling-obfuscation-paper-shredding.shtml#c304</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Yeah, given Chicago's reputation, he could well be.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110311/01434213446/dailydirt-tuition-debt-is-chumps.shtml#c56</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[sorrykb]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 18:39:49 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110311/01434213446/dailydirt-tuition-debt-is-chumps.shtml#c56</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>College is also entirely unnecessary for the vast majority of jobs.</blockquote><br />
These days, even the jobs for which you don't <b><i>need</i></b> a college degree require a college degree. With so many people looking for work, it's a quick and easy way for employers to winnow down the field of applicants.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: What a whiney baby + @ &quot;Oh, you didn</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/18103323179/filmmaker-behind-pirate-bay-documentary-says-bogus-dmca-takedowns-take-away-his-free-speech.shtml#c914</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 18:38:51 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/18103323179/filmmaker-behind-pirate-bay-documentary-says-bogus-dmca-takedowns-take-away-his-free-speech.shtml#c914</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>The bots get false positives at times and one is one too many. In this case it seems like a lot of independent false positives on something that do not make these studios look good. That is rather suspicious!</blockquote><br />
In fact, it seems they were either targeting the documentary itself or targeting links containing the phrase "Pirate Bay" regardless of content. Either way, it's altogether improper behavior for anyone filing a DMCA notice, and in no way satisfies the "good faith" requirement of the DMCA. If the DMCA's "perjury" clause had any teeth, Simon Klose would be wiping the floor with all the studios.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/02455423183/prenda-lawyer-says-georgia-court-should-ignore-judge-wrights-order-because-look-hackers.shtml#c432</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 18:34:48 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/02455423183/prenda-lawyer-says-georgia-court-should-ignore-judge-wrights-order-because-look-hackers.shtml#c432</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The best and brightest of copyright enforcement, ladies and gentlemen.<br />
<br />
average_joe and horse with no name just hate it when due process is enforced.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: What a melange! Think hit EVERY one of your wacky notions!</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130424/00010122821/adam-savage-why-copyright-trademark-holders-need-to-get-over-their-obsession-with-control.shtml#c181</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 18:33:31 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130424/00010122821/adam-savage-why-copyright-trademark-holders-need-to-get-over-their-obsession-with-control.shtml#c181</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[So the benchmark is if no one complains, it's legal. Thanks for admitting that. Unless at any point I am made aware of any wishes of the copyright owner, anything I do is legal because no one complains. Thanks for clarifying that for me, out_of_the_blue. Your morals are superior and I will follow them to the letter.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Not What It Appears</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130510/15454323039/appeals-court-issues-135-page-ruling-software-patents-that-answers-almost-nothing.shtml#c1010</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert Sachs]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 18:31:54 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130510/15454323039/appeals-court-issues-135-page-ruling-software-patents-that-answers-almost-nothing.shtml#c1010</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The CLS decision is not as pointless as you suggest.  In fact, there is a fair degree of agreement between the decisions that actually is good for patentees, including software patent holders.  <br />
<br />
First, the majority of judges agree that the presumption of validity applies to Section 101.  See Lourie at 23, and Radar at 26. This means that a defendant can't kill a software patent on a motion to dismiss, and without facts (e.g., expert testimony). <br />
<br />
Second, the majority of judges agree that the key question is "preemption": does the claim cover all practical applications of the idea.  They  agree that this comes down to a question of the scope of the claim relative to "practical" and "real world effects".  The judges all look for "meaningful limitations".  Where the judges disagree is how you do that analysis, on what counts as "meaningful." <br />
<br />
Even Lourie (who found all the claims ineligible) requires that the claim "wholly preempt" all "practical uses" of the idea. I would argue that a defendant has to prove that it could not practice the abstract idea without infringing. The patentee need only show that its possible to do that, because there is some limitation in the claim that is not required to practice the "big idea." In general, given a broadly stated "abstract idea" any good engineer can show that there is some limitation in the claim that is not required to implement the abstract idea. In that case, the defendant loses.  <br />
<br />
Your quotation above that "generic computer automation" should kill lots of software patents is not correct.  Most software patents are not mere computer automation of an existing idea practiced in real life.  Certainly there are plenty, but they are the minority.  They may be more visible because they are more likely to be contested and result in litigation, but that's a biased sample.<br />
<br />
More fundamentally, the underlying logic of this view is at odds with the law and I would argue, common sense.  It has never been the case that an invention is ineligible because it is "automation" or because it uses conventional mechanisms.  It may be obvious, but it's still eligible for patenting.  Indeed, caselaw going back over a 100 years, and the modern patent law, specifically allowed for inventions that were new "uses" of existing machines, which arguably covers the "mere" computerization of an existing process.  <br />
<br />
Further, this thinking is "biased" against computers for no apparent reason. More specifically: would you deny patent eligibility to someone who used conventional pulleys and gears and levers and springs etc. in a new way to lift a stone?  No, you would say that qualified as eligible for a patent, and then decide whether it was obvious.  If you would not discriminate against other types of "hardware" that can be reconfigured and repurposed, then you should not discriminate against computer hardware which is reconfigured and repurposed by software.<br />
<br />
One of the hallmarks of our patent system is that it is technology agnostic: it does not dictate which technologies are a priori worthy of protecting and which are not. It lets in all comers and thus does not bias the path of technological innovation.  Imagine if in the 1920s or so, the Supreme Court decided the inventions that used electricity were merely applying a "natural law" or "natural phenomena" and therefore no electrical device was eligible for patent protection? Maybe you would say that we'd be better off--but there is no evidence for that.  Indeed, the historical record is that Edison, Westinghouse, and many others relied on patents in order obtain financing and maintain profits for further research and development. <br />
<br />
For a detailed analysis of the CLS opinions see <a href='http://www.bilskiblog.com' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://www.bilskiblog.com</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110311/01434213446/dailydirt-tuition-debt-is-chumps.shtml#c54</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 18:31:07 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110311/01434213446/dailydirt-tuition-debt-is-chumps.shtml#c54</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>"College is also entirely unnecessary for the vast majority of jobs."</i><br />
<br />
These jobs you speak of... do they require you to say "do you want fries with that?" alot?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130514/10391523084/vp-joe-biden-believes-theres-no-legal-reason-government-cant-slap-sin-tax-violent-media.shtml#c647</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[bw1]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 18:28:38 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130514/10391523084/vp-joe-biden-believes-theres-no-legal-reason-government-cant-slap-sin-tax-violent-media.shtml#c647</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Ask Franklin and Schonfeld if the tax should apply to a movie about the Battle of Jericho, or the movies "Mosada" or "The Passion of the Christ."  I think they would change their tune.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c565</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 18:23:18 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c565</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I agree with you on being surprised about the rejection of erotica: the most popular fanfic has always traditionally been erotica--specifically slash erotica.  So I'm guessing this may not be quite the popular thing they imagine it will be.  But there are any number of works that are pretty awesome and ready-for-TV just as they are, and I can think of plenty of fics that can have the erotic scenes neatly edited out as they do not advance the plot and are there for fan-service.<br />
<br />
Do you post your fic on Archiveofourown.org?  I both post &amp; read most of my fanfic there for many reasons, but a big one is that there's a drop-down menu on "Download" where you can choose mobi, epub, pdf, or html to download to your ebook rather than reading the fic on the screen. My first thought on discovering the drop-down was, "I'll never have to pay for an overpriced zine again!", and I immediately gave AO3 a nice donation.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110311/01434213446/dailydirt-tuition-debt-is-chumps.shtml#c42</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Mighty Buzzard]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 18:17:19 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110311/01434213446/dailydirt-tuition-debt-is-chumps.shtml#c42</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[College is also entirely unnecessary for the vast majority of jobs. If you want a better baseline education, improve K-12 education and leave college for those it will actually benefit.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Pentium</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/10303023175/magic-hat-brewery-sues-west-sixth-brewing-using-number-six-their-logo.shtml#c346</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Miff]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 18:08:57 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/10303023175/magic-hat-brewery-sues-west-sixth-brewing-using-number-six-their-logo.shtml#c346</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Remember that the 80486 was back in the Golden Age of computing when Compaq could legally reverse-engineer an IBM PC and not get sued out of existence.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Prior Art</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c2002</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 18:08:40 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c2002</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[You are talking about the idea of two-factor authentication, not the method of implementation (What patents are supposed to protect - the implementation not the idea.)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>