<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Latest Techdirt Comments</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title>Re: Mike's Position (my opinion of it anyway).</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c951</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[jupiterkansas]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 12:22:49 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c951</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Unfortunately there's nothing Mike could say to satisfy the "state your position" trolls, because they're aren't here seeking his position or truth or honest discussion. <br />
<br />
Their goal is simply to discredit Mike and this website so it will not be as influential, and make it an unpleasant place to visit. <br />
<br />
Oh, and they're failing miserably.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Beyond stupid</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c488</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Internet Zen Master]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 12:22:24 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c488</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Stupid is sort of thing that the US DOJ does (see: MegaUpload case). I'm pretty sure the brainiacs at the Justice Department aren't so lobotomized that they would even <i>consider</i> going after an entire domain registrar.<br />
<br />
Then again, with the current administration, who knows?<br />
<br />
As the Zen Master says, "We'll see."]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/11200723149/war-journalists-doj-claimed-fox-news-reporter-was-aider-abettor-co-conspirator-with-leaker.shtml#c45</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Josh in CharlotteNC]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 12:20:05 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/11200723149/war-journalists-doj-claimed-fox-news-reporter-was-aider-abettor-co-conspirator-with-leaker.shtml#c45</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[CCTV camera + facial recognition (not great yet, but improvements keep coming)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c475</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[DannyB]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 12:20:03 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c475</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Should a registrar be able to tell if a site commits criminal acts if it registers a domain name like:<br />
<br />
PrendaLaw.com<br />
Ingenuity123.com<br />
AFholdings.com<br />
RIAA.com<br />
MPAA.com<br />
<br />
etc, and other criminal organization domain names?<br />
<br />
Should the registrar be able to deny registration if the name looks suspicious?  Or if it doesn't look like a clear lawful purpose can be determined?  A name like RIAA.com might seem suspicious.  After all, it could be an acronym or initialism for a lot of things:<br />
<br />
Racketeering Industry Asshats of America<br />
( . . . other expansions of RIAA left to imagination . . . )<br />
<br />
Can the registrar be expected to know?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130505/14372422951/court-finds-fantasy-stories-obscene.shtml#c209</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 12:19:07 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130505/14372422951/court-finds-fantasy-stories-obscene.shtml#c209</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Don't let these judges near any fan fiction websites...]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130505/14372422951/court-finds-fantasy-stories-obscene.shtml#c189</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lord Binky]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 12:19:02 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130505/14372422951/court-finds-fantasy-stories-obscene.shtml#c189</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[So if a work can't compete with a work that has reached recognition as great classical literature, it is obscene or isn't worthy of close inspection to determine it is not obscene? That doesn't seem a very good way to judge something...]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20130508/06065623001/new-hope-how-going-free-to-play-brought-redemption-to-star-wars-mmo.shtml#c518</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Yates]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 12:17:17 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20130508/06065623001/new-hope-how-going-free-to-play-brought-redemption-to-star-wars-mmo.shtml#c518</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I would also make the point that the game is less than 1.5 years old.<br />
<br />
This is obviously not a "years old" game, and in MMO terms, it is still fairly young.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/11200723149/war-journalists-doj-claimed-fox-news-reporter-was-aider-abettor-co-conspirator-with-leaker.shtml#c33</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[BentFranklin]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 12:16:44 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/11200723149/war-journalists-doj-claimed-fox-news-reporter-was-aider-abettor-co-conspirator-with-leaker.shtml#c33</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["Is there any method of communication that is not being monitored?"<br />
<br />
Yes, the old fashioned way: meeting in parking garages wearing trench coats.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130505/14372422951/court-finds-fantasy-stories-obscene.shtml#c177</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[jupiterkansas]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 12:15:35 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130505/14372422951/court-finds-fantasy-stories-obscene.shtml#c177</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Has that judge read Leviticus?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Again, sheerly an anti-copyright WEDGE for Mike.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c933</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lowestofthekeys]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 12:12:54 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c933</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Bah, should have been more descriptive.<br />
<br />
It's a tiger beat poster of Mike Masnick.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Asserting the Fifth</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/18383623114/your-word-against-ours-how-fbis-no-electronic-recording-policy-rigs-game-destroys-its-credibility.shtml#c288</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 12:12:43 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/18383623114/your-word-against-ours-how-fbis-no-electronic-recording-policy-rigs-game-destroys-its-credibility.shtml#c288</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Again, sheerly an anti-copyright WEDGE for Mike.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c908</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lowestofthekeys]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 12:11:55 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c908</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Rikuo, you need order one of these:<br />
<br />
<a href='http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=2chq906&amp;s=6' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=2chq906&amp;s=6</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c430</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rikuo]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 12:11:50 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c430</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["The Pirate Bay was ruled to "encourage infringement". Which to this day, still has me scratching my head. How can a court find someone guilty of aiding a crime, (not in committing the crime themselves) but not actually charge anyone with committing the actual crime?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c424</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[RD]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 12:10:19 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c424</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["So Mike, is it your position that registrars should be able to register domain names to sites that they know are committing criminal acts? I'm trying to understand what the problem is here."<br />
<br />
The problem is you are a walking fucktard who wants everyone in the entire world to be responsible for even the slightest infringement of copyright EXCEPT THE ACTUAL PERPETRATOR of the infringement. You want liability all the way down to some homeless person who doesn't even have electricity, and punish 99% of the entire population by restricting their rights and/or fining and throwing them in jail because a few  % of outliers do the actual infringing, which doesnt even have a significant impact on anyone's bottom line anyway (see: several BILLION DOLLAR GROSSING movies THIS YEAR ALONE.)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Again, sheerly an anti-copyright WEDGE for Mike.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c896</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rikuo]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 12:09:18 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c896</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[How the fuck did you know I've got a poster of Mike (naked, not that it's your business) on my bedroom door, Mike Masnick figurines, a Mike Masnick mug, and every time my computer boots up it says "Hello. Rikuo. You. Really. Know. How. To. Turn. Me. On!" in Mike Masnick's voice? You spying on me, huh!? How dare you criticize Der Fuhrer! Heil Masnick!<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Is that what you really believe goes on? That we're some sort of cult?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c890</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[average_joe]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 12:07:32 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c890</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>Nailed it, AJ</i><br />
<br />
Thanks. These threads always turn into a referendum on me personally rather than "the faithful" acknowledging that I have a point about Mike, but I appreciate the support. I'm sure Mike would have something interesting to say about the proposal if he actually bothered to read it.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c873</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 12:07:03 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c873</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[See, you can make posts that are only marginally insulting.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c417</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Josh in CharlotteNC]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 12:05:26 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c417</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>  is it your position that registrars should be able to register domain names to sites that they know are committing criminal acts? </i><br />
<br />
Is it your position that someone accused or convicted of a crime should not be able to register a domain?  <br />
<br />
Is it your position that the government can determine what legal products and services a company can offer to those accused or convicted of crimes?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c872</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[average_joe]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 12:05:23 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c872</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[And I'll just add the irony that Mike whines about not having access to such proposals in other situations, but here where he actually has access he doesn't even bother to make use of it. Instead we just get conclusory statements about what the proposals say rather than an actual textual analysis. Pretty funny.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c853</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 12:05:14 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c853</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It is a positive thing, but that proposal is the secondary focus of this article.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>