<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Latest Techdirt Comments</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Yes, it's trolling and yes, it's ridiculous</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1472</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[silverscarcat]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 09:47:41 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1472</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Maybe because there's more here than normal?  Maybe the only thing different about this is in your mind?  Maybe because it's Kim Dotcom and you auto-hate him and think he should be hung without a trial?  Maybe because it's someone who's <i>ACCUSED</i> of copyright infringement that has you and AJ and others with your panties in a knot?<br />
<br />
Take your pick, they're all likely correct.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Unlimited Talk</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20130521/20101423164/att-says-you-can-use-any-video-streaming-app-you-want-just-as-soon-as-it-can-get-meter-running.shtml#c378</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Derek Kerton]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 09:47:26 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20130521/20101423164/att-says-you-can-use-any-video-streaming-app-you-want-just-as-soon-as-it-can-get-meter-running.shtml#c378</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Voice is "unlimited" by some carriers because it is inherently limited.<br />
<br />
A cellular voice line, connected and left on for 24 hours a day and one month, would use in the neighborhood of 3-4 GB of data. It cannot possibly use more, and most likely will use much, much less.<br />
<br />
OTOH, a mobile data user is able to transceive tremendous amounts of data, not limited by the fact that the codec is 8-16 Kbps. And the more a carrier upgrades the network and the phone, the more data each subscriber can move.<br />
<br />
Voice is just data. But data is not just voice.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20130523/01030023182/man-butt-dials-911-while-discussing-murder-plot.shtml#c313</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zakida Paul]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 09:46:01 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20130523/01030023182/man-butt-dials-911-while-discussing-murder-plot.shtml#c313</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[You win 10000 internets today]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Yes, it's trolling and yes, it's ridiculous</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1451</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 09:45:27 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1451</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Very glib Masnick. But anyone with an ounce of objectivity can see that patent trolling by Dotcom is treated very differently by you than patent trolling by others. I don't know why you don't just come right out and defend him for doing what he has to do. I think you can actually make a respectable case.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Yes, it's trolling and yes, it's ridiculous</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1427</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[silverscarcat]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 09:44:18 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1427</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[If he had his assets not frozen, he could properly defend himself.<br />
<br />
Plus, as we've been saying, if Megaupload loses, then how long until other websites start getting bullied by the U.S. government over copyright infringement?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/10290323174/vod-service-acetrax-shuts-down-germany-customers-movies-are-lost-due-to-drm.shtml#c196</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zakida Paul]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 09:42:11 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/10290323174/vod-service-acetrax-shuts-down-germany-customers-movies-are-lost-due-to-drm.shtml#c196</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["Here's a quick tip. When something is scarce, you control the market. When you try to CREATE scarcity, you offend the market."<br />
<br />
Comment of the week right there.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: It's like Tethering all over again</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20130521/20101423164/att-says-you-can-use-any-video-streaming-app-you-want-just-as-soon-as-it-can-get-meter-running.shtml#c361</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Derek Kerton]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 09:40:13 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20130521/20101423164/att-says-you-can-use-any-video-streaming-app-you-want-just-as-soon-as-it-can-get-meter-running.shtml#c361</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It's not like tethering at all.<br />
<br />
They charged more for tethering, but they also blocked it, fought against it, and the OS and firmware installed made tethering apps hard to install, and only available to moderately skilled hackers.<br />
<br />
In this case, they're just saying "You wanna stream video, you download the app."<br />
<br />
If tethering had been that easy, there would never have been any tethering controversy at all.<br />
<br />
PS: Their tethering stills sucks *even* when you pay for it. They put a complicated app on the phone to manage tethering, and it checks with the network to ensure that you have paid for tethering, then it pops up several useless warnings like "Tethering will turn on your Wi-Fi. Yes, no?" then it turns finally tethers. Probably about 15 seconds delay for what should be 2. That inserts complexity and delay. I'd rather use hacks, even though I paid.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1409</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 09:38:00 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1409</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[just read where Dotcom lost the patent in EU because AT&amp;T got it. also read where there is a problem with the same patent in the USA over dates of registration, so he could be in for a swift rebuttal. however, the point about the effect the 'wrong' outcome of his case on those three and a lot more, is quite valid. sooner or later the likes of Google is gonna have to step up to the plate and make some sort of stand against the entertainment industries. they have already seen that no matter what a site tries to do to please those industries, it is never enough. they simply keep coming back for more, so you might as well do nothing from day one. on top of that, Google among others are constantly hauled over the coals by Congress. surely it must be getting pissed off with this? i certainly would be and be seriously looking for somewhere else to set up shop where the country/government concerned appreciated having a really, really major employer and tax payer.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Trusting Any Company to Securely Protect Consumers</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/18265123163/reporters-find-exposed-personal-data-via-google-threatened-with-cfaa-charges.shtml#c740</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[I Forgot]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 09:35:21 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/18265123163/reporters-find-exposed-personal-data-via-google-threatened-with-cfaa-charges.shtml#c740</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[This is systematically problematic with corporations who require extended personal data of its customers. This case does give the appearance of these companies attempting to cover their own arses after they mishandled or neglected to secure even the most simple of data breaches after the fact. <br />
<br />
This is so tiring to hear of yet more personal information that was entrusted to a company that once again ends up in the wrong hands. There should be a law that will bring to bear full liability upon the company's CEO, Vice President and entire Board of the corporation when this occurs as well as all top management to the degree of damage it causes or potentially causes.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Read for comprehension!</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1397</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 09:33:40 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1397</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[You're leaving out that the DoJ is trying to set precedent here.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Yes, it's trolling and yes, it's ridiculous</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1379</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[silverscarcat]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 09:33:38 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1379</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Hey, AJ, can you stop denying that you've been payed by your masters at the MAFIAA and just be honest for once?  Any chance you could just admit it?  Thanks.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Yes, it's trolling and yes, it's ridiculous</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1371</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Masnick]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 09:33:09 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1371</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>It's the stuff you DIDN'T say that we're focusing on</i><br />
<br />
Yeah.  That pretty much says it all, doesn't it?<br />
<br />
<i>And, of course, it's Kim Dotcom, so you give him a free pass with this stuff.</i><br />
<br />
Pointing out that this is a dumb move and probably hurts his own case is giving him a free pass?<br />
<br />
Seriously, dude, I've told you before, and I'll say it again: you need to stop listening to the voices in your head that you THINK is me, and start responding to what I actually said.  The fact that you have this strawman Mike built up in your head who is nothing like I actually am, but which you insist is the real me, is fucking weird.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Actually, had to shut down because of piracy!</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/10290323174/vod-service-acetrax-shuts-down-germany-customers-movies-are-lost-due-to-drm.shtml#c176</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 09:32:17 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/10290323174/vod-service-acetrax-shuts-down-germany-customers-movies-are-lost-due-to-drm.shtml#c176</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Just like how the GIMP and Inkscape are totally killing Adobe Photoshop and Illustrator.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/01382223168/new-york-times-tells-startup-it-cant-even-mention-ny-times.shtml#c1012</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 09:32:05 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/01382223168/new-york-times-tells-startup-it-cant-even-mention-ny-times.shtml#c1012</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Actually a better example is if Apple used copyrighted video clips in an ad for iMovie. The software itself doesn't compete with the videos, but it's entire purpose is to create content that does compete. The "does not impact market" point is not so clearly answered. Mike even acknowledges this sort of potential market impact in the last paragraph, but then dismisses it under the mistaken idea that the NYT objects to the tool itself. At no point have they attempted to shutdown the tool. Even for lawyers, they were very clear that their problem is unauthorized use of content and framing the tool as a way to infringe on their copyright. Scroll Kit wasn't being described as a tool to "create a Sow Fall-like experience", but as a tool to "create Snow Fall".]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>911</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20130523/01030023182/man-butt-dials-911-while-discussing-murder-plot.shtml#c235</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 09:31:43 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20130523/01030023182/man-butt-dials-911-while-discussing-murder-plot.shtml#c235</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Has anyone noticed that 911 was called to report that a murder was about to happen and THE MURDER STILL HAPPENED?<br />
<br />
For all the complaining from law enforcement that they need to be able to record and listen to communications to protect us, it does not seem to do much good even when they are given the opportunity.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Solution</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/17321623162/released-video-silva-beating-shows-his-last-moments-video-actual-beating-still-missing.shtml#c852</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tiernoc]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 09:30:51 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/17321623162/released-video-silva-beating-shows-his-last-moments-video-actual-beating-still-missing.shtml#c852</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[A better solution in my humble opinion would be a civilian oversight board.  Remove the blue line entirely, and have Internal Affairs report to this oversight board.  Remove the Police entirely from the chain of command, and when events such as the "lost" video footage occur treat it like what it is: "Intentional tampering with evidence".]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/10290323174/vod-service-acetrax-shuts-down-germany-customers-movies-are-lost-due-to-drm.shtml#c174</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 09:30:20 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/10290323174/vod-service-acetrax-shuts-down-germany-customers-movies-are-lost-due-to-drm.shtml#c174</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["After [the June 21st shutdown], owners of Windows PCs can download their films."<br />
<br />
THIS is why I hate the current trends in proprietary media. Window's is only a small segment of the media viewing market. Tablets, laptops, PC's, smartphones, ipods and more are all capable of viewing internet media. How do media companies respond to this? By trying to tell you that you aren't allowed to view or support their content on any but a narrow range of systems.<br />
<br />
Here's a quick tip. When something is scarce, you control the market. When you try to CREATE scarcity, you offend the market.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Drones</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/11032823096/how-low-can-drones-go.shtml#c944</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Suzanne Lainson]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 09:27:50 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/11032823096/how-low-can-drones-go.shtml#c944</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>Congress and the FAA could solve this problem quickly and easily. Just mandate a 1000-foot minimum altitude over private property, for all types of aircraft, regardless of whether it's urban or rural.</i><br />
<br />
That would eliminate many of the proposed uses for commercial drones, like deliveries. If drone use is going to be fully commercialized, it isn't going to happen.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Actually, had to shut down because of piracy!</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/10290323174/vod-service-acetrax-shuts-down-germany-customers-movies-are-lost-due-to-drm.shtml#c171</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zakida Paul]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 09:27:46 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/10290323174/vod-service-acetrax-shuts-down-germany-customers-movies-are-lost-due-to-drm.shtml#c171</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Not to mention every musician making a living from music in the face of piracy.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Actually, had to shut down because of piracy!</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/10290323174/vod-service-acetrax-shuts-down-germany-customers-movies-are-lost-due-to-drm.shtml#c168</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 09:27:46 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/10290323174/vod-service-acetrax-shuts-down-germany-customers-movies-are-lost-due-to-drm.shtml#c168</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["Also, all DRM is due to piracy."<br />
<br />
About this.<br />
<br />
DRM is not a piracy stopping tool. It is a competition stopping tool.<br />
<br />
DRM + DMCA anti-circumvention clauses means that you can't create competing devices to play protected media without either paying for licensing or violating the law. Hence, total an complete monopoly on both the product and the consumption channels.<br />
<br />
DRM was never about piracy. It is about control and keeping the competition away.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>