<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Latest Techdirt Comments</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/02350923170/new-bill-would-stop-patent-trolls-hiding-behind-shell-companies.shtml#c69</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bengie]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 17:22:12 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/02350923170/new-bill-would-stop-patent-trolls-hiding-behind-shell-companies.shtml#c69</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[We should have an anonymous president and all votes should be anonymous.<br />
<br />
Hmmm.. Maybe anonymity doesn't work for lawsuits.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Copyright</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/01382223168/new-york-times-tells-startup-it-cant-even-mention-ny-times.shtml#c603</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[horse with no name]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 17:21:57 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/01382223168/new-york-times-tells-startup-it-cant-even-mention-ny-times.shtml#c603</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Let see.  The content was created by NYT.  Check.  They hold the copyright.  That's all they need on the face.<br />
<br />
Now, can you tell me, using the standard test, how this is fair use?  Remember, this is to promote what is really a commercial product.  So, what do you think?<br />
<br />
Put another way, could the same type of promo video be made using generic color block images, using lorem ipsum text?  The answer is yes, they could have "recreated" the NYT page without their content, and then used it as an example, going with the basic "large metropolitain newspaper" and been done with it.<br />
<br />
Fair use?  I am still waiting for someone to clearly state why using NYT's content and name is fair use here.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/18102623141/so-its-come-to-this-seven-high-school-students-arrested-throwing-water-balloons.shtml#c1682</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alana]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 17:17:20 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/18102623141/so-its-come-to-this-seven-high-school-students-arrested-throwing-water-balloons.shtml#c1682</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[TERRORISTS!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/02350923170/new-bill-would-stop-patent-trolls-hiding-behind-shell-companies.shtml#c65</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[DOlz]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 17:17:13 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/02350923170/new-bill-would-stop-patent-trolls-hiding-behind-shell-companies.shtml#c65</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Anonymity to express ideas and have discussions (Federalist Papers for example) is fine.<br />
<br />
Anonymity to hide when bringing a lawsuit against someone inhibits their ability to defend themselves.<br />
<br />
Context try in sometime it makes the world less confusing.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Solution</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/17321623162/released-video-silva-beating-shows-his-last-moments-video-actual-beating-still-missing.shtml#c405</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 17:17:11 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/17321623162/released-video-silva-beating-shows-his-last-moments-video-actual-beating-still-missing.shtml#c405</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[1 is a stipulation included in every government job that requires a security clearance.<br />
<br />
3 is in absolutely no way a 4th amendment search.  Recording your employees while they are at work is not only perfectly legal it's pretty routine for many jobs.<br />
<br />
5 Is already in place for work e-mail, texting on a work phone, and phone calls from phones at work.  It's unclear from the list if it was meant to include monitoring of personal e-mail/texts/phone calls.  That I would agree is too far although I don't think it's a 4th amendment issue either.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: 3 cheers for dead pigs</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/17321623162/released-video-silva-beating-shows-his-last-moments-video-actual-beating-still-missing.shtml#c401</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[lucidrenegade]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 17:16:36 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/17321623162/released-video-silva-beating-shows-his-last-moments-video-actual-beating-still-missing.shtml#c401</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It used to be that I would find your comment disgusting.  These days, not so much.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Watch and adapt</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/17321623162/released-video-silva-beating-shows-his-last-moments-video-actual-beating-still-missing.shtml#c397</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[lucidrenegade]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 17:13:55 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/17321623162/released-video-silva-beating-shows-his-last-moments-video-actual-beating-still-missing.shtml#c397</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[You'll just get shot in the back.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/17321623162/released-video-silva-beating-shows-his-last-moments-video-actual-beating-still-missing.shtml#c391</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Watchit]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 17:12:33 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/17321623162/released-video-silva-beating-shows-his-last-moments-video-actual-beating-still-missing.shtml#c391</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Yes, because blows to the torso and midriff are completely non lethal all the time of course, especially with double handed strikes.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/02350923170/new-bill-would-stop-patent-trolls-hiding-behind-shell-companies.shtml#c57</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Brown]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 17:12:04 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/02350923170/new-bill-would-stop-patent-trolls-hiding-behind-shell-companies.shtml#c57</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Me neither, but I still predict this bill will die.  If you have the means to set up shell companies to hide behind, you can afford to make contributions to certain political campaigns, too.  A small start-up that's just trying to make an honest buck or two doesn't often have that luxury.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/17321623162/released-video-silva-beating-shows-his-last-moments-video-actual-beating-still-missing.shtml#c385</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 17:03:22 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/17321623162/released-video-silva-beating-shows-his-last-moments-video-actual-beating-still-missing.shtml#c385</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Cops need to know that the confiscation of evidence like this is not tolerable. If these cops do not face serious convictions then we have made it clear to them that confiscating and destroying evidence when guilty can help them get away with their crimes.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/02350923170/new-bill-would-stop-patent-trolls-hiding-behind-shell-companies.shtml#c56</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[That One Guy]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 17:01:38 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/02350923170/new-bill-would-stop-patent-trolls-hiding-behind-shell-companies.shtml#c56</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Sounds like <i>someone</i> is a little peeved their 'business model' may soon be threatened.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/17321623162/released-video-silva-beating-shows-his-last-moments-video-actual-beating-still-missing.shtml#c375</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 16:57:33 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/17321623162/released-video-silva-beating-shows-his-last-moments-video-actual-beating-still-missing.shtml#c375</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><i>... if you live in the area where these police work how can you trust ANYONE they'd send when you call 911...</i></blockquote><br />
<br />
Maybe they just see things differently?<br />
<br />]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/02350923170/new-bill-would-stop-patent-trolls-hiding-behind-shell-companies.shtml#c40</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[That One Guy]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 16:56:27 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/02350923170/new-bill-would-stop-patent-trolls-hiding-behind-shell-companies.shtml#c40</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Given that I can't think of a single group offhand <i>other</i> than patent trolls or those using shell companies to sue without repercussions, will be interesting to see who exactly steps up to attack this proposal.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/02350923170/new-bill-would-stop-patent-trolls-hiding-behind-shell-companies.shtml#c38</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Brown]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 16:54:14 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/02350923170/new-bill-would-stop-patent-trolls-hiding-behind-shell-companies.shtml#c38</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I don't think we read the same article.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/02350923170/new-bill-would-stop-patent-trolls-hiding-behind-shell-companies.shtml#c20</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 16:52:37 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/02350923170/new-bill-would-stop-patent-trolls-hiding-behind-shell-companies.shtml#c20</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[So anonymity is good, except for when it's used by someone you don't like. Great message, Mike.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/02350923170/new-bill-would-stop-patent-trolls-hiding-behind-shell-companies.shtml#c17</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 16:50:14 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/02350923170/new-bill-would-stop-patent-trolls-hiding-behind-shell-companies.shtml#c17</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Lets hope the same will apply too copyright trolls.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: But in today's world, the consequences are total</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130506/10364522962/eric-schmidt-still-fan-figuring-out-way-to-erase-past.shtml#c167</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 16:48:56 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130506/10364522962/eric-schmidt-still-fan-figuring-out-way-to-erase-past.shtml#c167</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[That is an awfully simplistic view.<br />
<br />
The reality is that right now, the upper management at major companies did not grow up with the technology nanny recording their every move. They never put a YouTube video up of them drinking with their buddies because there was no YouTube.<br />
<br />
That will not always be the case. It is going to take a generation to move people into the top positions (possibly the well-connected, but that's where they were going anyway) and they will likely understand this kind of stupidity and it will become less important.<br />
<br />
The people that are complaining now are the ones that decided to act stupidly first. It is not an entire generation. I know plenty of 18 year old kids that have never posted something stupid on Facebook. If their early discretion and good judgement gives them a competitive edge - fantastic, that's the way the world should work. The playing field should not be leveled too the lowest common denominator.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Hmm</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130506/10364522962/eric-schmidt-still-fan-figuring-out-way-to-erase-past.shtml#c157</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[zegota]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 16:47:59 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130506/10364522962/eric-schmidt-still-fan-figuring-out-way-to-erase-past.shtml#c157</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote> Of course, this makes me wonder, what the hell did Eric Schmidt do as a kid that was so bad? </blockquote><br />
<br />
That sounds eerily similar to "Why are you so concerned about privacy unless you have something to hide?"]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Denied due process?</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/16402423161/first-hand-account-judicial-smackdown-prenda-minnesota.shtml#c1318</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matthew Cline]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 16:44:31 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/16402423161/first-hand-account-judicial-smackdown-prenda-minnesota.shtml#c1318</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[At the hearing before Judge Wright at which Cooper was present, Prenda and friends were represented by at least one lawyer.  Those lawyers could have cross examined Cooper then.  So how was Prenda's due process denied?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>buyers extorting sellers</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080516/1612421141.shtml#c997</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[RAYLEARNED]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 16:43:10 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20080516/1612421141.shtml#c997</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[WELL~~ NOW THAT WE SELLERS CAN DO NOTHING BUT PRAISE EVEN THE NASTIEST BUYERS (ACCORDING TO EBAY'S RULES)~~ BUYER HAVE FIGURED IT OUT. THEY HAVE ALSO FIGURED OUT HOW TO "INSINUATE" THAT THEY WILL LEAVE YOU BAD FB WITHOUT ACTUALLY SAYING SO. MORE LIKE~~ "I'M NOT HAPPY BUT~ IF YOU WILL REFUND 1/2 THE COST, I WILL KEEP IT AND LEAVE APPROPRIATE FEEDBACK.<br />
IT HAS ACTUALLY GOTTEN TO ABOUT 30% (WITH THE HELP OF OUR ECONOMY) BUT THE FUNNY PART IS~~ IT'S NEVER THE EXPENSIVE STUFF~ IT'S ALWAYS THE $10 &amp; $15 BUYERS. <br />
I JUST REFUNDED A LADY THE COMPLETE COST (SHIPPING AND ALL) ON AN ITEM &amp; EVEN LET HER KEEP THE ITEM SIMPLY BECAUSE SHE SAID THERE WAS A SCRATCH (THAT I DEFINITELY DID NOT SEE. SHE IS STILL WRITING &amp; GIVING ME THE BLUES!<br />
I HAVE BEGGED HER TO JUST GO AWAY &amp; LET ME TRY TO REMAIN TRANQUIL AS ~ WHEN I INFORMED HER I WAS TERMINAL~ SHE SUGGESTED THAT I SHOULD QUITE EBAY THEN AS I AM CERTAINLY NOT FIT TO DO IT!<br />
NASTY BITCH~` loalasmom4life]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>