<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Latest Techdirt Comments</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/13573923121/retired-lt-col-violent-media-has-bred-generation-killers.shtml#c798</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 09:40:55 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/13573923121/retired-lt-col-violent-media-has-bred-generation-killers.shtml#c798</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Apparently the Lt.Col. has never served in the combat MOS's. One of the  things that does come with combat since you put your ass on the line is rank. You know, if you are lucky enough it's the people around you die, not you, increasing you senior status for eligibility. War does weird things to the mind. People aren't the same when they return as the innocent one they sent into it. <br />
<br />
The military's job is to break shit and kill. That's what they do. I suspect the good Lt. Col. never had to get out in it and find out just what his branch did do.  <br />
<br />
You can desk jockey your whole career or you can come in say a psychologist and start out as a Lt. Col., which means he never got promoted if that is the case. <br />
<br />
On the whole it sounds like he's someone with enough rank to be stupid and dangerous to those around them. That is exactly what started fraggin' parties in Vietnam is the troops wanted to survive the experience and it was unlikely with leaders such as this bonehead would have been.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/18345423136/doj-dept-education-to-colleges-start-restricting-free-speech-campus-kiss-your-federal-funding-goodbye.shtml#c702</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[kenichi tanaka]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 09:40:22 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/18345423136/doj-dept-education-to-colleges-start-restricting-free-speech-campus-kiss-your-federal-funding-goodbye.shtml#c702</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[While I agree that this new policy aimed at colleges and universities is a bit broad and takes a "zero tolerance" policy in regards to sexual harassment on campuses, I have to ask, "what took them so long"?<br />
<br />
First, Washington never considered this to be an issue until 2013? Now that the Obama Administration has been getting one beating after another and they are embroiled in one disaster after another, the administration is trying to score some points but they are doing so for the wrong reasons.<br />
<br />
Sure, draft policy for campuses that forces every campus to take every complaint of sexual harassment as serious as they would any other crime but it seems there are harsher penalties for cheating on an exam then there are for sexual harassment and that is simply unacceptable.<br />
<br />
Finally, I think that the policy needs to be scaled back so that it doesn't chill free speech. If some people are talking innocently, or cracking a joke, and a female student happens to be walking by, I think that punishment deeming it as sexual harassment should be taken in context of the conversation. if the students were talking in a manner because they first saw a female student walking by then they should be penalized for sexual harassment. But, there are just so many innocent discussions that now stand the chance of being seen as sexual harassment.<br />
<br />
Are dumb blonde jokes now considered sexual harassment? What about sorority and fraternity parties or initiations that often involve sex?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/19190923142/if-youre-going-to-illegally-seize-citizens-cell-phones-least-make-sure-youre-grabbing-right-ones.shtml#c169</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Violated]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 09:39:57 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/19190923142/if-youre-going-to-illegally-seize-citizens-cell-phones-least-make-sure-youre-grabbing-right-ones.shtml#c169</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Yes it seems she did go out to passively annoy where they should have really just told her to back off (if not f**k off).<br />
<br />
It also seems to me that if a device has two SD cards then one of them is a clear decoy. This is a nice addition to fight unlawful seizure but clearly this is a sign that she aimed to get arrested.<br />
<br />
With all that said she did not do anything wrong when she did not interfere in their work. I am quite sure that upholding the law does not involve charging people with false crimes when they could have handled her in a more social way.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: HEY, TIMMY, don't forget the illegal WARS:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/13573923121/retired-lt-col-violent-media-has-bred-generation-killers.shtml#c777</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 09:39:18 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/13573923121/retired-lt-col-violent-media-has-bred-generation-killers.shtml#c777</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[You're just wrong DH and so desperately grasping at this point it is rather embarassing. Cut your losses and stick to things you do understand.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/18345423136/doj-dept-education-to-colleges-start-restricting-free-speech-campus-kiss-your-federal-funding-goodbye.shtml#c678</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 09:39:05 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/18345423136/doj-dept-education-to-colleges-start-restricting-free-speech-campus-kiss-your-federal-funding-goodbye.shtml#c678</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[as an asexual robot I find humans having ANY sort of genitals or sexual preference to be offensive.<br />
<br />
I therefore want to complain about the following groups:<br />
Men, Women, boys, girls, transgender pre-op boys, transgenger pre-op girls, transgender post-op boys, transgender post-op girls, "other", and asexuals (for flaunting their non-sexualness)<br />
I also find trousers and skirts offensive because they draw a line between the acceptable (above the waist) and the naughty parts (below the waist).<br />
<br />
I also find full body-bag style clothes offensive because by completely hiding every part of the body they FORCE me to use my imagination to think about whats going on underneath....<br />
<br />
There that should do it....]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>It's &quot;law&quot; enforcement, not &quot;non-bitchiness&quot; enforcement</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/19190923142/if-youre-going-to-illegally-seize-citizens-cell-phones-least-make-sure-youre-grabbing-right-ones.shtml#c147</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[RonKaminsky]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 09:39:03 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/19190923142/if-youre-going-to-illegally-seize-citizens-cell-phones-least-make-sure-youre-grabbing-right-ones.shtml#c147</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[One of the job requirements for a law enforcement officer is the ability to know the difference between bitchiness and illegality. Another requirement is the ability to control one's anger --- especially since a lot of their job is arresting people who don't.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/19190923142/if-youre-going-to-illegally-seize-citizens-cell-phones-least-make-sure-youre-grabbing-right-ones.shtml#c124</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Frankz]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 09:38:40 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/19190923142/if-youre-going-to-illegally-seize-citizens-cell-phones-least-make-sure-youre-grabbing-right-ones.shtml#c124</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[More people might want to start using apps that upload video to the internet as it's being recorded.  Lose the phone or memory card, or have it deleted, they'll usually miss the uploaded version.  Some, like the free ACLU app, even use secure servers so uploaded videos *can't* be deleted.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/19190923142/if-youre-going-to-illegally-seize-citizens-cell-phones-least-make-sure-youre-grabbing-right-ones.shtml#c108</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 09:38:36 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/19190923142/if-youre-going-to-illegally-seize-citizens-cell-phones-least-make-sure-youre-grabbing-right-ones.shtml#c108</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Nope.  Police should be <i>accountable</i> and to a higher standard than the public.  because they are as much <i>peacekeepers</i> as they are <i>upholders of the law</i>.<br />
<br />
Abuses should be called to account.  But not in Stasi America.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: HEY, TIMMY, don't forget the illegal WARS:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/13573923121/retired-lt-col-violent-media-has-bred-generation-killers.shtml#c759</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 09:37:48 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/13573923121/retired-lt-col-violent-media-has-bred-generation-killers.shtml#c759</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[So the past is the past.<br />
<br />
Which is rather the point.<br />
<br />
When the US and it's tagalongs of the bullied and the credulous invaded;<br />
Iraq did not have WMD or the capability of manufacturing them.<br />
It was not engaged in any form of genocide.<br />
It was not engaged in war with any other country and it was not harbouring terrorists despite much manipulation to play make believe with that.<br />
<br />
The invasion of Iraq was a war of aggression, the very crime that Iraq committed and the people responsible for it and the subsequent deaths, maimings etc are at least as criminal as Hussein was.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>I wonder</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/18345423136/doj-dept-education-to-colleges-start-restricting-free-speech-campus-kiss-your-federal-funding-goodbye.shtml#c659</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bengie]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 09:37:02 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/18345423136/doj-dept-education-to-colleges-start-restricting-free-speech-campus-kiss-your-federal-funding-goodbye.shtml#c659</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I wonder how this would play with the public Uni I went to. One of the student rights for the past 100+ years has been that a student has a right to trial by a student jury for "punishments".<br />
<br />
As long as a student is paid up and didn't do anything criminal, they have the right of any academic punishment to be acquitted by a jury of their peers.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/19190923142/if-youre-going-to-illegally-seize-citizens-cell-phones-least-make-sure-youre-grabbing-right-ones.shtml#c87</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 09:36:32 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/19190923142/if-youre-going-to-illegally-seize-citizens-cell-phones-least-make-sure-youre-grabbing-right-ones.shtml#c87</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I agree, a lot of the people who record this stuff make their presence known and they make it obvious the cops are being recorded before the footage reaches the public. Just like with that last case where the cops confiscated camera footage and it got deleted.<br />
<br />
<a href='http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130512/20494523050/bakersfield-ca-law-enforcement-follow-up-beating-possibly-intoxicated-man-to-death-seizing-witnesses-cell-phones.shtml' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130512/20494523050/bakersfield-ca-law-enforcement-follow-up-beating-possibly-intoxicated-man-to-death-seizing-witnesses-cell-phones.shtml</a><br />
<br />
Supposedly it might be turned over to the FBI but the truth is, unless we put pressure for any cops responsible for doing anything wrong to be proportionally disciplined (proportional to how a normal citizen would be disciplined if they did the same thing, but a cop should, if anything, be more strictly disciplined) with jail time, fines, paying damages to the family, etc... chances are this thing will continue to stall and, after everyone forgets about it, nothing might be done.<br />
<br />
But the fault lies with those making the recordings. One person calls the cops and tells them of the recording. The cops should have been notified of the footage only after it was available for all to see. People need to be smarter about this stuff and to be aware that, while you (should) have a right to record, reality doesn't always work that way.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/18345423136/doj-dept-education-to-colleges-start-restricting-free-speech-campus-kiss-your-federal-funding-goodbye.shtml#c658</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 09:36:04 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/18345423136/doj-dept-education-to-colleges-start-restricting-free-speech-campus-kiss-your-federal-funding-goodbye.shtml#c658</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["'Unwelcome' sexual invitations?<br />
<br />
How can you tell it's unwelcome before you extend it? Your intended can't let you know it is unwelcome until after you ask.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Justice</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/18345423136/doj-dept-education-to-colleges-start-restricting-free-speech-campus-kiss-your-federal-funding-goodbye.shtml#c643</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 09:35:11 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/18345423136/doj-dept-education-to-colleges-start-restricting-free-speech-campus-kiss-your-federal-funding-goodbye.shtml#c643</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Obama's Justice Department strikes again. When will people figure out he's the worst thing to happen to America since Nixon?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/19190923142/if-youre-going-to-illegally-seize-citizens-cell-phones-least-make-sure-youre-grabbing-right-ones.shtml#c75</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[lucidrenegade]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 09:28:26 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/19190923142/if-youre-going-to-illegally-seize-citizens-cell-phones-least-make-sure-youre-grabbing-right-ones.shtml#c75</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Not that I support what the cops did, but it looks like they weren't paying any attention to her until she started being a bitch.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: HEY, TIMMY, don't forget the illegal WARS:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/13573923121/retired-lt-col-violent-media-has-bred-generation-killers.shtml#c744</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dark Helmet]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 09:24:23 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/13573923121/retired-lt-col-violent-media-has-bred-generation-killers.shtml#c744</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["Why does 'Merica insist on "taking anyone out"? World Police! Fuck Ya!"<br />
<br />
You'd rather abdicate our human obligation to keep genocides from occurring?  That's fine if you want that to be your policy, but then we need to remove our signature from the genocide convention....]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Response to: sorrykb on May 21st, 2013 @ 9:15am</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/19190923142/if-youre-going-to-illegally-seize-citizens-cell-phones-least-make-sure-youre-grabbing-right-ones.shtml#c66</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 09:23:46 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/19190923142/if-youre-going-to-illegally-seize-citizens-cell-phones-least-make-sure-youre-grabbing-right-ones.shtml#c66</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[But jailbreaking a phone is illegal. Cops may piss all over the Bill of Rights but copyright law is another matter.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130513/10360323060/criminal-nabbed-his-own-food-porn.shtml#c150</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ruben]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 09:23:23 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130513/10360323060/criminal-nabbed-his-own-food-porn.shtml#c150</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<a href='http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6YMPAH67f4o' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6YMPAH67f4o</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: HEY, TIMMY, don't forget the illegal WARS:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/13573923121/retired-lt-col-violent-media-has-bred-generation-killers.shtml#c738</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dark Helmet]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 09:22:58 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/13573923121/retired-lt-col-violent-media-has-bred-generation-killers.shtml#c738</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Check again:<br />
<br />
1. Engage in wars of aggression - likely there are examples of this<br />
2. Commit genocide - Not even close.  To suggest this means you don't understand the definition.  No specific ethnic group or people was singled out for destruction in whole or part in either Iraq or Afghanistan.  Only armed combatants were sought, with no distinction on ethnicity or race made.<br />
3. Harbor international terrorists/gangsters: Please provide examples, as many as you can over the 200+ year lifespan of our country, and let's see what that list looks like.  Keep in mind Saddam personally harbored such terrorists himself over a much shorter timespan.<br />
4. Be in non-compliance with the UN WMD regulations - The US absolutely IS in compliance with this treaty.  In addition to being an allowed nuclear state, the US has eliminated over 80% of it's deployed nuclear warheads and 90% of its non-strategic warheads in NATO.  We're currently in the process of eliminating entire categories of warheads and delivery systems as well.  We've also reduced the role nukes play in the military since WWII.  The treaty does NOT mandate immediate disarm of nuclear states, but gradual disarming as a prime policy.  The US has done that.<br />
<br />
All you've proven is that the US does NOT meet the criteria, so this discussion should be over....]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Don't do this for us, please</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/18345423136/doj-dept-education-to-colleges-start-restricting-free-speech-campus-kiss-your-federal-funding-goodbye.shtml#c632</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[raindog469]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 09:21:36 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/18345423136/doj-dept-education-to-colleges-start-restricting-free-speech-campus-kiss-your-federal-funding-goodbye.shtml#c632</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[As a gay man who got bashed pretty regularly at the 80% male engineering school I went to... <br />
<br />
as a former activist and current contributor to equality and anti-bullying campaigns... <br />
<br />
and as a guy who used to vote Democrat but switched to Green for the last election because I find Obama too conservative in too many ways... <br />
<br />
This is reprehensible.<br />
<br />
The only comfort I can take from it is that it's so prima facie unconstitutional that all the administration will end up with is a bunch of case law against them. But in the meantime, for the kids who'll inevitably lose their tuitions and a shot at a degree because they use the wrong colloquialism in the wrong time and place, this is a life-altering tragedy.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: This is progress</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/18345423136/doj-dept-education-to-colleges-start-restricting-free-speech-campus-kiss-your-federal-funding-goodbye.shtml#c625</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 09:19:18 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/18345423136/doj-dept-education-to-colleges-start-restricting-free-speech-campus-kiss-your-federal-funding-goodbye.shtml#c625</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Its possible I cant see the sarcasm flag on mobile.   However regarding 'only bad speech will be forbidden'<br />
<br />
That's what they said.when the first amendment was.forgone to go after wikileaks<br />
<br />
Ask AP or Fox News how well thats worked out now.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>