<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Latest Techdirt Comments</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101209/09504712210/dailydirt-taking-another-look-nuclear-energy.shtml#c80</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wolfy]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 03:14:22 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101209/09504712210/dailydirt-taking-another-look-nuclear-energy.shtml#c80</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[and commenter # 4 is just plain full of shit.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101209/09504712210/dailydirt-taking-another-look-nuclear-energy.shtml#c71</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wolfy]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 03:13:14 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101209/09504712210/dailydirt-taking-another-look-nuclear-energy.shtml#c71</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Where something can go wrong, it usually will. Look at Japan. Someone "liberated" the gas for the backup generators (or it just wasn't there to begin with). Then there was an earthquake. The dice were cast right there. The tsunami was just icing on the cake. #3 is right, humans will always find a way to screw things up, either deliberately (Shoddy workmanship, cutting corners for extra profit... what American company would do that?!?) or by a gazillion ways accidentally... use your imagination. I'll be you could come up with a couple ways a nuc. plant could be compromised.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/11200723149/war-journalists-doj-claimed-fox-news-reporter-was-aider-abettor-co-conspirator-with-leaker.shtml#c894</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 03:10:49 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/11200723149/war-journalists-doj-claimed-fox-news-reporter-was-aider-abettor-co-conspirator-with-leaker.shtml#c894</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["<br />
 Step out of line, and YOU could be next."<br />
<br />
A good message to send too, I would say.<br />
<br />
If by stepping out of line you mean breaking the law..]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/11200723149/war-journalists-doj-claimed-fox-news-reporter-was-aider-abettor-co-conspirator-with-leaker.shtml#c872</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 03:09:21 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/11200723149/war-journalists-doj-claimed-fox-news-reporter-was-aider-abettor-co-conspirator-with-leaker.shtml#c872</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["It's not like they suspected this reporter of anything before the leak. No, they only suspected the reporter after the leak"<br />
<br />
WOW,, amazing, they only suspect someone of a crime AFTER that crime has been committed !!!!! OMFG..... !!!!!!!<br />
<br />
Next time, THINK before you talk.. far less people will think  you are a moron then.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130313/10343422312/rejection-pirate-bay-founders-appeal-sets-dangerous-precedent-liability-free-expression.shtml#c1578</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Niall]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 03:05:20 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130313/10343422312/rejection-pirate-bay-founders-appeal-sets-dangerous-precedent-liability-free-expression.shtml#c1578</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[At best it's the store owners suspecting that some people have crack in their pockets, but they have no way to be sure. Unless they have some legal duty to report anyone and everyone to the police on pure suspicion... they don't.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: convicted</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130514/14283523085/interesting-move-peter-sunde-pirate-bay-flattr-to-run-eu-parliament.shtml#c390</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Niall]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 02:59:45 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130514/14283523085/interesting-move-peter-sunde-pirate-bay-flattr-to-run-eu-parliament.shtml#c390</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Didn't stop His Shrubiness...]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Lawyers aren't bad enough; now Mike embraces convicts.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130514/14283523085/interesting-move-peter-sunde-pirate-bay-flattr-to-run-eu-parliament.shtml#c386</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Niall]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 02:58:08 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130514/14283523085/interesting-move-peter-sunde-pirate-bay-flattr-to-run-eu-parliament.shtml#c386</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Blue is Cardassian. Charged == Guilty.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Liability Slipery Slope</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c823</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Niall]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 02:56:00 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c823</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Precisely, that's the whole point that Julian Assange doesn't want to go to Sweden - your mutual extradition process works far too well...]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Missing Video Not Recovered</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/18051923103/footage-lethal-beating-deleted-seized-phone-sheriff-asks-fbi-to-take-over-investigation.shtml#c1096</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 02:52:44 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/18051923103/footage-lethal-beating-deleted-seized-phone-sheriff-asks-fbi-to-take-over-investigation.shtml#c1096</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101209/09504712210/dailydirt-taking-another-look-nuclear-energy.shtml#c48</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 02:46:41 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101209/09504712210/dailydirt-taking-another-look-nuclear-energy.shtml#c48</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[After Chernobyl and one other large-ish accident (also, I think, in the former USSR?) the next several most deadly nuclear accidents are _medical_, not power, related.<br />
<br />
Even including Chernobyl, wind power has caused more fatalities per watt-hour than nuclear.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/15490323152/intellectual-property-mess-holding-up-tpp.shtml#c38</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 02:41:24 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/15490323152/intellectual-property-mess-holding-up-tpp.shtml#c38</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[the democratic process you mention is long gone! there is nothing democratic about the way things are done or who they affect. the USA has gone from a nation that believed in freedom and privacy to one of secrecy and punishment all brought about by the allowing of certain industries to manipulate the laws to their best advantage at the expense of everyone else, not just in the USA but worldwide. Congress has given so much power to these industries that they now more or less run the country and the various politicians are just front men and mouth pieces!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: The law according to - LOOK! SQUIRREL!</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/12190223151/prendas-paul-hansmeier-asks-appeals-court-to-delay-sanctions-appeals-court-says-no-try-again.shtml#c280</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Donglebert the Needlessly Obtuse]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 02:29:25 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/12190223151/prendas-paul-hansmeier-asks-appeals-court-to-delay-sanctions-appeals-court-says-no-try-again.shtml#c280</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Whilst I don't 100% agree with the previous but one argument (A.Commentator), your counterargument is dreadfully weak.<br />
<br />
I want to buy a chair.  I go see the chair.  I might even sit in the chair.  If I like it, I can buy it.  If it's rubbish, I don't buy it.  The risk that someone doesn't want to buy it is always with the seller.  The way to mitigate that risk is to make a product that people want to buy.<br />
<br />
If I hire a car, book a hotel, or buy a train ticket I have a certain level of expectation of the quality of service that will be provided.  If that service does not meet that expectation, I ask for a refund and get my money back.<br />
<br />
The risk is always with the seller.<br />
<br />
Go away and come up with a better argument.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Mike's Position (my opinion of it anyway).</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c1470</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[PaulT]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 02:21:14 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c1470</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I get the idea that one of three things are true about this particular thread derailer:<br />
<br />
1. He's actually too stupid to understand anything that's not spelt out in small words in a few sentences easy enough for him to digest. He therefore doesn't understand the pretty clear positions that everybody else understands very clearly, hence the childish whining and attacks when he doesn't get what everyone else can see he already has. He literally won't be able to understand unless Mike writes a post detailing exactly what he things, and since that won't simply say "I hate copyright and want to destroy it" or "here's a completely rewritten law ready to go", he won't understand or accept it.<br />
<br />
2. He thinks he knows what Mike's position is, but has wrongly assumed that it's a position that wishes to remove copyright entirely, or give everything to pirates directly to those who didn't create anything. Therefore, he thinks that if he can debate Mike he can trick him into admitting what he "truly believes". That is failing because Mike's confirmed his actual position in previous discussions as opposed to the fictional version he wants, so he keeps pretending that nothing has been said in the hope that he'll be told what he wants.<br />
<br />
3. He's paid to sit on here attacking every word that's said that might put his employers' actions in a bad light. Unlike others who are in a similar position, he's trying to make it about him and his "mistreatment" rather than what's actually being said.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/11552823150/major-hollywood-studios-all-sent-bogus-dmca-takedowns-concerning-pirate-bay-documentary.shtml#c715</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[techflaws]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 02:19:03 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/11552823150/major-hollywood-studios-all-sent-bogus-dmca-takedowns-concerning-pirate-bay-documentary.shtml#c715</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[You nicely handed his ass to that jack!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/15490323152/intellectual-property-mess-holding-up-tpp.shtml#c13</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 02:16:27 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/15490323152/intellectual-property-mess-holding-up-tpp.shtml#c13</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[They will not release it as they know the public will revolt.... again, and it will all be a waste of their time and money.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/15490323152/intellectual-property-mess-holding-up-tpp.shtml#c10</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 02:10:09 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/15490323152/intellectual-property-mess-holding-up-tpp.shtml#c10</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I am a member of the United States general public (We The People) and I hereby openly reject the Trans Pacific Partnership as it is written.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c807</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[PaulT]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 01:50:40 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c807</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["A point was made."<br />
<br />
An idiotic point, hence the AC's reaction to it.<br />
<br />
But, let's go through the problems: first of all, how are domain names registered? Usually, they're registered before any content exists. I personally own 14 domain names, but there's only content on two of them. The registrar has absolutely no way of knowing what I plans to use them for. How are they meant to screen them before sale? Especially bearing in mind that they might not sell the domain directly (different rules apply to different countries, but many TLDs can be available in moments with no human screening).<br />
<br />
After the domain is utilised for something, the registrar then has no way of knowing unless they constantly monitor it. They are not informed of any changes apart from the very basics (contact names, DNS servers). They have no relation to the content, no control over the hosting, and they sure as hell can't have knowledge of how legal the content is outside of their own country (and remember, before the US stuck its nose in, TPB was perfectly legal in Sweden).<br />
<br />
So, at best what he's asking is that domain registrars should constantly monitor domains over which they have no direct control other than the ability to suspend if required. That's potentially millions of domains, for which they may not have the knowledge required to know if it's illegal (most infringing domains won't be as obvious as TPB, and a lot of perfectly legal services have been targeted in these kinds of cases). On top of that, there's the dangers of implementing such a thing - the ability for a private entity to censor speech is a very dangerous thing to promote, even if the aims in doing so are noble.<br />
<br />
It's a silly point, and attacking those saying it's stupid doesn't really help improve it. There's no reason why a registrar should have responsibility for policing these things, any more than it's the phone company's or the yellow pages' responsibility for monitoring what you do with your phone number. They can investigate and react in response to legal requests, but they should not be responsible for policing it. There are many different agencies both better equipped and better positioned to do the same thing, and every possible bad action happens out of the registrar's control without their involvement or permission.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c1451</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[PaulT]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 01:35:58 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c1451</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Exactly. I don't think they hate the blind. They're unwilling to give up any potential control over content in order to allow them to access it. They're too dumb to realise that the DRM they're fighting to protect is already broken. They're too blind (ironically) to see that anything they do in opposition to making exceptions for the disabled will only negatively impact them in terms of publicity. They don't understand that these actions will in themselves encourage piracy and make people less supportive of their cause, even among those people who don't partcipate in piracy.<br />
<br />
But, hate the blind? Probably not in those exact words, no. That doesn't change a word of what Mike said though. Sadly, AJ is too moronic and too obsessed wto recognise that.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100714/00462310203.shtml#c234</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruno]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 01:26:36 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100714/00462310203.shtml#c234</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[This is libelous and irrelevent to the topic and should be removed]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/11552823150/major-hollywood-studios-all-sent-bogus-dmca-takedowns-concerning-pirate-bay-documentary.shtml#c694</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim Griffiths]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 01:21:02 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/11552823150/major-hollywood-studios-all-sent-bogus-dmca-takedowns-concerning-pirate-bay-documentary.shtml#c694</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[This is citizen kane levels of slow clap worthy. To stop the pirates breaking the law it's perfectly fine to break the law!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>