<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Latest Techdirt Comments</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/01382223168/new-york-times-tells-startup-it-cant-even-mention-ny-times.shtml#c1461</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[nasch]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 11:34:09 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/01382223168/new-york-times-tells-startup-it-cant-even-mention-ny-times.shtml#c1461</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>Yes, fair use counts as authorized distribution. But the only way this is fair use is if there is zero market impact, which is questionable.</i><br />
<br />
That's not correct, fair use is determined based on the balance of the four factors.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Copyright</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/01382223168/new-york-times-tells-startup-it-cant-even-mention-ny-times.shtml#c1436</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[nasch]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 11:33:25 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/01382223168/new-york-times-tells-startup-it-cant-even-mention-ny-times.shtml#c1436</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>Right, and the only factor that's debatable is market impact.</i><br />
<br />
You really think people will go to ScrollKit's site to get NYT stories rather than NYT's?  Because that's how there would be a market impact.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/18265123163/reporters-find-exposed-personal-data-via-google-threatened-with-cfaa-charges.shtml#c842</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[nasch]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 11:31:58 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/18265123163/reporters-find-exposed-personal-data-via-google-threatened-with-cfaa-charges.shtml#c842</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>No, Google is NOT saying that. Yet their system is more than capable of keeping URLs out of the system that are listed in the robots file so there's no excuse why they, as a supposed security advocate, shouldn't honor robots.txt instructions.</i><br />
<br />
But you keep mentioning security in connection with robots.txt.  If you acknowledge that it's not a security measure, and Google doesn't say it's a  security measure, why are you still talking about security?<br />
<br />
Also, why is this a big deal?  I'm not trying to defend Google, I just really don't see why it's important.  Can you explain it?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/19133923200/copyright-patent-its-all-same-to-worlds-third-largest-news-agency.shtml#c276</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 11:30:43 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/19133923200/copyright-patent-its-all-same-to-worlds-third-largest-news-agency.shtml#c276</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>News flash: just because the nuances of IP law are your private obsession doesn't mean everyone else in the world gives a shit.<br />
<br />
People make mistakes. People are lazy. People are under pressure to get shit done and quality sometimes suffers. Journalists are people. This is not news.<br />
<br />
Anyway why don't you jot us off a quick three page summary of the changes in international maritime law over the last 10 years. Make sure to get all the details right!<br />
<br />
Oh what's that? You don't spend all day studying the nuances of maritime law? What's your problem? What are you, some kind of simpleton?</i><br />
<br />
Exactly. The irony is that Tim himself butchers the doctrines more than most.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/17515223193/riaa-copyright-reform-we-need-is-to-make-everyone-else-copyright-cops.shtml#c1034</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 11:27:32 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/17515223193/riaa-copyright-reform-we-need-is-to-make-everyone-else-copyright-cops.shtml#c1034</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Exactly! Just like the RIAA should give up fighting piracy! You can't stop it; it's part of the new reality. Adapt or die.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130524/01462423203/ex-prenda-lawyer-brett-gibbs-pleads-poverty-to-judge-wright.shtml#c310</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 11:27:26 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130524/01462423203/ex-prenda-lawyer-brett-gibbs-pleads-poverty-to-judge-wright.shtml#c310</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Someone please take screenshots of all his admissions on that Caribbean wedding website.   You just know he's going to yank it off the internet.<br />
<br />
"Your honor, I can't pay the money!  I'm sick!  I'm poor!"<br />
<br />
"If you are sick, why did you post that your condition is 'stable (good)' on your wedding page?  If you are poor, then how did you afford a wedding in the Caribbean?"<br />
<br />
*stammers* "um.... um... um... look over there!  Gay marriage!  Hackers!"]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Turnabout is fair play</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/17515223193/riaa-copyright-reform-we-need-is-to-make-everyone-else-copyright-cops.shtml#c1029</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greevar]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 11:27:25 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/17515223193/riaa-copyright-reform-we-need-is-to-make-everyone-else-copyright-cops.shtml#c1029</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It would only eliminate <i>centralized</i> sources. Only sites and links would be gone, but there would still be tools out there that don't rely on fixed links and sites. There are pure p2p tools that aggregate their indices without a centralized server or link. They peer the index to fellow peers and the user searches through the index for content. No servers, no link required. Tools like Tribler make this possible. Once these tools are published, there's no way to make them disappear. The internet never forgets.<br />
<br />
They could close down The Pirate Bay every other p2p site, but the genie is out of the bottle. There is nothing they can do short of shutting down the entire internet that will stop sharing of content. Since that will never happen, they're just pissing in the wind. It's war is over, they lost. What's left are some flailing corpses unwilling to accept the fact that they are dead.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/21222323165/another-ca-cop-thinks-cell-phone-might-be-dangerous-weapon.shtml#c457</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[jimb]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 11:27:18 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/21222323165/another-ca-cop-thinks-cell-phone-might-be-dangerous-weapon.shtml#c457</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[What are the cops going to do when Google Glass and the knockoffs become commonplace? "Sir, you have to take -off- those glasses!" --? Is this ridiculous enough yet? I predict the glasses with the built-in camera will be the end of this. Free $100-million idea -- real-time streaming wifi or cellular link of computer-glasses video to a website (Youtube?) for the whole world to see. You might not get cash, but Google stock is nearly as good. Whoever runs with this, don't forget who thought it up first.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: I'm either over or under thinking this.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/15495123189/ron-paul-doesnt-win-ronpaulcom-is-guilty-reverse-domain-hijacking.shtml#c403</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lurker Keith]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 11:25:04 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/15495123189/ron-paul-doesnt-win-ronpaulcom-is-guilty-reverse-domain-hijacking.shtml#c403</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I do think Reverse Domain Hijacking is a new concept, but I think I understand it.<br />
<br />
A normal domain hijacking takes place before a legitimate owner can take control of a domain.<br />
<br />
Here, the domain was being used legitimately, &amp; they even offered up one they had, but didn't need, for free. But Ron was trying to hijack both anyway.<br />
<br />
The problem comes in that we normally think of hijacking the way Reverse Domain Hijacking appears to work: taking from a legitimate owner.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/17515223193/riaa-copyright-reform-we-need-is-to-make-everyone-else-copyright-cops.shtml#c1026</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 11:24:38 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/17515223193/riaa-copyright-reform-we-need-is-to-make-everyone-else-copyright-cops.shtml#c1026</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Actually it's a brilliant analogy. But you're too much of a partisan weasel to admit you got royally pwnd.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/19133923200/copyright-patent-its-all-same-to-worlds-third-largest-news-agency.shtml#c265</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 11:24:36 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/19133923200/copyright-patent-its-all-same-to-worlds-third-largest-news-agency.shtml#c265</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The reality, of course, is that minor factual errors that slip through from time to time are not a big deal. Especially ones that are only going to be noticed by experts in a particular field. <br />
<br />
So while that editor is going to appear to be very concerned about any error, the reality is that shit happens, the editor knows it, and tries to balance accuracy with every other one of 25 concerns she has all day. Sometimes accuracy doesn't win.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/17515223193/riaa-copyright-reform-we-need-is-to-make-everyone-else-copyright-cops.shtml#c1025</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 11:21:43 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/17515223193/riaa-copyright-reform-we-need-is-to-make-everyone-else-copyright-cops.shtml#c1025</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[So just give up. Got it.<br />
<br />
Great suggestion that I'll certainly take under advisement as well.<br />
<br />
/sarcasm]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Turnabout is fair play</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/17515223193/riaa-copyright-reform-we-need-is-to-make-everyone-else-copyright-cops.shtml#c1008</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[beltorak]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 11:20:22 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/17515223193/riaa-copyright-reform-we-need-is-to-make-everyone-else-copyright-cops.shtml#c1008</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[wait, it gets better; after they prove to me that their content is not infringing on anything and it's reinstated, my neighbor will take it down....<br />
<br />
wash, rinse, repeat.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Too many thieves and pirates break ANY business model.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/17515223193/riaa-copyright-reform-we-need-is-to-make-everyone-else-copyright-cops.shtml#c1001</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 11:20:09 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/17515223193/riaa-copyright-reform-we-need-is-to-make-everyone-else-copyright-cops.shtml#c1001</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Lol<br />
<br />
Most people here ARE pirates. Duh]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/19133923200/copyright-patent-its-all-same-to-worlds-third-largest-news-agency.shtml#c257</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Leigh Beadon]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 11:18:33 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/19133923200/copyright-patent-its-all-same-to-worlds-third-largest-news-agency.shtml#c257</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[OK, but I have an experiment for you. Apply for a job at a major news agency and tell the editor interviewing you that you don't think factual errors about points of law are a big deal. Then berate him for not hiring you.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/19133923200/copyright-patent-its-all-same-to-worlds-third-largest-news-agency.shtml#c233</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 11:16:48 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/19133923200/copyright-patent-its-all-same-to-worlds-third-largest-news-agency.shtml#c233</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[As you all are so fond of pointing out, most journalism isn't better than this and probably never has been. You just notice this particular error because you know something about it.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Turnabout is fair play</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/17515223193/riaa-copyright-reform-we-need-is-to-make-everyone-else-copyright-cops.shtml#c993</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 11:16:12 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/17515223193/riaa-copyright-reform-we-need-is-to-make-everyone-else-copyright-cops.shtml#c993</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Standard trope from the piracy-loving Mike Masnick.<br />
<br />
Snore.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/19133923200/copyright-patent-its-all-same-to-worlds-third-largest-news-agency.shtml#c227</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 11:15:25 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/19133923200/copyright-patent-its-all-same-to-worlds-third-largest-news-agency.shtml#c227</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Is my local barista writing a news article about a patent?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/19133923200/copyright-patent-its-all-same-to-worlds-third-largest-news-agency.shtml#c212</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 11:15:21 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/19133923200/copyright-patent-its-all-same-to-worlds-third-largest-news-agency.shtml#c212</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["Nuance" = the new "Anomaly"?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: It's a for profit site</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/15495123189/ron-paul-doesnt-win-ronpaulcom-is-guilty-reverse-domain-hijacking.shtml#c401</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[jjmsan]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 11:14:22 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/15495123189/ron-paul-doesnt-win-ronpaulcom-is-guilty-reverse-domain-hijacking.shtml#c401</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Which you know how? The evidence Ron Paul submitted apparently submitted did not seem to persuade the domain commission.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>