<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Latest Techdirt Comments</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Yes, it's trolling and yes, it's ridiculous</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1918</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 17:29:17 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1918</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["<br />
 Masnick's weasely narrative is totally unnecessary and only serves to make him look like a bigger jerk than usual."<br />
<br />
which takes some doing !!!!!<br />
<br />
Masnick probably has been taking lessons off Kim fatbastard..]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/02514123171/partisanship-over-spying-journalists-is-stupid-spying-journalists-is-bad-period.shtml#c177</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hephaestus]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 17:25:08 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/02514123171/partisanship-over-spying-journalists-is-stupid-spying-journalists-is-bad-period.shtml#c177</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[or seriously stupid ... wait ... that would mean that over 90% of the voting population is stupid.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: What a melange! Think hit EVERY one of your wacky notions!</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130424/00010122821/adam-savage-why-copyright-trademark-holders-need-to-get-over-their-obsession-with-control.shtml#c125</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[out_of_the_blue]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 17:24:00 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130424/00010122821/adam-savage-why-copyright-trademark-holders-need-to-get-over-their-obsession-with-control.shtml#c125</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[@"Quit pushing your idea of "morality", OOTB. what may be "moral" to you is "immoral" to someone else."<br />
<br />
There are absolute standards that derive from the facts of existence, it's not all relative and up for grabs the way you commie-pirates want.<br />
<br />
Sticking to copyright: while Disney may have "stolen" from fairy tales (no one complained), the labor of thinking up, working out, and producing Mickey Mouse was nearly all due to Walt Disney (and his gang of slave-artists to draw the many images), so the resulting film is ALL his. -- And to ENJOY the product of his work, you only had to pay a nickel! If you don't want to pay, you don't have to, but you've then NO right to enjoy the content. THAT'S A MORAL DEAL, plain and simple.  -- Of course Disney is bad example for later years, but was absolutely true up to 28 years from creation date.<br />
<br />
And no, I'm not going to shut up. But you just keep pushing your immorality of taking what you haven't created, because that too serves MY purposes!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/02514123171/partisanship-over-spying-journalists-is-stupid-spying-journalists-is-bad-period.shtml#c163</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Squid Lips]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 17:23:29 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/02514123171/partisanship-over-spying-journalists-is-stupid-spying-journalists-is-bad-period.shtml#c163</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[At what point is the Congressional approval rating low enough for us to decide that the partisan lockdown we've been in for the last 50 years is unacceptable? I would have said somewhere below 10%, but we've been below 10% for about as long as I can remember.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Thankyou TechDirtBag Censors</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1893</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 17:23:07 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1893</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[For highlighting the post most worth reading.<br />
<br />
Really appreciate the "ADVERTISING" and your efforts to promote those particular posts.<br />
<br />
Thanks again.. keep up the good work..]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/02514123171/partisanship-over-spying-journalists-is-stupid-spying-journalists-is-bad-period.shtml#c159</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[PRMan]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 17:22:52 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/02514123171/partisanship-over-spying-journalists-is-stupid-spying-journalists-is-bad-period.shtml#c159</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Unless you have a warrant because the person is a suspected criminal...]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Prior Art</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1869</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 17:18:10 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1869</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[like the difference between using a carburettor and fuel injection for a car engine.<br />
<br />
they are both doing the same job (feeding fuel to the engine) but with 2 different METHODS.<br />
<br />
But I don't expect you to understand the difference, you've been worshiping masnick for too long.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Alternativly, the birth of 3 factor authenication</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1868</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 17:14:16 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1868</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[well done idiot, you listed 3 "ways" to do something, but nothing ON THE FUCKING METHOD INVOLVED in making them a reality.<br />
<br />
and as you should well know, (but clearly do not) patents are A METHOD to achieve a result, NOT THE FUCKING result itself.<br />
<br />
This one apparently is "A METHOD OF PASSWORD" authentication.<br />
<br />
Notice it is not THE method, or the only method possible, but it is simply A METHOD.<br />
<br />
for example, "A method of supplying fuel to an internal combustion engine" Might describe the method of using a type of carburettor, ANOTHER METHOD might be using a form of FUEL Injector. <br />
<br />
You don't patent 'feeding fuel to an engine' you patent A METHOD of feeding fuel into an engine.<br />
<br />
Therefore this is a method of password authentication, it is NOT the method. <br />
<br />
Just as prior art does not apply between carburation and fuel injection it does not apply here.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130424/00010122821/adam-savage-why-copyright-trademark-holders-need-to-get-over-their-obsession-with-control.shtml#c100</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ezekial]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 17:13:43 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130424/00010122821/adam-savage-why-copyright-trademark-holders-need-to-get-over-their-obsession-with-control.shtml#c100</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[This, from the guy who censors the brand name of everything they use on Mythbusters. Guess he wouldnt want one of them to sue for using their product in a way they didnt want him to.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>$3K used to be what a college degree cost...</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110311/01434213446/dailydirt-tuition-debt-is-chumps.shtml#c7</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 17:13:19 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110311/01434213446/dailydirt-tuition-debt-is-chumps.shtml#c7</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Some day, the college tuition boom will pop. Hopefully. Maybe.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Yes, it's trolling and yes, it's ridiculous</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1856</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 17:13:12 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1856</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Honestly? You never speak honestly.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Yes, it's trolling and yes, it's ridiculous</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1848</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 17:12:16 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1848</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[So basically, you're calling him out on something that is off-topic for the article as published. This is what pundits and internet trolls do to puff themselves up, you realize? You've added nothing to the conversation but vitriol and bald-faced lies based upon your own slanted observations of how Mike thinks. You respond to things that were never said, meaning that they are without a basis in fact, or, as you seem to love to say, FUD. Grow the hell up, and join the adults in the conversation.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: What a melange! Think hit EVERY one of your wacky notions!</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130424/00010122821/adam-savage-why-copyright-trademark-holders-need-to-get-over-their-obsession-with-control.shtml#c79</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[AC Unknown]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 17:02:35 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130424/00010122821/adam-savage-why-copyright-trademark-holders-need-to-get-over-their-obsession-with-control.shtml#c79</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Quit pushing your idea of "morality", OOTB.  what may be "moral" to you is "immoral" to someone else.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>What a melange! Think hit EVERY one of your wacky notions!</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130424/00010122821/adam-savage-why-copyright-trademark-holders-need-to-get-over-their-obsession-with-control.shtml#c56</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[out_of_the_blue]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 16:59:31 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130424/00010122821/adam-savage-why-copyright-trademark-holders-need-to-get-over-their-obsession-with-control.shtml#c56</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Well, no, I don't see a clear "piracy promotes sales", though gets near it.<br />
<br />
I'm going to pick out this from the mess: "Frustratingly, they suggest that you have to enforce copyright to keep it, which is simply not true." For use as my launch point, though I SEE the way you mean it; however, it's more important to note that while it's literally true that you can have your copyright yet not enforce it, you LIKELY won't get any money from your product that way! And other people will, so it's doubly immoral. And, yet again, I hold that morality is an essential point about copyright, or on trademark here, at least as far as your text explains the shouting match.<br />
<br />
But we know Mike isn't concerned about morality, so drop that.<br />
<br />
On to the "control" aspects. -- IF you've worked to make a bit of intellectual property, then you own it just as much as if your labor shapes a physical object. Of course once you've done the labor there is always the lazy many who covet the item and will steal it if they can. Thieves use a variety of word tricks to undermine ownership, and one of them is the loaded concept of "control". They'll argue that "control" isn't in your best interests, that you're not playing "fair", call you greedy merely because you want a little from everyone in exchange for a highly-valued item that the thieves couldn't and wouldn't make. And that's clearly the way "control" is used above.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<i>Take a loopy tour of <b>Techdirt.com!</b> You always end up same place!</i><br />
<a href='http://techdirt.com/' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://techdirt.com/</a><br />
You've found the site of Internet Quipper <b>Mike "Streisand Effect" Masnick!</b><br />
<i>12:59:13[n-482-4]</i>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Not even a little Swiftian</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/22543223166/modest-proposal-going-piracy-neutral.shtml#c469</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Laroquod]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 16:53:58 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/22543223166/modest-proposal-going-piracy-neutral.shtml#c469</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[When one dubs something a 'Modest Proposal' in the Swiftian sense, it means that one is making fun of the kind of person who would make this proposal. Is that what this video is doing, mocking the sort of person/filmmaker who would propose we be 'Piracy Neutral'? I think not, or else it is doing a very muddled job of it, too meek to actually make a satirical point and too genuinely tickled by its own absurd concept to bother biting hard enough to be called 'satire'.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/10303023175/magic-hat-brewery-sues-west-sixth-brewing-using-number-six-their-logo.shtml#c342</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 16:51:06 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/10303023175/magic-hat-brewery-sues-west-sixth-brewing-using-number-six-their-logo.shtml#c342</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[What are you talking about? When I'm chugging the beers and slam them upside down that 6 magically turns into a 9. I don't know how this magic works but it is amazing!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>being harrassed by nsa satellite</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120827/12503920170/nsa-whistleblower-explains-how-nsa-is-collecting-data-all-you-hes-sorry-about-it.shtml#c1156</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[John K. Nelson]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 16:49:49 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120827/12503920170/nsa-whistleblower-explains-how-nsa-is-collecting-data-all-you-hes-sorry-about-it.shtml#c1156</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Please send me an e mail ,I have been monitored and harrassed for 11 years now by satellite.Dream manipulation , shocks to the nervous system, verbal threats, and a lot more .I need to know if you get this, please confirm. Im not afraid to fight these BASTARDS!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/10303023175/magic-hat-brewery-sues-west-sixth-brewing-using-number-six-their-logo.shtml#c341</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nom du Clavier]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 16:44:47 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/10303023175/magic-hat-brewery-sues-west-sixth-brewing-using-number-six-their-logo.shtml#c341</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Ah, but seven eight nine*<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
* as seen on Numberphile, I don't claim this pun as my own.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Would you go far as &quot;Spying Is Bad, Period&quot;?</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/02514123171/partisanship-over-spying-journalists-is-stupid-spying-journalists-is-bad-period.shtml#c150</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 16:44:41 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/02514123171/partisanship-over-spying-journalists-is-stupid-spying-journalists-is-bad-period.shtml#c150</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Idiot!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/10303023175/magic-hat-brewery-sues-west-sixth-brewing-using-number-six-their-logo.shtml#c332</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 16:42:24 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/10303023175/magic-hat-brewery-sues-west-sixth-brewing-using-number-six-their-logo.shtml#c332</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Why does Twitter call the pound sign a hash tag?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>