<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Latest Techdirt Comments</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title>Re: Is there really a market for paid-for fan fiction?</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c127</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[PaulT]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 04:49:47 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c127</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It will be interesting to see how this goes, but I'd say it's down to quality. The terms seem to indicate that the stories will need to adhere to certain rules, and as they're published by Amazon they will possibly have some form of editorial oversight.<br />
<br />
So, rather than "pure" fan fiction, you'll get something that's more like a standard authorised novel. That is, you'll probably get something approaching a novel based on the universe you'd buy in the shops anyway, with the advantage of ideas coming from random authors rather than pre-approved commissioned authors who may or may not have any passion for the original material. It may also be more likely for a current show to take the direction suggested by fan fiction if it's officially licensed and published - giving fans a way to direct the show in the way they prefer.<br />
<br />
So, if the quality of the paid work is higher, or even leads to new material in the canonical world of the original then it's definitely better than the free stuff. If not, well, there's nothing that can stop true fans from writing and sharing what they wish.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Odd</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c105</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 04:47:59 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c105</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I actually agree here.<br />
<br />
Amazon isn't doing anyone any favours, save, perhaps, minimizing the risk of a lawsuit.<br />
<br />
Amazon's "service" would be redundant if there were clear exceptions for derivative works in copyright.<br />
<br />
Alas, there aren't, so we must continue to pretend that art and science must be created in a vacuum to be of any value.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Necessity is the mother of invention</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20130510/00083123031/cool-new-platform-supporting-artists-patreon-jack-conte.shtml#c116</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 04:46:03 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20130510/00083123031/cool-new-platform-supporting-artists-patreon-jack-conte.shtml#c116</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Segways are not indispensable nor necessary, they are a nice gimmick and a good example of gyro stabilisation but not useful. Try again.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: paywall</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20130510/00083123031/cool-new-platform-supporting-artists-patreon-jack-conte.shtml#c100</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lurk-a-lot]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 04:44:44 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20130510/00083123031/cool-new-platform-supporting-artists-patreon-jack-conte.shtml#c100</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Actually, I first heard of patreon via a youtube subscription - get that? An artist that was already producing video content for free that was also asking his subscribers if they wanted to support his efforts.<br />
<br />
So:<br />
1. Not a paywall.<br />
2. I personally already like his content.<br />
<br />
... which makes you wrong on all of your points.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Just like a book deal, but worse</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c104</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[That One Guy]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 04:37:19 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c104</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[So a fanfic writer basically sells away the rights to their creation for a max of a 35% cut of the profits, doesn't get any advance or anything like that, and amazon gets both copyright and the lion's share of the profits... sounds like a steal alright, but most certainly <b>not</b> in favor of the writer.<br />
<br />
Moreover, and perhaps more worrisome, I can easily see the 'the only fair use is paid use' lot using this to attack derivative works where the character's/settings <i>aren't</i> licensed, by insisting that now a system is in place where you <i>can</i> pay to use the characters and settings in a derivative work, that means you <i>have</i> to do so, otherwise you're 'stealing from the original writer(s)'.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Been done before.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c100</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 04:35:57 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c100</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eric_Flint" rel="nofollow">Eric Flint</a>  pioneered this idea.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c91</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[PaulT]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 04:35:56 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c91</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Well, you do have a clear choice ultimately. Amazon still allow you to self publish through them without demanding exclusivity or ownership. However, they can't allow you to do this with straight up fan fiction due to legal liability. So, you can accept their terms and publish fan fiction with the relevant restrictions in return for the name recognition and legal status that this gives you. Or, you can do a 50 Shades and rewrite your story to remove the references to copyrighted characters and publish freely with rights retained. This is just one avenue that Amazon are offering, not an "accept these terms or don't get published" that the legacy guys offered.<br />
<br />
I'd also say that this setup could be due to licensing rather than a deliberate move by Amazon. That is, rather than allow a blanket licence for every author, the rights holders are only willing to grant permission to a book solely owned and published by Amazon Publishing.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Is there really a market for paid-for fan fiction?</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c85</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 04:33:49 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c85</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[depends on the original work- the Star Wars EU isn't much more than fanfiction where the author has said that it actually happened in the canonical universe.<br />
<br />
as for if there would be a market, there might actually be one- some fanfiction is arguably just as good as original works, with a couple arguably reaching the level of basically being original works. would I pay for fanfiction? if it was by an author I knew was sufficiently good. (however, there is a LOT of fanfiction that wouldn't be worth it.)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Odd</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c74</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[PaulT]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 04:28:51 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c74</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["Not a lot of innovation here."<br />
<br />
Well, if you ignore all the innovation, of course there's none. Name one other service doing this for authors at the moment.<br />
<br />
"Yet another success story where a modern company becomes a middleman."<br />
<br />
As opposed to who? Publishers? Retailers? Half the people you try to defend are also middlemen. Being a middleman is essentially what Amazon do - and they're successful because they're very good at it.<br />
<br />
"will likely turn to greed if one of the works gets developed into an actual TV episode or movie"<br />
<br />
Because no book is ever successful otherwise.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: paywall</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20130510/00083123031/cool-new-platform-supporting-artists-patreon-jack-conte.shtml#c85</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 04:28:43 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20130510/00083123031/cool-new-platform-supporting-artists-patreon-jack-conte.shtml#c85</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["It reads more like a failwall..."<br />
<br />
It's spelled fail <b>whale</b>.<br />
<br />
Dude. Pay attention.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Silver lining?</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[That One Guy]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 04:25:47 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[As stupid a move as I find trying to squeeze funds out of three <b>very</b> large companies to be, a possible side-effect from something like this is that any argument made, either by the government or the companies, against this instance of 'pay me or get sued' would also work just as well against patent trolls, and anything that makes their lives more difficult is all for the better.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c65</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 04:24:31 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c65</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I think the difference is little: however, the fact that it allows people to self-publish (or attempt to, at any rate) is interesting.<br />
<br />
It still worries me that it's very much a gatekeeper move.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Is there really a market for paid-for fan fiction?</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c60</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sneeje]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 04:24:27 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c60</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I gotta ask, is there really a market for paid-for fan fiction?  I'm not really interested in fan-fiction myself, so maybe I just don't have the right perspective.<br />
<br />
But my sense is that significant part of what makes it fun is the lack or restrictions and the ability to share it widely.  So, I personally just don't see how there would be any market for paid-for fan-fiction, regardless of price.  And if the originator thinks this will give them more control, they should think again. This isn't going to stop fans from writing fan-fiction and sharing it.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c53</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 04:24:20 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c53</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["Amazon Wants To Sell Fan Fiction With It, Originator And FanFic Author All Sharing Profits"<br />
<br />
Is it just me, or was that title unnecessarily hard to parse?<br />
<br />
Might just be my bad English, though (not my first language).]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130425/17042522839/how-gema-is-still-worst-collective-rights-organization-world.shtml#c960</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[PaulT]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 04:18:58 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130425/17042522839/how-gema-is-still-worst-collective-rights-organization-world.shtml#c960</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["You fail to realize that the piracy issue is what forces us into an incredibly deflationary environment that in the end will hurt you as the consumer."<br />
<br />
..and the answer is to rape clubs so that they can't afford to operate any more, kill off avenue for independent musicians and charge organisations for music they haven't even played?<br />
<br />
"Yeah, bank on Spotify and prepare for what will happen to your carefully curated playlists once Spotify doesn't work the way _you_ want it to work any longer."<br />
<br />
If Spotify change their business or are forced to shut down, I will use an alternative service, or just revert to other ways of listening to music. I pay for Spotify (among other things) because it's convenient and gives me what I want as a consumer. Taking that away will not make me magically start buying CDs or spend 10x the money to get the same music. Is that through your thick skull yet?<br />
<br />
You're a moron if you think that there's only one way to get music, but you're also a moron to demand that people who already pay for music should pay again because your cash cow of selling plastic discs is no longer enriching your beloved industry.<br />
<br />
"But go on... dream..."<br />
<br />
Judging by your comments in the paragraphs above that sentence, you're the one dreaming. You're living in a fantasy world. You have to invent strawmen to attack because the people you're addressing aren't as easy to attack as you wish they were. Virtually nothing you've accused me of bears any resemblance to fact.<br />
<br />
You're inventing fiction. Why won't you debate reality? Too hard for you?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c35</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zakida Paul]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 04:13:13 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c35</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["For works over 10,000 words, the fanfic author gets a 35% cut. For shorter works, it's 20%. *snip*  The "ownership" of the new work belongs to Amazon, as you're basically signing a publishing agreement with Amazon, who then controls the work."<br />
<br />
So, Amazon are going from distributor to gatekeeper with the same tricks of not giving the creator of the work the majority of profits from sales while keeping control of the work for themselves?<br />
<br />
How is this different to traditional publishers?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Odd</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c28</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[horse with no name]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 04:10:35 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c28</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<b>Once again, if you just make it so that innovation can occur, people quite frequently figure out business models that build on what maximalists consider "piracy" if they give it time and let the business models shake out.</b><br />
<br />
Not a lot of innovation here.  Amazon is paying for the rights to use the characters, and then turning around and taking ownership of the resulting works.  Essentially, they are just middle-manning to clear rights to use the characters, at an insanely high cost to the writer.<br />
<br />
Yet another success story where a modern company becomes a middleman.  Perhaps they are a facilitator for the moment, but that will likely turn to greed if one of the works gets developed into an actual TV episode or movie.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Facebook</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c8</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Miles]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 04:03:02 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c8</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Why aren't you posting on facebook anymore??? I'm missing everything! :(]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/03160923172/chinese-hacks-google-database-surveillance-targets-highlight-how-dumb-technology-backdoors-are.shtml#c259</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 04:00:32 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/03160923172/chinese-hacks-google-database-surveillance-targets-highlight-how-dumb-technology-backdoors-are.shtml#c259</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[not according to USA law enforcement agencies. did i not read where action was going to be taken by them against a company if it didn't build in a backdoor so they could spy on whoever?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/02350923170/new-bill-would-stop-patent-trolls-hiding-behind-shell-companies.shtml#c264</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 03:58:51 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/02350923170/new-bill-would-stop-patent-trolls-hiding-behind-shell-companies.shtml#c264</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[i thought that it was also going to include a clause that made those who made illegal claims accountable? if right, that could perhaps start the ball rolling over false copyright claims and take downs. now that would be something really worth bringing into law!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>