<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Latest Techdirt Comments</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c283</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chuck Norris' Enemy (deceased)]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 12:57:21 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c283</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[What is your point and maybe we'll refute it?  Support your claim that it will weaken any copyright protections.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: So, anyone who still believes that &quot;1984&quot; is fiction?</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/11200723149/war-journalists-doj-claimed-fox-news-reporter-was-aider-abettor-co-conspirator-with-leaker.shtml#c1240</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 12:56:53 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/11200723149/war-journalists-doj-claimed-fox-news-reporter-was-aider-abettor-co-conspirator-with-leaker.shtml#c1240</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[You can encrypt your data back and forth between your friends. Heck, you can probably even find ways to encrypt your phone conversations between you and whoever you are talking to with a pre-shared key. There are ways to opt-out. <br />
<br />
and if everyone did it then the government would have to make the parties aware of their intrusion before being able to decrypt anything which would make it much more difficult for them to do anything without due process and get away with not letting the public know.<br />
<br />
Yes, the government can try to retaliate by making encryption technology illegal but the advantage of that is such laws are publicly transparent and the public has an opportunity to put public pressure at resisting such laws. Government wiretapping is not necessarily transparent to those being monitored.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/19190923142/if-youre-going-to-illegally-seize-citizens-cell-phones-least-make-sure-youre-grabbing-right-ones.shtml#c717</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 12:56:31 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/19190923142/if-youre-going-to-illegally-seize-citizens-cell-phones-least-make-sure-youre-grabbing-right-ones.shtml#c717</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><i>Since the police destroyed evidence the law should assume they are guilty</i></blockquote><br />
<br />
Right now, we don't know that this alleged video ever existed on the phone.  We have the new attorney, Rodriguez, telling us that he doesn't know, and his expert doesn't know.<br />
<br />
On the one side of the ledger, we have]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Decentralized power</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101209/09504712210/dailydirt-taking-another-look-nuclear-energy.shtml#c254</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Suzanne Lainson]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 12:56:06 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101209/09504712210/dailydirt-taking-another-look-nuclear-energy.shtml#c254</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I can't stress this enough. If you want to see a true grassroots revolution, it can't happen via nuclear energy. You don't really want the world to become dependent on nuclear energy because there are too many opportunities for political/economic control by just a few players.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Too bad the Yelp terms of service block 101's suing</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130509/01524123017/yelp-fights-back-against-carpet-cleaning-service-that-sued-anonymous-critics-defamation.shtml#c506</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 12:55:56 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130509/01524123017/yelp-fights-back-against-carpet-cleaning-service-that-sued-anonymous-critics-defamation.shtml#c506</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[because I'm guessing if one had an actual bad review one could back up with documentation it might be a hoot to sue yelp! for deleting the 'truth'.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c278</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zakida Paul]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 12:55:36 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c278</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Pfft.  I bought every song/album I have.  I bought every e-book I have.  I will enjoy them however I please.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c260</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chosen Reject]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 12:55:16 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c260</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[But anticircumvention should never have been under copyright law.  Note I'm not saying it should never have existed (it shouldn't have, but that's a different argument); I'm saying it should have been part of some other section of the law.  Anticircumvention was a power grab by copyright law.<br />
<br />
If SCotUS started to make treaties and Congress told them to stop, it wouldn't be a weakening of SCotUS, it would simply be putting them in their place.  That anticircumvention was ever a part of copyright law is wrong (that it was ever a part of the law at all is another wrong for another discussion).]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c245</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Masnick]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 12:53:59 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c245</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i> That Mike is pretending that it's not a weakening is priceless. </i><br />
<br />
That AJ is pretending I said something I didn't, and then going on one of his trademarked temper tantrums, is priceless.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Decentralized power</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101209/09504712210/dailydirt-taking-another-look-nuclear-energy.shtml#c248</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Suzanne Lainson]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 12:53:08 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101209/09504712210/dailydirt-taking-another-look-nuclear-energy.shtml#c248</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Also, nuclear power continues to give control to a small group of people: owners of companies that mine and process fuel and owners of power plants that distribute the energy.<br />
<br />
Also, since fuel isn't available equally in all countries, you have the same issues that generate wars and tension between countries.<br />
<br />
It's far better, economically and politically, to give individual consumers as much control over their own power as possible. So the more that can be done locally and the more the entire system can be broken down into units cheap enough for individuals or small groups to own themselves, the better.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c237</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[average_joe]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 12:52:03 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c237</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[If you bypass certain access controls now, you are violating the DMCA. If after this is passed you bypass those same access controls, you may not be violating the DMCA. This weakens the DMCA since it makes certain activities that used to be illegal and makes them legal. This LESSENS the rights that copyright owners currently have.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c234</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zakida Paul]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 12:52:02 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c234</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["Copyright law is not only concerned about infringement."<br />
<br />
Yes, it is concerned with reducing the rights on consumers to enjoy what they buy in any way they see fit.<br />
<br />
I pay for the damn thing so I will bloody well enjoy it and back it up multiple times.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c226</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Masnick]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 12:52:01 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c226</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>That is irrelevant to my point. This would weaken copyright law. Mike's claim to the contrary is totally bogus. Can anyone refute my actual point?</i><br />
<br />
It changes the law.  It does not weaken anyone's *copyright* which is what I claimed.<br />
<br />
But here you are throwing a temper tantrum pretending I said what I didn't say.<br />
<br />
You do that all too frequently.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c209</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Masnick]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 12:50:54 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c209</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>Wow, really? Of course it weakens copyright law--that's why you support it</i><br />
<br />
I said it doesn't weaken *copyrights*.  I said nothing about the law.  It changes the law, but it does not weaken anyone's copyrights.<br />
<br />
If you weren't so desperate to attack me on every post, you might try actually reading what I wrote.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c198</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chosen Reject]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 12:50:35 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c198</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Copyright is solely concerned with infringement.  That's what copyright law is all about.  The whole basis of copyright law is to make it illegal for people to copy and distribute certain works under certain circumstances.  Anticircumvention laws are only about making it illegal for people to circumvent technical reasons why they can't copy, but it doesn't take into account that copyright law is only about stopping the copyring/distribution of certain works under certain circumstances.  Not all works and/or under all circumstances.  Anticircumvention stops all works under all circumstances.<br />
<br />
This isn't weakening copyright law; it's restricting copyright law to be just copyright law.  If there were a section of copyright law that dealt with embezzlement and a bill was proposed to remove it from copyright law to it's own section, would you call that a weakening of copyright law as well?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c196</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[average_joe]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 12:50:17 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c196</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[That is irrelevant to my point. This would weaken copyright law. Mike's claim to the contrary is totally bogus. Can anyone refute my actual point?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c193</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[average_joe]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 12:49:06 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c193</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[You miss the point. Under the current law, it is illegal to circumvent certain access controls. This is so even if once circumvented, the person does not commit copyright infringement. Under the change that Mike supports, it won't be illegal to circumvent those same measures even if the person does not commit copyright infringement. Thus, the very same act that is currently illegal under copyright law would become legal under the proposed change. This is clearly a WEAKENING of copyright law; the rights held by copyright owners will be weakened. That Mike is pretending that it's not a weakening is priceless. I'm not saying that it's a good idea or a bad idea. I'm merely pointing out the irrefutable fact that this would weaken copyright law.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: No more Fox for me...</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/01321523153/kitchen-nightmares-lawyers-threaten-infamous-samy-amy-if-they-talk-about-their-experience-show.shtml#c332</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[davnel]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 12:48:37 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/01321523153/kitchen-nightmares-lawyers-threaten-infamous-samy-amy-if-they-talk-about-their-experience-show.shtml#c332</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[There's always some idiot who cares more about "being on TV" than the contents of some document they had to sign, didn't understand a single word of, and therefore didn't care. There'll always be fodder for such shows.<br />
.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c177</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ruben]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 12:48:18 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c177</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[AJ, it's obvious to anyone with half a brain that copyright is too restrictive and draconian. Why in the hell should works be tied up in this system for a hundred plus years? Who's benefiting from that arrangement? This is a huge reason why there's so little respect for copyright law.<br />
<br />
And it never should have been change to opt-out. Copyright as an opt-in system is the way was intended.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c156</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shmerl]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 12:45:09 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c156</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>Anticircumvention is a different wrong than infringement</i><br />
<br />
Who said it should be wrong? The DRM lobby? Everyone else says it's not wrong. So this new proposal expresses the view of the public. And it should repeal the invalid law of the DRM lobby which was forced on the public previously.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Decentralized power</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101209/09504712210/dailydirt-taking-another-look-nuclear-energy.shtml#c237</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Suzanne Lainson]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 12:44:24 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101209/09504712210/dailydirt-taking-another-look-nuclear-energy.shtml#c237</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Building plants that generate electricity that is then distributed across a power grid is both inefficient and locks people into a centralized system.<br />
<br />
It is better to create more location-based systems (for example, using solar to run individual housing units).<br />
<br />
Now, you could perhaps have nuclear plants in very isolated, safe areas that use that electricity to create hydrogen that would then power fuel cells.<br />
<br />
And perhaps some day there will be very small nuclear units that power homes or blocks.<br />
<br />
But replacing current oil or gas-fired power plants with nuclear power plants is both costly and less flexible than other options.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>