<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Latest Techdirt Comments</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title>Re: STASI rises from the grave in electronic form.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/09064523528/germanys-spies-have-nsa-envy-working-their-own-comprehensive-snooping-system.shtml#c39</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 23:45:55 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/09064523528/germanys-spies-have-nsa-envy-working-their-own-comprehensive-snooping-system.shtml#c39</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[if it keeps us safe, why not]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>STASI rises from the grave in electronic form.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/09064523528/germanys-spies-have-nsa-envy-working-their-own-comprehensive-snooping-system.shtml#c16</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 23:44:16 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/09064523528/germanys-spies-have-nsa-envy-working-their-own-comprehensive-snooping-system.shtml#c16</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Do we really need to turn the world into East Germany?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Bizzaro legal system</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/16530423522/arizona-court-skeptical-medical-excuse-prenda-lawyers.shtml#c171</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[That One Guy]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 23:39:58 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/16530423522/arizona-court-skeptical-medical-excuse-prenda-lawyers.shtml#c171</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Something just occurred to me, inspired by your comment here.<br />
<br />
It seems that, currently at least, the 'justice' system is treating lawyers and non-lawyers dead opposite of how they should be treated. <br />
<br />
Lawyers are expected to know the law backwards and forwards and what is and is not acceptable, so you'd the the judicial system would hold them to quite the high standard, going after them harshly for screw-ups and abusing the system like the trolls pull regularly, and yet they don't, instead treating them as though they had no idea what they were doing, and therefor deserved the benefit of the doubt, and multiple chances to 'get it right'.<br />
<br />
Conversely, it would be insane to expect non-lawyers to know all the little bits and rules of current law, given how much there is to learn and know, so you'd expect the system would be more lenient on them for any mistakes they make(whether accidental or intentional) in their actions, and yet they are held to exacting standards, far higher than those a lawyer has to deal with. <br />
<br />
Defendant lies on the stand? He just committed perjury and is sentence accordingly. <br />
<br />
Lawyer lies when presenting his case? He 'misremembered the facts', or 'was mistaken when he was presenting evidence', or something similarly mild.<br />
<br />
Defendant is evasive on questions posed to him by the prosecution/judge? Considered to be 'in contempt of court', and punished accordingly.<br />
<br />
Lawyer is evasive regarding questions posed to him by opposition/judge? <i>Maybe</i> gets, at most, a chewing out by the judge for dodging the questions, but unlikely to suffer more beyond that.<br />
<br />
Basically the people who should know the law are treated as though they don't, while those that don't know the law are treated as though they should... it's no wonder the system is such a mess these days.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/13581923535/microsoft-capitulates-removes-online-drm-xbox-one.shtml#c1038</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 23:35:30 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/13581923535/microsoft-capitulates-removes-online-drm-xbox-one.shtml#c1038</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Because the Dryden Flight Research center won't sell it to you?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/16530423522/arizona-court-skeptical-medical-excuse-prenda-lawyers.shtml#c158</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[That One Guy]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 23:23:52 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/16530423522/arizona-court-skeptical-medical-excuse-prenda-lawyers.shtml#c158</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Oh, that is just beautiful, the Prenda gang has got to be having Judge Wright flashbacks with questions like those being presented. <br />
<br />
Hopefully they'll react the same way this time around too, nothing starts the circus act that is 'Prenda in a court-room desperately trying to get out alive and without saying a word' quite like trying to get a judge dismissed for having the audacity of <i>asking question</i>.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/02025423448/company-claims-patent-pop-up-ads-sues-porn-travel-companies.shtml#c377</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 23:22:59 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/02025423448/company-claims-patent-pop-up-ads-sues-porn-travel-companies.shtml#c377</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Actually, your use of "Pop-Up" has been very misleading, both in your interpretation of the story and as a red-herring for your commentators (who very rarely, it seems, read any of your primary sources).<br />
<br />
If you read the patent, it is for "Pop-Under" advertising.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/16530423522/arizona-court-skeptical-medical-excuse-prenda-lawyers.shtml#c150</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[That Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 23:18:17 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/16530423522/arizona-court-skeptical-medical-excuse-prenda-lawyers.shtml#c150</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[And to think people were always so ready to bash Mr. Harris for his "interesting" filings.<br />
Oh the court will frown on this or that, always missing the bigger picture of many of the lawyers in these cases are being much more disrespectful to the courts.<br />
<br />
A Doe has to be extra careful to not anger a Judge but when you can show repeated fraud committed by lawyers you often see a slight tongue lashing and nothing else.  If a Doe had faked a signature you'd expect all sorts of holy hell from the bench... but a troll got a tiny smack on the nose and the ability to refile the case in the future.<br />
<br />
The legal system is failing the public, copyright trolls are just making it painfully obvious how broken the system has gotten.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/02025423448/company-claims-patent-pop-up-ads-sues-porn-travel-companies.shtml#c373</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 23:16:37 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/02025423448/company-claims-patent-pop-up-ads-sues-porn-travel-companies.shtml#c373</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[From the Patent....<br />
<br />
"most Internet businesses use interrupting advertisements such as pop-up windows"<br />
<br />
<br />
So can you patent something that already has a name?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/13581923535/microsoft-capitulates-removes-online-drm-xbox-one.shtml#c1037</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 23:14:42 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/13581923535/microsoft-capitulates-removes-online-drm-xbox-one.shtml#c1037</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Ironically I could actually vouch for this.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130618/11332223519/states-attorneys-general-want-to-special-exception-to-blame-sites-actions-users.shtml#c1088</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 23:14:04 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130618/11332223519/states-attorneys-general-want-to-special-exception-to-blame-sites-actions-users.shtml#c1088</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[So all of the owners of porn sites should be sent to Iran to be stoned to death?<br />
<br />
All magazine publishers that allow depictions of scantilly clad women should be sent to Indonesia for sentencing?<br />
<br />
All of the Hollywood producers/screenwriters that disrespect the Thai Monarchy should be sent to Thailand for violation of Thailand's lese majeste law?<br />
<br />
Now can you see how stupid your comment was..<br />
<br />
Was about to post this when my sarcasm meter started working again. I just had to bash my head against the desk enough times.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/18243923466/hollywoods-new-talking-point-gatekeepers-are-awesome.shtml#c883</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 23:09:59 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/18243923466/hollywoods-new-talking-point-gatekeepers-are-awesome.shtml#c883</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Sorry, Mike, you know that isn't likely. While OotB does sometimes respond with links and somewhat flimsy evidence, it's almost always lacking in anything substantive. Still better than the milkman, though.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/02025423448/company-claims-patent-pop-up-ads-sues-porn-travel-companies.shtml#c365</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 23:06:25 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/02025423448/company-claims-patent-pop-up-ads-sues-porn-travel-companies.shtml#c365</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I definitely remember getting Popups in 1996.<br />
I got suckered into clicking on a deceptive porn site link and they wouldn't stop poping up.<br />
<br />
(it really was deceptive)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Linux on PS3</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/13581923535/microsoft-capitulates-removes-online-drm-xbox-one.shtml#c1016</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 23:04:30 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/13581923535/microsoft-capitulates-removes-online-drm-xbox-one.shtml#c1016</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Uhh, DARPA <i>used this function in their server array</i>.  MIT and others did the same.  I used it as a part of my home programming practice.  I sold mine very shortly thereafter and bought a midrange notebook.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Oooh, SCARY TITLE and AGENDA!</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130618/11332223519/states-attorneys-general-want-to-special-exception-to-blame-sites-actions-users.shtml#c1068</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 22:45:04 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130618/11332223519/states-attorneys-general-want-to-special-exception-to-blame-sites-actions-users.shtml#c1068</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Cathy, you would not know common decency if it walked up and slapped you with a fish.<br />
<br />
<b> Surely we can all agree that comments at times go too far and that some are edging past decency </b><b><br />
<br />
I think that most will agree that your comments go way past decency. Your comments are always filled with lies, more lies and ad-hominems<br />
<br />
You are the most immoral person who comments on this site.<br />
<br />
You are only happy when your corporate pay masters are stealing rights away from the public.<br />
<br />
You seem to believbe that anything that your masters do is moral and we are immoral for discussing the antics that they pull</b>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: @&quot;PaulT&quot;, compulsive yapper.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/01121423439/hollywood-studios-keep-saying-its-employees-must-get-paid-now-may-be-forced-to-pay-its-interns.shtml#c1604</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[PaulT]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 22:43:30 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/01121423439/hollywood-studios-keep-saying-its-employees-must-get-paid-now-may-be-forced-to-pay-its-interns.shtml#c1604</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Or you could, say, not make up figures and accept that whether or not it matches some figures you pulled out of your ass, DH is being compensated for his work to a degree that he's happy with. If Mike is paying an amount the contractors are happy with, who cares what you think?<br />
<br />
Then, perhaps, stop launching impotent attacks on Mike that are clearly based on lies and false assumptions at this point, and turn attention to the company that's now going to be hit with a class action lawsuit for paying their interns nothing at all...]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/18243923466/hollywoods-new-talking-point-gatekeepers-are-awesome.shtml#c816</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[techflaws]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 22:40:42 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130613/18243923466/hollywoods-new-talking-point-gatekeepers-are-awesome.shtml#c816</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Funny how you complete fail to disprove any of Mike's point. He must have struck a raw nerve with you indeed.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c1047</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[techflaws]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 22:23:36 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c1047</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Right, piracy has stopped, everyone hates Kim Dotcom and the US got a boost of their reputation. Epic win by the DOJ.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c1034</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[techflaws]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 22:22:40 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130619/07515923527/leaseweb-deletes-megauploads-servers-without-warning-destroying-key-evidence.shtml#c1034</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Can't have it both ways, dude. Sorry.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/16530423522/arizona-court-skeptical-medical-excuse-prenda-lawyers.shtml#c146</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anon E. Mous]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 22:12:28 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/16530423522/arizona-court-skeptical-medical-excuse-prenda-lawyers.shtml#c146</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Prenda sure seems to like to leave the contract lawyers it hires off of Craiglst in peril, not that Goodhue doesn't deserve what he gets here for hooking up with Prenda and Steele.<br />
<br />
Once again Prenda is about to throw another lawyer under the bus much like it did with Gibbs. While I am of the opinion that Goodhue is up a creek without a paddle due to his tactics (no doubt ordered by John "my poor ego" Steele) in trying to delay in having to answer Judge Snow's questions.<br />
<br />
Obviously Judge Snow has picked up the scent of John Steele in this case and matched it's stench to the case that Judge Wright had before him where Prenda had a major fail due to their stupidity and ego in trying to get settlement cash from people.<br />
<br />
Besides Goodhue's failure to answer Judge Snow properly with the documents he asked concerning Goodhue's medical episode on the day he was to appear and answer some questions about Prenda shows that Goodhue's attempt is to not be in the situation that Gibbs found himself in in front of Judge Wright.<br />
<br />
Judge Snow in his order stated that Goodhue must provide answers to the following question about the case which are:<br />
<br />
&#9726;Identify the persons who signed the names]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130619/10395523531/next-time-someone-says-twitter-is-killing-deep-thinking-with-short-quick-messages-show-them-this.shtml#c467</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 21:55:24 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130619/10395523531/next-time-someone-says-twitter-is-killing-deep-thinking-with-short-quick-messages-show-them-this.shtml#c467</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["(and, yes, this includes me)"<br />
<br />
So will you one day be one of those people demanding congress to pass new anti-competitive laws because you can't adapt to new technologies?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>