<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Latest Techdirt Comments</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Read for comprehension!</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c889</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 07:49:43 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c889</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Nothing in the article above is a justification of Kim's actions.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: &quot;reasonably monetize what might be considered infringement under the law&quot;</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c460</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 07:49:29 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c460</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Why don't you go and write a fanfic piece about some characters and settings copyrighted by Disney and let us know how it works out for you?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Prior Art</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c880</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[silverscarcat]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 07:48:34 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c880</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[And you, and other apologists, don't see the problem if Megaupload loses, do you?<br />
<br />
That's because, unlike other copyright and patent trolls, and I disagree with Dotcom on this issue, but unlike others who only seek to gain money and do nothing else, the Megaupload case DOES apply to other internet companies.  If Megaupload loses, it won't be long before the MAFIAAA decides that if they can take down Megaupload, why not try for Youtube, Google, Twitter, Facebook, Reddit, ETC.?<br />
<br />
There's more at stake here than someone being a patent troll, which is unlike other patent trolls which just seek to cause disruption in the market place.<br />
<br />
If Megaupload fails in court, then the entire internet community could be in trouble.<br />
<br />
Remember how we reacted to SOPA?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Read for comprehension!</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c876</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 07:47:10 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c876</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It's patent trolling in this case.  It's unequivocally what Kim is threatening here.  Let's not mince words.  Average joe doesn't need to be wrong about everything.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>more dissembling by Masnick</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/02350923170/new-bill-would-stop-patent-trolls-hiding-behind-shell-companies.shtml#c345</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[staff]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 07:46:18 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/02350923170/new-bill-would-stop-patent-trolls-hiding-behind-shell-companies.shtml#c345</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[More dissembling by Mad Mike.<br />
<br />]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Read for comprehension!</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c872</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 07:45:40 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c872</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I don't want to put words in his mouth but the article doesn't read like Mike thinks trolling is a good idea here either.<br />
<br />
The DMCA doesn't apply in criminal cases?  The safe harbor is for criminal charges too.  For a wannabe lawyer that's a pretty stupid thing to say.  Any case over the DMCA has the potential to set bad precedent (or good) what tilts this towards bad is that Kim isn't a particularly sympathetic case.  And it would absolutely be bad for the 'tech' industry as a whole if a bas precedent was set on the DMCA just because a court didn't like Kim very much (a very real possibility).]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Read for comprehension!</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c859</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 07:45:00 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c859</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Here's Masnick's headline, in case you missed it:<br />
<br />
<i>Kim Dotcom Threatens To Sue Google, Facebook And Twitter Over 2-Factor Authentication Patent If They Don't Help Him</i><br />
<br />
And here's a later line from his story:<br />
<br />
<i>"Specifically, he's asking them to help fund his defense, in exchange for not getting sued for the patent."</i><br />
<br />
That is Msasnick parsing words, not me. I see it for the extortion it is: Fund Dotcom's defense or be sued for an unrelated matter.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20130510/00083123031/cool-new-platform-supporting-artists-patreon-jack-conte.shtml#c211</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Real Michael]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 07:44:33 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/casestudies/articles/20130510/00083123031/cool-new-platform-supporting-artists-patreon-jack-conte.shtml#c211</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I'm not convinced. It's like turning music business into a charity social club. It makes the people using it seem desperate, whereas something like Kickstarter is just "This is my project, you contribute X amount and get Y content." Done.<br />
<br />
It's not a bad idea but I seriously doubt it will take off.<br />
<br />
(BTW, Techdirt keeps freezing at random intervals. The heck is going on?)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20130523/01030023182/man-butt-dials-911-while-discussing-murder-plot.shtml#c34</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[silverscarcat]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 07:43:08 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20130523/01030023182/man-butt-dials-911-while-discussing-murder-plot.shtml#c34</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[But that would be reasonable!<br />
<br />
:P]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Actually...</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/18265123163/reporters-find-exposed-personal-data-via-google-threatened-with-cfaa-charges.shtml#c731</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[kitsune361]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 07:41:45 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/18265123163/reporters-find-exposed-personal-data-via-google-threatened-with-cfaa-charges.shtml#c731</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Unfortunately... not as often as I probably should.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: &quot;I believe in sharing knowledge and ideas for the good of society.&quot;</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c836</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 07:39:57 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c836</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[You do know that for normal, well-adjusted people it's possible to be behind a person on one issue but against them on another right?  It's really not tangled at all, Kim is right on the Mega 'conspiracy' fight and wrong on patent trolling.  It's really that simple.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: &quot;reasonably monetize what might be considered infringement under the law&quot;</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c448</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Seegras]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 07:38:36 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c448</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Actually, no. And no again. <br />
<br />
Fan Fiction is NOT, and CAN NOT be copyright infringement, because there is nothing copied at all. <br />
<br />
US: "102 (b) In no case does copyright protection for an original work of authorship extend to any idea, procedure, process, system, method of operation, concept, principle, or discovery, regardless of the form in which it is described, explained, illustrated, or embodied in such work."<br />
<br />
Copyright is about the exact form, and not about an "idea" or a "concept".<br />
<br />
The use of characters and settings developed by others MIGHT constitute trademark infringement (if named the same), but most literary characters are not even trademarked.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: It's actually a better joke than one might have thought...</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/22543223166/modest-proposal-going-piracy-neutral.shtml#c396</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 07:36:08 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/22543223166/modest-proposal-going-piracy-neutral.shtml#c396</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Now wait a minute. I submit that any music, artwork, video, fiction that I might post as a replacement will be SO bad that they will happily give me ALL of their content just to make me go away. Yeah! Tell me there's no value in bad.<br />
<br />
/s]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Read for comprehension!</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c824</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Howard the Duck]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 07:36:07 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c824</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[You said "They're being told.", then "Specifically, he's asking...", which is it?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c799</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 07:33:18 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c799</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Hahahaha.<br />
<br />
What Does Any Of That Have To Do With The Patent Being Granted?<br />
<br />
Reading Comprehension Fail.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c433</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Real Michael]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 07:32:15 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c433</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It's not. This move would essentially transofrm every fanfic into a 'work for hire' owned by Amazon. It's essentially a means of outsourcing independent writers to come up with ideas so that Amazon can then turn around and make a mint in the event that a studio wants to license a work.<br />
<br />
Baaaaaad idea.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/01382223168/new-york-times-tells-startup-it-cant-even-mention-ny-times.shtml#c961</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gwiz]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 07:31:44 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/01382223168/new-york-times-tells-startup-it-cant-even-mention-ny-times.shtml#c961</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>This use fails on the 4th factor of consideration...</i><br />
<br />
Oops. Worded that wrong. Didn't mean "fails". I meant that the 4th factor would support that this use is fair use.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Bad legal move</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c791</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[CFWoods]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 07:31:19 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c791</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Recipe for making you life much worse:<br />
<br />
- Have the government seize your funds<br />
<br />
- Threaten very large companies with an infringement suit if they don't pay you so you can defend yourself on another matter<br />
<br />
Reason:<br />
<br />
This invites a declaratory judgement action that you've already admitted you can't afford.<br />
<br />
*** shakes head ***]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Prior Art</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c790</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 07:31:11 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c790</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>ust like OOTB. AJ doesn't actually read the entire article. Otherwise he would have noticed that Mike said it was a bad idea. It is much easier to make a stand when you take things out of context.</i><br />
<br />
Here's what mini-Masnick said about Dr. Evil:<br />
<br />
"That said, the threat of suing over a patent if they don't fund his defense seems like a potentially poorly thought out strategic move that could backfire. Remember, Dotcom has been hit with racketeering claims, and I would think that anything that implies "give me money or I'll sue" isn't the best move for someone already facing racketeering charges."<br />
<br />
That is in marked contrast from his usual bile over patent and copyright trolls he doesn't worship.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Is that it?</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c781</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 07:30:58 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c781</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Did You Stop Reading Before The Last Paragraph?<br />
<br />
Thats The Only WAy To Comprehend Your Issues.<br />
<br />
Nice Selective Reading Skills.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>