<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Latest Techdirt Comments</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Use Your Own Content</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/01382223168/new-york-times-tells-startup-it-cant-even-mention-ny-times.shtml#c920</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Niall]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 05:35:15 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/01382223168/new-york-times-tells-startup-it-cant-even-mention-ny-times.shtml#c920</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[And the NYT never ever ever profits off other people's work or unpaid resources?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/01382223168/new-york-times-tells-startup-it-cant-even-mention-ny-times.shtml#c917</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 05:35:08 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/01382223168/new-york-times-tells-startup-it-cant-even-mention-ny-times.shtml#c917</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[If this is fair use, then there's nothing stopping someone from just going to Flickr, pulling non-CC licensed images, and using them in an advertisement. You call companies out for pulling that kind of shit all the time. How is this any different?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Copyright</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/01382223168/new-york-times-tells-startup-it-cant-even-mention-ny-times.shtml#c909</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Niall]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 05:33:03 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/01382223168/new-york-times-tells-startup-it-cant-even-mention-ny-times.shtml#c909</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Show me the line in the Constitution where it effectively says "Any copying of any material that may possibly be covered by copyright is automatically infringing"...<br />
<br />
Fair use butthurts copyright maniacs. And no, this could be out of fair use - but you refuse to even countenance it unless it's you 'infringing'.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/22543223166/modest-proposal-going-piracy-neutral.shtml#c364</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greevar]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 05:31:56 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/22543223166/modest-proposal-going-piracy-neutral.shtml#c364</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[What are you talking about? Haven't you heard of The Pirate Party? And the reason they haven't accomplished that goal is because the opposition has way more money, which is the only thing that talks in government. After all, money has been deemed speech and that means the *IAA have more speech than any grass roots org does.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Copyright</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/01382223168/new-york-times-tells-startup-it-cant-even-mention-ny-times.shtml#c893</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Niall]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 05:30:53 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/01382223168/new-york-times-tells-startup-it-cant-even-mention-ny-times.shtml#c893</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Well, if you wish to say that you can reproduce a similar effect (note: I haven't been able to see either) a lot simpler and cheaper (which NYT might well be interested in for their own purposes), then using a selection of the original content may well be seen to be more useful.<br />
<br />
Of course, some lorem ipsum might be safer, if less good as an illustration, especially if your point is precisely "we can generate this for 1% of the resources, why are you paying those cowboys?". <br />
<br />
And I'll sympathise more with papers the day they pay people who feature in their stories for the stories they write. (Which of course would be wrong in many cases.)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Is there really a market for paid-for fan fiction?</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c191</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 05:25:43 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c191</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["depends on the original work- the Star Wars EU isn't much more than fanfiction where the author has said that it actually happened in the canonical universe."<br />
<br />
Star Wars (unlike Star Trek) kept a tighter control on continuity and used already-published authors.<br />
Trek (primarily Pocket Books) used fanfic writers and stated that, except for adaptations of movies &amp; TV episodes, the stories weren't canonical.<br />
Pity since some authors, like comics scribe Peter David, did first-rate material that deserves to be part of the overall Trek Universes (Yes, it's plural).]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Just like a book deal, but worse</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c189</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[That One Guy]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 05:24:59 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c189</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I suppose the bit that makes the 35% cut look particularly bad to me is the transfer of the copyright over the story. <br />
<br />
If it was instead a <i>license</i> or something similar, where Amazon was legally allowed to act as seller, but the author still retained all other rights over the story, I wouldn't consider that too bad of a deal, it's just as-is writers would basically be handing over the rights to their works for nothing more than the <i>potential</i> of profit in the future.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Odd</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c180</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 05:24:46 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c180</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<a href='http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/sara-sheridan/writers-earnings-cultural-myth_b_3136859.html' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/sara-sheridan/writers-earnings-cultural-myth_b_3136859.html</a><br />
<br />
Your argument is invalid.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Wargames</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/03160923172/chinese-hacks-google-database-surveillance-targets-highlight-how-dumb-technology-backdoors-are.shtml#c286</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[RyanNerd]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 05:24:16 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/03160923172/chinese-hacks-google-database-surveillance-targets-highlight-how-dumb-technology-backdoors-are.shtml#c286</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Anyone who was alive and watched "hacking" movies during the 80's knows that there is always a back door and that this will prevent WWIII.<br />
<br />
"Do you want to play a game?"]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: It funny to read all of this</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/18102623141/so-its-come-to-this-seven-high-school-students-arrested-throwing-water-balloons.shtml#c1991</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Niall]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 05:20:13 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/18102623141/so-its-come-to-this-seven-high-school-students-arrested-throwing-water-balloons.shtml#c1991</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[You were actually being quite reasonable until that last unnecessary dig.<br />
<br />
We could just as equally say "calling the cops and making harmless fun an arrestable offence is just the kind of overreach that content controllors and copywrong maximalists and patent trolls buy laws for".]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Is there really a market for paid-for fan fiction?</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c158</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 05:20:12 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c158</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["I gotta ask, is there really a market for paid-for fan fiction? I'm not really interested in fan-fiction myself, so maybe I just don't have the right perspective."<br />
<br />
Quite frankly, a good 3/4 of Star Trek novels are just fanfic with the "naughty bits" expunged.<br />
Yet they sell.<br />
<br />
(Star Wars has a better track record of using profesional authors and maintaining continuity.)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Zero tolerance is the result of the 60's not cured by it</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/18102623141/so-its-come-to-this-seven-high-school-students-arrested-throwing-water-balloons.shtml#c1982</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Niall]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 05:17:15 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/18102623141/so-its-come-to-this-seven-high-school-students-arrested-throwing-water-balloons.shtml#c1982</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Oh, and Conservative "Respect my authoritah!" attitudes are so much better. Along with turning a blind eye on any bullying of anyone darker than a light sun-tan, of anyone who isn't a jock, of anyone who isn't hetero-male-overcompensating, of anyone 'different'. Because the world was so much a better place 30-60 years ago, and nothing's improved.<br />
<br />
Yes people go too far with political correctness. But there is still so far to go. It's just getting the balance right.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Odd</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c154</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 05:15:29 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c154</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["Amazon is paying for the rights to use the characters, and then turning around and taking ownership of the resulting works. Essentially, they are just middle-manning to clear rights to use the characters, at an insanely high cost to the writer."<br />
<br />
As usual, ass with no brain, you're wrong.<br />
The writers are writing the stories simnply for the love of the series/movie, without thought of profit (as hard as it is for a copyright maximalist like you to believe).<br />
Amazon has simply come up with a way for the studios and writers to make money!<br />
<br />
"Perhaps they are a facilitator for the moment, but that will likely turn to greed if one of the works gets developed into an actual TV episode or movie."<br />
<br />
The licensors (tv/movie studios) control the rights, so even if one of these fanfic stories prove good enough to adapt into an episode or film, the studio, not Amazon makes the money on it.<br />
Amazon only makes money on copies of the stories sold through it.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Another monopoly?</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c152</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Watson]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 05:14:46 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c152</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Presumably if Amazon become the licence holder for written works derived from certain TV shows, then they'll spend most of their time taking legal action against anyone who publishes fan fiction for free online based on those same TV shows (i.e. if you don't publish it through Amazon - the copyright holder - then you'll be sued). <br />
<br />
While existing copyright holders "don't mind [free fan fiction] (with a few notable exceptions) as long as nothing is being sold" I suspect Amazon will.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Intent versus implementation</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130506/10364522962/eric-schmidt-still-fan-figuring-out-way-to-erase-past.shtml#c348</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gert-Jan]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 05:12:49 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130506/10364522962/eric-schmidt-still-fan-figuring-out-way-to-erase-past.shtml#c348</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I think there is a lot of good to say about the desire to have the history fade away and/or to have the option as a user to delete past events about that user.<br />
<br />
The challenge is to transform this desire to workable procedures and laws. You don't necessarily need a "right to be forgotten" for a basic implementation of this. However, you do need cooperation of commercial and noncommercial parties that collect or buy your information, with or without laws to facilitate it.<br />
<br />
Without laws, you need alternative incentives for these commercial and noncommercial parties. Reputation (naming &amp; shaming) can work for big brands.<br />
<br />
Such initiative, even with big leaking holes and only covering (say) 70%, would be a big improvement over the current situation. It would also provide a learnings how to further improvement.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Odd</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c147</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 05:12:14 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c147</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Of course, if Amazon gains the rights to the characters, sure they can publish fanfics...<br />
<br />
And then they can have their own team of authors write anything they want utilizing those characters.  They could theoretically spin the entire control of that specific universe.<br />
<br />
They get the rights to use X-Files characters.  They publish fanfics.  Two months later they drop out 50 full sized X-Files novels.  Profit (provided X-Files are still relevant, but replace with, uhhh, anything else).]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: at least the videos exist still</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/17321623162/released-video-silva-beating-shows-his-last-moments-video-actual-beating-still-missing.shtml#c777</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 04:58:01 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/17321623162/released-video-silva-beating-shows-his-last-moments-video-actual-beating-still-missing.shtml#c777</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><i>the sherriff says he's seen them.</i></blockquote><br />
I don't think you've been paying close attention.<br />
<br />
Sheriff Youngblood was referring to the black-and-white security video taken by a camera near the corner of Palm Drive and Flower Street in East Bakersfield.<br />
<br />
That video has already been published. You can view that video, among other places, embedded in the <i>KERO 23ABC News</i> story,]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Just like a book deal, but worse</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c136</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[PaulT]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 04:57:56 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c136</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["sounds like a steal alright, but most certainly  not in favor of the writer."<br />
<br />
Not really. It's better than the offer they currently have (zero income, and if you try you'll probably be shut down and/or sued). Writers always have the option of altering the story to remove references to other works if they wish to publish without this protection for higher cuts. True, the cut could be higher, but we don't know how much of that 65% is being demanded by the copyright holders or how much behind the scenes work is actually involved to guarantee compliance (all work done on the author's behalf for no up front charge).<br />
<br />
I agree with your second point, but what's the alternative, really? Without this move, fan fic languishes in an area where the author can't profit, and any attempt to shut down freebies is bound to backfire on the copyright holders in some way.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Is there really a market for paid-for fan fiction?</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c127</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[PaulT]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 04:49:47 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c127</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It will be interesting to see how this goes, but I'd say it's down to quality. The terms seem to indicate that the stories will need to adhere to certain rules, and as they're published by Amazon they will possibly have some form of editorial oversight.<br />
<br />
So, rather than "pure" fan fiction, you'll get something that's more like a standard authorised novel. That is, you'll probably get something approaching a novel based on the universe you'd buy in the shops anyway, with the advantage of ideas coming from random authors rather than pre-approved commissioned authors who may or may not have any passion for the original material. It may also be more likely for a current show to take the direction suggested by fan fiction if it's officially licensed and published - giving fans a way to direct the show in the way they prefer.<br />
<br />
So, if the quality of the paid work is higher, or even leads to new material in the canonical world of the original then it's definitely better than the free stuff. If not, well, there's nothing that can stop true fans from writing and sharing what they wish.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Odd</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c105</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 04:47:59 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/11301723178/amazon-wants-to-sell-fan-fiction-with-it-originator-fanfic-author-all-sharing-profits.shtml#c105</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I actually agree here.<br />
<br />
Amazon isn't doing anyone any favours, save, perhaps, minimizing the risk of a lawsuit.<br />
<br />
Amazon's "service" would be redundant if there were clear exceptions for derivative works in copyright.<br />
<br />
Alas, there aren't, so we must continue to pretend that art and science must be created in a vacuum to be of any value.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>