<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Latest Techdirt Comments</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/14172323158/judge-not-impressed-prenda-alan-cooper-lawsuit.shtml#c692</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[DannyB]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 06:02:08 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/14172323158/judge-not-impressed-prenda-alan-cooper-lawsuit.shtml#c692</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It is unfair that judges are so biased against perpetrating multiple simultaneous frauds upon the court while using the court as a tool in an extortion shakedown.<br />
<br />
This bias on the part of the judges is brazenly obvious.<br />
<br />
This bias is unfair to the plaintiff/lawyers (who are one and the same party although separated by a tangled web of paper shell companies).  This bias prevents the plaintiff from pursuing the much needed mailing list of identities for sending out threatening extortion letters.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: A few corrections</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130425/17042522839/how-gema-is-still-worst-collective-rights-organization-world.shtml#c876</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[PaulT]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 06:01:35 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130425/17042522839/how-gema-is-still-worst-collective-rights-organization-world.shtml#c876</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[OK, then... Just provide citations for all your claims and you can consider the article corrected. Sorry, anonymous comments without citations are not corrections.<br />
<br />
Oh, and most people don't care what GEMA members want. If the market is trending towards flat fee subscription services, then that's where it's heading. I know the labels would dearly love to charge multiple Euros for each song, or even their wet dream of pay per listen, but if the consumers don't want that you can't force them to pay in the way you prefer.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/00493523143/ridiculous-timing-obama-administration-responds-to-spying-ap-pushing-journalist-shield-law-that-wouldnt-matter.shtml#c329</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chuck Norris' Enemy (deceased)]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 06:00:53 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/00493523143/ridiculous-timing-obama-administration-responds-to-spying-ap-pushing-journalist-shield-law-that-wouldnt-matter.shtml#c329</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Dyslexic troll?  Maybe "ham beat off" or something?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/16203623112/nintendo-exchanges-goodwill-control-issues-mass-monetization-claims-lets-play-videos.shtml#c441</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave jaCKSON]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 05:58:38 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/16203623112/nintendo-exchanges-goodwill-control-issues-mass-monetization-claims-lets-play-videos.shtml#c441</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I don't get the leap from "Nintendo will put an ad on your video" to "Nintendo wantz al ur moniez!". Surely this is about youtube selling advertising space and not about grabbing $$$? maybe I missed something.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/11032823096/how-low-can-drones-go.shtml#c205</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[That One Guy]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 05:57:57 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/11032823096/how-low-can-drones-go.shtml#c205</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Yeah, having something hovering in the yard, looking through a window of a house via camera... he calls it 'research', I'd call it voyeurism, no different than if he'd sneaked up and peeked through the windows directly.<br />
<br />
The 'spray it with water' idea isn't so much frying the circuits, as it is 'knocking it out of the air with the water pressure by throwing it off balance'.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Pump Out Enough Balloon Juice...</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/15581423160/prenda-gets-some-tiny-bit-good-news-as-it-may-get-out-two-critical-cases.shtml#c175</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Edward Teach]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 05:55:46 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/15581423160/prenda-gets-some-tiny-bit-good-news-as-it-may-get-out-two-critical-cases.shtml#c175</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[And judges let you go, it seems. OJ Simpson, JonBenet Ramsey, and many others prove that.<br />
<br />
So, why do Judges let lawyers off the hook so easily?  If this had been some ordinary (non-lawyer) schmoe, said schmoe would be in jail right now.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Hollywood screener DVDs</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c1792</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[DannyB]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 05:53:48 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c1792</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Wasn't there a TechDirt article not long ago that described how Hollywood trains its own people how to circumvent the DRM on DVD screeners in violation of the DMCA?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Anon E Mouse</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/14172323158/judge-not-impressed-prenda-alan-cooper-lawsuit.shtml#c671</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Umad?]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 05:51:54 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/14172323158/judge-not-impressed-prenda-alan-cooper-lawsuit.shtml#c671</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[U mad bro?<br />
<br />
Bwahahahahahahaha!!!!!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/11032823096/how-low-can-drones-go.shtml#c202</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 05:50:44 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/11032823096/how-low-can-drones-go.shtml#c202</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Possibly, want to bet the guy and his remote are waterproof too?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/11032823096/how-low-can-drones-go.shtml#c201</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 05:44:31 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/11032823096/how-low-can-drones-go.shtml#c201</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Sounds like a peeking Tom to me rather then a burglar doing research for a future crime.<br />
<br />
Also, people not all machinery will short circuit if you spray it with water. Some of them are build to be water proof, by preventing water from getting on the inside where it does the actual damage.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Skycrime</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/11032823096/how-low-can-drones-go.shtml#c198</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chuck Norris' Enemy (deceased)]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 05:44:24 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/11032823096/how-low-can-drones-go.shtml#c198</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[If I can bring it down then it is too close to my property.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/11032823096/how-low-can-drones-go.shtml#c174</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zakida Paul]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 05:43:21 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/11032823096/how-low-can-drones-go.shtml#c174</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Why is it OK for governments to spy on my every move but the minute I spy on my hot neighbour in the shower, I am labelled a 'pervert'?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/02413623115/bogus-lawsuit-plus-threats-to-those-who-write-about-it-leads-to-epic-response.shtml#c1000</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dale]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 05:41:32 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/02413623115/bogus-lawsuit-plus-threats-to-those-who-write-about-it-leads-to-epic-response.shtml#c1000</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[There is an updated press release from JonMon (at <a href='http://prsync.com/monsarrat/jon-monsarrat-brings-general-electric-and-citigroup-power-to-expose-cyberbullies-542401/' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://prsync.com/monsarrat/jon-monsarrat-brings-general-electric-and-citigroup-power-to-expose-cyberbullies-542401/</a>) which revises the press release referred to in this article:<br />
<br />
"Second, due to a separate miscommunication, the press release stated that the new venture launched with partnerships. That was in error. The new venture does not launch with any partnerships."]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: the Rabbit Hole is Deeper than you Know</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/02413623115/bogus-lawsuit-plus-threats-to-those-who-write-about-it-leads-to-epic-response.shtml#c988</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dale]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 05:38:55 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/02413623115/bogus-lawsuit-plus-threats-to-those-who-write-about-it-leads-to-epic-response.shtml#c988</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[You write "I can't say if Jon Monserrat was involved".<br />
<br />
Rumor has it that JonMon is or at least was heavily involved in these activities as well.  And it is said that he's been kicked out of some of them for obnoxious behavior.<br />
<br />
BTW, I like how you lump "sci-fi fairs" with various sexual proclivities!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Well, at least there's some resistance here to spying.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/11032823096/how-low-can-drones-go.shtml#c161</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[out_of_the_blue]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 05:37:24 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/11032823096/how-low-can-drones-go.shtml#c161</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[But none have a practicable boundary, let alone solution.<br />
<br />
Definition of intrustion can't be limited to only when above your property, let alone when the drone operator is in sight, or known. Also, shooting one down even if over your property will only lead to tangles that you don't want. -- Just ask Iran about the grief they've gotten for shooting down spying US drones. -- And the notion that you're going to mount your own constant air defense is silly. <br />
<br />
But there IS an easy definition of spying even in a public space, and that's when <i>stopped</i> or practically so to focus on one location; applies to people, Google Glass, or drones.<br />
<br />
Passing by <i>might</i> be okay (unless spying is the only purpose, as Google Streetview), but when stopped to ogle, it crosses over the creepy line. (And for the nit-pickers, that can be stretched when a public event, such as police arresting someone, but Google Glass in constant operation at a cocktail party, or a drone hovering in residential area has to be considered firmly out of bounds.)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: It's not that hard</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/11032823096/how-low-can-drones-go.shtml#c152</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 05:37:01 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/11032823096/how-low-can-drones-go.shtml#c152</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[If I can fire a high powered handgun into the air while screaming at a drone in my front yard, well, that's an America i don't want to live in.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>A few corrections</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130425/17042522839/how-gema-is-still-worst-collective-rights-organization-world.shtml#c875</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 05:36:29 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130425/17042522839/how-gema-is-still-worst-collective-rights-organization-world.shtml#c875</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[- GEMA is not a for-profit organisation. Every license fee is being distributed to the members.<br />
<br />
- top artists get more money because their music is actually used and licensed more and in more places and for higher fees. There's nothing conspiratorial about this, it's the success that puts them and their licenses in this position<br />
<br />
- all these flat fee licenses being paid are a terrible thing and we in GEMA resent it wholeheartedly. We want clear per use accountability. It's the licensee that prefer to not pay per use but rather have a flat fee.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Following instructions</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/02413623115/bogus-lawsuit-plus-threats-to-those-who-write-about-it-leads-to-epic-response.shtml#c972</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dale]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 05:31:25 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/02413623115/bogus-lawsuit-plus-threats-to-those-who-write-about-it-leads-to-epic-response.shtml#c972</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[You write:  "why should anyone be required to follow instructions to the effect of stopping a private party?"<br />
<br />
My memory is that the police had been called out by somebody because the party was becoming a nuisance.  And in any case, there were plenty of people under the legal drinking age drinking there, so the police did have a right to stop it.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/00554723091/more-details-emerge-key-legal-fight-over-dmca-abuse.shtml#c296</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 05:28:39 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/00554723091/more-details-emerge-key-legal-fight-over-dmca-abuse.shtml#c296</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[the DMCA has been nothing other than the Congress sponsored entertainment industries method of shutting down anything and anyone they didn't like, regardless of whether there had been any wrong doings. it was purposefully left as it is so that those industries could do maximum damage in all instances and have no recourse against it when it had legitimate sites or items closed/removed. if they were made to pay for all the wrong instances, there would be many more legitimate items and sites still flourishing, as they would have taken much more care over the closures wanted and not wasted money. the really annoying thing is, if the situation happens in reverse, all hell is let lose and law suits started by the industries demand ridiculous sums. it shows how one sided the law is and, to my mind, why it was introduces as it is, a payback from Congress for the lobbying and campaign contributions to them! typical of today's politics but disgraceful none the less!!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/06034223155/quack-professor-releases-dumbest-violent-video-game-theory-ever.shtml#c72</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arsik Vek]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 05:24:15 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/06034223155/quack-professor-releases-dumbest-violent-video-game-theory-ever.shtml#c72</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Holy balls (to oppose the Testicilians).... this guy is nuts.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>