<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Latest Techdirt Comments</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130612/16480623431/us-chamber-commerce-bollywood-is-so-successful-without-strong-copyrights-that-it-will-fail-unless-india-strengthens-its.shtml#c774</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Niall]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 04:16:12 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130612/16480623431/us-chamber-commerce-bollywood-is-so-successful-without-strong-copyrights-that-it-will-fail-unless-india-strengthens-its.shtml#c774</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[And a Temple of Doom and a bullwhip!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130612/16480623431/us-chamber-commerce-bollywood-is-so-successful-without-strong-copyrights-that-it-will-fail-unless-india-strengthens-its.shtml#c755</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Niall]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 04:15:42 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130612/16480623431/us-chamber-commerce-bollywood-is-so-successful-without-strong-copyrights-that-it-will-fail-unless-india-strengthens-its.shtml#c755</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I hadn't noticed Bollywood having any issues getting into international markets where there is a strong Indian sub-continental presence - Bollywood films aren't too hard to find here in the UK, for instance, albeit I'm sure that's only a fraction of the output.<br />
<br />
And any country producing such gems as 'Jersey Shore' cannot possibly complain about the local output of any other country!<br />
<br />
Disclaimer: I know the UK has 'The Only Way Is Essex' (TOWIE).]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Had a think about it</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130608/03355523371/warning-letters-under-uks-three-strikes-plan-unlikely-to-be-sent-out-before-2016-if-ever.shtml#c154</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 04:11:37 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130608/03355523371/warning-letters-under-uks-three-strikes-plan-unlikely-to-be-sent-out-before-2016-if-ever.shtml#c154</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[You missed a major class:<br />
<br />
Those who want content but cannot get it by legal means, leaving piracy or do without as the only option.<br />
<br />
The content industry is very good at creating this cklass by regional releases, and withdrawing content from streaming sites when it is about to be broadcast on TV, cable or satellite.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130611/00503223401/public-outcry-taiwan-kills-their-version-sopa.shtml#c93</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Violated]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 04:11:33 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130611/00503223401/public-outcry-taiwan-kills-their-version-sopa.shtml#c93</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Good news indeed.<br />
<br />
The Internet is under attack on a global front where no matter in which country they strike we should always stand shoulder to shoulder with our brothers and sisters to strike down such bad legislation.<br />
<br />
We cannot allow the Internet to be harmed by those organization aiming to make a land-grab for control.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/02053123505/dick-cheneys-crystal-ball-says-that-nsa-surveillance-could-have-stopped-911.shtml#c1557</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[terry_allen]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 04:09:24 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/02053123505/dick-cheneys-crystal-ball-says-that-nsa-surveillance-could-have-stopped-911.shtml#c1557</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[You know, I've always thought that it just didn't make sense that Valerie Plame's husband was the intended target of her outing.  I mean, this is Dick Cheney!  If he wanted, he could simply arrange to have the guy found in bed, naked, drunk, with an entire Girl Scout troop as his only visible companions.  And the only way he can get back at this guy is to intentionally blow his wife's cover?  No, sorry, can't buy it.<br />
<br />
What I <i>can</i> buy, though, is the idea that Valerie Plame herself -- who was, after all, working independently to answer that vital question of where the WMDs were in Iraq, or if they existed at all -- might have been the real problem for Cheney, and the real target.  A CIA agent loses a lot of her effectiveness once everybody in the world knows she's a CIA agent.  All Cheney had to do was figure out a quasi-legal way to get the information to the media.<br />
<br />
And there you are, another whistleblower dealt with.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/00483923515/nsas-lockbox-has-no-lock.shtml#c739</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ninja]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 04:04:42 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/00483923515/nsas-lockbox-has-no-lock.shtml#c739</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[So you are telling me that they'll behave and never look at data without a warrant despite it being readily available. Right.<br />
<br />
Then they say 9/11 could have been avoided if they had all that data. How do both statements fit together? The only possible way they could look at the data if available would be to have a court warrant which means they'd need to argue that there's a probable cause and this could only be done by normal police work which would have raised some data first.<br />
<br />
Providing a warrant is given, the telcos store metadata as what was collected for a good while thus making such preemptive surveillance completely unnecessary. Their own arguments kill each other.<br />
<br />
No really, just a peek.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130612/16480623431/us-chamber-commerce-bollywood-is-so-successful-without-strong-copyrights-that-it-will-fail-unless-india-strengthens-its.shtml#c744</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Niall]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 04:04:13 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130612/16480623431/us-chamber-commerce-bollywood-is-so-successful-without-strong-copyrights-that-it-will-fail-unless-india-strengthens-its.shtml#c744</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Yes, but when you compare the average income in India with the US, plus what percentage of the population have access to movies, I suspect that Bollywood can only do better in its current format.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130612/16480623431/us-chamber-commerce-bollywood-is-so-successful-without-strong-copyrights-that-it-will-fail-unless-india-strengthens-its.shtml#c724</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Niall]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 04:03:03 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130612/16480623431/us-chamber-commerce-bollywood-is-so-successful-without-strong-copyrights-that-it-will-fail-unless-india-strengthens-its.shtml#c724</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The same could be said of a lot of US output.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/01573323504/senator-lindsey-graham-defends-nsa-surveillance-arguing-about-something-entirely-different.shtml#c779</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Niall]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 04:01:49 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/01573323504/senator-lindsey-graham-defends-nsa-surveillance-arguing-about-something-entirely-different.shtml#c779</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Judging by the amount of times you inanely spam each and every thread irrelevantly, not in the slightest. Obviously youe man-crush isn't returned, and you are beneath notice.<br />
<br />
The only downside to your obsession is that I may stop bothering to show pinked-out comments and miss some of OotB's slightly more lucid rants.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/01573323504/senator-lindsey-graham-defends-nsa-surveillance-arguing-about-something-entirely-different.shtml#c778</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[techflaws]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 04:00:33 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/01573323504/senator-lindsey-graham-defends-nsa-surveillance-arguing-about-something-entirely-different.shtml#c778</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Enjoy your tiny echo chamber, LOL!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/01573323504/senator-lindsey-graham-defends-nsa-surveillance-arguing-about-something-entirely-different.shtml#c759</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Niall]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 03:59:47 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/01573323504/senator-lindsey-graham-defends-nsa-surveillance-arguing-about-something-entirely-different.shtml#c759</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Ooo, Paulbot spam as well as AJ-froth.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/01573323504/senator-lindsey-graham-defends-nsa-surveillance-arguing-about-something-entirely-different.shtml#c737</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Niall]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 03:58:04 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/01573323504/senator-lindsey-graham-defends-nsa-surveillance-arguing-about-something-entirely-different.shtml#c737</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Oh, I think it's moved beyond crush and well into stalking.<br />
<br />
Aren't there some kind of cyberbullying laws that can be thrown at this clown? Because this very much sounds like self-admitted bullying to me!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>I hope he is wrong</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/06292823517/nypd-boss-angry-over-secret-nsa-surveillancebut-only-because-it-was-secret.shtml#c297</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Doe]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 03:57:14 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/06292823517/nypd-boss-angry-over-secret-nsa-surveillancebut-only-because-it-was-secret.shtml#c297</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<em>I think the American public can accept the fact if you tell them that every time you pick up the phone, it</em>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/01573323504/senator-lindsey-graham-defends-nsa-surveillance-arguing-about-something-entirely-different.shtml#c716</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Niall]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 03:56:18 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/01573323504/senator-lindsey-graham-defends-nsa-surveillance-arguing-about-something-entirely-different.shtml#c716</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Because maybe it's idiotic spam. "Because he's scared of you" is a wild guess which is about as accurate as claims of WMDs in Iraq.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Of course...</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130608/03355523371/warning-letters-under-uks-three-strikes-plan-unlikely-to-be-sent-out-before-2016-if-ever.shtml#c143</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Androgynous Cowherd]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 03:56:11 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130608/03355523371/warning-letters-under-uks-three-strikes-plan-unlikely-to-be-sent-out-before-2016-if-ever.shtml#c143</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><i>What makes that particularly ridiculous, is that the pioneer of the three-strikes approach, France, is clearly backing away from it. For the UK to plough on with an outdated and discredited scheme regardless, is just farcical.</i></blockquote><br />
<br />
Of <i>course</i> it's farcical -- that's the UK's specialty! :)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130618/11332223519/states-attorneys-general-want-to-special-exception-to-blame-sites-actions-users.shtml#c942</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[JMT]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 03:54:53 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130618/11332223519/states-attorneys-general-want-to-special-exception-to-blame-sites-actions-users.shtml#c942</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Sorry, who got censored where in this story?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/11212323508/how-knowing-government-is-spying-you-changes-how-you-act.shtml#c3117</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Niall]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 03:52:36 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/11212323508/how-knowing-government-is-spying-you-changes-how-you-act.shtml#c3117</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[That's ok, I'm sure they don't want to return to any 'normal' that compares to right-wingers. After all, who wants to be compared to the bloke who 'goes Hulk' and *gains* IQ? ;)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Mike and Tolles against AG investigating Google for antitrust.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130618/11332223519/states-attorneys-general-want-to-special-exception-to-blame-sites-actions-users.shtml#c930</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[JMT]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 03:52:18 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130618/11332223519/states-attorneys-general-want-to-special-exception-to-blame-sites-actions-users.shtml#c930</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>"Anyhoo, when more than one AG comes after you, it's just possible that you're engaged in fairly obvious fiddling."</i><br />
<br />
Nice appeal to authority there. Obviously there's no reason to believe that if one AG seeks to improve their chances of career advancement by grandstanding on a stupid issue like this, that others would jump on the bandwagon for the same ulterior motives. No, AG's clearly have moral superiority when in numbers...]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/11133123507/steve-wozniak-speaks-out-against-nsa-spying-this-is-not-my-america.shtml#c613</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Howard]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 03:46:42 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130617/11133123507/steve-wozniak-speaks-out-against-nsa-spying-this-is-not-my-america.shtml#c613</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[There is always one who give in to the temptation :]<br />
<br />
But the trend in the latest week is promising. Sooner or later we starve them.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/14341223521/google-without-admitting-it-gets-fisa-orders-files-lawsuit-to-challenge-fisa-gag-orders.shtml#c456</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 03:45:33 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130618/14341223521/google-without-admitting-it-gets-fisa-orders-files-lawsuit-to-challenge-fisa-gag-orders.shtml#c456</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[perhaps another tack would be to try to get the whole idea of the FISA court kicked out? from what i understand, it basically makes secret decisions that are unable to be disclosed, so stop that!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>