<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Latest Techdirt Comments</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/19190923142/if-youre-going-to-illegally-seize-citizens-cell-phones-least-make-sure-youre-grabbing-right-ones.shtml#c1166</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 15:01:35 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/19190923142/if-youre-going-to-illegally-seize-citizens-cell-phones-least-make-sure-youre-grabbing-right-ones.shtml#c1166</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[If we make it a rule that guilty cops who confiscate and destroy evidence against them can get away with it we are all worse off. Allowing these police officers not to be convicted of murder makes this rule a reality. That's unacceptable.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: It's like Tethering all over again</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20130521/20101423164/att-says-you-can-use-any-video-streaming-app-you-want-just-as-soon-as-it-can-get-meter-running.shtml#c206</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[DannyB]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 14:59:19 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20130521/20101423164/att-says-you-can-use-any-video-streaming-app-you-want-just-as-soon-as-it-can-get-meter-running.shtml#c206</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[You miss the point complete.<br />
<br />
Going over your data plan limit is entirely unrelated to whether you can use your data for your phone or your laptop.  You can do one without the other.<br />
<br />
I used it a lot on my laptop and never went over my cap.  Never came close.<br />
<br />
Aren't the carriers supposed to warn you when you are getting close to your limit anyway?  Didn't the FCC require this?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/16402423161/first-hand-account-judicial-smackdown-prenda-minnesota.shtml#c1222</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 14:58:28 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/16402423161/first-hand-account-judicial-smackdown-prenda-minnesota.shtml#c1222</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["In parting, she addressed Paul Hansmeier, once again saying, "I believe you to be in violation of a whole lot of rules." She then repeated her earlier statement that she was forwarding the case folder to the Lawyers Board.<br />
<br />
And that was the end. Judge Alton then called a recess before the next case."<br />
<br />
I beg to differ, if she refers this to the Lawyer's Board it is only the beginning.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: It's like Tethering all over again</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20130521/20101423164/att-says-you-can-use-any-video-streaming-app-you-want-just-as-soon-as-it-can-get-meter-running.shtml#c200</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[DannyB]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 14:56:56 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20130521/20101423164/att-says-you-can-use-any-video-streaming-app-you-want-just-as-soon-as-it-can-get-meter-running.shtml#c200</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[That's what I did.<br />
<br />
I used my own means to tether like there was no tomorrow and never heard diddly squat from AT&amp;T.  I didn't exceed my plan limit on data.  In fact, I never usually even come close -- including when tethering.<br />
<br />
Unfortunately, most people cannot just "use their own means" to implement tethering to a custom app.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/19190923142/if-youre-going-to-illegally-seize-citizens-cell-phones-least-make-sure-youre-grabbing-right-ones.shtml#c1157</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 14:56:26 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/19190923142/if-youre-going-to-illegally-seize-citizens-cell-phones-least-make-sure-youre-grabbing-right-ones.shtml#c1157</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[You do not, under any circumstances, murder someone and then take the footage to hide your guilt. That's what the cops did here. Those recording the footage had no reason to lie. The cops forcefully took the footage because they knew darn well they were guilty. They should be responsible for having strong evidence (footage) proving their innocence and they failed to provide any. They took what they thought was the only incriminating footage against them (though they failed, apparently) and destroyed it. It would violate rule utility principles to just let them get away with this. As a rule we as a society need to make it known that, under these circumstances, cops have a huge burden to prove their innocence, a burden they have failed to meet. Otherwise future cops will have no problems doing the same thing. I want convictions. What the cops did here is wrong. They should be presumed guilty.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Their loss</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20130521/20101423164/att-says-you-can-use-any-video-streaming-app-you-want-just-as-soon-as-it-can-get-meter-running.shtml#c185</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[PRMan]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 14:54:21 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20130521/20101423164/att-says-you-can-use-any-video-streaming-app-you-want-just-as-soon-as-it-can-get-meter-running.shtml#c185</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Sprint has unlimited everything and doesn't play these sorts of games...]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/19190923142/if-youre-going-to-illegally-seize-citizens-cell-phones-least-make-sure-youre-grabbing-right-ones.shtml#c1137</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 14:52:30 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/19190923142/if-youre-going-to-illegally-seize-citizens-cell-phones-least-make-sure-youre-grabbing-right-ones.shtml#c1137</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[(of wrongfully confiscating potentially incriminating evidence against the cops *)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/18265123163/reporters-find-exposed-personal-data-via-google-threatened-with-cfaa-charges.shtml#c603</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[alanbleiweiss]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 14:52:23 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/18265123163/reporters-find-exposed-personal-data-via-google-threatened-with-cfaa-charges.shtml#c603</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[A citation for it? yeah half the search marketing industry. As an SEO audit professional I routinely encounter it.  They list URLs, but beneath them, where a description of the file would go is a statement <br />
<br />
<blockquote>A description for this result is not available because of this site's robots.txt</blockquote>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/19190923142/if-youre-going-to-illegally-seize-citizens-cell-phones-least-make-sure-youre-grabbing-right-ones.shtml#c1117</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 14:50:30 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/19190923142/if-youre-going-to-illegally-seize-citizens-cell-phones-least-make-sure-youre-grabbing-right-ones.shtml#c1117</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[You're not  making any sense. Why would Tello need an attorney for doing nothing wrong? You still have done nothing to absolve the police of guilt and, if anything, your post supports their guilt.<br />
<br />
What's suspicious here is the fact that the phone was being quarantined until the cops had a chance to get a hold of it and erase evidence potentially incriminating them before any potential information leaked. That's unacceptable. Given the current circumstances it would unjustly violate rule utility principles not to convict these police officers with murder. If we as a society do not convict police officers with murder under these circumstances then we have made it advantageous to guilty police officers under these circumstances to get a hold of evidence and either destroy it or put it through some investigative circus (ie: the FBI forensic analysis circus) than for them to allow the person shooting the footage to publicly release copies. No, we as a society should, as a rule, discourage this sort of unacceptable behavior (of wrongfully confiscating potentially incriminating evidence) and punish these police officers presuming their guilt. Anything less is an outrageous injustice. I want murder convictions. I want future cops to know that, under these circumstances, you better not take any evidence potentially incriminating you unless you first have very good evidence supporting your innocence (video footage). Some forensic analysis circus doesn't count. This is an outrage. I want convictions here.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Return to active duty</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/17321623162/released-video-silva-beating-shows-his-last-moments-video-actual-beating-still-missing.shtml#c226</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Trails]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 14:44:31 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/17321623162/released-video-silva-beating-shows-his-last-moments-video-actual-beating-still-missing.shtml#c226</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The May 20th <a href="http://www.turnto23.com/news/local-news/cellphone-video-of-alleged-beating-death-of-david-silva-to-be-released" rel="nofollow">linked article</a> has the same line you mentioned above:<br />
<br />
<blockquote>It is common to place law enforcement officers on paid leave during investigations of arrest-related deaths, but the Californian reported the deputies involved remain on duty.<br />
<br />
"We're following the same protocol, as far as the administrative process is concerned, that we'd follow in similar-type incidents," sheriff's spokesman Ray Pruitt said.</blockquote>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/03160923172/chinese-hacks-google-database-surveillance-targets-highlight-how-dumb-technology-backdoors-are.shtml#c38</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[lordbinky]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 14:43:28 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/03160923172/chinese-hacks-google-database-surveillance-targets-highlight-how-dumb-technology-backdoors-are.shtml#c38</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Obviously the hackers would have never thought of this until people brought it up. Thanks alot guys....]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Use Your Own Content</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/01382223168/new-york-times-tells-startup-it-cant-even-mention-ny-times.shtml#c578</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[anonymouse]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 14:43:22 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/01382223168/new-york-times-tells-startup-it-cant-even-mention-ny-times.shtml#c578</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[How can you steal something from someone when it is readily available to all at no cost. with no advertising either.<br />
<br />
and your confusion shows the problem with everyone, not even the lawyers knowing what is covered by fair use and what is not.<br />
<br />
The reason i believe this is fair use is the fact that they claim it took 6 months to create , while scroll is releasing software that does the same in an hour, how are you going to be able to compare when you cannot use the original.<br />
<br />
And this is not about generating money from the content, the content is used as an example, which is allowed in fair use laws i believe or hope as nobody seems to know at the moment.<br />
<br />
Also the artwork you mention previously was stolen to generate money from advertising, this is not the case here.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Their loss</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20130521/20101423164/att-says-you-can-use-any-video-streaming-app-you-want-just-as-soon-as-it-can-get-meter-running.shtml#c166</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 14:41:13 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20130521/20101423164/att-says-you-can-use-any-video-streaming-app-you-want-just-as-soon-as-it-can-get-meter-running.shtml#c166</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I nearly purchased a Galaxy S4 through AT&amp;T, but after hearing this news I decided firmly against it and will go with a different provider.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/18265123163/reporters-find-exposed-personal-data-via-google-threatened-with-cfaa-charges.shtml#c598</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 14:40:57 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/18265123163/reporters-find-exposed-personal-data-via-google-threatened-with-cfaa-charges.shtml#c598</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[wget respects the robots.txt file when scraping a website. Therefore no evidence that Google is ignoring it either. Much more likely a total admin failure on the TerraCom site that left the data as public in a public directory.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/17321623162/released-video-silva-beating-shows-his-last-moments-video-actual-beating-still-missing.shtml#c221</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arkiel]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 14:36:47 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/17321623162/released-video-silva-beating-shows-his-last-moments-video-actual-beating-still-missing.shtml#c221</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[We really need a judge that'll permit an adverse inference jury instruction when this kind of thing crops up.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/01382223168/new-york-times-tells-startup-it-cant-even-mention-ny-times.shtml#c559</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[anonymouse]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 14:36:40 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/01382223168/new-york-times-tells-startup-it-cant-even-mention-ny-times.shtml#c559</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[How are we all supposed to know what is fair use or not when even the top lawyers who work with this as a profession day in and day out do not know when it is fair use or not.<br />
<br />
Seriously congress needs to come up with an easy way to determine when something is fair use and when not to specifically help those who wish to create and more importantly those whose job it is to know.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: As I've said, police aren't even thugs now, just attack dogs.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/17321623162/released-video-silva-beating-shows-his-last-moments-video-actual-beating-still-missing.shtml#c202</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ltlw0lf]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 14:34:22 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/17321623162/released-video-silva-beating-shows-his-last-moments-video-actual-beating-still-missing.shtml#c202</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>it's as though eye-witness testimony is being edged out entirely.</i><br />
<br />
Eye-witness testimony is notoriously sketchy.  The camera, when it captures the whole truth and isn't tampered with, is a lot better than human memories, which can forget, rationalize, etc, and people have been convicted of a crime based on witness testimony when other technologies (i.e. DNA, video tape, etc.) have ultimately overturned those convictions.  The problem is that cameras are still really crappy and don't capture everything, and they tend to be directional and may not capture stuff happening on the periphery.<br />
<br />
However, it is not being edged out entirely.  In most cases, video-tape and other technology enhances what the eye-witnesses saw, giving juries a better idea about what really happened.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101209/09504712210/dailydirt-taking-another-look-nuclear-energy.shtml#c291</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Ho]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 14:33:06 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20101209/09504712210/dailydirt-taking-another-look-nuclear-energy.shtml#c291</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Your profile icon is fitting for this discussion, ChrisB.<br />
<br />
<a href='http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/2012/liquid-batteries-0214.html' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/2012/liquid-batteries-0214.html</a><br />
<br />
High temperature liquid metal batteries might be useful for grid-scale electricity. Someday?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: As I've said, police aren't even thugs now, just attack dogs.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/17321623162/released-video-silva-beating-shows-his-last-moments-video-actual-beating-still-missing.shtml#c194</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gwiz]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 14:30:30 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/17321623162/released-video-silva-beating-shows-his-last-moments-video-actual-beating-still-missing.shtml#c194</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>Oh, and take this egregious tenuously related dig: I bet EVERY ONE of those savages played violent video games until they could do it in real life. How could violent games possibly lead to any other behavior than savagery?</i><br />
<br />
<br />
Once again Blue ignores any evidence contrary to his predetermined beliefs.<br />
<br />
<a href='http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121219/09593821438/yet-more-evidence-shows-no-link-between-video-games-actual-violence.shtml' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121219/09593821438/yet-more-evidence-shows-no-link-between-video-games-actual-violence.shtml</a><br />
<br />
<a href='http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130228/09391122151/video-games-do-not-cause-violence-according-to-former-fbi-profiler.shtml' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130228/09391122151/video-games-do-not-cause-violence-according-to-former-fbi-profiler.shtml</a><br />
<br />
<a href='http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100609/1109309754.shtml' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100609/1109309754.shtml</a><br />
<br />
<a href='http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090318/0212264165.shtml' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090318/0212264165.shtml</a><br />
<br />
There is plenty more where that came from.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130508/10233423003/bug-allows-same-sex-marriage-nintendo-game-nintendo-releases-patch-to-fix-it.shtml#c3856</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 14:29:13 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130508/10233423003/bug-allows-same-sex-marriage-nintendo-game-nintendo-releases-patch-to-fix-it.shtml#c3856</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["...being run by the government...". That's the problem right there.<br />
And if you want to talk about the constitution, where it mentions religion it is restriction on the powers of congress. Anyone with any sort of reading comprehension can see that. Now, what US constitution are YOU reading?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>