<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Latest Techdirt Comments</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title>Re: Until...</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20130521/20101423164/att-says-you-can-use-any-video-streaming-app-you-want-just-as-soon-as-it-can-get-meter-running.shtml#c126</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 13:23:31 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20130521/20101423164/att-says-you-can-use-any-video-streaming-app-you-want-just-as-soon-as-it-can-get-meter-running.shtml#c126</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Exactly, well put sir!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/06034223155/quack-professor-releases-dumbest-violent-video-game-theory-ever.shtml#c541</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wally]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 13:20:42 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/06034223155/quack-professor-releases-dumbest-violent-video-game-theory-ever.shtml#c541</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[In my professional opinions (yes I'm now A+ Cert working on Network+ Cert) he is definitely a loon in spite of the fact that he is right in saying that liquid particle flow in the simulation of blood typically does run video cards ragged...especially with flying gibs...so at least he's right about the video card's/cards' rising temperatures...<br />
<br />
The violence stems from the detachment from reality and not knowing between what is real and what is not real.  Watching violence doesn't affectively make one violent, but it does make us slightly less prone to sympathizing with victims of violence and abuse if we are exposed to it at an early age.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Copyright to promote the useful arts and science</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/01382223168/new-york-times-tells-startup-it-cant-even-mention-ny-times.shtml#c502</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[jupiterkansas]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 13:20:40 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/01382223168/new-york-times-tells-startup-it-cant-even-mention-ny-times.shtml#c502</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[* so when and artist dies, and their children dies, and maybe even their grandchildren die, so that nobody cares any longer about the artist's precious work but it is still under copyright, it will be given to a lawyer to manage, or else remain legally inaccessible to anybody in any way.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: wget</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/18265123163/reporters-find-exposed-personal-data-via-google-threatened-with-cfaa-charges.shtml#c457</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 13:20:29 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/18265123163/reporters-find-exposed-personal-data-via-google-threatened-with-cfaa-charges.shtml#c457</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[See! Right here!  Proof that they were hacking!  Aaron Swartz used it!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: wget</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/18265123163/reporters-find-exposed-personal-data-via-google-threatened-with-cfaa-charges.shtml#c441</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 13:20:28 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/18265123163/reporters-find-exposed-personal-data-via-google-threatened-with-cfaa-charges.shtml#c441</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[See! Right here!  Proof that they were hacking!  Aaron Swartz used it!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>What does it sound like?</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/18102623141/so-its-come-to-this-seven-high-school-students-arrested-throwing-water-balloons.shtml#c1495</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[DougV]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 13:20:26 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/18102623141/so-its-come-to-this-seven-high-school-students-arrested-throwing-water-balloons.shtml#c1495</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[What does it sound like when a water balloon and a block-headed school system collide?<br />
<br />
<b><i>DOUCHE!!!!</i></b>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>BOFH</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/01382223168/new-york-times-tells-startup-it-cant-even-mention-ny-times.shtml#c477</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 13:16:57 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/01382223168/new-york-times-tells-startup-it-cant-even-mention-ny-times.shtml#c477</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Dear New York Times,<br />
<br />
It's charming that you think you're still relevant, but if you don't stop pestering me, I will replace you with a small shell script.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Use Your Own Content</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/01382223168/new-york-times-tells-startup-it-cant-even-mention-ny-times.shtml#c471</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[DanZee]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 13:16:44 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/01382223168/new-york-times-tells-startup-it-cant-even-mention-ny-times.shtml#c471</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Well, Tech Dirt has written many times about companies using copyrighted artwork in their ads.  Last week, there was a story about a copyright organization using a copyrighted piece of art they didn't ask permission to use.  But now Tech Dirt says it's all right to steal something off the Times' Website and use it to sell a product? Eh, it seems a bit hypocritical.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: REALLY?</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130502/18364622931/ma-teen-arrested-held-without-bail-posting-supposed-terrorist-threat-facebook.shtml#c1243</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Future Gen]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 13:14:19 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130502/18364622931/ma-teen-arrested-held-without-bail-posting-supposed-terrorist-threat-facebook.shtml#c1243</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[You said it!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: It's like Tethering all over again</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20130521/20101423164/att-says-you-can-use-any-video-streaming-app-you-want-just-as-soon-as-it-can-get-meter-running.shtml#c121</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[anonymouse]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 13:12:35 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20130521/20101423164/att-says-you-can-use-any-video-streaming-app-you-want-just-as-soon-as-it-can-get-meter-running.shtml#c121</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Hopefully this will be brought up in the next discussion about network neutrality.<br />
Other than that this just encourages more and more people to demand services like Google  fiber 1gb system, which hopefully will grow faster and faster around the country and give places like AT&amp;T a real problem. Damn imagine if they had to sell off their internet department because they could not attract customers.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/18102623141/so-its-come-to-this-seven-high-school-students-arrested-throwing-water-balloons.shtml#c1485</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alt0]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 13:11:47 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/18102623141/so-its-come-to-this-seven-high-school-students-arrested-throwing-water-balloons.shtml#c1485</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Really? Are you frikin' kidding me? <br />
Its people like you and your attitude that have stripped modern children of their childhood.<br />
<br />
Every action has its consequence....AHHHHHHH!<br />
(Imagine a "Lewis Black" frustrated scream)<br />
<br />
They were water balloons. WATER BALLOONS<br />
How much "calculating" would it take to err... let me see, fill up a frikin' balloon with water and chuck it at someone? Like maybe none?<br />
<br />
And, to call this an ASSAULT? For god's sake get a grip. I certainly hope you do not (or ever have) children, because to be raised by you would completely suck.<br />
<br />
10 bucks says this is either a cop or married to one.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130502/18364622931/ma-teen-arrested-held-without-bail-posting-supposed-terrorist-threat-facebook.shtml#c1240</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ashlyn]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 13:11:02 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130502/18364622931/ma-teen-arrested-held-without-bail-posting-supposed-terrorist-threat-facebook.shtml#c1240</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Actually a lot of the translations of the OBL tapes were found to be incorrect.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Until...</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20130521/20101423164/att-says-you-can-use-any-video-streaming-app-you-want-just-as-soon-as-it-can-get-meter-running.shtml#c96</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick Smith]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 13:05:10 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20130521/20101423164/att-says-you-can-use-any-video-streaming-app-you-want-just-as-soon-as-it-can-get-meter-running.shtml#c96</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[we forcibly separate the telecom business from the content delivery business this will contain to happen.  <br />
<br />
We should just designate a few companies as telecom providers and they can not do anything other than hook you up to the network.  Their entire existence will be the building, expanding, and maintaining the various telecommunication networks (this includes but is not limited to voice, video, and data).  Allow them to sell access using any plan they want as long as at least 2 of them servicing an area.  If an area only has 1 provider then it run as a local utility and it must have all changes approved.<br />
<br />
Entertainment Studios, Cable/Satellite companies, music labels, etc, can have absolutely no relationships (other than buying access as everyone else will have to) with the telecom providers.<br />
<br />
No net neutrality issues.  No bundling craziness.  In most places where there exists a large number of people you should get genuine competition.   For smaller/rural areas you should at least have the options that currently exist and the community will have some input into what is offered.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/18265123163/reporters-find-exposed-personal-data-via-google-threatened-with-cfaa-charges.shtml#c435</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wally]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 13:04:43 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/18265123163/reporters-find-exposed-personal-data-via-google-threatened-with-cfaa-charges.shtml#c435</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I cannot wait to see how long it will take before Google Fanboys to defend Google's lax in security over this.<br />
<br />
<br />
Google apparently no longer uses its spider crawler to help show people the most relevancy possible when they search...Instead they do relevancy in the way most web advertisers do by what and how many things an individual clicks on and move those items up on said individual's search results based on how many times you click a link.  They identify you via IP address and hold your search data for up to 9 months.  Within the 9 months if you search on Google, they don't delete previous searches at all when the 9 month mark rolls around.<br />
<br />
If Google's CEO has the power to internally check any user's e-mails without a password...imagine what these reporters who pointed out the security flaw could have done.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Don't go out of your way to write a scraper program!</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/18265123163/reporters-find-exposed-personal-data-via-google-threatened-with-cfaa-charges.shtml#c417</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 13:03:12 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/18265123163/reporters-find-exposed-personal-data-via-google-threatened-with-cfaa-charges.shtml#c417</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Right. Just leave it there. <br />
<br />
Makes perfect sense to let someone in an eastern bloc country find it and "report" it instead via some IRC room.<br />
<br />
("Report" in the above sentence means "Sell for profit")<br />
<br />
You fucking dumbass.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/18265123163/reporters-find-exposed-personal-data-via-google-threatened-with-cfaa-charges.shtml#c393</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 13:03:06 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/18265123163/reporters-find-exposed-personal-data-via-google-threatened-with-cfaa-charges.shtml#c393</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[you can most definitely thank the government for this sorry state of affairs. had it stuck to what it said about protecting whistle blowers, then turning turtle and crapping all over them just to protect their own ridiculously stupid mistakes, every freakin' industry has jumped on the band wagon! this was one of things that started the ever increasing slide down the shit chute for the USA. no one is safe from their own law enforcement. is it any wonder why people rebel against them when they get all protection for doing the right thing thrown straight out the window? any wonder why they are getting to not care a toss what happens when companies get caught out over things like this? no good deed goes unpunished is a 'truer words spoken in jest' kind of thing]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Don't go out of your way to write a scraper program!</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/18265123163/reporters-find-exposed-personal-data-via-google-threatened-with-cfaa-charges.shtml#c369</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 13:00:50 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/18265123163/reporters-find-exposed-personal-data-via-google-threatened-with-cfaa-charges.shtml#c369</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[so a program that does the same thing as a browser without the html rendering = evul hacker program that you should not write?<br />
<br />
better idea: use some fucking common sense and realize wget is not inherently bad]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20130521/20101423164/att-says-you-can-use-any-video-streaming-app-you-want-just-as-soon-as-it-can-get-meter-running.shtml#c92</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nick]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 13:00:44 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20130521/20101423164/att-says-you-can-use-any-video-streaming-app-you-want-just-as-soon-as-it-can-get-meter-running.shtml#c92</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Why...  Doesn't google and apple just release a non pre-loaded app that is identical to the main app to get around the "pre-loaded app traffic must be paid for" rule?<br />
<br />
Which, by the way, seems the complete opposite of what you'd think:  Pre-loaded apps on a phone indicate that the cellular provider was ok with the app being on the phone in the first place (since the provider has some control over the OS that is installed, such as their logo plastered all over the boot screen).  If an app WASN'T pre-approved, such as added on after the purchase, then you'd expect the cellular provider could MAYBE have a little bit of a gripe if their customers start using that app for a lot of traffic.<br />
<br />
Which is all bogus, of course, as all of this is just absurd.  Traffic whether from a video app, VOIP app, or other, is all the same bandwidth.  I wish they'd just come out and state that what they hate is not that people use their bandwidth limits, but that people ACTUALLY use the speed they were given.  It frustrates me that, similar to ISPs, they actually feel threatened when their customers use the speeds they pay for, and feel they have to punish them as a result.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c1887</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[average_joe]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 13:00:32 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c1887</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>No, I'm asking *you* why *you* believe a phone service provider should have a legal cause of action against me merely for making full use of my own property.</i><br />
<br />
Are you referring to unlocking or jailbreaking?<br />
<br />
<i>If doing so violates my contract with them, then they have remedies under contract law. They don't need the DMCA.</i><br />
<br />
Going after each customer in breach of contract is far more difficult than shutting down the parties that supply the tools that make it all too simple for their customers to breach.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c1876</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[average_joe]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 12:58:56 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c1876</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>AJ, your "merits" have been torn to shreds already.</i><br />
<br />
Hardly. I'm asking Mike to admit that this would weaken some of the rights that copyright holders have as far as anticircumvention is concerned. He can't even admit that much. Just like he can't admit that there is an allegation of specific criminal infringement against the Dotcom Crew or that Swartz may have violated the CFAA. For some reason (ahem... fundamental, cellular-level dishonesty) he can't ever concede simple points that cut against his rhetoric.<br />
<br />
As far as the 106 rights go, all I've heard are conclusory statements that DRM does absolutely nothing to prevent piracy. If Mike is basing his assessment that this proposal doesn't weaken 106 rights because DRM is ineffective, he should admit that. But he won't discuss it because he knows he can't prove that DRM has no effect. It's just part of the TD mantra that disincentives are completely ineffective when it's copyright. It's total bullshit, as per usual, and Mike has run away rather than discuss anything on the merits. What a fake.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>