<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Latest Techdirt Comments</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c1377</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[JMT]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 17:32:44 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c1377</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>"It protects DRM which protects copyright."</i><br />
<br />
"Protecting copyright" may be the <i>stated</i> purpose of DRM, but it is not the intended purpose (that would be <i>control</i>, not protection) nor is is the real-world result. As a protection measure it's proven to be completely ineffective.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/19190923142/if-youre-going-to-illegally-seize-citizens-cell-phones-least-make-sure-youre-grabbing-right-ones.shtml#c972</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 17:30:48 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/19190923142/if-youre-going-to-illegally-seize-citizens-cell-phones-least-make-sure-youre-grabbing-right-ones.shtml#c972</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><i>should be enough to warrant punishment</i></blockquote><br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qualified_immunity" rel="nofollow">Qualified immunity</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/19190923142/if-youre-going-to-illegally-seize-citizens-cell-phones-least-make-sure-youre-grabbing-right-ones.shtml#c950</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[AB]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 17:30:18 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/19190923142/if-youre-going-to-illegally-seize-citizens-cell-phones-least-make-sure-youre-grabbing-right-ones.shtml#c950</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>"what do the same cops do when things get even more heated? beat someone to death?"</i><br />
<br />
Yup. Maybe it's something in their training...]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c1376</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[JMT]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 17:26:55 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c1376</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>"And are you admitting that this does weaken copyright holders rights?"</i><br />
<br />
Let's play your silly game. YES, it would (not "does")  weaken copyright holders rights, by taking away legal rights <i>they absolutely should not have.</i> These rights contradict the true purpose of copyright (encouraging creativity) so removing them does not weaken copyright one bit.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Out of Sight, Out of Mind</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110311/01552013459/dailydirt-weapons-sky.shtml#c17</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 17:26:10 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110311/01552013459/dailydirt-weapons-sky.shtml#c17</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Interactive Pakistan Murders Using Drones: <a href='http://drones.pitchinteractive.com/' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://drones.pitchinteractive.com/</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Examples</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130521/12175523157/nyc-says-renting-out-your-place-via-airbnb-is-running-illegal-hotel.shtml#c275</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[zerostar83]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 17:25:57 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130521/12175523157/nyc-says-renting-out-your-place-via-airbnb-is-running-illegal-hotel.shtml#c275</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[This article reminds me of a law when I lived in California limiting the number of yard sales one can have at their home per year. I'm sure it wouldn't be too hard to find someone abusing this website to make money under the table and avoid situations such as cleanliness. Bed bugs anyone?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/19190923142/if-youre-going-to-illegally-seize-citizens-cell-phones-least-make-sure-youre-grabbing-right-ones.shtml#c929</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[AB]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 17:25:43 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/19190923142/if-youre-going-to-illegally-seize-citizens-cell-phones-least-make-sure-youre-grabbing-right-ones.shtml#c929</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Seconded!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>France..</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110311/01552013459/dailydirt-weapons-sky.shtml#c3</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 17:18:08 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110311/01552013459/dailydirt-weapons-sky.shtml#c3</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The French are going to buy drones from the US or Israel to "modernize" their airborne capabilities.... <br />
<br />
There must be other countries making drones now....]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c1367</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[silverscarcat]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 17:17:28 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c1367</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[So says the dumbass troll, huh?<br />
<br />
I'm just calling it like I see it, AJ.<br />
<br />
No matter how many times we've told you that this isn't about weakening copyright, but rather about letting owners have control of their items, you just put your fingers in your ears and go "NO!  IT'S WEAKENING COPYRIGHT!  DEBATE ME, MIKE!  WHY YOU RUN AWAY LIKE A COWARD?!"<br />
<br />
So, really, AJ, you're the dumbass troll.<br />
<br />
All of your points have been countered and you just keep replying with the same lies.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130521/12175523157/nyc-says-renting-out-your-place-via-airbnb-is-running-illegal-hotel.shtml#c266</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mason Wheeler]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 17:16:42 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130521/12175523157/nyc-says-renting-out-your-place-via-airbnb-is-running-illegal-hotel.shtml#c266</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I was talking about credibility, not the validity of a business model.  Simply because something's a "philosophical viewpoint" does not necessarily mean it's just as good as any other philosophical viewpoint, and in the case of this particular philosophy it's about as close to pure evil as you can get.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: &gt;&gt;$1k/day</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/15164823159/bad-day-prenda-continues-judge-rejects-stay-adds-1k-per-day-each-day-they-dont-pay-up.shtml#c151</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[apauld]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 17:14:14 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/15164823159/bad-day-prenda-continues-judge-rejects-stay-adds-1k-per-day-each-day-they-dont-pay-up.shtml#c151</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[except he also seems to be releasing Gibbs from all this nonsense, so I have to wonder what is Gibbs responsibility now?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/19190923142/if-youre-going-to-illegally-seize-citizens-cell-phones-least-make-sure-youre-grabbing-right-ones.shtml#c925</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 17:13:48 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/19190923142/if-youre-going-to-illegally-seize-citizens-cell-phones-least-make-sure-youre-grabbing-right-ones.shtml#c925</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[In most of those cases the witnesses were acting self interested and were a party to their own fraud. In this case the witnesses are more neutral parties regardless of their backgrounds, unless they are connected to the person who allegedly got beaten (or the police). Four witnesses, that's quite a bit.<br />
<br />
"if forensic analysis of the cellphone can establish"<br />
<br />
So I am<br />
<br />
A: At the mercy of forensic analysis, which is a hit and miss thing.<br />
<br />
B: At the mercy of those doing the analysis, the FBI, the police, etc... to be honest about their findings, assuming they are even honest about investigating anything. They all represent the same party, the government, and are all are a potential conflict of interest.<br />
<br />
Or, the cell phone could have been kept with the person who allegedly shot the footage and, if there was footage, it could have been made public. The police prevented that. I am now at their mercy. This was true the moment the cell phone left the possession of the person who allegedly shot the footage. That by itself should be enough to warrant punishment, enough punishment to deter future confiscations like this even in cases where guilt occurred.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>how do i law?</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/15164823159/bad-day-prenda-continues-judge-rejects-stay-adds-1k-per-day-each-day-they-dont-pay-up.shtml#c147</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ken]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 17:11:14 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/15164823159/bad-day-prenda-continues-judge-rejects-stay-adds-1k-per-day-each-day-they-dont-pay-up.shtml#c147</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Paul Hansmeier filed a joinder in Prenda's motion after Judge Wright had already denied it.  They really are the A team.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/12190223151/prendas-paul-hansmeier-asks-appeals-court-to-delay-sanctions-appeals-court-says-no-try-again.shtml#c508</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[apauld]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 17:08:08 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/12190223151/prendas-paul-hansmeier-asks-appeals-court-to-delay-sanctions-appeals-court-says-no-try-again.shtml#c508</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[You keep stating stuff like <b><i>"But the judge in this case went above and beyond, calling in people who were not directly party to the case, calling people in from outside of the district, and essentially putting them on trial without the benefits of time to build a defense."</i></b> but that claim is completely without merit.  As it has been explained to you, numerous times with details, the judge did only what the rules of his court allowed, no more no less.   If you aren't smart enough to read back over this whole saga and see it, then you are probably about to be disbarred.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c1366</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[average_joe]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 17:06:15 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c1366</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The only one behaving like a "dumbass troll" is you.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/14172323158/judge-not-impressed-prenda-alan-cooper-lawsuit.shtml#c406</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[arachne]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 17:06:01 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/14172323158/judge-not-impressed-prenda-alan-cooper-lawsuit.shtml#c406</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[A lawyer can sometimes get out of hot water by voluntarily surrendering his/her license to practice law.  A bit later (usually after getting out of rehab) she/he can petition to be reinstated.  Its usually granted if the lawyer sounds contrite enough.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: sums it up</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130502/18364622931/ma-teen-arrested-held-without-bail-posting-supposed-terrorist-threat-facebook.shtml#c1050</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[yup]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 16:59:52 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130502/18364622931/ma-teen-arrested-held-without-bail-posting-supposed-terrorist-threat-facebook.shtml#c1050</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[is this a reference to a movie or something]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c1347</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shmerl]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 16:58:00 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c1347</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>It protects DRM which protects copyright.</i><br />
<br />
So you agree that DMCA 1201 is not directly related to copyright, it's directly related to DRM. Relation to copyright is indirect. Now you have to convince everyone that such relation will affect any copyrights if DMCA is to be dismantled. You'll have really hard time doing it. Firstly, the presence of DMCA doesn't really reduce the breaking of DRM. If DRM is breakable - it will be broken, DMCA or not. Secondly DRM itself doesn't really affect copyright - as practice shows DRM doesn't prevent infringement, all it does it is annoying legitimate users by crippling the usability.<br />
<br />
So to put it shortly, you have a defective method (DRM) that doesn't protect copyright, but pretends that it does. Because of its deficiency, there is another  defective method (DMCA), which doesn't protect DRM, but pretends that it does. And you are saying that removing this second level defective layer will affect copyright? It's laughable. I'd say - scrape them both (DMCA and DRM) and it won't affect any copyright. Surely scraping the DMCA is a good first step.<br />
<br />
Fair use argument goes only on top of this.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c1324</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[silverscarcat]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 16:56:59 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c1324</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[No, you're just such a dumbass troll that he's done arguing with you because you'll just go, like you're doing now, "LALALALALALALALALALALALA!!!  I CAN'T HEAR YOU!!!  WHY YOU NO DEBATE ME?!  LALALALALALALALALALALALALALA!!!!" with your fingers in your ears.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c1313</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[silverscarcat]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 16:55:01 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c1313</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Oh, and one more thing, buskahosa...<br />
<br />
<i>But there is no RIGHT to fair use, only a privilege.</i><br />
<br />
that's a flat-out lie!<br />
<br />
Copyright is the privilege, not Fair Use.  Fair Use is the right and is how creativity fucking works!<br />
<br />
But you'll just ignore what I say like you ignore everything else that counters your little world, won't you?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>