<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Latest Techdirt Comments</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title>Until...</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20130521/20101423164/att-says-you-can-use-any-video-streaming-app-you-want-just-as-soon-as-it-can-get-meter-running.shtml#c96</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick Smith]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 13:05:10 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20130521/20101423164/att-says-you-can-use-any-video-streaming-app-you-want-just-as-soon-as-it-can-get-meter-running.shtml#c96</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[we forcibly separate the telecom business from the content delivery business this will contain to happen.  <br />
<br />
We should just designate a few companies as telecom providers and they can not do anything other than hook you up to the network.  Their entire existence will be the building, expanding, and maintaining the various telecommunication networks (this includes but is not limited to voice, video, and data).  Allow them to sell access using any plan they want as long as at least 2 of them servicing an area.  If an area only has 1 provider then it run as a local utility and it must have all changes approved.<br />
<br />
Entertainment Studios, Cable/Satellite companies, music labels, etc, can have absolutely no relationships (other than buying access as everyone else will have to) with the telecom providers.<br />
<br />
No net neutrality issues.  No bundling craziness.  In most places where there exists a large number of people you should get genuine competition.   For smaller/rural areas you should at least have the options that currently exist and the community will have some input into what is offered.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/18265123163/reporters-find-exposed-personal-data-via-google-threatened-with-cfaa-charges.shtml#c435</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wally]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 13:04:43 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/18265123163/reporters-find-exposed-personal-data-via-google-threatened-with-cfaa-charges.shtml#c435</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I cannot wait to see how long it will take before Google Fanboys to defend Google's lax in security over this.<br />
<br />
<br />
Google apparently no longer uses its spider crawler to help show people the most relevancy possible when they search...Instead they do relevancy in the way most web advertisers do by what and how many things an individual clicks on and move those items up on said individual's search results based on how many times you click a link.  They identify you via IP address and hold your search data for up to 9 months.  Within the 9 months if you search on Google, they don't delete previous searches at all when the 9 month mark rolls around.<br />
<br />
If Google's CEO has the power to internally check any user's e-mails without a password...imagine what these reporters who pointed out the security flaw could have done.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Don't go out of your way to write a scraper program!</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/18265123163/reporters-find-exposed-personal-data-via-google-threatened-with-cfaa-charges.shtml#c417</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 13:03:12 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/18265123163/reporters-find-exposed-personal-data-via-google-threatened-with-cfaa-charges.shtml#c417</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Right. Just leave it there. <br />
<br />
Makes perfect sense to let someone in an eastern bloc country find it and "report" it instead via some IRC room.<br />
<br />
("Report" in the above sentence means "Sell for profit")<br />
<br />
You fucking dumbass.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/18265123163/reporters-find-exposed-personal-data-via-google-threatened-with-cfaa-charges.shtml#c393</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 13:03:06 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/18265123163/reporters-find-exposed-personal-data-via-google-threatened-with-cfaa-charges.shtml#c393</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[you can most definitely thank the government for this sorry state of affairs. had it stuck to what it said about protecting whistle blowers, then turning turtle and crapping all over them just to protect their own ridiculously stupid mistakes, every freakin' industry has jumped on the band wagon! this was one of things that started the ever increasing slide down the shit chute for the USA. no one is safe from their own law enforcement. is it any wonder why people rebel against them when they get all protection for doing the right thing thrown straight out the window? any wonder why they are getting to not care a toss what happens when companies get caught out over things like this? no good deed goes unpunished is a 'truer words spoken in jest' kind of thing]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Don't go out of your way to write a scraper program!</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/18265123163/reporters-find-exposed-personal-data-via-google-threatened-with-cfaa-charges.shtml#c369</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 13:00:50 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/18265123163/reporters-find-exposed-personal-data-via-google-threatened-with-cfaa-charges.shtml#c369</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[so a program that does the same thing as a browser without the html rendering = evul hacker program that you should not write?<br />
<br />
better idea: use some fucking common sense and realize wget is not inherently bad]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20130521/20101423164/att-says-you-can-use-any-video-streaming-app-you-want-just-as-soon-as-it-can-get-meter-running.shtml#c92</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nick]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 13:00:44 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20130521/20101423164/att-says-you-can-use-any-video-streaming-app-you-want-just-as-soon-as-it-can-get-meter-running.shtml#c92</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Why...  Doesn't google and apple just release a non pre-loaded app that is identical to the main app to get around the "pre-loaded app traffic must be paid for" rule?<br />
<br />
Which, by the way, seems the complete opposite of what you'd think:  Pre-loaded apps on a phone indicate that the cellular provider was ok with the app being on the phone in the first place (since the provider has some control over the OS that is installed, such as their logo plastered all over the boot screen).  If an app WASN'T pre-approved, such as added on after the purchase, then you'd expect the cellular provider could MAYBE have a little bit of a gripe if their customers start using that app for a lot of traffic.<br />
<br />
Which is all bogus, of course, as all of this is just absurd.  Traffic whether from a video app, VOIP app, or other, is all the same bandwidth.  I wish they'd just come out and state that what they hate is not that people use their bandwidth limits, but that people ACTUALLY use the speed they were given.  It frustrates me that, similar to ISPs, they actually feel threatened when their customers use the speeds they pay for, and feel they have to punish them as a result.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c1887</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[average_joe]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 13:00:32 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c1887</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>No, I'm asking *you* why *you* believe a phone service provider should have a legal cause of action against me merely for making full use of my own property.</i><br />
<br />
Are you referring to unlocking or jailbreaking?<br />
<br />
<i>If doing so violates my contract with them, then they have remedies under contract law. They don't need the DMCA.</i><br />
<br />
Going after each customer in breach of contract is far more difficult than shutting down the parties that supply the tools that make it all too simple for their customers to breach.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c1876</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[average_joe]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 12:58:56 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c1876</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>AJ, your "merits" have been torn to shreds already.</i><br />
<br />
Hardly. I'm asking Mike to admit that this would weaken some of the rights that copyright holders have as far as anticircumvention is concerned. He can't even admit that much. Just like he can't admit that there is an allegation of specific criminal infringement against the Dotcom Crew or that Swartz may have violated the CFAA. For some reason (ahem... fundamental, cellular-level dishonesty) he can't ever concede simple points that cut against his rhetoric.<br />
<br />
As far as the 106 rights go, all I've heard are conclusory statements that DRM does absolutely nothing to prevent piracy. If Mike is basing his assessment that this proposal doesn't weaken 106 rights because DRM is ineffective, he should admit that. But he won't discuss it because he knows he can't prove that DRM has no effect. It's just part of the TD mantra that disincentives are completely ineffective when it's copyright. It's total bullshit, as per usual, and Mike has run away rather than discuss anything on the merits. What a fake.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Copyright to promote the useful arts and science</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/01382223168/new-york-times-tells-startup-it-cant-even-mention-ny-times.shtml#c446</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[madasahatter]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 12:57:12 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/01382223168/new-york-times-tells-startup-it-cant-even-mention-ny-times.shtml#c446</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Correction<br />
*providing employment to shysters<br />
*enabling legalized racketeer and extortion by said shysters.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: It's like Tethering all over again</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20130521/20101423164/att-says-you-can-use-any-video-streaming-app-you-want-just-as-soon-as-it-can-get-meter-running.shtml#c73</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 12:56:22 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20130521/20101423164/att-says-you-can-use-any-video-streaming-app-you-want-just-as-soon-as-it-can-get-meter-running.shtml#c73</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[it sounds to me as if you need to do away with taps that are in any room except the bathroom (washing, showering etc) and outside (watering the lawn) if you then continue, as you stated, to get containers of water from the bat tap or outside to wash dishes, you will be fine :-). that should also lead to all new houses being built with no water source in the kitchen, which i would think is a violation of health laws. the court case from this could be very interesting!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/18265123163/reporters-find-exposed-personal-data-via-google-threatened-with-cfaa-charges.shtml#c357</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 12:55:46 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/18265123163/reporters-find-exposed-personal-data-via-google-threatened-with-cfaa-charges.shtml#c357</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It's not Google's fault if incompetent companies publish information to the entire world and they happen to stumble over it accidentally.  (And anyone using robots.txt as a 'security measure' should be punched in the face with a missile.)  The problem here is that companies are greedy, stupid and negligent -- and are looking for scapegoats.  Prosecutors, eager to catch themselves a SOOOOPERHACKER and get their names in the press, are happy to oblige.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Exactly when did school administrators become THIS incompetent</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/18102623141/so-its-come-to-this-seven-high-school-students-arrested-throwing-water-balloons.shtml#c1469</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 12:55:31 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/18102623141/so-its-come-to-this-seven-high-school-students-arrested-throwing-water-balloons.shtml#c1469</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I mean seriously, school admins that can't handle a water balloon fight without police assitance? <br />
<br />
To the admins who decided they need to call the cops: just quit. You SUCK as school administrators and would better serve society in another capacity where zero critical thinking is involved (maybe collecting golf balls at a driving range, perhaps?).<br />
<br />
What are you teaching our children? That adults are such PUSSIES that they need goofs with weapons in order to have some semblance of order? What do you do when your OWN children misbehave? Same thing, I presume?<br />
<br />
I feel sorry for kids today - the school to prison pipeline is alive and well it seems.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Clearly school districts have to much money</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/18102623141/so-its-come-to-this-seven-high-school-students-arrested-throwing-water-balloons.shtml#c1450</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[vilain]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 12:52:23 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/18102623141/so-its-come-to-this-seven-high-school-students-arrested-throwing-water-balloons.shtml#c1450</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[because they keep doing stupid things (along with police departments) to kids and now their parents.  If the DA chooses to pursue this, I hope that any civil suit that results will make the school district think before acting stupidly.  And their new insurance company--cause it only takes one incident of 'being stupid' to get your insurance cancelled.<br />
<br />
That's rent-a-cop better find a good lawyer.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/18265123163/reporters-find-exposed-personal-data-via-google-threatened-with-cfaa-charges.shtml#c334</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 12:51:47 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/18265123163/reporters-find-exposed-personal-data-via-google-threatened-with-cfaa-charges.shtml#c334</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Yeah, but the discovery and reactivation through modding Hot Coffee back into GTASA didn't result in CFFA charges.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Timbo</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/06034223155/quack-professor-releases-dumbest-violent-video-game-theory-ever.shtml#c540</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Watchit]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 12:46:05 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/06034223155/quack-professor-releases-dumbest-violent-video-game-theory-ever.shtml#c540</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Here in america we ridicule stupid people equally, regardless of race.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/06034223155/quack-professor-releases-dumbest-violent-video-game-theory-ever.shtml#c515</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Watchit]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 12:44:48 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/06034223155/quack-professor-releases-dumbest-violent-video-game-theory-ever.shtml#c515</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Because the big media companies who made said violent movies also control most major media outlets. Ergo the higher ups in big media say it's violent video games, not movies.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: According to..</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/11032823096/how-low-can-drones-go.shtml#c783</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Suzanne Lainson]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 12:44:28 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130515/11032823096/how-low-can-drones-go.shtml#c783</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[There's lots of potential uses for them beyond spyware, so I hope there isn't a kneejerk reaction against the whole concept. <br />
<br />
If anything, I think companies will push the other way, for rapid adoption, and then we'll have to figure out how to keep them from constantly colliding with each other. But I suppose if the drones all have monitors, they can navigate through lower airspace full of flying objects.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Over 100C!!!</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/06034223155/quack-professor-releases-dumbest-violent-video-game-theory-ever.shtml#c506</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Watchit]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 12:42:21 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/06034223155/quack-professor-releases-dumbest-violent-video-game-theory-ever.shtml#c506</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I think you missed the point...]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>lol</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/18102623141/so-its-come-to-this-seven-high-school-students-arrested-throwing-water-balloons.shtml#c1438</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[steve]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 12:42:03 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/18102623141/so-its-come-to-this-seven-high-school-students-arrested-throwing-water-balloons.shtml#c1438</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Lmao gary we dumped 100 pounds of jello mix in our highschool pool the night before a swim meet my senior year in 84]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>B.S</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/18102623141/so-its-come-to-this-seven-high-school-students-arrested-throwing-water-balloons.shtml#c1428</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lee]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 12:40:50 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/18102623141/so-its-come-to-this-seven-high-school-students-arrested-throwing-water-balloons.shtml#c1428</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The country is continuing to take small pieces from us at every turn. If we do not start doing something about this and soon we will have no more rights.<br />
The whole police department and school should have charges brought against them and they should have to pay monetary penalties to the students and parents involved.<br />
Have we forgotten that it is we the people, not me the government.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>