<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Latest Techdirt Comments</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Not acceptable</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/01450023148/makers-nutella-force-fan-who-created-world-nutella-day-to-shut-it-down-updated.shtml#c714</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Reality Check]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 02:45:02 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/01450023148/makers-nutella-force-fan-who-created-world-nutella-day-to-shut-it-down-updated.shtml#c714</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Actually enforcing a trademark is NOTHING like harassing a fan.  NOTHING.  <br />
<br />
Enforcing a trademark is preventing others from labeling their chocolate hazelnut spread with a logo and/or name that looks like yours, so that an 'idiot in a hurry' would mistakenly buy their product thinking it was yours.<br />
<br />
Enforcing a trademark is completely unrelated to harassing people who use your trademark to refer to YOUR product.  <br />
<br />
That's the key, this person was actually referring to <b>Nutella</b>.  So, no trademark infringement, just common everyday IP bullying and lunacy.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Take action, vote for Basic Income</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/06185923116/rice-university-professor-skynets-gonna-take-ur-jerbs.shtml#c950</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 02:43:15 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/06185923116/rice-university-professor-skynets-gonna-take-ur-jerbs.shtml#c950</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I don't see the robot future bleak. But I want a piece of the pie of the productivity gain.<br />
<br />
That's what these people promote too: Basic Income. <a href="http://www.basicincome.org/bien/aboutbasicincome.html" rel="nofollow">www.basicincome.org/bien/aboutbasicincome.html</a><br />
<br />
And if you're in Europe, please sign the petition: <a href="http://sign.basicincome2013.eu" rel="nofollow">sign.basicincome2013.eu</a>]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Geez, Mike, you just confirmed the accusation.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130521/12175523157/nyc-says-renting-out-your-place-via-airbnb-is-running-illegal-hotel.shtml#c390</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 02:41:25 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130521/12175523157/nyc-says-renting-out-your-place-via-airbnb-is-running-illegal-hotel.shtml#c390</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Even opinions can be based upon fact and empirical evidence.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: TIL...</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/01450023148/makers-nutella-force-fan-who-created-world-nutella-day-to-shut-it-down-updated.shtml#c696</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 02:30:16 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/01450023148/makers-nutella-force-fan-who-created-world-nutella-day-to-shut-it-down-updated.shtml#c696</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Over here in the UK, we've got a franchise called Shakeaway that does blended milkshakes with various ingredients. Refreshers, Snickers, Oreos, you name it.<br />
<br />
Having one with peanut butter and Nutella is especially nice. I recommend it (although PB/Nutella sandwich goes well too).]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c950</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[PaulT]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 02:26:45 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c950</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Why do you people always have to lie in order to make your pathetic "points"?<br />
<br />
Here, for example, the domain in question was registered in 2007. At that time, nobody had been found guilty of any crime.<br />
<br />
Once again, stop lying out of your ass every time you say something, and you might get somewhere.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c928</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[PaulT]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 02:21:23 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c928</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[To be fair, that's a subdomain of go.com - the TLD registrar has nothing to do with it.<br />
<br />
But, there's plenty of problems raised by the hard of thinking above - if I for example register piratemovies.com, am I setting up a source for pirated movies, or a perfectly legal fan site or merchandising site for the Pirates Of The Caribbean movies? Nobody knows until the site is built, and that's got nothing to do with registrars.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Yes.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c1730</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 02:19:58 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c1730</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<b>It's a pretty simple question: do you actually own the products you buy?</b><br />
<br />
yes, but that does not mean you are able to use what you own how you like.<br />
<br />
You can own many things and still have restrictions on it's use, you can own a car, but it's illegal to speed on public roads, you can own a knife but you cannot kill someone with it, or use it to conduct a crime.<br />
<br />
You (in America) can own a gun, but you cannot just take it where you like or discharge it when you like, (or kill someone with it).<br />
<br />
So Masnick, it's quite simple yes, you can own many things, you can even own copies of works and not own the copyright!!.<br />
<br />
This is pretty basic stuff mansick, why do you have so much trouble understanding it ?????????]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/18383623114/your-word-against-ours-how-fbis-no-electronic-recording-policy-rigs-game-destroys-its-credibility.shtml#c620</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 02:19:35 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/18383623114/your-word-against-ours-how-fbis-no-electronic-recording-policy-rigs-game-destroys-its-credibility.shtml#c620</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[&gt; "When was the last time that you beat your wife?"<br />
<br />
I beat her all the time. With Chess.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: I bring popcorn</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/14172323158/judge-not-impressed-prenda-alan-cooper-lawsuit.shtml#c626</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 02:19:15 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/14172323158/judge-not-impressed-prenda-alan-cooper-lawsuit.shtml#c626</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[This has got to be THE lamest cliche comment in the history of the internet.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/19190923142/if-youre-going-to-illegally-seize-citizens-cell-phones-least-make-sure-youre-grabbing-right-ones.shtml#c1075</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 02:15:56 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130519/19190923142/if-youre-going-to-illegally-seize-citizens-cell-phones-least-make-sure-youre-grabbing-right-ones.shtml#c1075</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[minor quibble- Tasers are like any weapon in that misuse can cause them to be lethal. They are called Less-lethal ( not less-than-lethal) because when used as you are supposed to use them, then they are not lethal, except in certain ( rare) circumstances. Tasering someone until they stop breathing is misuse of the Taser, same as using a gun to shoot up a bunch of people is misuse of a gun. <br />
<br />
but yeah, the poilce were idiots.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/13573923121/retired-lt-col-violent-media-has-bred-generation-killers.shtml#c1229</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[roderick]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 01:50:10 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/13573923121/retired-lt-col-violent-media-has-bred-generation-killers.shtml#c1229</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Then you better admit that there is no evidence that the creative arts 'soothe the savage breast', that musicians and artists are grossly overpaid, and that we cannot persuade anyone to do anything.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Not acceptable</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/01450023148/makers-nutella-force-fan-who-created-world-nutella-day-to-shut-it-down-updated.shtml#c691</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 01:36:32 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/01450023148/makers-nutella-force-fan-who-created-world-nutella-day-to-shut-it-down-updated.shtml#c691</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[you are not wrong that the issue is insufficient supervision of the lawyers sending out these notices, but it is important that it was a third party sending out the notices, because it is a different kind of stupidity. Incidentally, the reason why the notice is sent out is because there was apparently some form of misuse of the trademark. Legally, you have to enforce a trademark, or you lose it.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Every day it's the same thing</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/01450023148/makers-nutella-force-fan-who-created-world-nutella-day-to-shut-it-down-updated.shtml#c676</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[PaulT]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 01:33:31 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/01450023148/makers-nutella-force-fan-who-created-world-nutella-day-to-shut-it-down-updated.shtml#c676</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["Why does this keep happening?"<br />
<br />
Because lawyers don't really care about the publicity and reputation aspects as long as they get paid, and the companies have been conned into thinking they need aggressive copyright and trademark defences from the lawyers. Until they wake up and realise that the collateral damage can actually be worse than whatever they're defending against to begin with, it will continue.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Every day it's the same thing</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/01450023148/makers-nutella-force-fan-who-created-world-nutella-day-to-shut-it-down-updated.shtml#c657</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 01:30:51 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/01450023148/makers-nutella-force-fan-who-created-world-nutella-day-to-shut-it-down-updated.shtml#c657</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[anytime a company says it will allow a product to be used for X purpose, that is a type of license. It's known as a blanket license.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/00493523143/ridiculous-timing-obama-administration-responds-to-spying-ap-pushing-journalist-shield-law-that-wouldnt-matter.shtml#c273</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zakida Paul]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 01:25:02 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/00493523143/ridiculous-timing-obama-administration-responds-to-spying-ap-pushing-journalist-shield-law-that-wouldnt-matter.shtml#c273</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["The man is a moron."<br />
<br />
So was the only real competition.  Romney is a Bush level moron.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/00493523143/ridiculous-timing-obama-administration-responds-to-spying-ap-pushing-journalist-shield-law-that-wouldnt-matter.shtml#c258</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zakida Paul]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 01:23:18 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/00493523143/ridiculous-timing-obama-administration-responds-to-spying-ap-pushing-journalist-shield-law-that-wouldnt-matter.shtml#c258</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Not just Obama.<br />
<br />
Republicans too.<br />
Tories in the UK, and Labour, and Lib Dems, and UKIP.<br />
<br />
It is something that career politicians are very adept at.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Window dressing to conceal shift from payoffs to coercion.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/00493523143/ridiculous-timing-obama-administration-responds-to-spying-ap-pushing-journalist-shield-law-that-wouldnt-matter.shtml#c249</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zakida Paul]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 01:19:52 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/00493523143/ridiculous-timing-obama-administration-responds-to-spying-ap-pushing-journalist-shield-law-that-wouldnt-matter.shtml#c249</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Come on, it's OOTB.  All he does is post blanket attacks on groups of people.<br />
<br />
All rich people are criminals<br />
All corporations are corrupt<br />
All torrent users are pirates<br />
All Techdirt readers and writers are freetards<br />
<br />
I would expect nothing less than him believing all journalists are evil and soulless.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c1712</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 01:11:59 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/10401723156/if-you-think-you-should-actually-own-products-you-bought-now-would-be-good-time-to-call-congress.shtml#c1712</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[They have a claim, but it is not a copyright claim. DMCA is related to, but is not, copyright.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Leakers and the government</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/00493523143/ridiculous-timing-obama-administration-responds-to-spying-ap-pushing-journalist-shield-law-that-wouldnt-matter.shtml#c226</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 00:54:51 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130520/00493523143/ridiculous-timing-obama-administration-responds-to-spying-ap-pushing-journalist-shield-law-that-wouldnt-matter.shtml#c226</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[USA has a 2-party system. Why not use its inherrent possibilities? When a case is ready for review, let the opposition party take a look at how they feel about it and decide if it is something problematic to national security.<br />
<br />
Since non of the parties are puritan in this field, it would of course still result in bypartisan screwups or opposition caused screwups being hidden, but it is less likely to be the case thab a current administrations faux pas.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Fire Code</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130521/12175523157/nyc-says-renting-out-your-place-via-airbnb-is-running-illegal-hotel.shtml#c359</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[PaulT]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 00:47:21 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/blog/innovation/articles/20130521/12175523157/nyc-says-renting-out-your-place-via-airbnb-is-running-illegal-hotel.shtml#c359</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[What a bunch of crap.<br />
<br />
"fire exits"<br />
<br />
If the building doesn't already have sufficient fire exits, why does the fact that people staying from an internet booking instead of just living there change the fact that this is a problem? If it's an occupancy problem, the same issue is raised from a guy having a few friends round for a party, do you want NYC to shut down all parties and large family gatherings too?<br />
<br />
"tax avoidance"<br />
<br />
That's a matter for the IRS, not zoning laws. In fact, AirBnB would have records of everything booked, unlike someone who rents his room from an ad on his company's notice board or under the table via friends or family. Why do you want to make enforcement of taxes more difficult?<br />
<br />
"Imagine the hidden cameras, or running through your luggage"<br />
<br />
This happened to a friend of mine in a big name Vegas hotel, and there's plenty of stories around about licensed premises having all these things happen. You're deluding yourself if you think that renting an apartment suddenly makes this an issue. If you're talking about the ability to prevent people from renting their apartment out, you can't actually prevent that in any realistic way (they can still rent via word of mouth) but law enforcement can request AirBnB to block that person/property from advertising.<br />
<br />
"perhaps re-renting a property that they don't own and have in fact just broken into"<br />
<br />
Imagine if he's secretly running a zoo and has a tiger in one of the closets! Cite somewhere this is actually happening, or STFU. Fiction is not a basis for law.<br />
<br />
"I would hate to live in a "secure" building in New York, only to have a stream of strangers coming in to spend a single night at the condo on the same floor as me"<br />
<br />
Then isn't that down to the building's management? What if the guy who owns that apartment just lets his friends crash there after a night out on the town or has a large family who often visit? Should the law attack them as well?<br />
<br />
"Closely focusing only on the technology, and forgetting that the transaction happens in the real world with all the risks and legal implications that come with it is classic."<br />
<br />
So, you just ignore all the articles where those aspects are discussed, especially given that most of the "hating" is down to real, demonstrable experiences people have with the bullshit being opposed. Typical. I think we've found our new troll, and he's not very good.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>