<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Latest Techdirt Comments</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title>Re: Congress shall make no law...</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130507/17274422984/house-judiciary-committee-sets-up-first-hearing-copyright-reform.shtml#c534</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Bradley]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 11:28:40 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130507/17274422984/house-judiciary-committee-sets-up-first-hearing-copyright-reform.shtml#c534</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[No, copyright doesn't prevent you or me from saying a darn thing. It prevents you from using my speech without permission, or me using your speech without permission. In other words, it prevents our rights to our own speech.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>So what?</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130505/14372422951/court-finds-fantasy-stories-obscene.shtml#c121</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[JoeCool]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 11:28:23 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130505/14372422951/court-finds-fantasy-stories-obscene.shtml#c121</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Why should something be illegal even if it IS obscene? As long as no one was hurt in producing it, it's a matter for parents to watch over their own kids. If they're an adult and they don't like it, just don't read it! There are lots of things I would consider obscene - it's a SUBJECTIVE standard, after all. But I have no problem with them existing (again, as long as there was no abuse involved in the creation of it as would be the case with literary works).]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Stupid</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130505/14372422951/court-finds-fantasy-stories-obscene.shtml#c105</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Karl]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 11:27:38 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130505/14372422951/court-finds-fantasy-stories-obscene.shtml#c105</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I thought cases like this went out the window in the late 90's, when the Internet happened, and everyone on the planet realized that curtailing offensive speech was a waste of time.<br />
<br />
Still, it could get a lot worse. Look at <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mike_Diana" rel="nofollow">Mike Diana</a>. As part of his probationary sentence, he was ordered to <em>stop drawing</em> altogether - and to submit to random searches and seizures of his drawings and writings throughout his probation.<br />
<br />
Hopefully whatever this guy faces won't be nearly so totalitarian.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>An appropriate defense</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130505/14372422951/court-finds-fantasy-stories-obscene.shtml#c96</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 11:27:15 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130505/14372422951/court-finds-fantasy-stories-obscene.shtml#c96</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Defendant: Your honour, my works are not obscene. At least not compared with some things that pass as opinions in certain circles. I present to you Exhibit A: A random collection of comments from Youtube.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Again, sheerly an anti-copyright WEDGE for Mike.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c766</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[average_joe]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 11:26:54 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c766</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>Then the real question is...what is your point in being here?</i><br />
<br />
I'm merely pointing out that Mike hasn't said anything of substance.<br />
<br />
He claims that the this group "has written a ridiculous letter with little basis in fact, arguing that this treaty for the blind would be 'casting aside' the 'international copyright infrastructure.'" But then he never actually explains why that's not true. No substance. <br />
<br />
He claims that the proposal would "provide extremely limited situations in which copyright restrictions would be limited for the sake of making it easier for vision-impaired people to access works." But he never bothers to back that up textually. No substance.<br />
<br />
It's just a bunch of faith-based, conclusory statements. I'm pointing out that he's a total hypocrite when he castigates others for making faith-based assertions because he does the same with alarming frequency. I'm pointing out that the whole point of this article is merely to discredit a group that he disagrees with (despite him not appearing to actually understand the substance of the arguments or counterarguments). It's total bullshit. I'm calling him out for it.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Who else may get  left out?:  Anti-globalists</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130507/17274422984/house-judiciary-committee-sets-up-first-hearing-copyright-reform.shtml#c515</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[MIke Bradley]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 11:24:26 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130507/17274422984/house-judiciary-committee-sets-up-first-hearing-copyright-reform.shtml#c515</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[At a time when the global economy for copyrighted material is going gangbusters while the US's is sinking, you advocate the US bowing out of the global economy in favor of our sinking selves. Brilliant!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130505/14372422951/court-finds-fantasy-stories-obscene.shtml#c76</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zakida Paul]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 11:24:24 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130505/14372422951/court-finds-fantasy-stories-obscene.shtml#c76</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["of course their Bible won't be."<br />
<br />
Even though the Bible is full of much sicker stuff.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Yet again, Mike can't find a lower bound.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130505/14372422951/court-finds-fantasy-stories-obscene.shtml#c69</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zakida Paul]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 11:23:28 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130505/14372422951/court-finds-fantasy-stories-obscene.shtml#c69</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[What the fuck has this to do with copyright?<br />
<br />
Jesus, your rants just keep getting more and more nonsensical.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130505/14372422951/court-finds-fantasy-stories-obscene.shtml#c62</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 11:22:12 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130505/14372422951/court-finds-fantasy-stories-obscene.shtml#c62</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Man, aspiring Boy's Love manga writers won't like this.<br />
<br />
Or Yaoi writers in general.<br />
<br />
Which is sad for me because I like those.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: ^Unprecedented QUAD POSTS! Hooray!</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c354</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chuck Norris' Enemy (deceased)]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 11:21:32 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c354</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Oh, you never learn blue.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130505/14372422951/court-finds-fantasy-stories-obscene.shtml#c47</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[gorehound]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 11:20:40 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130505/14372422951/court-finds-fantasy-stories-obscene.shtml#c47</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[And of course it is  in one of those Bible Thumping Southern States ! Censorship is just what they would love to do.........of course their Bible won't be.<br />
<br />
This is an Assault on our very 1ST Amendment Rights !]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Yet again, Mike can't find a lower bound.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130505/14372422951/court-finds-fantasy-stories-obscene.shtml#c46</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[out_of_the_blue]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 11:20:23 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130505/14372422951/court-finds-fantasy-stories-obscene.shtml#c46</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[This is a clear enough case to be beyond "free speech". And I see NO slipperly slope resulting, but surely there IS some limit.<br />
<br />
Mike definitely has a pattern of anti-morality combined with intricate legalisms to get around plain common law. -- Especially in copyright Go ahead and take what you haven't created. If Megaupload doesn't have a US address, then it can outright infringe! -- And don't worry about Google: you've NO right whatsoever to any privacy on the net or in person! Just let mega-corporations do whatever is technically possible, so long as there's no explicit exact statute against it. -- And over all that, Mike is constantly alarmed at what he deems "moral panics".<br />
<br />
Mike expects civilization to continue to exist without ANY principles or morality. -- And yet he's always puzzled when gov't and corporate thugs take moral fudging and tecnicalities as an okay for pillaging and flat-out tyranny. Mike refuses to see that private and public morality are connected.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c331</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[RyanNerd]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 11:19:59 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c331</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I think it is utlility companies in general. If infringers didn't have water and gas to they would not be able to drink or cook their food. Wait.... Wait... Grocery stores. If the infringers had no food. Wait.... Wait.... Damn farmers!!!!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>What can stop it?</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/18383623114/your-word-against-ours-how-fbis-no-electronic-recording-policy-rigs-game-destroys-its-credibility.shtml#c258</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jay]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 11:18:55 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/18383623114/your-word-against-ours-how-fbis-no-electronic-recording-policy-rigs-game-destroys-its-credibility.shtml#c258</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Nothing can stop the American inquisition!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>A particular sort of evil.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c746</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[JEDIDIAH]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 11:18:16 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c746</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I think he hates everyone. It's not just the blind. It just happens to be the blind that are the victim at this particular moment.<br />
<br />
No benefit or right is too trivial or too imagined to justify harming everyone else.<br />
<br />
THAT is the copyright maximalist mindset.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>A particular sort of evil.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c724</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[JEDIDIAH]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 11:16:17 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c724</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[They don't "hate" the blind, they just don't care if they do the blind harm or prevent others from helping the blind. They are evil narcissists who don't care they they are causing severe harm over a questionable or trivial "benefit".<br />
<br />
Their artistic megalomania is causing harm and they don't care.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>And yet</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130505/14372422951/court-finds-fantasy-stories-obscene.shtml#c39</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[ChurchHatesTucker]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 11:14:55 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130505/14372422951/court-finds-fantasy-stories-obscene.shtml#c39</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Fifty Shades of Grey is sold brazenly. Way to drop the ball, Georgia.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130505/14372422951/court-finds-fantasy-stories-obscene.shtml#c25</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 11:12:00 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130505/14372422951/court-finds-fantasy-stories-obscene.shtml#c25</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["Serious literary, artistic, political or scientific value."<br />
<br />
Translation: it's not obscene if it's several hundred years old.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Liability Slipery Slope</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c329</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 11:09:14 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/16464823123/swedish-prosecutor-claims-registrar-se-domains-being-accomplice-infringement-because-pirate-bay-domain.shtml#c329</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It's liability all the way down...]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Again, sheerly an anti-copyright WEDGE for Mike.</title>
<link>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c722</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 11:07:55 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/08324323118/trade-group-representing-many-large-companies-claims-that-exceptions-blind-would-cast-aside-copyright.shtml#c722</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Then the real question is...what is your point in being here?<br />
<br />
Your "voice of dissent" isn't listened to because nobody respects your opinion on things, so what other reason besides stroking your ego would you be here?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>